切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 523 -527. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.06.013

论著

多种植物油组分预防肿瘤放化疗相关毒性反应的效果分析
江泽莹, 王安婷, 王姣丽, 陈慈, 周秋玲, 黄燕娟, 周芳, 薛琰, 周剑烽, 谭文勇(), 杜美芳()   
  1. 510086 南方医科大学深圳医院肿瘤科
    518108 深圳市宝安区石岩人民医院肿瘤科
    518101 深圳市宝安区人民医院肿瘤科
    518101 深圳市宝安区人民医院肿瘤科;518101 深圳市宝安区人民医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-21 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 谭文勇, 杜美芳
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81974462); 南方医科大学深圳医院临床研究启动计划(LCJH202003)

Effect of multiple plant oils combination in preventing the chemoradiotherapy induced toxicities

Zeying Jiang, Anting Wang, Jiaoli Wang, Ci Chen, Qiuling Zhou, Yanjuan Huang, Fang Zhou, Yan Xue, Jianfeng Zhou, Wenyong Tan(), Meifang Du()   

  1. Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southen Medical University, Shenzhen 510086, China
    Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Baoan Shiyan People′s Hospital, Shenzhen 518108, China
    Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Baoan People′s Hospital, Shenzhen 518101, China
    Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Baoan People′s Hospital, Shenzhen 518101, China; Department of Nursing, Shenzhen Baoan People′s Hospital, Shenzhen 518101, China
  • Received:2023-07-21 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenyong Tan, Meifang Du
引用本文:

江泽莹, 王安婷, 王姣丽, 陈慈, 周秋玲, 黄燕娟, 周芳, 薛琰, 周剑烽, 谭文勇, 杜美芳. 多种植物油组分预防肿瘤放化疗相关毒性反应的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 523-527.

Zeying Jiang, Anting Wang, Jiaoli Wang, Ci Chen, Qiuling Zhou, Yanjuan Huang, Fang Zhou, Yan Xue, Jianfeng Zhou, Wenyong Tan, Meifang Du. Effect of multiple plant oils combination in preventing the chemoradiotherapy induced toxicities[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(06): 523-527.

目的

初步探讨多种植物油组分对肿瘤放化疗相关的皮肤黏膜毒性反应的预防效果。

方法

2022年7月至2023年6月南方医科大学深圳医院肿瘤科收治的患者(108例),观察其用3~5种不同植物油组合预防肿瘤放化疗相关的毒性反应(放射性皮炎、口腔黏膜炎、手足综合征)。34例患者接受预防性植物油护理(预防组),74例未接受植物油预防性护理(非预防组)。观察两组的放化疗相关性皮肤黏膜毒性反应的发生率,毒性反应评价采用常见不良反应评价标准(CTCAE 5.0),两组发生率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

108例患者主要为头颈部鳞癌、乳腺癌和胃肠道肿瘤。预防组和非预防组分别有64.7%和31.1%的患者接受根治性抗肿瘤治疗,44.1%和35.1%的患者接受单纯放疗,32.4%和43.2%的患者接受同步放化疗。应用复方植物油后肿瘤放化疗相关性皮肤黏膜毒性反应的发生率明显不同。预防组和非预防组的2~3级毒性反应发生率分别为35.3%和64.8%,0~1级的发生率分别为64.7%和35.2%(χ2=16.347,P=0.001)。在头颈部肿瘤中,预防组的2~3级放射性皮炎、口腔黏膜炎的发生率分别为33.4%和50.0%,其发生率分别降低60.6%和40.9%。在预防组和非预防组中,乳腺癌的放射性皮炎发生率分别为27.3%和66.7%,其2~3级急性放射性皮炎的发生率降低59.1%(χ2=5.038,P=0.025)。在胃肠道肿瘤患者中,手足综合征2~3级的发生率分别23.5%和45.2%,2~3级手足综合征的发生率降低47.9%(χ2=2.192,P=0.139)。

结论

多种植物油组合可有效用于肿瘤放化疗相关皮肤黏膜毒性反应的护理预防。

Objective

To explore the preliminary prevention effects of multiple plant oil combination on chemoradiotherapy induced mucosal toxicities.

Methods

From July 2022 to June 2023, 108 patients in Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southen Medical University used 3-5 plant oils to prevent the chemoradiotherapy toxicities including the oral mucositis (OM), radiation dermatitis (RD), hand-and-foot syndrome (HSF). 34 patients were recruited as preventing with multiple plant oils (prevention group, PG) and 74 patients were treated as routine practice (non-prevention group, NPG). Compared the incidence rates of OM, RD, and HFS that were evaluated with the criteria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0. And the Chi square was used to compare the statistical difference.

Results

108 patients had head and neck, breast, gastrointestinal cancer mainly. In PG and NPG, 64.7% and 31.1% received curative treatment respectively, 44.1% and 35.1% had radiotherapy alone, 32.4% and 43.2% did concurrent chemoradiotherapy respectively. The overall incidence rate of toxicities was statistically different. The grade 2-3 of toxicities was 35.3% and 64.8% and grade 0-1 were 64.7% and 35.2% in PG and NPG respectively (χ2=16.347, P=0.001). For patients with head and neck cancer, the rate of grade 2-3 of RD and OM were 33.4% and 50.0% respectively. The RD and OM rate decreased 60.6% and 40.9% respectively. For breast cancer, the RD rate were 27.3% and 66.7% in PG and NPG respectively and grade 2-3 RD rate decreased 59.1%(χ2=5.038, P=0.025). For gastrointestinal cancer, the grade 2-3 of HFS were 23.5% and 45.2% which decreased 47.9%(χ2=2.192, P=0.139).

Conclusion

The combination of multiple plant oils could be used to mitigate the severity of the chemoradiotherapy induced dermal and/or oral mucosal toxicities.

表1 108例肿瘤患者的临床特征[例(%)]
表2 两组毒性反应发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
[2]
Xia C, Dong X, Li H, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(5): 584-590.
[3]
Behroozian T, Bonomo P, Patel P, et al. Multinational association of supportive care in cancer (MASCC) clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis: international Delphi consensus-based recommendations[J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2023, 24(4): e172-e185.
[4]
杨易,张芊,张雅芝,等. 手足皮肤反应与手足综合征[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志2023, 52(2): 125-128.
[5]
席晨曦,强万敏,王书蕊,等. 化学治疗引起的手足综合征管理现状及研究进展[J]. 护理与康复2023, 22(5): 94-97; 94-97, 102.
[6]
Villa A, Sonis ST. Radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis: pharmacotherapies in recent and current clinical trials[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2023, 32(4): 301-310.
[7]
Das AP, Agarwal SM. Recent advances in the area of plant-based anti-cancer drug discovery using computational approaches[J]. Mol Divers, 2023: 1-25.
[8]
江泽莹,谭文勇,谭雅馨. 一种用于防治放化疗相关性皮肤黏膜损伤的组合物及其应用[P]. 2023108700951, 20230717.
[9]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0[S]. Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
[10]
彭琦,孙红玲,吴婉英,等. 肿瘤患者放射性皮炎评估工具与护理干预研究进展[J]. 中华全科医学2023, 21(5): 849-852.
[11]
吴晓月. 外用中药预防放射性皮肤损伤的临床研究[D]. 中国中医科学院,2022.
[12]
范铭,冯梅,袁双虎. 放射性皮炎的预防与治疗临床实践指南[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志2023, 30(6): 315-323.
[13]
张艳东,张艳俊,李腾飞. 植物精油的提取及其生理活性研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发2023, 44(9): 203-210.
[14]
陈建烟,李永裕,吴少华. 植物精油生物活性作用机理研究进展[J]. 天然产物研究与开发2012, 24(9): 1312-1318.
[15]
梁新丽,李秋香,黄小英,等. 植物精油抗肿瘤作用研究进展[J]. 中草药2022, 53(4): 1252-1263.
[16]
张辉,徐端妙,林秀君,等. 6种植物精油体外抗肿瘤活性研究[J]. 丽水学院学报2023, 45(2): 43-47.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[7] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[8] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[9] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[10] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[13] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[14] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[15] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?