切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 204 -207. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.03.004

淋巴水肿

基于多学科协作的预防性淋巴管-静脉吻合术在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫患者中的应用
蒙燕1, 唐如冰1, 蒋奕1, 陆华1, 苏玉兰1, 张琼1, 何英煜1,†()   
  1. 1. 530021　南宁，广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-18 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 何英煜

Application of preventive lymphaticovenular anastomosis in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node dissection based on multidisciplinary collabration

Yan Meng1, Rubing Tang1, Yi Jiang1, Hua Lu1, Yulan Su1, Qiong Zhang1, Yingyu He1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China
  • Received:2024-03-18 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yingyu He
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

蒙燕, 唐如冰, 蒋奕, 陆华, 苏玉兰, 张琼, 何英煜. 基于多学科协作的预防性淋巴管-静脉吻合术在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫患者中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 204-207.

Yan Meng, Rubing Tang, Yi Jiang, Hua Lu, Yulan Su, Qiong Zhang, Yingyu He. Application of preventive lymphaticovenular anastomosis in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node dissection based on multidisciplinary collabration[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(03): 204-207.

目的

观察多学科协作模式下行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)同期预防性淋巴管-静脉吻合术(LVA)对乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿及生存质量的影响。

方法

选择2022年8月至2023年7月广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科收治的行ALND同期预防性LVA乳腺癌患者17例，通过建立多学科团队，实施术前多学科会诊、辅助患者决策、术后康复指导、"互联网＋"管理的医疗模式。对患者上肢周径实施监测，并采用中文版世界卫生组织生存质量量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)评估患者术后生存质量。

结果

随访9.60～19.30(12.74±2.51)个月。术前双上肢周径差值0.50(0.03, 0.88)cm，末次随访时双上肢周径差值0.50(0.13, 1.00)cm，17例患者行ALND术后均未出现肢体淋巴水肿，肩关节功能恢复良好。末次随访时患者生存质量生理领域得分为(15.40±2.37)分，心理领域得分为(16.64±2.19)分，社会关系领域得分为(14.80±2.66)分，环境领域得分为(15.43±2.12)分，心理领域得分最高。

结论

多学科协作模式下实施预防性LVA，可增加乳腺癌患者的治疗决策参与度，减少术后淋巴水肿的发生，提高患者生存质量。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 淋巴管-静脉吻合术, 淋巴水肿, 预防性治疗, 多学科协作
Objective

To observe the effect of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and preventive lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) on postoperative upper limb lymphedema and quality of life in patients with breast cancer based on the multidisciplinary callabration model.

Methods

A total of 17 patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND and preventive LVA admitted to the Department of Breast Surgery of Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from August 2022 to July 2023 were entrolled. By establishing a multidisciplinary team, the medical model of preoperative multi-disciplinary treatment, assisting patient decision-making, postoperative rehabilitation guidance, and internet plus management were implemented. Monitored the circumference of the upper limbs and evaluated the postoperative quality of life using the Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF.

Results

The follow-up time was 9.60-19.30 (12.74±2.51) months.The difference in the circumference of upper limbs was 0.50 (0.03, 0.88)cm before surgery and 0.50 (0.13, 1.00)cm at the last follow-up, no limb lymphedema occured after operation. At the last follow-up, the patient′s quality of life score was 15.40±2.37, 16.64±2.19, 14.80±2.66 and 15.43±2.12 in the physiological, psychological, social relations and environmental fields, respectively, and the highest scores was in the psychological fields.

Conclusion

Preventive LVA under the multidisciplinary callabration model can increase the participation of breast cancer patients in treatment decision-making, reduce the occurrence of postoperative lymphedema and improve the quality of life of patients.

Key words: Breast cancer, Lymphaticovenular anastomosis, Lymphedema, Preventative healing approach, Multidisciplinary collaboration
[1]
Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2013, 310(14): 1455-1461.
[2]
Donker M, Van Tienhoven G, Straver M, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(12): 1303-1310.
[3]
Galimberti V, Cole B, Viale G, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(10): 1385-1393.
[4]
Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(10): 927-933.
[5]
Mclaughlin S, Brunelle C, Taghian A. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, screening, management, and the impact of locoregional treatment[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(20): 2341-2350.
[6]
蒋奕，廖晓明，唐玮，等. 套入式淋巴管静脉吻合在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术同期预防性淋巴水肿手术中的应用1例并文献复习[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志，2022, 14(2): 212-215.
[7]
Boccardo F, Casabona F, Friedman D, et al. Surgical prevention of arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(9): 2500-2505.
[8]
Feldman S, Bansil H, Ascherman J, et al. Single institution experience with lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(10): 3296-3301.
[9]
程舸畅，唐举玉. 妇科恶性肿瘤根治术后下肢淋巴水肿的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华显微外科杂志，2022, 45(2): 230-235.
[10]
中华护理学会. 乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿预防和护理[EB/OL].(2021-03-13) [2024-03-20].

URL    
[11]
何英煜，蒙燕，李繁荣，等. 腹股沟薄层血管化淋巴结皮瓣移植术治疗乳腺癌术后Ⅲ期上肢淋巴水肿的护理[J]. 中国临床护理，2023, 15(8): 484-487.
[12]
田子睿，姚敏，王拥军，等. 中文版Constant-Murley肩关节评分量表的研制与应用[J]. 中医正骨，2019，31(5)：20-21.
[13]
方积乾，万崇华，史明丽，等. 生存质量研究概况与测定量表[J]. 现代康复，2000, 4(8): 1123-1126，1133.
[14]
Shen A, Qiang W, Zhang L, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema: an umbrella review[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(1): 284-302.
[15]
Braude L, Kirsten L, Gilchrist J, et al. A systematic review of women′s satisfaction and regret following risk-reducing mastectomy[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2017, 100(12): 2182-2189.
[16]
Mcduff S, Mina A, Brunelle C, et al. Timing of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: when are patients most at risk？[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2019, 103(1): 62-70.
[17]
郝元涛，方积乾，李彩霞，等. 世界卫生组织生命质量量表及其中文版 [J]. 国外医学(社会医学分册), 1999(3): 118-122.
[18]
刘英，李群，吕大鹏，等．有氧运动联合康复护理干预在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的应用效果[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)，2021，16(2)：170-174.
[1] 蔡林利, 宋宏萍, 巨艳, 党晓智, 韩铭, 肖迎聪. 超声结合临床病理指标模型对T1-2期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(02): 143-150.
[2] 邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文. 术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 849-853.
[3] 广东省医学会乳腺病学分会(广东省医学会乳腺病学分会青年委员会), 长江学术带乳腺联盟, 重庆市医学会乳腺病分会, 广东省预防医学会乳腺癌防治专业委员会. 三阴性乳腺癌新辅助铂类应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-10.
[4] 王季, 王淑婷, 肖聪慧, 廖鑫, 严鹭慧, 徐姗姗, 邓呈亮, 王玉龙. 采用综合消肿疗法联合淋巴管-静脉吻合术治疗继发性淋巴水肿的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 198-203.
[5] 周煦川, 马戈甲, 苏学峰, 王文飞, 秦傲霜, 刘宾. 规范化综合消肿治疗在亚临床期下肢淋巴水肿中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 192-197.
[6] 邓呈亮, 陈君哲, 章一新. 继发性肢体淋巴水肿的外科整合治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 185-191.
[7] 曹彤瑜, 沈余明. 乳癌术后放疗致胸壁放射性溃疡创面的重建流程[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 184-184.
[8] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[9] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[10] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[11] 牟鳄贤, 李卓璇, 董浩, 于淼, 纪娟, 徐佳, 王浩, 刘世伟. 初始腋窝淋巴结转移乳腺癌新辅助治疗后腋窝病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1027-1032.
[12] 薛文欣, 常婉英, 肖瑶, 张盼盼, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺恶性非肿块型病变列线图预测模型的构建及外部验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1045-1050.
[13] 李越, 周祺祺, 赵洪猛. 初诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1097-1101.
[14] 赵莉, 张敏伟, 于海侠, 张宇萌, 丰金岭, 李德春. 组织标记夹置入在评估乳腺癌术前新辅助化疗疗效中的应用价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 166-170.
[15] 朱文静, 寇惠娟, 倪雅娟, 邓捷, 林琳, 胡筱筠. MDT联合CBL-PBL教学模式及形成性评价在心内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 120-124.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号