切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 213 -220. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.03.006

论著

国产手术导航系统在全髋关节置换术中的应用
吕欣1, 孙智文1,(), 郭峰1, 张一波1, 陈晓伟1, 苏日娜2   
  1. 1. 024000 赤峰市医院骨关节科
    2. 024000 赤峰市医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-25 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 孙智文

Application of domestic surgical navigation system in total hip arthroplasty

Xin Lyu1, Zhiwen Sun1,(), Feng Guo1, Yibo Zhang1, Xiaowei Chen1, Rina Su2   

  1. 1. Department of Bone and Joint, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng 024000, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng 024000, China
  • Received:2022-03-25 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhiwen Sun
引用本文:

吕欣, 孙智文, 郭峰, 张一波, 陈晓伟, 苏日娜. 国产手术导航系统在全髋关节置换术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 213-220.

Xin Lyu, Zhiwen Sun, Feng Guo, Yibo Zhang, Xiaowei Chen, Rina Su. Application of domestic surgical navigation system in total hip arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(03): 213-220.

目的

目的探讨国产手术导航系统辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)的有效性和安全性。

方法

选择赤峰市医院骨关节科2021年5月至9月收治的符合入选标准的拟接受THA的患者42例,通过中央随机化系统将患者分为试验组(n=19)与对照组(n=23)。2组患者入院后常规行患侧髋关节X线、全骨盆CT等术前相关检查,试验组患者术中应用国产手术导航系统辅助完成THA,对照组患者使用传统手术方法完成THA。2组患者术后常规预防感染、预防下肢深静脉血栓,并行髋关节功能锻炼。记录2组患者手术时间、术中出血量。术后1个月,通过影像学检查测量髋臼假体角度并计算2组患者髋臼假体角度位于Lewinnek安全区的比例。术后1个月,比较2组患者西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)量表评估评分、Harris髋关节评分、SF-36健康调查评分、髋关节活动度、关节脱位率和并发症发生率。数据行独立样本t检验、χ2检验。

结果

试验组手术时间为(107.7±25.3) min,较对照组[(80.2±21.7) min]延长,差异有统计学意义(t=3.791,P<0.05);试验组术中出血量为(281.6±151.1) mL,与对照组[(233.9±117.7) mL]比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.149,P=0.257)。术后1个月,试验组髋臼假体角度位于Lewinnek安全区的比例为94.7%(18/19),与对照组[60.9%(14/23)]比较,比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.579,P=0.010。术后1个月,试验组组患者WOMAC量表评估评分、Harris髋关节评分、SF-36健康调查评分分别为(13.8±7.3)、(80.9±6.8)、(602.6±69.4)分,与对照组[(14.8±8.3)、(80.3±7.9)、(588.8±114.7)分]比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.409、0.276、0.458,P=0.257、0.685、0.784、0.650)。术后1个月,试验组患者髋关节内收(15.3±4.6)°,外展(33.3±7.7)°,内旋(13.7±4.4)°,外旋(23.9±14.4)°,屈曲(100.0±10.8)°,与对照组[内收(15.7±4.6)°、外展(32.8±7.0)°、内旋(12.6±4.7)°、外旋(19.1±8.5)°、屈曲(95.4±12.5)°]比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.274、0.146、0.759、1.348、1.251,P=0.785、0.885、0.452、0.185、0.218)。术后1个月,试验组患者术后无关节脱位发生,对照组患者关节脱位率为4.3%(1/23),2组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P=1.000);试验组并发症发生率为21.1%(4/19),与对照组[13.0%(3/23)]比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.077,P=0.782)。

结论

国产手术导航系统辅助THA较传统THA髋臼假体角度更加精准,安全性更高,但是手术时间相对延长,术后早期临床效果相同。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of domestic surgical navigation system in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

Forty-two patients who met the inclusion criteria and planned to receive THA and admitted to the Department of Bone and Joint, Chifeng Hospital from May to September 2021 were selected. The patients were divided into the experimental group (n=19) and the control group (n=23) by the central randomization system. After admission, patients in the two groups underwent routine preoperative related examinations such as X-ray films of the affected hip joint and whole pelvis CT. The patients in the experimental group were treated with domestic surgical navigation system to assist in completing THA during the operation. While the patients in the control group were treated with traditional surgical methods to complete THA. All the patients received routine postoperative infection prevention, prevention of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, and hip joint functional exercise. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the patients in the two groups were collected. At one month after operation, the acetabular prosthesis angle was measured by imaging examination to calculate the proportion of the acetabular prosthesis angle in the Lewinnek safe zone in the two groups. At one month after operation, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) assessment score, Harris hip score, SF-36 health survey score, hip range of motion, joint dislocation rate and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Data were processed with independent samples t test, chi-square test.

Results

The operation time of the experimental group was (107.7±25.3) min, which was longer than that of the control group [(80.2±21.7) min], and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.791, P<0.05); the intraoperative blood loss of the experimental group was (281.6±151.1) mL, compared with the control group [(233.9±117.7) mL], the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.149, P= 0.257). At one month after operation, the proportion of the acetabular prosthesis angle in the Lewinnek safe zone in the experimental group was 94.7% (18/19), compared with the control group [60.9% (14/23)], the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.579, P= 0.010). At one month after operation, the WOMAC scale evaluation score, Harris hip score, and SF-36 health survey score were (13.8±7.3), (80.9±6.8), (602.6±69.4) points, respectively, which were higher than those of the control group [(14.8±8.3), (80.3±7.9), (588.8±114.7) points], the differences were not statistically significant (t=-0.409, 0.276, 0.458; P=0.685, 0.784, 0.650). At one month after operation, , the hip joints in the experimental group were adduction (15.3±4.6)°, abduction (33.3±7.7)°, internal rotation (13.7±4.4)°, external rotation (23.9±14.4)°, flexion (100.0±10.8) °, compared with the control group [adduction (15.7±4.6)°, abduction (32.8±7.0)°, internal rotation (12.6±4.7)°, external rotation (19.1±8.5)°, flexion (95.4±12.5)°], the differences were not statistically significant (t=-0.274, 0.146, 0.759, 1.348, 1.251; P=0.785, 0.885, 0.452, 0.185, 0.218). There was no postoperative joint dislocation in the experimental group, while the joint dislocation rate in the control group was 4.3% (1/23), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was 21.1% (4/19), compared with the control group [13.0% (3/23)], the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.077, P=0.782).

Conclusion

The surgical navigation system assisted THA is more accurate and safer than the traditional THA acetabular prosthesis, but the operation time is relatively longer, and the early postoperative clinical effect is the same.

表1 2组行THA的患者术前基本资料比较
表2 2组行THA患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后1个月髋臼假体角度位于Lewinnek安全区的患者比例、WOMAC量表评估评分、Harris髋关节评分、SF-36健康调查评分比较
表3 2组行THA患者术后1个月髋关节活动度比较(°,±s)
图1 右侧股骨头坏死患者术前患侧髋关节X线、全骨盆CT检查。A示X线示右侧股骨头部分缺失、上移,髋臼上缘骨质部分缺损;B示全骨盆CT检查示右侧股骨头塌陷、变形,髋臼上缘骨质部分缺失,髋臼前后壁骨量正常
图2 国产手术导航系统辅助行THA治疗右侧股骨头坏死患者,术前国产手术导航系统策划髋臼假体大小、角度、位置、整体策划影像与术中髋臼配准。A示术前依据CT检查数据,分别策划髋臼假体大小、角度及位置;B示术前整体策划影像;C示术中髋臼配准;THA为全髋关节置换术
图3 国产手术导航系统辅助行THA治疗右侧股骨头坏死患者,国产手术导航系统引导下行髋臼磨锉、髋臼假体植入及植入假体后髋臼假体的角度、腿长、偏心距显示。A示术中可实时显示髋臼磨锉时磨锉角度、位置及深度,绿色代表未磨锉到的位置,红色代表磨锉过深的位置;B示术中髋臼假体植入时可实时显示臼杯角度及位置;C示植入假体后显示髋臼假体的角度、腿长、偏心距;THA为全髋关节置换术
图4 国产手术导航系统引导下行THA术后股骨头坏死患者骨盆正位X线片可见髋臼假体角度良好,股骨柄侧假体大小及角度良好,双下肢基本等长;THA为全髋关节置换术
[1]
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement[J]. Lancet, 2007, 370(9597): 1508-1519.
[2]
Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs[J]. Acta Orthop, 2007, 78(1): 108-115.
[3]
Zengerink I, Reijman M, Mathijssen NM, et al. Hip Arthroplasty Malpractice Claims in the Netherlands: Closed Claim Study 2000-2012[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(9): 1890-1893. e4.
[4]
Ellapparadja P, Mahajan V, Atiya S, et al. Leg length discrepancy in computer navigated total hip arthroplasty - how accurate are we[J]. Hip Int, 2016, 26(5): 438-443.
[5]
Patterson DC, Grelsamer RP, Bronson MJ, et al. Lawsuits After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Malpractice Claims Analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(10): 2958-2962.
[6]
Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(2): 319-329.
[7]
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60(2): 217-220.
[8]
Kelley TC, Swank ML. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91 Suppl 1: 153-158.
[9]
Jennings JM, Randell TR, Green CL,et al. Independent Evaluation of a Mechanical Hip Socket Navigation System in Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(3): 658-661.
[10]
Bradley MP, Benson JR, Muir JM. Accuracy of Acetabular Component Positioning Using Computer-assisted Navigation in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. Cureus, 2019, 11(4): e4478.
[11]
吴坚,吕明,柳剑,等. 传统手术方法安放髋臼假体角度准确性的三维CT研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志 2013, 21(15): 1528-1532, 1561.
[12]
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee[J]. J Rheumatol, 1988, 15(12): 1833-1840.
[13]
Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
[14]
Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population[J]. Med Care, 1988, 26(7): 724-735.
[15]
孙迎放. 骨与关节损伤修复的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5): 478-481.
[16]
Deep K, Shankar S, Mahendra A. Computer assisted navigation in total knee and hip arthroplasty[J]. SICOT J, 2017, 3: 50.
[17]
Wasterlain AS, Buza JA 3rd, Thakkar SC, et al. Navigation and Robotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. JBJS Rev, 2017, 5(3): e2.
[18]
Tanino H, Nishida Y, Mitsutake R, et al. Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Cup Placement of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(1): 172-177.
[19]
Takada R, Jinno T, Miyatake K, et al. Portable imageless navigation system and surgeon′s estimate for accurate evaluation of acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty in supine position[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2020, 30(4): 707-712.
[20]
Gausden EB, Popper JE, Sculco PK, et al. Computerized navigation for total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower complications and ninety-day readmissions: a nationwide linked analysis[J]. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(3): 471-476.
[21]
Shigemura T, Baba Y, Murata Y, et al. Is a portable accelerometer-based navigation system useful in total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2021, 107(1): 102742.
[22]
Fujita K, Kabata T, Maeda T, et al. The use of the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip replacement: An analysis of the orientation of the trial acetabular component using a navigation system[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(3): 306-311.
[23]
张先龙,王坤正. 关节外科的未来——数字骨科技术在关节外科的应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志 2021, 41(8): 525-531.
[1] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[2] 孔德铭, 刘铮, 李睿, 钱文伟, 王飞, 蔡道章, 柴伟. 人工智能辅助全髋关节置换三维术前规划准确性评价[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 431-438.
[3] 刘晓凡. 老年股骨头坏死髋关节置换术后康复应用多维度干预[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 314-319.
[4] 张江礼, 刘金辉, 潘西庆, 刘光源, 范虓. 全膝关节置换应用智能辅助手术导航系统治疗膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 346-351.
[5] 刘正宇, 刘春风, 王振. 改良后外侧入路半髋置换治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 409-413.
[6] 卢国良, 潘耀成. 比较不同类型假体用于骨质疏松症的老年股骨颈骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 277-279.
[7] 刘敏, 唐恩溢, 刘喆, 葛苏蒙, 刘梅, 孙国文. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面部微小异物取出手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 375-379.
[8] 易柏成, 李旭光, 王容容, 王新璇. 数字化3D打印导板应用于上前牙钙化根管治疗2例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 385-390.
[9] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[10] 赵静, 范晔, 游雅婷, 陈慧, 王静, 张静. 虚拟支气管镜导航联合径向超声支气管镜在周围型肺癌中的诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 524-528.
[11] 戈伟, 陈刚. 纳米炭导航行淋巴示踪在结直肠癌TNM分期中淋巴分期价值的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 288-293.
[12] 王莹莹. 神经导航联合术中神经电生理监测在脑干胶质瘤手术切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 293-298.
[13] 景方坤, 周建波, 王全才, 黄海韬, 李岩峰, 徐杨熙. 神经导航引导下治疗基底节高血压脑出血的短期疗效预测[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 154-159.
[14] 邓屹, 叶苏意, 崔伟, 乐艳青, 陈兢兢, 陈俞溪, 陈泳衡, 许荣德, 李静. 影像引导下经皮肺穿刺活检的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 296-302.
[15] 李晓峰, 徐栗, 朱建坤, 金锋, 张运曾. LungPro 支气管镜导航注射吲哚菁绿在多发肺小结节手术中定位的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 231-235.
阅读次数
全文


摘要