切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 316 -321. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.04.006

论著

负压封闭引流联合局部浸润麻醉下清创并手术缝合修复胸部正中切口愈合不良的临床应用
朱喆辰1, 史京萍1, 王鸣1, 姚刚1, 阮姝婕1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院整形烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-12 出版日期:2021-08-05
  • 通信作者: 阮姝婕

Clinical application of vacuum sealing drainage combined with debridement under local infiltration anesthesia and surgical suture to repair sternal incision nonunion

Zhechen Zhu1, Jingping Shi1, Ming Wang1, Gang Yao1, Shujie Ruan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Plastic and Burns Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2021-06-12 Published:2021-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Shujie Ruan
引用本文:

朱喆辰, 史京萍, 王鸣, 姚刚, 阮姝婕. 负压封闭引流联合局部浸润麻醉下清创并手术缝合修复胸部正中切口愈合不良的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(04): 316-321.

Zhechen Zhu, Jingping Shi, Ming Wang, Gang Yao, Shujie Ruan. Clinical application of vacuum sealing drainage combined with debridement under local infiltration anesthesia and surgical suture to repair sternal incision nonunion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(04): 316-321.

目的

探讨应用负压封闭引流(VSD)联合局部浸润麻醉下清创并手术缝合修复胸部正中切口术后愈合不良的治疗效果。

方法

选取2016年5月至2019年6月在南京医科大学第一附属医院行胸部正中切口手术术后切口愈合不良的患者51例。所有患者均在局部浸润麻醉下沿原切口将存在皮下潜腔的部位彻底敞开,清除切口及周围软组织坏死筋膜、脂肪组织,先予3%过氧化氢溶液,再予0.9%氯化钠溶液彻底冲洗切口,清创后于切口内放置VSD材料并封闭创面,维持VSD治疗1周,压力约-40 kPa,如VSD治疗后局部感染无好转且分泌物较多,VSD引流不畅时需更换VSD材料或再次手术清创。VSD治疗1周后如创周炎症反应情况好转,引流液清亮且无脓性分泌物,引流量减少,于局部浸润麻醉下行手术缝合修复切口,于胸肌筋膜层分离切口两侧,切除少量切缘陈旧肉芽组织和内翻上皮组织,放置切口深部高真空引流管,逐层缝合切口,确保切口内无死腔形成。如胸骨钢丝或金属固定器周围经VSD治疗仍有脓性分泌物,予手术去除,彻底清创后同期缝合修复切口。术后患者予胸带固定胸廓,切口覆盖敷料见分泌物时及时换药,如无明显分泌物每2 d换药1次。引流管留置1周后如引流量稳定,每日低于10 mL即予以拔除,引流量较多则适当推迟拔管时间,拔管后可安排出院。出院后门诊隔日复诊换药至术后2周拆线,年龄大于60岁且有基础疾病者,推迟拆线时间。如切口愈合不良,继续隔日门诊换药治疗。患者住院期间予基础疾病治疗并根据切口分泌物培养结果进行抗生素治疗。若缝合修复手术术后短期内切口再次感染破溃,需再次对切口分泌物进行细菌培养并根据药物敏感试验结果行抗感染治疗,切口换药治疗,清除炎性肉芽组织,碘仿纱条填塞,保守治疗1个月后若局部皮肤红肿无好转,切口仍未愈合,需考虑胸骨骨髓炎可能,再次清创后胸骨缺损处二期采用胸大肌肌瓣填塞。换药时观察切口皮肤颜色,是否存在红肿表现;观察引流管是否通畅,引流量,引流液性状;切口正常愈合后每3个月通过门诊或网络随访患者,记录切口愈合情况。记录治疗期间患者有无血栓、出血、心脏意外等并发症发生。

结果

51例患者经清创、VSD治疗后缝合修复切口,术后所有患者引流管均引流通畅,术后每日最大引流量均小于30 mL,引流液颜色均由鲜红转为暗红。正常愈合的切口皮肤由术后早期的微红逐渐恢复正常皮肤颜色。随访3~24个月,51例患者中有42例切口愈合良好,在随访期间未再出现切口破溃。术后愈合不良的9例患者中,有6例患者术后1周起出现切口处点状皮肤红肿,换药治疗后红肿未消退,后出现局部破溃,经换药治疗1个月后愈合;1例患者术后拆线时切口愈合良好,在术后5个月时因钢丝刺破皮肤外露行手术去除钢丝再次缝合治愈,2例患者出现皮肤红肿破溃后,经换药治疗1个月无好转,后再次住院行手术清创,胸大肌肌瓣填塞胸骨缺损治愈。治疗期间所有患者均未发生血栓、出血、心脏意外等并发症。

结论

应用VSD技术联合局部浸润麻醉手术下清创并手术缝合修复胸部正中切口愈合不良,手术创伤小,麻醉风险小,患者预后良好,是修复胸部正中切口愈合不良的简单有效的方法。

Objective

To explore the therapeutic effect by vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with debridement under local infiltration anesthesia and surgical suture to repair postoperative sternal incision nonunion.

Methods

Fifty-one patients with sternal incision nonunion after median thoracic incision surgery admitted in First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from May 2016 to June 2019 were enrolled in the research. Under local infiltration anesthesia, all patients were completely opened the subcutaneous cavity along the original incision, removed the incision and surrounding soft tissue necrosis, fascia, and adipose tissue, washed the incision thoroughly with 3% hydrogen peroxide and then 0.9% sodium chloride solution, and then, placed VSD material in the incision and sealed the wound after debridement. VSD treatment was maintained for about one week at the pressure of about -40 kPa. New VSD material and once more debridement was taken if local infection did not improve or the secretion did not gradually reduced after VSD treatment. After 1 week of VSD treatment, if the inflammation around the wound improved, the drainage fluid was clear and there was no purulent secretion, and the drainage was reduced, the incision was repaired by suture under local infiltration anesthesia, and both sides of the incision were separated on the pectoral muscle fascia and a small amount of old margins granulation tissues and inverted epithelial tissues were removed, a high-vacuum drainage tube was placed in the deep part of the incision, and the incision was sutured layer by layer to ensure that no dead space was formed in the incision. If there were still purulent secretions around the sternum wire or metal fixator after VSD treatment, they should be removed surgically, and the incision should be repaired at the same time after thorough debridement. The patients were fixed with chest band after suture. The dressing should be changed in time when secretions were seen from the incision covering dressing. If there was no obvious secretion, the dressing should be changed every 2 days. After the drainage tube was left for 1 week, if the drainage volume was stable, it would be removed if the drainage volume was less than 10 mL per day. If the drainage volume was large, the time of extubation would be delayed appropriately, and discharge could be arranged after extubation. After discharge from the hospital, the patient would return to the outpatient clinic every other day and change the dressing before removal of the stitches 2 weeks after the operation. If the patient was older than 60 years old or had systemic diseases, the time of taking out the stitches would be delayed. If the incision did not heal well, the outpatient dressing change continued every other day. During the hospitalization, the patients were treated for systemic diseases and antibiotics were given according to the results of culture of the incision secretions. If the incision became infected and ruptured again within a short period of time after the suture repair operation, the excretion of the incision should be cultured again and anti-infective treatment should be performed according to the results of the drug sensitivity test, dressing change with iodoform gauze and local debridement of inflammatory granulation tissue were the main therapy for the next month until the incision was fully expanded and filled. If the local skin redness and swelling did not improve after 1 month of conservative treatment, and the incision had not healed, the possibility of sternal osteomyelitis should be considered. After through debridement, the sternum defect was filled with pectoralis major muscle flap in the second stage.The skin color of the incision should be observed for signs of redness and swelling and the drainage tube should be inspected to make sure it was unobstructed and calculated by its fluid quantity while the dressing was changed. After the incision healed, the patient was followed up through the outpatient clinic or online every 3 months to record the healing of the incision. During the treatment period, whether the patient had any complications such as blood clots, bleeding, and cardiac accidents were recorded.

Results

Fifty-one patients were sutured to repair the incision after debridement and VSD treatment. After the operation, the drainage tubes of all patients were drained smoothly, the maximum drainage volume was less than 30 mL every day after the operation, and the color of the drainage fluid changed from bright red to dark red. The normally healed incision skin gradually returned to its normal skin color postoperatively. During the follow-up period from 3 to 24 months, 42 of the 51 patients had incisions healed well, and no incision rupture occurred during the follow-up period. Among the 9 patients with poor postoperative healing, 6 patients had incision skin redness about 1 week after the operation. The redness and swelling did not subside after dressing change, and local ulceration occurred later. They were treated with dressing change and healed within a month. Another patient healed well at first and were removed of the stitches puncturely. But his incision ulcered 5 months after sucture because of exposure of sternum fixation wire. The patient was cured after being removed of the steel wire and sutured again. The other two patients had skin redness, swelling and ulceration and they did not improve after dressing change for 1 month. They were hospitalized again for surgical debridement, and the sternum defect was cured by filling the pectoralis major muscle flap. During the treatment, all potients had no complications such as thrombosis, bleeding and cardiac accidents occurred.

Conclusions

VSD combined with surgical suture repair under local anesthesia is a simple and effective method to repair sternal wound nonunion, with advantages of less surgical trauma, less anesthesia risk and satisfying prognosis.

图1 VSD联合局部浸润麻醉下清创并缝合修复手术修复冠状动脉搭桥术后胸部正中切口愈合不良。A示患者入院时胸部正中切口点状破溃不愈伴较多渗出;B示经局部浸润麻醉下切口清创+VSD治疗,于清创术后10 d拆除VSD材料,切口内肉芽组织颜色红,无水肿;C示于局部麻醉下行缝合修复手术,术中剥离深筋膜,分层缝合皮下、皮肤组织,于皮下放置真空引流管;D示缝合修复手术术后6个月随访,切口瘢痕愈合,无再次破溃;VSD为负压封闭引流
[1]
Dohmen PM, Misfeld M, Borger MA, et al. Closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2014, 11(4): 395-402.
[2]
Gorlitzer M, Wagner F, Pfeiffer S, et al. Prevention of sternal wound complications after sternotomy: results of a large prospective randomized multicentre trial[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2013, 17(3): 515-522.
[3]
李现杰,张润生,杨恒,等. 胸大肌肌瓣移植治疗心脏术后胸骨感染疗效分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志2019, 35(2): 76-79.
[4]
陈波,贲道锋,夏照帆. 负压创面治疗技术的研究应用进展[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2014, 9(2): 198-202.
[5]
Pairolero PC, Arnold PG. Management of recalcitrant median sternotomy wounds[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1984, 88(3): 357-364.
[6]
褚万立,郝岱峰,赵景峰,等. 富血小板血浆治疗深部胸骨切口感染一例并文献回顾[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(1): 46-51.
[7]
Deo SV, Shah IK, Dunlay SM, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 95(3): 862-869.
[8]
丁凯,周晓艳,唐春立,等. 正中开胸术后胸骨哆开的原因分析与处理对策[J]. 临床误诊误治2014, 27(5): 66-68.
[9]
Jacobson JY, Doscher ME, Rahal WJ, et al. Asymmetric sternotomy and sternal wound complications: assessment using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction[J]. Innovations (Phila), 2015, 10(1): 52-56.
[10]
高永顺,刘吉福. 心脏外科手术后胸骨切口深部感染的治疗经验[J]. 临床外科杂志2017, 25(5): 337-339.
[11]
张汝凡,冯自豪,陆南杭,等. 18F-FDG PET/CT引导下心脏术后慢性胸骨切口感染并发肋软骨炎的诊疗[J]. 中国美容医学2018, 27(2): 25-28.
[12]
侯玉森,曹玉珏,余斌,等. 影响心脏术后早期前胸裂开切口愈合因素的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(3): 210-214.
[13]
李小兵. 开胸术后胸骨切口感染裂开的临床治疗[J]. 创伤外科杂志2019, 21(6): 480-481.
[14]
Simek M, Chudoba A, Hajek R, et al. From open packing to negative wound pressure therapy: A critical overview of deep sternal wound infection treatment strategies after cardiac surgery[J]. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2018.
[15]
郭海雷,赵光举,卢才教,等. 封闭负压引流在心脏手术后胸骨裂开创面中的临床应用[J]. 中国现代医生2016, 54(34): 81-84.
[16]
Sajja LR. Strategies to reduce deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal mammary artery grafting[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 16(Pt B): 171-178.
[17]
高鲁方,向道康,周涛. 心脏外科术后深部胸骨切口感染特征及耐药基因检测[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志2019, 14(7): 852-856.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 姜珊, 李湘燕, 田硕涵, 温冰, 何睿, 齐心. 采用优化抗感染治疗模式改善糖尿病足感染预后的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 398-403.
[3] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 邹永康, 石雍, 徐贤刚, 张帅民, 刘衍, 杨生鹏, 叶啟发, 陈根, 张毅. 肾移植术后手术切口米根霉感染伴菌血症一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 289-292.
[6] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[7] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[8] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[9] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[10] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[11] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[12] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[13] 丛黎, 马林, 陈旭, 李文文, 张亮亮, 周华亭. 改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?