切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 120 -124. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折
郭杰坤1,(), 方向1, 刘国强1, 曾令国1, 周龙泽1   
  1. 1. 512026 韶关,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-30 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 郭杰坤

Mininally invasive treatment for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures using special fracture block reduction device

Jiekun Guo1,(), Xiang Fang1, Guoqiang Liu1, Lingguo Zeng1, Longze Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yuebei People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University, Shaoguan 512026, China
  • Received:2021-01-30 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiekun Guo
引用本文:

郭杰坤, 方向, 刘国强, 曾令国, 周龙泽. 应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(02): 120-124.

Jiekun Guo, Xiang Fang, Guoqiang Liu, Lingguo Zeng, Longze Zhou. Mininally invasive treatment for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures using special fracture block reduction device[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(02): 120-124.

目的

探讨应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的临床效果。

方法

2019年8月至今,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院创伤骨科应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折患者8例;其中Ⅱ型骨折4例,Ⅲ型骨折4例。所有患者均应用塌陷骨块顶复器复位胫骨平台关节面的塌陷骨折,经皮微创植入接骨板固定骨折端。采集手术时间、术中失血量等数据。术后定期随访,复查影像学检查;进行膝关节HSS评分和Rasmussen影像学评分评估患膝关节功能恢复情况;记录患膝关节屈曲角度和丢拐下床负重时间。

结果

8例患者均获随访,随访时间10.00~14.00个月,平均( 11.50±1.32 ) 个月。所有患者骨折10个月内均骨性愈合。丢拐下床负重时间5~8周,平均( 5.88±1.05) 周。末次随访时,膝关节屈曲度为95.00°~125.00 °,平均(111.00±10.69) °;Rasmussen影像学评分优良率达100%;膝关节HSS评分78.00~90.00分,平均(84.25±4.89) 分。

结论

应用塌陷骨块顶复器能将胫骨平台的塌陷骨折块解剖复位,恢复胫骨平台关节面平整;经皮微创植入钢板内固定,可最大程度地减少软组织和膝关节的损伤。术后疗效好,是治疗SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的有效方法。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of special fracture block reduction device in mininally invasive treatment for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures.

Method

From August 2019 to now, eight patients admitted to the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of Yuebei People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University who suffered from Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures were included into the study, there were four cases of typeⅡand four cases of type Ⅲ.All patients were treated with special fracture block reduction device .The treatment was evaluated according to the surgical time and blood loss, and functional outcomes were evaluated according to HHS scores and Rasmussen radiological scoring system. Time to get out of bed and load was scored.

Results

All 8 patients were followed up for 10.00-14.00 months, with an average of (11.50±1.32 ) months. Time to get out of bed and load was 5 to 8 weeks, with an average of(5.88±1.05) weeks. All the fratures healed within 10 months postoperatively.At the last follow-up, the flexion of knee joint was 95.00° to 125.00 °, with an average of (111.00±10.69)°. The satisfaction rate was 100% according to Rasmussen radiological scoring system, and the mean HHS score was 78.00 to 90.00 points, with an average of (84.25±4.89) points.

Conclusion

Special fracture block reduction device is tested to be a feasible and worthwhile alternative for Schatzker typeⅡand Ⅲ tibial plateau fractures.

图1 环钻三件套
图2 术中将环钻中套更换为骨窗环钻
图3 应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗右胫骨平台Schatzker Ⅲ型骨折。A、B示术前X线正、侧位;C示术前三维CT大体观;D、E、F示术前三维CT冠状位、矢状位及横切位;G示术中复位前透视照;H、I示术中在床边X线监视下,置入导针至塌陷骨块下;J、K示经导针开骨道;L、M、N示术中经过骨块顶复器,关节面塌陷骨块复位成功;O示术中小切口植入钢板;P示术中切口照;Q、R、S、T、U、V、W、X示术后影像学表现为骨折端复位,胫骨力线良好,关节面恢复平整,其中Q、R示术后X线正侧位,S、T、U示术后三维CT大体观,V、W、X示术后三维CT矢状位、冠状位及横切位
图4 应用塌陷骨块顶复器治疗右胫骨平台Schatzker Ⅱ型骨折。A、B示术前X线正侧位;C、D、E示术前三维CT矢状位、冠状位及横切位;F、G示术前三维CT大体观;H、I、J、K示术中在床边X线监视下,置入导针至塌陷骨块下;经导针开骨道;L、M示术中经过骨块顶复器,关节面塌陷骨块复位成功;N示术中小切口植入钢板;O示术中切口照;P、Q、R、S、T、U、V、W、X示术后影像学表现为塌陷骨折块复位良好,关节面平整,其中P、Q示术后X线正侧位, R、S、T示术后三维CT矢状位、冠状位及横切位;U、V示术后三维CT大体观;W、X示术后膝关节功能恢复良好,术后5周弃拐行走,术后8个月骨折端端骨性愈合
[1]
Vendeuvre T, Gayet Lé. Percutaneous treatment of tibial plateau fractures[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2021, 107(1S): 102753.
[2]
Chase R, Usmani K, Shahi A, et al. Arthroscopic-assisted reduction of tibial platerau fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2019, 50(3): 305-314.
[3]
Elsoe R, Larsen P, Nielsen NP, et al. Population-Based Epidemiology of Tabial Plateau Fractures[J]. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(9): e780-786.
[4]
Kfuri M, Schatzker J. Revisting the Schazker classication of tabial plateau fractures[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(12): 2252-2263.
[5]
He QF, Sun H, Shu LY, et al. Tabial plateau fractures in elderly people: an institutiional retr-ospective study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 276.
[6]
Le Baron M, Cermollacce M, Flecher X, et al. Tabial plateau fracture management: ARIF versus ORIF-clinical and radiological comparison[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019, 105(1): 101-106.
[7]
Prat-Fabregat S, Camacho-Carrasco P. Treatment Strategy of tabial plateau fracture: an update[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2017, 1(5): 225-232.
[8]
Mthethwa J, Chikate A. A review of the management of tabial plateau frature[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2018, 102(2): 119-127.
[9]
Wood KB, Li W, Lebl DR, et al. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures[J]. Spine J, 2014, 14 (1): 1145-1164.
[10]
Cuzzocrea F, Jannelli E, Ivone A, et al. Arthroscopic-Guided Balloon Tibioplasty in Schatzker Ⅲ Tibial Plateau Fracture [J]. Joints, 2019, 6(4): 220-227.
[11]
Kokkalis ZT, Iliopoulos ID, Pantazis C, et al. What′s new in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures?[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(6): 1162-1169.
[12]
Augat P, von Rüden C. Evolution of fracture treatment with bone plates[J]. Injury, 2018, 49 Suppl 1: S2-S7.
[13]
Duwelius PJ, Rangitsch MR, Colville MR, et al. Treatment of tibial plateau fractures by limited internal fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1997(339): 47-57.
[14]
Elsøe R, Larsen P, Rasmussen S, et al. High degree of patient satisfaction after percutaneous treatment of lateral tibia plateau fractures[J]. Dan Med J, 2016, 63(1): A5174.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[3] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[4] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[5] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[6] 周春林, 韩元龙, 丁飞, 吴玮杰. 踝关节骨折内固定术后形态变化及功能影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 736-740.
[7] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[8] 禄韶英. 股动脉假性动脉瘤的微创治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 377-380.
[9] 王竟楠, 赵吉宏. 从微创到功能:牙槽外科的必由之路[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 381-385.
[10] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[11] 刘喆, 黄杰, 胡恩艳, 王祖恒, 傅点, 陈宇豪, 张廷玲, 徐晓峰, 葛京平, 程文. 后腹膜肾上腺肿瘤微创手术的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 500-505.
[12] 贺翔, 杨科, 曹义国, 陈贵恒. 腹腔镜治疗小儿鞘膜积液的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-528.
[13] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[14] 邱朋, 邓正栋, 王剑明. 肝内胆管结石微创治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 591-596.
[15] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
阅读次数
全文


摘要