切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 402 -407. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2015.05.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合应用替罗非班对介入术相关心肌损伤及近期预后的影响
周发展1, 武君2, 宋兆峰1, 张焕轶1, 尹鲁骅1,()   
  1. 1. 271000 泰安市中心医院心内科
    2. 271212 山东省,新泰市第三人民医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-08 出版日期:2015-10-01
  • 通信作者: 尹鲁骅
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2010HM069); 泰安市科技发展引导计划(2013YY14)

Effect of tirofiban on myocardial reperfusion injury and recent prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Fazhan Zhou1, Jun Wu2, Zhaofeng Song1, Huanyi Zhang1, Luhua Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Taian City Central Hospital, Taian 271000, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, the Third People′s Hospital of Xintai City, Xintai 271212, China
  • Received:2014-07-08 Published:2015-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Luhua Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Luhua, Email:
引用本文:

周发展, 武君, 宋兆峰, 张焕轶, 尹鲁骅. 急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合应用替罗非班对介入术相关心肌损伤及近期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2015, 10(05): 402-407.

Fazhan Zhou, Jun Wu, Zhaofeng Song, Huanyi Zhang, Luhua Yin. Effect of tirofiban on myocardial reperfusion injury and recent prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2015, 10(05): 402-407.

目的

探讨急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者过程中应用替罗非班对急诊PCI术相关心肌再灌注损伤及近期预后的影响。

方法

接受急诊PCI治疗的AMI患者93例,采用随机数字表法分为治疗组(n=48)和对照组(n=45),治疗组于急诊PCI球囊扩张狭窄冠脉病变后立即冠脉内推注替罗非班10 μg/kg,继之以0.15 μg/(kg·min)静脉泵入36 h,对照组仅于球囊扩张成功后立即植入支架,未应用替罗非班。两组患者术前术后冠状动脉造影TIMI血流分级通过分析患者冠脉造影的图像所得;同时检测两组介入治疗术前及术后12、24 h心肌损伤标记物肌酸激酶,MB型(CK-MB)、心肌肌钙蛋白(cTnI)、内皮损伤标志物血管性血友病因子(vWF)、炎症反应标志物超敏-C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)的水平含量;并记录术后6个月再发心绞痛、心肌梗死、死亡等主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的随访情况。数据采用SPSS 19.0软件包行统计学分析,组间计量资料比较行t检验,组间计数资料比较采用χ2检验。

结果

治疗组的TIMI 3级血流分级比例明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.283, P=0.004);术前CK-MB、cTnI、hs-CRP、vWF的水平两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P均大于0.05);两组患者术后12 h及24 h CK-MB、cTnI、vWF、hs-CRP水平均较术前增高;但与对照组比较,术后12 h治疗组患者CK-MB水平(14.34±3.12)U/L低于对照组(15.65±2.53)U/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.215,P=0.029);术后24 h治疗组患者cTnI水平(0.124±0.235)ng/mL低于对照组(0.239±0.312)ng/mL,差异有统计学意义(t=2.016,P=0.047);术后12 h及术后24 h治疗组患者vWF水平(512.28±135.73)U/L、(584.63±143.38)U/L显著低于对照组(575.72±126.41) U/L、( 667.59±145.35) U/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.328、2.770,P=0.022、0.007);术后24 h治疗组患者hs-CRP水平(7.32±2.75)mg/L显著低于对照组(8.74±3.62)mg/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.138,P=0.035)。治疗组与对照组比较,PCI术后6个月在因冠心病再次入院、心源性死亡及非致死性心肌梗死方面差异无统计学意义(P均大于0.05)。

结论

AMI患者急诊PCI应用替罗非班可显著改善靶血管前向血流TIMI分级,降低PCI术后心肌损伤、内皮损伤及炎症反应,未显示出减少术后6个月MACE发生的作用。

Objective

To explore the effect of tirofiban on myocardial reperfusion injury and recent prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction by emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods

Ninety-three patients with acute myocardial infarction treated undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention were selected and divided randomly into treatment group (n=48, 10 μg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 μg·kg-1· min-1 infusion 36 hours) and control group (n=45, no tirofiban). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade was assessed from coronary angiography picture at the end of percutaneous coronary intervention. Plasma concentrations of creatine kinase, MB form, cardiac troponin I, hypersensitive C-reactive protein and von willebrand factor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, blood samples were obtained before and after percutaneous coronary intervention. The major adverse cardiac events of postoperative 6 months were recorded and compared between two groups of patients. SPSS 19.0 statistical software package be used to analyze the data, measurement data was compared between groups by t test, while count data was compared between groups by chi-square test.

Results

Compared with control group, TIMI3 flow degree of treatment group in the last coronary angiography picture after percutaneous coronary intervention was higher, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.283, P=0.004). At 12 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, creatine kinase, MB form of treatment group (14.34±3.12) U/L was lower than control group(15.65±2.53) U/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.215, P=0.029). At 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac troponin I, of treatment group (0.124±0.235) ng/mL was lower than control group(0.239±0.312) ng/mL, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.016, P=0.047). At 12 and 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, von willebrand factor of treatment group(512.28±135.73) U/L, (584.63±143.38) U/L was significantly lower than control group(575.72±126.41) U/L, (667.59±145.35) U/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.328, 2.770, P=0.022, 0.007). At 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, hypersensitive C-reactive protein of treatment group (7.32±2.75) mg/L was significantly lower than control group(8.74±3.62) mg/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.138, P=0.035). The major adverse cardiac events (including recurrence of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction) of postoperative 6 months in treatment group was lower than control group, there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). Two groups had no deaths.

Conclusion

Tirofiban used for acute myocardial infarction patients during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention could decrease myocardial tissue perfusion injury and inflammation, but the major adverse cardiac events of postoperative 6 months were not reduced in statistics.

表1 两组急性心肌梗死患者间一般资料的比较[n(%)]
表2 两组急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后冠状动脉造影TIMI血流分级比较[n(%)]
表3 两组急性心肌梗死患者PCI术前术后CK-MB、cTnI、hs-CRP和vWF水平的比较(±s)
1
杨红庆,姜文锡,梅换明,等. 纤维蛋白原与超敏C反应蛋白在冠心病患者中的表达与意义[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2013, 33(21): 5293-5294.
2
Gottsauner-Wolf M, Zasmeta G, Hornykewycz S, et al. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein after coronary stent implantation[J]. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21(14): 1152-1158.
3
白红颖,丁宁. 急诊介入联合替罗非班在急性心梗患者中应用的安全性与近期预后评价[J].海南医学院学报,2011, 17(4): 484-487.
4
张立博,苏仁芳,陈德超,等. 替罗非班冠状动脉内注射联合血栓抽吸对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的影响[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2012, 6(6): 1607-1609.
5
张枫林,胡有东,郭燕,等. TNF、sTNFR-1和sTNFR-2水平对老年陈旧性心肌梗死严重程度的影响[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2014, 9(6): 625-629.
6
Nageh T, Sherwood RA, Harris BM, et al. Cardiac troponin T and I and creatine kinase-MB as markers of myocardial injury and predictors of outcome following percutane- ous coronary intervention[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2003, 92(23): 285-293.
7
Maxwell SR, Lip GY. Reperfusion injury: A review of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutic options[J]. Int J Cardiol, 1997, 58(2): 95-117.
8
姚泰,主编. 生理学[M]. 1版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005: 108-111.
9
李振光,王远臣. 内皮细胞功能障碍与动脉粥样硬化[J]. 国外医学生理、病理科学与临床分册,1997, 17(2): 139-140.
10
吴立玲,徐海. 心血管病理生理学[M]. 北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000: 8-10.
11
Qi X, Peng Y, Gu J, et al. Inflammatory cytokine release in patients with unstable angina after coronary angioplasty[J]. Jpn Heart J, 2002, 43(2): 103-115.
12
Boos CJ, Balakrishnan B, Jessani S, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on peripheral venous blood circulating endothelial cells and plasma indices of endothelial damage/dysflinction[J]. Chest, 2007, 132(6): 1920-1926.
13
Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of elevated baseline C-reactive protein among established markers of risk in percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2001, 104(9): 992-997.
14
Saleh N, Svane B, Jensen J, et al. Stent implantation, but not pathogen burden, is associated with plasma C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina pectoris[J]. Am Heart J, 2005, 149(5): 876-882.
15
Azar RR, McKay RG, Kiernan FJ, et al. Coronary angioplasty induce a systemic inflammatory response[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1997, 80(11): 1476-1478.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[6] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[7] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[8] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[9] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要