切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 120 -124. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折
郭杰坤1,(), 方向1, 刘国强1, 曾令国1, 周龙泽1   
  1. 1. 512026 韶关,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-30 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 郭杰坤

Mininally invasive treatment for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures using special fracture block reduction device

Jiekun Guo1,(), Xiang Fang1, Guoqiang Liu1, Lingguo Zeng1, Longze Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yuebei People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University, Shaoguan 512026, China
  • Received:2021-01-30 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiekun Guo
引用本文:

郭杰坤, 方向, 刘国强, 曾令国, 周龙泽. 应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(02): 120-124.

Jiekun Guo, Xiang Fang, Guoqiang Liu, Lingguo Zeng, Longze Zhou. Mininally invasive treatment for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures using special fracture block reduction device[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(02): 120-124.

目的

探讨应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的临床效果。

方法

2019年8月至今,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院创伤骨科应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折患者8例;其中Ⅱ型骨折4例,Ⅲ型骨折4例。所有患者均应用塌陷骨块顶复器复位胫骨平台关节面的塌陷骨折,经皮微创植入接骨板固定骨折端。采集手术时间、术中失血量等数据。术后定期随访,复查影像学检查;进行膝关节HSS评分和Rasmussen影像学评分评估患膝关节功能恢复情况;记录患膝关节屈曲角度和丢拐下床负重时间。

结果

8例患者均获随访,随访时间10.00~14.00个月,平均( 11.50±1.32 ) 个月。所有患者骨折10个月内均骨性愈合。丢拐下床负重时间5~8周,平均( 5.88±1.05) 周。末次随访时,膝关节屈曲度为95.00°~125.00 °,平均(111.00±10.69) °;Rasmussen影像学评分优良率达100%;膝关节HSS评分78.00~90.00分,平均(84.25±4.89) 分。

结论

应用塌陷骨块顶复器能将胫骨平台的塌陷骨折块解剖复位,恢复胫骨平台关节面平整;经皮微创植入钢板内固定,可最大程度地减少软组织和膝关节的损伤。术后疗效好,是治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的有效方法。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of special fracture block reduction device in mininally invasive treatment for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures.

Method

From August 2019 to now, eight patients admitted to the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of Yuebei People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University who suffered from Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures were included into the study, there were four cases of typeⅡand four cases of type Ⅲ.All patients were treated with special fracture block reduction device .The treatment was evaluated according to the surgical time and blood loss, and functional outcomes were evaluated according to HHS scores and Rasmussen radiological scoring system. Time to get out of bed and load was scored.

Results

All 8 patients were followed up for 10.00-14.00 months, with an average of (11.50±1.32 ) months. Time to get out of bed and load was 5 to 8 weeks, with an average of(5.88±1.05) weeks. All the fratures healed within 10 months postoperatively.At the last follow-up, the flexion of knee joint was 95.00° to 125.00 °, with an average of (111.00±10.69)°. The satisfaction rate was 100% according to Rasmussen radiological scoring system, and the mean HHS score was 78.00 to 90.00 points, with an average of (84.25±4.89) points.

Conclusion

Special fracture block reduction device is tested to be a feasible and worthwhile alternative for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures.

图1 环钻三件套
图2 术中将环钻中套更换为骨窗环钻
图3 应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗右胫骨平台Schatzker Ⅲ型骨折。A、B示术前X线正、侧位;C示术前三维CT大体观;D、E、F示术前三维CT冠状位、矢状位及横切位;G示术中复位前透视照;H、I示术中在床边X线监视下,置入导针至塌陷骨块下;J、K示经导针开骨道;L、M、N示术中经过骨块顶复器,关节面塌陷骨块复位成功;O示术中小切口植入钢板;P示术中切口照;Q、R、S、T、U、V、W、X示术后影像学表现为骨折端复位,胫骨力线良好,关节面恢复平整,其中Q、R示术后X线正侧位,S、T、U示术后三维CT大体观,V、W、X示术后三维CT矢状位、冠状位及横切位
图4 应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗右胫骨平台Schatzker Ⅱ型骨折。A、B示术前X线正侧位;C、D、E示术前三维CT矢状位、冠状位及横切位;F、G示术前三维CT大体观;H、I、J、K示术中在床边X线监视下,置入导针至塌陷骨块下;经导针开骨道;L、M示术中经过骨块顶复器,关节面塌陷骨块复位成功;N示术中小切口植入钢板;O示术中切口照;P、Q、R、S、T、U、V、W、X示术后影像学表现为塌陷骨折块复位良好,关节面平整,其中P、Q示术后X线正侧位, R、S、T示术后三维CT矢状位、冠状位及横切位;U、V示术后三维CT大体观;W、X示术后膝关节功能恢复良好,术后5周弃拐行走,术后8个月骨折端端骨性愈合
[1]
Vendeuvre T, Gayet Lé. Percutaneous treatment of tibial plateau fractures[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2021, 107(1S): 102753.
[2]
Chase R, Usmani K, Shahi A, et al. Arthroscopic-assisted reduction of tibial platerau fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2019, 50(3): 305-314.
[3]
Elsoe R, Larsen P, Nielsen NP, et al. Population-Based Epidemiology of Tabial Plateau Fractures[J]. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(9): e780-786.
[4]
Kfuri M, Schatzker J. Revisting the Schazker classication of tabial plateau fractures[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(12): 2252-2263.
[5]
He QF, Sun H, Shu LY, et al. Tabial plateau fractures in elderly people: an institutiional retr-ospective study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 276.
[6]
Le Baron M, Cermollacce M, Flecher X, et al. Tabial plateau fracture management: ARIF versus ORIF-clinical and radiological comparison[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019, 105(1): 101-106.
[7]
Prat-Fabregat S, Camacho-Carrasco P. Treatment Strategy of tabial plateau fracture: an update[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2017, 1(5): 225-232.
[8]
Mthethwa J, Chikate A. A review of the management of tabial plateau frature[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2018, 102(2): 119-127.
[9]
Wood KB, Li W, Lebl DR, et al. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures[J]. Spine J, 2014, 14 (1): 1145-1164.
[10]
Cuzzocrea F, Jannelli E, Ivone A, et al. Arthroscopic-Guided Balloon Tibioplasty in Schatzker Ⅲ Tibial Plateau Fracture [J]. Joints, 2019, 6(4): 220-227.
[11]
Kokkalis ZT, Iliopoulos ID, Pantazis C, et al. What′s new in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures?[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(6): 1162-1169.
[12]
Augat P, von Rüden C. Evolution of fracture treatment with bone plates[J]. Injury, 2018, 49 Suppl 1: S2-S7.
[13]
Duwelius PJ, Rangitsch MR, Colville MR, et al. Treatment of tibial plateau fractures by limited internal fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1997(339): 47-57.
[14]
Elsøe R, Larsen P, Rasmussen S, et al. High degree of patient satisfaction after percutaneous treatment of lateral tibia plateau fractures[J]. Dan Med J, 2016, 63(1): A5174.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[3] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[4] 向辉, 贾晓斌, 全卫涛. 真空辅助乳腺微创旋切术治疗乳腺纤维瘤的效果及并发症观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-530.
[5] 吴登爽, 李墨农, 张欣红, 侯四川, 邱志磊. 解剖性显微镜下精索静脉结扎术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-596.
[6] 赵毅, 李昶田, 唐文博, 白雪婷, 刘荣. 腹腔镜术中超声主胰管自动识别模型的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 290-294.
[7] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[8] 卓文锋, 曾桂芳, 杨思加, 赵家立, 邹宝嘉, 白子锐, 林恩, 李坚. 腹腔镜巨脾切除术:逐步打破的手术壁垒[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 783-788.
[9] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[10] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[11] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[12] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[13] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[14] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?