切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 202 -207. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.03.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

快速康复外科在老年患者传统开腹与腹腔镜下胆囊切除加胆总管探查术围手术期中的应用
薛荣泉1, 韩晓月1, 夏医君1, 希龙夫1, 孙怡2, 云志中3,()   
  1. 1. 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古自治区人民医院肝胆胰脾外科
    2. 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学附属医院临床教学部
    3. 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古自治区人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-15 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 云志中
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2013MS11118); 内蒙古自治区人民医院科研基金项目(201319)

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative period of traditional open surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration in elderly patients

Rongquan Xue1, Xiaoyue Han1, Yijun Xia1, Longfu Xi1, Yi Sun2, Zhizhong Yun3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Inner Mongolia People′s Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China
    2. Department of Clinical Education, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010017, China
    3. Department of Urology Surgery, Inner Mongolia People′s Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China
  • Received:2019-03-15 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhizhong Yun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yun Zhingzhong, Email:
引用本文:

薛荣泉, 韩晓月, 夏医君, 希龙夫, 孙怡, 云志中. 快速康复外科在老年患者传统开腹与腹腔镜下胆囊切除加胆总管探查术围手术期中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(03): 202-207.

Rongquan Xue, Xiaoyue Han, Yijun Xia, Longfu Xi, Yi Sun, Zhizhong Yun. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative period of traditional open surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(03): 202-207.

目的

探讨快速康复外科(ERAS)理念在老年患者传统开腹与腹腔镜下胆囊切除加胆总管探查术围手术期的应用及其在临床中的使用价值。

方法

选取2012年1月至2016年4月在内蒙古自治区人民医院肝胆胰脾外科择期行胆囊切除加胆总管探查术的老年患者共113例,按随机数字表法将113例患者分为行开腹胆囊切除加胆总管探查术患者60例(O-组)和腹腔镜下胆囊切除加胆总管探查术患者53例(L-组),再用随机数字表法将两大组分为4个亚组,分别实施ERAS措施和传统措施,即分为O-ERAS组(30例)、O-Control组(30例)和L-ERAS组(27例)、L-Control组(26例)。O-组实施开腹胆囊切除术加胆总管探查术,L-组实施腹腔镜下胆囊切除术加胆总管探查术。而O-ERAS组和L-ERAS组采取ERAS相关措施进行处理,O-Control组和L-Control组应用传统方法处理,对不同组别病例的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后住院时间、住院费用等情况进行观察。对数据行t检验。

结果

O-Control组手术时间为(2.3±0.7) h、术中出血量为(81.0±77.7) mL、术后排气时间为(3.4±1.0) d、术后住院时间为(12.9±4.0) d,与O-ERAS组的手术时间[(1.9±0.5) h]、术中出血量[(48.0±24.1) mL]、术后排气时间[(2.8±0.9) d]、术后住院时间[(10.5±4.1) d]相比,后者术中出血量减少,手术时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间缩短,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.008、-2.099、-2.734、-2.233, P值均小于0.05);而2组住院费用分别为(22 246.9±13 344.3)元、(20 194.4±2 828.2),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 L-Control组手术时间为(2.2±0.6) h、术中出血量为(54.0±32.1) mL、术后排气时间为(2.9±0.9) d、术后住院时间为(7.0±2.0) d,与L-ERAS组的手术时间[(1.8±0.5) h]、术中出血量[(37.0±26.3) mL]、术后排气时间[(2.4±0.8) d]、术后住院时间[(5.7±1.1) d]相比,后者术中出血量减少,手术时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间缩短,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.179、-2.214、-2.197、-2.660,P值均小于0.05);而2组住院费用分别为(22 672.6±5 446.9) 、(22 404.4±8 482.4)元,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与O-ERAS组相比,L-ERAS组术中出血量减少,手术时间、术后排气时间和术后住院时间缩短,2组差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05);但2组住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

快速康复外科理念在老年患者胆囊切除加胆总管探查术中能促进老年患者术后康复,且腹腔镜胆囊切除术加胆总管探查术更有利于患者术后快速康复,临床应用效果明显,可在临床推广。

Objective

To analyze the application and value of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) in the elderly patients with open cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration and laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration in the perioperative period.

Methods

A total of 113 elderly patients undergoing cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration were selected from January 2012 to April 2016 in the Inner Mongolia People′s Hospital. All the patients were divided into 60 patients with open cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration (O-group) and 53 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration (L-group) according to random number table method. The two groups of patients were further divided into 4 subgroups by using random number table method, and the ERAS and traditional measures were respectively implemented, namely [L-ERAS group(27 patients), O-ERAS group(30 patients)] and [L-Control group(26 patients), O-Control group(30 patients)]. The O-group underwent open cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration, and the L-group underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration. The patients in the ERAS group were treated with ERAS, and the control group was treated by traditional method. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, the length of postoperative hospital stay, the hospitalization expenese in different groups were compared. Data were processed with t test.

Results

The operative time of O-Control group was (2.3±0.7) h, the intraoperative bleeding volume was (81.0±77.7) mL, postoperative exhaust time was (3.4±1.0) d, postoperative hospital stay was(12.9±4.0) d. And the operative time of O-ERAS group was(1.9±0.5) h, the intraoperative bleeding volume was (48.0±24.1) mL, postoperative exhaust time was (2.8±0.9) d, postoperative hospital stay was(10.5±4.1) d. Compare with the O-Control group, the latter with less amount of bleeding, the operative time, the time of postoperative exhaust time, the time of post-operative hospitalization were shortened, and the differences were statistically significant(t=-2.008, -2.099, -2.734, -2.233; with P values below 0.05). The hospitalization expenses of the two groups were(22 246.9±13 344.3) , (20 194.4±2 828.2) yuan, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). The operative time of L-Control group was(2.2±0.6) h, the intraoperative bleeding volume was (54.0±32.1) mL, postoperative exhaust time was (2.9±0.9) d, postoperative hospital stay was(7.0±2.0) d, the operative time of L-ERAS group was(1.8±0.5) h, the intraoperative bleeding volume was (37.0±26.3) mL, postoperative exhaust time was(2.4±0.8) d, postoperative hospital stay was(5.7±1.1) d. Compare with the L-Control group, the latter with less amount of bleeding, the operative time, the time of postoperative exhaust time, the time of post-operative hospitalization were shortened, and the differences were statistically significant(t=-2.179, -2.214, -2.197, -2.660; with P values below 0.05). The hospitalization expenses of the two groups were (22 672.6±5 446.9), (22 404.3±8 482.4) yuan, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Compared with the O-ERAS group, the L-ERAS group with less amount of bleeding , the operative time, the time of postoperative exhaust time, the time of post-operative hospitalization were shortened, and the differences were statistically significant(with P values below 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in hospitalization expenses between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

ERAS in elderly patients with cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration can promote the rehabilitation of elderly patients after surgery. And laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration is more conducive to rapid postoperative recovery, the effect of clinical application is obvious and can be promoted in clinic.

表1 4组需行胆囊切除加胆总管探查术的老年患者一般资料比较
表2 4组需行胆囊切除+胆总管探查术的老年患者术前相关措施比较
表3 4组需行胆囊切除+胆总管探查术的老年患者术中相关措施比较
表4 4组需行胆囊切除+胆总管探查术的老年患者术后相关措施比较
表5 O-ERAS组与O-Control组需行胆囊切除+胆总管探查术的老年患者各项观察指标比较(±s)
表6 L-ERAS组与L-Control组需行胆囊切除+胆总管探查术的老年患者各项观察指标(±s)
表7 O-ERAS组与L-ERAS组需行胆囊切除+胆总管探查术的老年患者各项观察指标比较(±s)
[1]
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BJM, 2001, 322(7284): 473-476.
[2]
江志伟,李宁,黎介寿. 快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2007, 27(2): 131-133.
[3]
Feng F, Li XH, Shi H, et al. Fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy could improve postoperative recovery of low-risk rectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Dig Dis, 2014, 15(6): 306-313.
[4]
Bray MS, Appel AL, Kallies KJ, et al. Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program for Colorectal Surgery at a Community Teaching Hospital[J]. WMJ, 2017, 116(1): 22-26.
[5]
Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) -The Evidence in Geriatric Emergency Surgery: A Systematic Review[J]. Chirurgia(Bucur), 2017, 112(5): 546-557.
[6]
俞巍,袁辉生,郑建伟,等. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合近期腹腔镜胆囊切除治疗胆系结石的可行性分析与体会[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2014, 9(4): 394-397.
[7]
潘志明. 快速康复外科理念在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的研究[J]. 河北医药,2015, 37(4): 553-556.
[8]
Kahokehr A, Broadbent E, Wheeler BR, et al. The effect of perioperative psychological intervention on fatigue after lapaoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized control trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(6): 1730-1736.
[9]
范桂红,张丽艳,王桂梅,等. 快速康复外科理念对老年胆囊手术患者术后康复的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2013, 33(15): 3785-3787.
[10]
郑惊雷,王在国,陈刘镇,等. 肝癌手术患者应用快速康复外科措施的效果分析[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 16-19.
[11]
谭黄业,樊献军,肖咏梅,等. 快速康复外科在腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中的应用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2011, 20(2): 146-149.
[12]
Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, et al. Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(8): 1015-1024.
[13]
Ramirez JM, Blasco JA, Roig JV, et al. Enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery: a multicentre study[J]. BMC Surg, 2011, 11: 9.
[14]
Taupyk Y, Cao X, ZhaoY, et al. Fast-track laparoscopic surgery: A better option for treating colorectal cancer than conventional laparoscopic surgery[J]. Oncol Lett, 2015, 10(1): 443-448.
[15]
张会明,李艳华,袁志勇,等. 快速康复外科对老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术围手术期细胞免疫功能的影响[J]. 河北医药,2016, 38(7): 1074-1075.
[16]
赵雪莹. 快速康复外科对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后应激反应与血糖的影响[J]. 中国医药导报,2016, 13(26): 132-135.
[17]
Sánchez-Pérez B, Aranda-Narváez JM, Suárez-Munoz MA, et al. Fast-track program in laparoscopic liver surgery: Theory or fact[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 4(11): 246-250.
[18]
Lu H, Fan Y, Zhang F, et al. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2014, 61(129): 168-172.
[19]
Hughes MJ, McNally S, Wigmore SJ. Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2014, 16(8): 699-706.
[20]
何敏琪,韩伟,周瑞仁,等. 快速康复外科理念在胃肠道肿瘤手术麻醉的应用[J]. 广西医科大学学报,2012, 29(4): 535-537.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[3] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[4] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[5] 王兴, 文阳辉, 姚戈冰, 郭平学, 杨自华. ICG荧光腹腔镜下胆囊切除术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 663-666.
[6] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[7] 姜宁宁, 蔺艳丽, 陈惠明. 胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中应用“三针法”缝合方案的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 531-534.
[8] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[9] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[12] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[15] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
阅读次数
全文


摘要