切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 428 -432. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2016.06.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者下肢烧伤的治疗结局差异性及机制研究
杨永熙1,(), 冯佳雄1, 黄晓涛1, 孙泽光1, 许研然1   
  1. 1. 515011 汕头市第二人民医院烧伤整形科
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-09 出版日期:2016-12-01
  • 通信作者: 杨永熙

Treatment differences and mechanism of diabetes mellitus patients and non-diabetes mellitus patients with lower extremity burns

Yongxi Yang1,(), jiaxiong Feng1, Xiaotao Huang1, Zeguang Sun1, Yanran Xu1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Plastics Surgery, the Second People′s Hospital of Shantou, Shantou 515011, China
  • Received:2016-10-09 Published:2016-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongxi Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Yongxi, Email:
引用本文:

杨永熙, 冯佳雄, 黄晓涛, 孙泽光, 许研然. 糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者下肢烧伤的治疗结局差异性及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2016, 11(06): 428-432.

Yongxi Yang, jiaxiong Feng, Xiaotao Huang, Zeguang Sun, Yanran Xu. Treatment differences and mechanism of diabetes mellitus patients and non-diabetes mellitus patients with lower extremity burns[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2016, 11(06): 428-432.

目的

探讨合并糖尿病对下肢烧伤患者创面愈合的影响及其可能机制。

方法

采用病例对照研究的方法,以汕头市第二人民医院烧伤整形科2010年9月至2013年7月收治的47例合并糖尿病的下肢烧伤患者作为糖尿病组,选取同期60例非糖尿病的下肢烧伤患者作为非糖尿病组。两组患者均采用创面处理、抗感染、基因重组碱性纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)治疗等常规疗法;糖尿病组加用降糖治疗。采用酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)测定两组患者治疗后7 d创面溃疡组织中的成纤维细胞生长因子2(FGF2)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)蛋白及mRNA表达水平;采用免疫组织化学法检测创面组织微血管密度(MVD)差异,并比较两组患者的隔离治疗时间、总住院时间、并发症发生比例及出院后治疗情况。数据比较采用t检验、χ2检验及Fisher确切概率法检验。

结果

治疗后7 d,糖尿病组患者的创面组织中FGF2蛋白(87.4±7.8) ng/mL,VEGF蛋白(106.3±14.2) ng/mL表达水平均高于非糖尿病组患者(61.3±9.2) ng/mL、(68.8±13.1) ng/mL,比较差异均有统计学意义(t=15.55、19.88,P值均小于0.01);糖尿病组患者的FGF2 mRNA(11.5±4.7)×104拷贝数、VEGF mRNA(8.7±3.9)×104拷贝数表达水平高于非糖尿病组患者(4.9±2.6)×104拷贝数、(2.8±1.7)×104拷贝数,比较差异均有统计学意义(t=9.23、10.52,P值均小于0.01);糖尿病组患者创面组织中MVD(14.6±2.5)个/视野低于非糖尿病组的(23.9±5.4)个/视野,比较差异有统计学意义(t=11.83,P<0.01)。糖尿病组患者的隔离治疗时间(8.9±7.2)d与非糖尿病组(8.6±6.5)d比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);总住院时间(16.3±5.5)d长于非糖尿病组患者(10.8±4.8)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。糖尿病组患者的并发症发生比例31.9%高于非糖尿病组患者13.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。糖尿病组患者需家庭护理、社区治疗、康复设施的比例均高于非糖尿病组患者,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05)。

结论

合并糖尿病下肢烧伤患者的创面组织中MVD低表达表明创面愈合血管化受到抑制,这可能是延缓糖尿病患者创面愈合的原因之一,同时合并糖尿病还会增加患者的并发症,对烧伤患者恢复产生不良影响。

Objective

To discuss on lower extremity wound healing of burn patients with diabetes mellitus and its possible mechanism.

Methods

With the method of case-control study, 47 cases of diabetic patients with lower extremity burns were set as the diabetic group, 60 cases of non-diabetic lower limb burn patients were set as non-diabetic group. Two groups of the patients were admitted to the department of burns and plastics surgery, the second People′s hospital of Shantou from July 2013 to September 2010. Two groups of patients were treated with conventional therapy such as wound treatment, anti infection, gene recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) treatment and so on. In addition, the patients of diabetes group were treated with hypoglycemic therapy. The protein and mRNA expression levels of the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured with the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in two groups of patients at the time of 7 days after treatment. Tissue microvessel density (MVD) was detected by immunohistochemistry. Isolation treatment time, total length of stay, incidence of complications and treatment outcome were compared between the two groups. The data were compared with the t test, the Chi square test and the Fisher exact probability test.

Results

Treatment after 7 days, the expression levels of FGF2 protein, VEGF protein in diabetes group (87.4±7.8) ng/mL, (106.3±14.2) ng/mL were significantly higher than the non-diabetes group (61.3±9.2) ng/mL, (68.8±13.1) ng/mL, the differences were statistically significant (t=15.55, 19.88, P values were less than 0.01). The expression levels of FGF2 mRNA, VEGF mRNA in diabetes group (11.5±4.7)×104 copies, (8.7±3.9)×104 copies were significantly higher than the non-diabetes group(4.9±2.6)×104 copies, (2.8±1.7)×104 copies, the differences were statistically significant (t=9.23, 10.52, P values were less than 0.01). The wound tissue MVD in diabetes group (14.6±2.5)/vision were less than the non-diabetes group (23.9±5.4)/vision, the difference was statistically significant (t=11.83, P value was less than 0.01). There was no significant difference (P value was more than 0.05) in the isolation treatment time between the diabetes group (8.9±7.2) d and non-diabetes group (8.6±6.5)d. There was significant difference (P value was more than 0.05) in total length of stay between the diabetes group (16.3±5.5)d and non-diabetes group(10.8±4.8)d. The incidence of complications in the diabetic group (31.9%) was higher than that in the non-diabetic group(13.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (P value was less than 0.05). The proportion of family care, community treatment and rehabilitation facilities in the diabetes group was higher than that in the non-diabetic group, and the difference was statistically significant (P value was less than 0.05).

Conclusions

The wound tissue in diabetic patients with lower extremity burns in the low expression of MVD showed that wound healing angiogenesis had been inhibited, which may be one of the causes of delayed wound healing in diabetes. While diabetes will increase the complications of patients, which have adverse effects on the recovery of burn patients.

表1 两组烧伤患者治疗后7 d创面组织中的FGF2、VEGF蛋白与FGF2 mRNA、VEGF mRNA表达情况(±s)
表2 两组烧伤患者的并发症情况比较
表3 两组烧伤患者出院治疗结局情况[例(%)]
1
吴标良,唐乾利,冯烈,等.糖尿病足部免疫表达和烧伤皮肤再生医疗技术干预治疗的影响[J].上海医学,2014,37(7):610-614.
2
吴标良,唐乾利,冯烈,等.烧伤皮肤再生医疗技术治疗糖尿病足部溃疡疗效的系统评价[J].中国全科医学,2014,17(32):3851-3854.
3
李杰辉,王丽,杜娟娇,等.湿润烧伤膏对糖尿病足患者溃疡创面凋亡基因Bcl-2和Bax的影响[J].时珍国医国药,2012,23(7):1616-1617.
4
陈忠.老年糖尿病病人低热烧伤38例治疗分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2011,31(17):3396-3397.
5
杨佳伟,曹桂军,李继华,等.负压封闭引流联合手术疗法治疗老年低热烧伤的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(9):2557-2558.
6
吴标良,唐乾利,覃晓洁,等.烧伤皮肤再生医疗对糖尿病足ERK1/2和p38信号通路分子的调控[J].中国全科医学,2015,18(29):3592-3595.
7
Azevedo F, Pessoa A, Moreira G, et al. Effect of Topical Insulin on Second-Degree Burns in Diabetic Rats.[J]. Biol Res Nurs, 2015, 18(2): 181-192.
8
Goutos I, Nicholas RS, Pandya AA, et al. Diabetes mellitus and burns. Part II-outcomes from burn injuries and future directions[J]. Int J Burns Trauma, 2015, 5(1): 13-21.
9
陆树良.对创面修复关键问题的思考[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(02):95-99.
10
邱学文.重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子对烧伤后残余创面转化生长因子β1和血管内皮生长因子表达的影响[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2013,32(8):637-640.
11
弓家弘,陆树良.干细胞治疗糖尿病难愈创面研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(06):518-521.
12
张爱群,孙富国,徐忠华,等.VEGF与b-FGF在海水浸泡大鼠烧伤皮肤组织中的表达[J].天津医药,2011,39(12):1171-1172.
[1] 曹雯佳, 刘学兵, 罗安果, 钟释敏, 邓岚, 王玉琳, 李赵欢. 超声矢量血流成像对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉壁剪切应力的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 709-717.
[2] 王宏宇, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 陈强, 闫增强. 亲属头皮加自体头皮混合移植接力在大面积深度烧伤创面修复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 554-554.
[3] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[4] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[11] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[12] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[13] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[14] 周学锋, 董哲毅, 冯哲, 蔡广研, 陈香美. 糖尿病肾脏疾病中西医结合诊疗指南计划书[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 301-305.
[15] 杜军霞, 赵小淋, 王浩然, 高志远, 王曼茜, 万楠熙, 张冬, 丁潇楠, 任琴琴, 段颖洁, 汤力, 朱晗玉. 2 型糖尿病的血液透析患者肠道微生物组学高通量测序分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 313-320.
阅读次数
全文


摘要