切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 185 -190. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.03.001

所属专题: 指南共识

专家述评

2022年闭合切口负压治疗用于切口和周围软组织管理的专家共识解读
张丕红1,(), 彭映华1   
  1. 1. 410008 长沙,中南大学湘雅医院烧伤整形科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-20 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张丕红

Interpretation of expert consensus on the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management in 2022

Pihong Zhang1,(), Yinghua Peng1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
  • Received:2022-04-20 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Pihong Zhang
引用本文:

张丕红, 彭映华. 2022年闭合切口负压治疗用于切口和周围软组织管理的专家共识解读[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 185-190.

Pihong Zhang, Yinghua Peng. Interpretation of expert consensus on the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management in 2022[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(03): 185-190.

《闭合切口负压治疗(ciNPT)用于切口和周围软组织管理的专家共识》(以下简称"共识")于2022年3月发表于International Wound Journal,该共识结合临床实际,围绕ciNPT提出10个推荐意见,指导ciNPT的临床应用,加强对切口及周围软组织的管理。本文从ciNPT的适应证、压力设置及持续时间、应用注意事项及应用时局部皮肤保护方面进行解读,并结合我国实际情况探讨手术切口并发症发生的相关危险因素,对ciNPT临床应用的成本效益进行分析,旨在改善手术切口愈合、减少切口并发症的同时,避免过度医疗、降低医疗开支。

The expert consensus on the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) for incision and surrounding soft tissue management (hereinafter referred to as the "consensus" ) was published in International Wound Journal in March 2022. Combined with clinical practice, the consensus puts forward 10 recommendations for ciNPT to guide the clinical use of ciNPT, and strengthen the management of incision and surrounding tissue. This paper interprets the guiding points of the consensus from the indications, pressure setting and duration of ciNPT, precautions for use and the protection of surrounding skin, and connecting with the actual situation in China to explore the related risk factors of surgical incision complications and ciNPT clinical application of cost-benefit analysis, in order to improve the healing of surgical incision, reduce incision complications, avoid excessive medical treatment and reduce medical expenses.

[1]
Willy C, Agarwal A, Andersen CA, et al. Closed incision negative pressure therapy: international multidisciplinary consensus recommendations[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(2): 385-398.
[2]
Silverman RP, Apostolides J, Chatterjee A, et al. The use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management: Expert panel consensus recommendations[J]. Int Wound J, 2022, 19(3): 643-655.
[3]
Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, et al. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 1997, 38(6): 553-562.
[4]
Timmers MS, Le Cessie S, Banwell P, et al. The effects of varying degrees of pressure delivered by negative-pressure wound therapy on skin perfusion[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2005, 55(6): 665-671.
[5]
Rodero MP, Hodgson SS, Hollier B, et al. Reduced Il17a expression distinguishes a Ly6c(lo)MHCII(hi) macrophage population promoting wound healing[J]. J Investig Dermatol, 2013, 133(3): 783-792.
[6]
Ailaney N, Johns WL, Golladay GJ, et al. Closed Incision negative pressure wound therapy for elective hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2021, 36(7): 2402-2411.
[7]
Waring M, Bielfeldt S, Mätzold K, et al. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives[J]. J Wound Care, 2011, 20(9): 412, 414, 416-422.
[8]
Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(suppl 2): S11.
[9]
Morikane K, Russo PL, Lee KY, et al. Expert commentary on the challenges and opportunities for surgical site infection prevention through implementation of evidence-based guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2021, 10(1): 65.
[10]
Emily TM, Keith SK, Caitlin KH, et al. Diabetes and Risk of Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2016, 37(1): 88-99.
[11]
O′Hara ML, Thom KA, Preas MA, et al. Update to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (2017): A summary, review, and strategies for implementation[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2018, 46(6): 602-609.
[12]
Fu MC, Buerba RA, Grauer JN. Preoperative nutritional status as an adjunct predictor of major postoperative complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2016, 29(4): 167-172.
[13]
Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Kebaish K, et al. Poor nutrition status and lumbar spine fusion surgery in the elderly: readmissions, complications, and mortality[J]. Spine, 2017, 42(13): 979-983.
[14]
Canturk Z, Canturk NZ, Cetinarslan B, et al. Nosocomial infections and obesity in surgical patients[J]. Obes Res, 2003, 11(6): 769-775.
[15]
Fleischmann E, Kurz A, Niedermayr M, et al. Tissue oxygenation in obese and non-obese patients during laparoscopy[J]. Obes Surg, 2005, 15(6): 813-819.
[16]
Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient: a susceptible host for infection[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt), 2006, 7(5): 473-480.
[17]
Polderman JA, Farhang-Razi V, Van Dieren S, et al. Adverse side effects of dexamethasone in surgical patients[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 11(11): CD011940.
[18]
Cheung AH, Wong LM. Surgical infection in patients with chronic renal failure[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2001, 15(3): 775-796.
[19]
Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status-historical perspectives and modern developments[J]. Anaesthesia, 2019, 74(3): 373-379.
[20]
American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Classifification System[EB/OL]. (2013-12-6) [2022-04-10].

URL    
[21]
Willy C, Agarwal A, Andersen CA, et al. Closed incision negative pressure therapy: international multidisciplinary consensus recommendations[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(2): 385-398.
[22]
Enneking FK, Radhakrishnan NS, Berg K, et al. Patient-Centered Anesthesia Triage System Predicts ASA Physical Status[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 124(6): 1957-1962.
[23]
Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(8): 784-791.
[24]
Singh DP, Gabriel A, Silverman RP, et al. Meta-analysis comparing out-comes of two different negative pressure therapy systems in closed incision management[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2019, 7(6): e2259.
[25]
Antoniou GA, Onwuka CC, Antoniou SA, et al. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prophylactic negative pressure therapy for groin wounds in vascular surgery[J]. Vasc Surg, 2019, 70(5): 1700-1710.
[26]
Boland PA, Kelly ME, Donlon NE, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2021, 190(1): 261-267.
[27]
Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, et al. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(5): 477-486.
[28]
Young SR, Hampton S, Martin R. Non-invasive assessment of negative pressure wound therapy using high frequency diagnostic ultrasound: oedema reduction and new tissue accumulation[J]. Int Wound J, 2013, 10(4): 383-388.
[29]
Kamolz LP, Andel H, Haslik W, et al. Use of sub-atmospheric pressure therapy to prevent burn wound progression in human: first experiences[J]. Burns, 2004, 30(3): 253-258.
[30]
魏景明,于梦根,任苒,等. 某三甲医院医务人员过度医疗认知和行为调查研究[J]. 中国医院管理 2018, 38(7): 29-33.
[31]
刘慧云,韩玉珍,刘国栋,等. 经济社会新常态下的过度医疗再探讨[J]. 中国医院管理 2017, 37(6): 25-26.
[32]
张卓,韩玉珍,刘国栋,等. 三级甲等公立医院过度医疗形成影响因素研究[J]. 中国医院管理 2017, 37(6): 29-31.
[1] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[2] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[3] 陈继秋, 朱世辉. 皮肤牵张装置的临床应用现状[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 451-453.
[4] 黄跃生. 努力建设高水平创面修复新学科[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 185-187.
[5] 唐甜甜, 马力. 中华医学会乳腺癌患者中心静脉血管通路临床实践指南解读[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 240-244.
[6] 白雪, 李珺, 邢婵, 高济越, 赵海东. 中华医学会乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿临床实践指南解读[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 245-249.
[7] 倪鑫淼, 王磊, 王潇, 陈志远, 翁小东, 刘修恒. 前列腺癌患者骨保护现状及临床用药进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 191-195.
[8] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 193-199.
[9] 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识编写组. 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 630-638.
[10] 杨旭希, 郑吉洋, 陈秀梅, 陈淑玲, 杨峻青, 苏芝琪, 左咏臻, 广东省医师协会心力衰竭专业医师分会, 广东省护士协会介入护士分会. 慢性心力衰竭患者容量管理护理专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 201-207.
[11] 中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会, 中国医师协会心律学专业委员会. 普通心脏起搏器和植入型心律转复除颤器手术操作规范中国专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 65-102.
[12] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国经口胆胰管镜超级微创诊疗技术共识意见(2023年,北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 217-239.
[13] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会护理协作组. 消化内镜中心的环境与布局专家共识建议(2023年,北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 240-247.
[14] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国结直肠息肉冷切专家共识(2023年,杭州)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 73-82.
[15] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 消化内镜超级微创手术创面预处理与抗生素应用专家共识(2023年,北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 83-91.
阅读次数
全文


摘要