切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (04) : 259 -265. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2026.04.004

皮瓣移植与修复重建

基于机器学习与计算机视觉技术的皮瓣移植术后血运监测模型的构建及验证
芦铭1,2, 刘波3, 钱真4, 王瑶4, 张艾捷3, 王充2, 李斌3, 栗鹏程3, 曹建华3, 吕柏蓉3, 李孟然3, 单祎宁3, 金彤雯3, 王广志1,()   
  1. 1 100084 北京,清华大学生物医学工程学院
    2 100035 首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院医学工程部
    3 100035 首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院手外科
    4 200232 上海联影智能科技有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-06 出版日期:2026-08-01
  • 通信作者: 王广志
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理中心临床医学发展专项(YGLX202314)

Development and validation of a model for blood perfusion monitoring after flap transplantation based on machine learning and computer vision technology

Ming Lu1,2, Bo Liu3, Zhen Qian4, Yao Wang4, Aijie Zhang3, Chong Wang2, Bin Li3, Pengcheng Li3, Jianhua Cao3, Borong Lyu3, Mengran Li3, Yining Shan3, Tongwen Jin3, Guangzhi Wang1,()   

  1. 1 School of Biomedical Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
    2 Department of Medical Engineering,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100035,China
    3 Department of Hand Surgery,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100035,China
    4 United Imaging Intelligence Co Ltd,Shanghai 200232,China
  • Received:2026-01-06 Published:2026-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Guangzhi Wang
引用本文:

芦铭, 刘波, 钱真, 王瑶, 张艾捷, 王充, 李斌, 栗鹏程, 曹建华, 吕柏蓉, 李孟然, 单祎宁, 金彤雯, 王广志. 基于机器学习与计算机视觉技术的皮瓣移植术后血运监测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 259-265.

Ming Lu, Bo Liu, Zhen Qian, Yao Wang, Aijie Zhang, Chong Wang, Bin Li, Pengcheng Li, Jianhua Cao, Borong Lyu, Mengran Li, Yining Shan, Tongwen Jin, Guangzhi Wang. Development and validation of a model for blood perfusion monitoring after flap transplantation based on machine learning and computer vision technology[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2026, 21(04): 259-265.

目的

构建基于机器学习与计算机视觉技术的非接触式精准监测系统,以实现对皮瓣血运状态的连续、客观评估及血管危象的早期预警。

方法

纳入2024年3月至2025年4月首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院手外科接受游离皮瓣移植手术患者84例,录制术后72 h皮瓣移植区域视频,构建包含580个视频的数据集,以8∶2的比例划分为训练集和测试集。采用Mask R-CNN模型实现皮瓣区域自动分割与追踪,提取颜色、纹理及远程光电容积脉搏波信号等8项特征,并基于集成学习算法构建风险预警模型,同时与传统人工监测进行对照验证。

结果

该系统在测试集中表现出较高的分割精度,交并比(IoU)为0.75时,平均精度达1.000;分类模型准确率达0.851±0.085。对于测试集中2例发生血管危象患者,模型预警时间均早于传统人工监测。

结论

本研究构建的人工智能监测系统可初步实现皮瓣血运的无创、连续、精准监测,提升预警时效性与临床实用性,具有降低皮瓣坏死风险、改善术后管理质量的潜力。

Objective

To develop a non-contact precision monitoring system based on machine learning and computer vision technology,enabling continuous and objective assessment of flap perfusion status and early warning of vascular crisis.

Methods

From March 2024 to April 2025,84 patients who underwent free flap transplantation in the Department of Hand Surgery at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital,Capital Medical University were enrolled. Videos of the flap transplanted areas were recorded during the first 72 hours postoperatively. A dataset comprising 580 videos was constructed and randomly divided into training set and test set at a ratio of 8∶2. The Mask R-CNN model was employed for automatic flap segmentation and tracking. Eight features,including color,texture,and photoplethysmographic signals,were extracted,and a risk warning model was established based on ensemble learning algorithms. The system's performance was compared with conventional manual monitoring for validation.

Results

The system demonstrated high segmentation accuracy on the test set, the average precision reached 1.000 at an intersection over union of 0.75,and the classification model achieved an accuracy of 0.851±0.085. For the two patients who developed vascular crisis in the test set,the model provided earlier warnings than conventional manual monitoring in all cases.

Conclusion

The artificial intelligence–based monitoring system constructed in this study enables non-invasive,continuous,and precise assessment of flap perfusion,enhances warning timeliness and clinical practicality,and holds potential for reducing the risk of flap necrosis and improving the quality of postoperative management.

图1 皮瓣移植区域视频数据获取。A示粘贴标准比色卡; B示摆放手机拍摄位置;C示手机拍摄方法示意
图2 采用Mask R-CNN模型对皮瓣区域进行自动检测与分割
表1 基于机器学习的皮瓣特征提取信息
图3 基于机器学习的皮瓣移植术后血管阻塞风险预警模型构建
图4 皮瓣移植患者术后血运监测。A示静脉阻塞患者;B示动脉阻塞患者
[1]
Lese IBiedermann RConstantinescu M,et al. Predicting risk factors that lead to free flap failure and vascular compromise: a single unit experience with 565 free tissue transfers[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg202174(3): 512-522. DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.126.
[2]
Yang JJLiang YWang XH,et al. Prediction of vascular complications in free flap reconstruction with machine learning[J]. Am J Transl Res202416(3): 817-828. DOI:10.62347/ZXJV8062.
[3]
Hu TYan TChen J,et al. Research progress in flap temperature monitoring technologies and applications after transplantation[J]. APL Bioeng202610(2): 021503. DOI:10.1063/5.0314573.
[4]
Sun PZhao MTang H. Risk factors for postoperative vascular crisis in squamous cell carcinoma reconstruction using supraclavicular artery flaps[J]. Am J Cancer Res202515(6): 2855-2871. DOI:10.62347/ZHMS1734.
[5]
Shen AYLonie SLim K,et al. Free flap monitoring,salvage,and failure timing: a systematic review[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg202137(3): 300-308. DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1722182.
[6]
He KGkioxari GDollar P,et al. Mask R-CNN[J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell202042(2): 386-397. DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2844175.
[7]
刘佳, 唐鋆磊, 林冰, 等. 基于HSV(色相-饱和度-明度)与形状特征的涂层锈点图像识别[J]. 中国表面工程, 2023, 36(4): 217-228. DOI: 10.11933/j.issn.1007-9289.20221008001.
[8]
Chiu CHKe SWTsai CF,et al. Deep learning based decision tree ensembles for incomplete medical datasets[J]. Technol Health Care202432(1): 75-87. DOI:10.3233/THC-220514.
[9]
Zhou ZYu LMeng F,et al. Study on blood circulation monitoring after the tissue transfer of ultrathin or conventional anterolateral thigh flaps[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open202412(11): e6337. DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006337.
[10]
Chang TYLee YCLin YC,et al. Implantable doppler probes for postoperatively monitoring free flaps: efficacy. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open20164(11): e1099. DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099.
[11]
Kohlert SQuimby AESaman M,et al. Postoperative free-flap monitoring techniques[J]. Semin Plast Surg201933(1): 13-16. DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1722182.
[12]
Setälä LKoskenvuori HGudaviciene D,et al. Cost analysis of 109 microsurgical reconstructions and flap monitoring with microdialysis[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg200925(9): 521-526. DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1238218.
[13]
Kang D. Nurse-led microsurgical free flap monitoring: a scoping review and evidence-based framework[J]. Healthcare (Basel)202513(21): 2703. DOI:10.3390/healthcare13212703.
[14]
Huang YTang YWu J,et al. Automatic detection and segmentation of tooth cracks based on improved Mask R-CNN[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform202630(1): 473-486. DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2025.3582650.
[15]
Van Putten LDAhmed AWegerif S. Remote photoplethysmography for contactless pulse rate monitoring: algorithm development and accuracy assessment[J]. Physiol Meas202546(11): 115004. DOI:10.1088/1361-6579/ae1804.
[16]
朱永佳,闭香连,杨振水,等. 断指再植术后患者发生血管危象的影响因素及其预测效能[J]. 微创医学202520(3):284-290. DOI: 10.11864/j.issn.1673.2025.03.07.
[17]
臧玮娜,杨福强,龙黎,等. 综合干预对断指再植患者围手术期血管危象的预防价值[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志202511(7):904-907. DOI:10.19418/j.cnki.issn2096-0646.2025.07.08.
[18]
Jacobson ACohen O. Review of flap monitoring technology in 2020[J]. Facial Plast Surg202036(6): 722-726. DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1721105.
[1] 周文考, 袁丽, 任晓媛, 谢强, 苏力德, 闫敏, 陈智浩, 黄灵炎. 基于随机森林与LASSO回归的急性心肌梗死PCI术后3年不良事件预测模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 122-130.
[2] 李东晖. 重症烧伤患者多重耐药菌感染风险的机器学习预测模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 368-377.
[3] 吕思怡, 王琰琪, 仇珺, 陈宇江, 高洁. 人工智能图像处理技术在口腔医学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 40-46.
[4] 徐宏博, 胡玉良, 魏雪栋, 金李晨, 武克风, 陈逸伦, 陆兵, 周守军, 侯建全. 基于临床和CT影像组学特征的机器学习模型对经皮肾镜术后脓毒症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 297-306.
[5] 黄楚曦, 吴卓. 人工智能在膀胱癌影像中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 241-247.
[6] 柯雨仙, 刘罡, 郭莹莹, 何李谦, 姜轶. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期并发呼吸衰竭风险预测模型研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 500-503.
[7] 宋佳耕, 袁文翰, 郑莹. 人工智能在妇科微创手术中的应用与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 60-64.
[8] 王小振, 陈灿辉, 唐善华, 代浩嘉, 丰扬舸, 王恺, 李清平, 李川江. 基于不同机器学习技术构建肝移植术后早期严重并发症预测模型和效能比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 197-204.
[9] 邢颖, 王峰. 基于机器学习构建肝切除术后肝衰竭预测列线图模型及其预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 190-196.
[10] 戴宗伯, 张城硕, 郭庭维, 何知远, 赵昊宇, 张宇慈, 张佳林. 基于MRI影像组学机器学习构建肝细胞癌微血管侵犯预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 36-44.
[11] 黄霞, 张和平, 何永成. 机器学习驱动的IgA肾病精准治疗:疗效评估、预后预测及临床转化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 166-169.
[12] 马凯蒂, 哈团结. 基于机器学习的糖尿病肾脏病患者疲乏状态诊断预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 144-150.
[13] 刘娜, 盛华, 高超. 机械通气与急性肾损伤:从机制到临床实践[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 345-350.
[14] 储丹丹, 何培, 万浩宇, 虎子单, 闻玉婷, 王佳, 匡野, 金腾川, 冯磊. 基于循证医学和机器学习的自身免疫性疾病检测项目组合新策略构建[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 166-173.
[15] 梁怡凡, 牟婧宇, 吴雅婷, 邳靖陶, 陈乐, 武剑. 不同人工智能模型预测脑卒中不良预后诊断效能的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 308-319.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?