切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.01.006

论著

活动型牛津膝单髁置换在膝关节自发性骨坏死治疗中的应用价值
陆军帅1, 高礼层1, 王逸群1, 徐小彬1, 麻文谦1, 朱玮1,()   
  1. 1. 201600 上海交通大学医学院附属松江医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-03 出版日期:2023-02-01
  • 通信作者: 朱玮
  • 基金资助:
    上海市松江区科学技术攻关项目(20SJKJGG7,22SJKJGG55)

Application value of movable Oxford unicondylar knee replacement in the treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee

Junshuai Lu1, Liceng Gao1, Yiqun Wang1, Xiaobin Xu1, Wenqian Ma1, Wei Zhu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201600, China
  • Received:2022-10-03 Published:2023-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei Zhu
引用本文:

陆军帅, 高礼层, 王逸群, 徐小彬, 麻文谦, 朱玮. 活动型牛津膝单髁置换在膝关节自发性骨坏死治疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 39-46.

Junshuai Lu, Liceng Gao, Yiqun Wang, Xiaobin Xu, Wenqian Ma, Wei Zhu. Application value of movable Oxford unicondylar knee replacement in the treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(01): 39-46.

目的

探讨活动型牛津膝单髁置换术在膝关节自发性骨坏死(SONK)治疗中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属松江医院骨科2015年1月至2022年8月收治的采用活动型牛津膝单髁置换术治疗的32例(32膝)SONK患者,其中单柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换14例,双柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换18例。术中患者麻醉成功后取仰卧位,屈膝90°取髌骨旁内侧至胫骨结节内侧入路,彻底清除股骨内髁病变坏死病变组织,根据病灶周围硬化骨完整度和强度选择截骨深度。小缺损以骨水泥填塞,较大缺损建议采用已清除的骨赘块制作细小碎骨柱填塞。安装单柱/双柱双柱活动型牛津膝假体。再次检查膝关节活动范围及稳定性,彻底止血,充分冲洗切口,关节周围注射鸡尾酒镇痛混合剂,常规放置引流管,逐层缝合,弹力绷带包扎固定。术后24 h内预防性应用抗生素,术后1~2 d拔除引流管,术后常规给予抗凝、镇痛等对症治疗,麻醉结束后主动进行股四头肌训练和踝泵练习。记录患者的手术时间及住院时间;记录患者术后1、3、6、12、24、36个月患膝并发症发生情况;分别于术前及末次随访时,收集并比较患者的膝关节功能情况[特种外科医院(HSS)评分、膝关节协会评分(KSS)、膝关节活动度];测量并比较患者术前及末次随访时下肢力线情况[膝关节股胫角、胫骨内髁后倾角及胫骨平台角];比较2种假体患者末次随访时的膝关节功能情况及下肢力线情况。数据比较采用t检验。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术,手术切口均Ⅰ期愈合。32例患者的手术时间为35.0~70.0 min,平均手术时间(45.5±6.9) min;住院时间5.0~8.0 d,平均6.5 d。32例患者中,1例双柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换患者于术后1个月出现半月板垫片脱位,予以翻修后好转;1例行单柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换后,于术后24个月出现下肢力线改变和假体松动,翻修为全膝关节置换术后好转。其他患者均无血管神经损伤、围手术期感染、假体松动、半月板垫片脱位、下肢深静脉血栓形成等相关并发症发生。末次随访时患者膝关节HSS评分、KSS和膝关节活动度分别为(85.6±4.4)分、(88.4±5.2)分、(108.8±8.2)°,均显著高于术前[(66.8±5.2)分、(61.3±9.8)分、(97.5±7.6)°],比较差异均有统计学意义(t=15.61、13.81、5.71,P<0.05);末次随访时患者膝关节股胫角、胫骨平台角分别为(174.4±5.6)°、(84.6±3.6)°,均显著低于术前[(179.5±3.8)°、(88.1±2.0)°],比较差异均有统计学意义(t=4.26、4.80,P<0.05);膝关节胫骨内髁后倾角末次随访时为(82.8±3.4)°,较术前[(84.2±3.9)°]差异无统计学意义(t=1.53,P=0.131)。末次随访时,单柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换患者HSS评分、KSS、膝关节活动度、股胫角、胫骨内髁后倾角、胫骨平台角分别为(84.8±4.2)分、(89.2±6.0)分、(107.6±9.0)°、(175.8±6.0)°、(82.0±4.1)°、(83.8±3.2)°,与双柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换患者[(86.3±4.6)分、(87.8±4.5)分、(109.8±7.9)°、(173.4±5.4)°、(83.5±3.6)°、(85.3±4.0)°]比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

活动型牛津膝单髁置换在SONK患者的治疗中取得满意效果,并发症发生少,能明显改善患膝功能和部分纠正下肢力线,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To explore the application value of movable Oxford unicondylar knee replacement in the treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK).

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients (32 knees) with SONK admitted to the Department of Orthopedics, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicinel from January 2015 to August 2022, including 14 patients with single-column movable Oxford knee unicondyle, 18 cases of double-column movable Oxford knee unicondyle. During the operation, after successful anesthesia, the patient was placed in the supine position, bent the knee 90° to take the approach from the medial side of the patella to the medial side of the tibial tubercle, thoroughly removed the necrotic tissue of the medial femoral condyle, and selected the osteotomy depth according to the integrity and strength of the sclerotic bone around the lesion. Small defects should be filled with bone cement, and large defects should be filled with small bone fragments made from cleared osteophytes. The Oxford knee prosthesis with single/double column and double column movement was installed. The range of motion and stability of the knee joint were re-checked, hemostasis was thoroughly stopped, the incision was fully rinsed, the cocktail analgesic mixture was inject around the joint, the drainage tube was routinely placed, layer by layer suture, and elastic bandage was used for fixation. Antibiotics were used prophylactically within 24 h after surgery, drainage tube was removed 1-2 d after surgery, and symptomatic treatment such as anticoagulation and analgesia were routinely given after surgery. After anesthesia, quadriceps muscle training and ankle pump exercises were actively performed. The operation time and postoperative hospitalization time of patients were record; the incidence of knee complications was recorded 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after operation; the knee function [hospital for special surgery (HSS) score, knee society score (KSS) , knee range of motion] were collected and compared before surgery and at the last follow-up; the alignment of lower limbs [the femorotibial angle of knee joint, posterior tibial slope and tibial plateau angle] were measured and compared before surgery and at the last follow-up; the knee function and the alignment of lower limbs of patients with two prostheses were compared at the last follow-up. Data were compared by t test.

Results

All the patients successfully completed the operation, and all the surgical incisions healed in stage Ⅰ. The operation time of 32 patients was 35.0-70.0 min, and the average operation time was (45.5 ± 6.9) min; the hospital stay ranged of patients was 5.0 -8.0 days, with an average of 6.5 days. Among the 32 patients, 1 patient with double-column movable oxford knee unicondylar replacement had a dislocation of meniscus pad one month after the operation, which was improved after revision; 1 patient underwent single-column movable oxford knee single condyle replacement, and the lower limb force line changes and prosthesis loosening occurred 24 months after the operation, the revision was improved after total knee replacement. Other patients had no serious complications such as vascular and nerve injury, perioperative infection, prosthesis loosening, meniscus pad dislocation, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. At the last follow-up, HSS score, KSS and knee range of motion were (85.6±4.4) points, (88.4±5.2) points and (108.8±8.2)°, respectively, which were significantly higher than those before surgery [(66.8±5.2) points, (61.3±9.8) points, (97.5±7.6)°], the differences were statistically significant (t=15.61, 13.81, 5.71; P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the knee femorotibial angle and tibial plateau angle were (174.4±5.6)° and (84.6±3.6)°, respectively, which were significantly lower than those before surgery [(179.5±3.8)°, (88.1±2.0)°], the differences were statistically significant (t=4.26, 4.80; P<0.05); the posterior tibial slope of tibial medial condyle of knee was (82.8±3.4)° at the last follow-up, which showed no statistically significant difference compared with that before surgery [(84.2±3.9)°](t=1.53, P=0.131). At the last follow-up, the HSS score, KSS, knee range of motion, femorotibial angle, posterior tibial slope, and tibial plateau angle of single column movable Oxford knee unicondylar replacement patients were (84.8±4.2) points, (89.2±6.0) points, (107.6±9.0)°, (175.8±6.0)°, (82.0±4.1)°, (83.8±3.2)°, respectively, compared with thedouble column movable Oxford knee unicondylar replacement patients [(86.3±4.6) points, (87.8±4.5) points, (109.8±7.9)°, (173.4±5.4)°, (83.5±3.6)°, (85.3±4.0)°], there were no statistically significant differences (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The movable Oxford unicondylar replacement of knee has achieved satisfactory results in the treatment of patients with SONK, with fewer complications and can significantly improve the function of the affected knee and partially correct the alignment of lower limbs, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

表1 不同观察时间SONK患者膝关节功能情况及下肢力线情况(±s)
表2 末次随访时2种假体置换类型SONK患者膝关节功能情况及下肢力线情况(±s)
图1 单柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换术治疗左膝SONK患者。A示患膝关节磁共振成像示矢状位及冠状位坏死灶超出负重区2/3;B示患膝关节磁共振成像示矢状位病变占比42%;C示患膝关节磁共振成像示冠状位压脂像见内侧髁负重区"新月形"软骨下病变;D示患膝磁共振成像示水平位去压脂像内侧髁负重区广泛骨质水肿;E、F示单柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换术后X线正位片和侧位片效果图,单柱位于内侧髁负重区;SONK为膝关节自发性骨坏死
图2 双柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换术治疗左膝SONK患者。A、B示门诊检查患膝X线正位片和侧位片显示骨坏死病灶不明显,被误诊为膝骨关节炎;C、D、E示患膝关节磁共振成像示冠状位、矢状位及水平位显示内侧髁2.5 cm×3.0 cm×2.0 cm骨质破坏伴骨髓水肿区;F示患膝关节磁共振成像示冠状位T2加权及压脂前后显影效果图,可直观病灶坏死区;G、H示双柱活动型牛津膝单髁置换术后效果图,双柱位于内侧髁负重区具有更好的抗旋转和抗松动,稳定性更佳;SONK为膝关节自发性骨坏死
[1]
Ahlbäck S, Bauer GC, Bohne WH. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1968, 11(6): 705-733.
[2]
Karim AR, Cherian JJ, Jauregui JJ, et al. Osteonecrosis of the knee: review[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2015, 3(6): 6.
[3]
Wilmot AS, Ruutiainen AT, Bakhru PT, et al. Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee: A recognizable associated soft tissue edema pattern and a similar distribution among men and women[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(11): 2096-2103.
[4]
Filip AM, Van den Broeck SB. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK)[J]. JBR-BTR, 2014, 97(4): 268.
[5]
卢明峰,李泽晖,朱东平,等. 单髁置换术治疗膝关节自发性骨坏死的近期疗效研究[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 477-483.
[6]
薛华明,蔡珉巍,涂意辉,等. 膝关节外侧间室单髁置换术临床应用进展[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(3): 77-79.
[7]
Jauregui JJ, Blum CL, Sardesai N, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: A metaanalysis[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2018, 26(2): 2309499018770925.
[8]
Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamiltom TW, et al. Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review[J]. Acta Orthopaedica, 2018, 89(1): 101-107.
[9]
Koshino T. The treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee by high tibial osteotomy with and without bone-grafting or drilling of the lesion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982, 64(1): 47-58.
[10]
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1976, 58(6): 754-765.
[11]
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989(248): 13-14.
[12]
Marcacci M, Andriolo L, Kon E, et al. Aetiology and pathogenesis of bone marrow lesions and osteonecrosis of the knee[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2017, 1(5): 219-224.
[13]
Uchio Y, Ochi M, Adachi N, et al. Intraosseous hypertension and venous congestion in osteonecrosis of the knee[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001(384): 217-223.
[14]
Lecouvet FE, Malghem J, Maldague BE, et al. MR imaging of epiphyseal lesions of the knee: current concepts, challenges, and controversies[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2005, 43(4): 655-672.
[15]
Akamatsu Y, Mitsugi N, Hayashi T, et al. Lowboneminerl density is associated wish the onset of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee[J]. Acta Orthop, 2012, 83(3): 249-255.
[16]
Pareek A, Parkes CW, Bernard C, et al. Spont aneousosteonerosis/subchondralin sufficiency fracttures of the knee: high rates of conversion to surgical treatment and arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Surg Am, 2020, 102(9): 821-829.
[17]
Meier C, Kraenzlin C, Friederich NF, et al. Effect of ibandronate on spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlledtrial[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2014, 25(1): 359-366.
[18]
Deie M, Ochi M, Adachi N, et al. Artificial bone grafting [calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic with an interconnected porous structure (IP-CHA)]and core decompression for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle in the knee[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(8): 753-758.
[19]
Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, et al. Mosaic Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation Versus Bone Marrow Stimulation Technique as a Concomitant Procedure With Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Medial Femoral Condyle[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(1): 233-240.
[20]
Aglietti P, Insall JN, Buzzi R, et al. Idiopathic osteonecrosis of the knee. Aetiology,prognosis and treatment[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1983, 65(5): 588-597.
[21]
McKeever DC. Early treatment of injuries to the knee joint[J]. Med Rec Ann, 1946, 40: 1382.
[22]
王鸿宇,王妍,杨瑞祥,等. 微创第三代牛津单髁置换术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节病的远期效果随访[J]. 中华外科杂志2022, 60(7): 703-708.
[23]
Van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, et al. Early functional outcome after lateral UKA is sensitive to postoperative lower limb alignment[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 687-693.
[24]
Staats K, Merle C, Schmidt-Braekling T, et al. Is the revision of a primary TKA really as easy and safe as the revision of a primary UKA?[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016, 4(24): 532.
[25]
Yoon C, Chang MJ, Chang CB, et al. Does unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have worse outcomes in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee than in medial compartment osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2019, 139(3): 393-403.
[26]
Fukuoka S, Fukunaga K, Taniura K, et al. Medium-term clinical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee with four to 15 years of follow-up[J]. Knee, 2019, 26(5): 1111-1116.
[27]
Chalmers BP, Mehrotra KG, Sierra RJ, et al. Reliable outcomes and survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for isolated compartment osteonecrosis[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-B(4): 450-454.
[28]
杨伟铭,曹学伟. 膝关节自发性骨坏死的研究进展[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志2017, 25(2): 79-82.
[29]
Sibilska A, Góralczyk A, Hermanowicz K, et al. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: what do we know so far? A literature review[J]. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(6): 1063-1069.
[30]
郭万首,张启栋,刘朝晖,等. 膝关节单髁置换术治疗晚期膝关节自发性骨坏死[J]. 中华骨科杂志2014, 34(6): 631-637.
[31]
叶培,董志兴,王立晖,等. 全膝关节置换术治疗晚期膝关节自发性骨坏死[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志2021, 36(8): 837-839.
[32]
胡德庆,黄子达,张文明,等. 单髁关节置换治疗膝关节自发性骨坏死的疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志2019, 33(1): 13-17.
[33]
Guo WS, Zhang QD, Liu ZH, et al. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee[J]. Orthop Surg, 2015, 7(2): 119-124.
[34]
姜学明,熊昌军,左云周,等. 单髁置换术治疗膝关节自发性骨坏死的短期疗效分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志2020, 35(10): 1079-1081.
[1] 樊绪国, 赵永刚, 杨砚伟. 腓骨在膝骨关节炎作用的研究观点[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 855-859.
[2] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[3] 梁家敏, 黄子荣, 崔家鸣, 钟名金, 冯文哲, 陈康, 胡艳, 欧阳侃, 杨雷, 王大平, 王满宜, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带保留残端重建促进膝关节功能的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 708-714.
[4] 李锐颖, 危望, 王达志, 时志斌. 深度学习技术在膝关节疾病中的研究现状与展望[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 722-725.
[5] 赵之栋, 李众利. 骨关节炎早期诊治的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 689-693.
[6] 王岩, 马剑雄, 郎爽, 董本超, 田爱现, 李岩, 孙磊, 靳洪震, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 马信龙. 外泌体在骨质疏松症诊疗中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 673-678.
[7] 方心俞, 黄昌瑜, 胡洪新, 林溢铭, 陈旸, 张楠心, 张文明. 膝关节软骨下不全骨折的治疗选择与疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 583-587.
[8] 郭璐琦, 赵雅琦, 李霁欣, 周兰, 林金鹏, 张子砚, 李俊杰, 王少白. 免荷矫形器对膝骨关节炎的生物力学影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 560-565.
[9] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[10] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[11] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[12] 周晓强, 孙超, 虞宵, 金宇杰, 李志强, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 同一患者同期行全膝和单髁置换术的早期临床疗效[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 275-281.
[13] 张子砚, 曾红, 许苑晶, 郭璐琦, 王金武, 王少白, 任富超, 缪伟强, 戴尅戎, 王茹. 膝关节生物力学标志物预测膝关节炎研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 315-320.
[14] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15] 刘新光, 杨滨, 刘晨, 王晓华, 张克. 股骨前皮质切割在前、后参考系统全膝关节置换术中发生的对比研究及锯片摆动偏差分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 507-512.
阅读次数
全文


摘要