切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 402 -407. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2015.05.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合应用替罗非班对介入术相关心肌损伤及近期预后的影响
周发展1, 武君2, 宋兆峰1, 张焕轶1, 尹鲁骅1,()   
  1. 1. 271000 泰安市中心医院心内科
    2. 271212 山东省,新泰市第三人民医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-08 出版日期:2015-10-01
  • 通信作者: 尹鲁骅
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2010HM069); 泰安市科技发展引导计划(2013YY14)

Effect of tirofiban on myocardial reperfusion injury and recent prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Fazhan Zhou1, Jun Wu2, Zhaofeng Song1, Huanyi Zhang1, Luhua Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Taian City Central Hospital, Taian 271000, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, the Third People′s Hospital of Xintai City, Xintai 271212, China
  • Received:2014-07-08 Published:2015-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Luhua Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Luhua, Email:
引用本文:

周发展, 武君, 宋兆峰, 张焕轶, 尹鲁骅. 急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合应用替罗非班对介入术相关心肌损伤及近期预后的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2015, 10(05): 402-407.

Fazhan Zhou, Jun Wu, Zhaofeng Song, Huanyi Zhang, Luhua Yin. Effect of tirofiban on myocardial reperfusion injury and recent prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2015, 10(05): 402-407.

目的

探讨急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者过程中应用替罗非班对急诊PCI术相关心肌再灌注损伤及近期预后的影响。

方法

接受急诊PCI治疗的AMI患者93例,采用随机数字表法分为治疗组(n=48)和对照组(n=45),治疗组于急诊PCI球囊扩张狭窄冠脉病变后立即冠脉内推注替罗非班10 μg/kg,继之以0.15 μg/(kg·min)静脉泵入36 h,对照组仅于球囊扩张成功后立即植入支架,未应用替罗非班。两组患者术前术后冠状动脉造影TIMI血流分级通过分析患者冠脉造影的图像所得;同时检测两组介入治疗术前及术后12、24 h心肌损伤标记物肌酸激酶,MB型(CK-MB)、心肌肌钙蛋白(cTnI)、内皮损伤标志物血管性血友病因子(vWF)、炎症反应标志物超敏-C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)的水平含量;并记录术后6个月再发心绞痛、心肌梗死、死亡等主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的随访情况。数据采用SPSS 19.0软件包行统计学分析,组间计量资料比较行t检验,组间计数资料比较采用χ2检验。

结果

治疗组的TIMI 3级血流分级比例明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.283, P=0.004);术前CK-MB、cTnI、hs-CRP、vWF的水平两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P均大于0.05);两组患者术后12 h及24 h CK-MB、cTnI、vWF、hs-CRP水平均较术前增高;但与对照组比较,术后12 h治疗组患者CK-MB水平(14.34±3.12)U/L低于对照组(15.65±2.53)U/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.215,P=0.029);术后24 h治疗组患者cTnI水平(0.124±0.235)ng/mL低于对照组(0.239±0.312)ng/mL,差异有统计学意义(t=2.016,P=0.047);术后12 h及术后24 h治疗组患者vWF水平(512.28±135.73)U/L、(584.63±143.38)U/L显著低于对照组(575.72±126.41) U/L、( 667.59±145.35) U/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.328、2.770,P=0.022、0.007);术后24 h治疗组患者hs-CRP水平(7.32±2.75)mg/L显著低于对照组(8.74±3.62)mg/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.138,P=0.035)。治疗组与对照组比较,PCI术后6个月在因冠心病再次入院、心源性死亡及非致死性心肌梗死方面差异无统计学意义(P均大于0.05)。

结论

AMI患者急诊PCI应用替罗非班可显著改善靶血管前向血流TIMI分级,降低PCI术后心肌损伤、内皮损伤及炎症反应,未显示出减少术后6个月MACE发生的作用。

Objective

To explore the effect of tirofiban on myocardial reperfusion injury and recent prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction by emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods

Ninety-three patients with acute myocardial infarction treated undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention were selected and divided randomly into treatment group (n=48, 10 μg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 μg·kg-1· min-1 infusion 36 hours) and control group (n=45, no tirofiban). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade was assessed from coronary angiography picture at the end of percutaneous coronary intervention. Plasma concentrations of creatine kinase, MB form, cardiac troponin I, hypersensitive C-reactive protein and von willebrand factor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, blood samples were obtained before and after percutaneous coronary intervention. The major adverse cardiac events of postoperative 6 months were recorded and compared between two groups of patients. SPSS 19.0 statistical software package be used to analyze the data, measurement data was compared between groups by t test, while count data was compared between groups by chi-square test.

Results

Compared with control group, TIMI3 flow degree of treatment group in the last coronary angiography picture after percutaneous coronary intervention was higher, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.283, P=0.004). At 12 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, creatine kinase, MB form of treatment group (14.34±3.12) U/L was lower than control group(15.65±2.53) U/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.215, P=0.029). At 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac troponin I, of treatment group (0.124±0.235) ng/mL was lower than control group(0.239±0.312) ng/mL, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.016, P=0.047). At 12 and 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, von willebrand factor of treatment group(512.28±135.73) U/L, (584.63±143.38) U/L was significantly lower than control group(575.72±126.41) U/L, (667.59±145.35) U/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.328, 2.770, P=0.022, 0.007). At 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, hypersensitive C-reactive protein of treatment group (7.32±2.75) mg/L was significantly lower than control group(8.74±3.62) mg/L, the difference was statistically significant (t=2.138, P=0.035). The major adverse cardiac events (including recurrence of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction) of postoperative 6 months in treatment group was lower than control group, there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). Two groups had no deaths.

Conclusion

Tirofiban used for acute myocardial infarction patients during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention could decrease myocardial tissue perfusion injury and inflammation, but the major adverse cardiac events of postoperative 6 months were not reduced in statistics.

表1 两组急性心肌梗死患者间一般资料的比较[n(%)]
表2 两组急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后冠状动脉造影TIMI血流分级比较[n(%)]
表3 两组急性心肌梗死患者PCI术前术后CK-MB、cTnI、hs-CRP和vWF水平的比较(±s)
1
杨红庆,姜文锡,梅换明,等. 纤维蛋白原与超敏C反应蛋白在冠心病患者中的表达与意义[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2013, 33(21): 5293-5294.
2
Gottsauner-Wolf M, Zasmeta G, Hornykewycz S, et al. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein after coronary stent implantation[J]. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21(14): 1152-1158.
3
白红颖,丁宁. 急诊介入联合替罗非班在急性心梗患者中应用的安全性与近期预后评价[J].海南医学院学报,2011, 17(4): 484-487.
4
张立博,苏仁芳,陈德超,等. 替罗非班冠状动脉内注射联合血栓抽吸对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的影响[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2012, 6(6): 1607-1609.
5
张枫林,胡有东,郭燕,等. TNF、sTNFR-1和sTNFR-2水平对老年陈旧性心肌梗死严重程度的影响[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2014, 9(6): 625-629.
6
Nageh T, Sherwood RA, Harris BM, et al. Cardiac troponin T and I and creatine kinase-MB as markers of myocardial injury and predictors of outcome following percutane- ous coronary intervention[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2003, 92(23): 285-293.
7
Maxwell SR, Lip GY. Reperfusion injury: A review of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutic options[J]. Int J Cardiol, 1997, 58(2): 95-117.
8
姚泰,主编. 生理学[M]. 1版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005: 108-111.
9
李振光,王远臣. 内皮细胞功能障碍与动脉粥样硬化[J]. 国外医学生理、病理科学与临床分册,1997, 17(2): 139-140.
10
吴立玲,徐海. 心血管病理生理学[M]. 北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000: 8-10.
11
Qi X, Peng Y, Gu J, et al. Inflammatory cytokine release in patients with unstable angina after coronary angioplasty[J]. Jpn Heart J, 2002, 43(2): 103-115.
12
Boos CJ, Balakrishnan B, Jessani S, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on peripheral venous blood circulating endothelial cells and plasma indices of endothelial damage/dysflinction[J]. Chest, 2007, 132(6): 1920-1926.
13
Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of elevated baseline C-reactive protein among established markers of risk in percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2001, 104(9): 992-997.
14
Saleh N, Svane B, Jensen J, et al. Stent implantation, but not pathogen burden, is associated with plasma C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina pectoris[J]. Am Heart J, 2005, 149(5): 876-882.
15
Azar RR, McKay RG, Kiernan FJ, et al. Coronary angioplasty induce a systemic inflammatory response[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1997, 80(11): 1476-1478.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[6] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[7] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[8] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[9] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要