切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 127 -133. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.02.006

论著

肩锁韧带缝线稳定联合锁骨钩钢板固定与袢钢板韧带全修复治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较
黄晓文1, 吕天润1, 左强1, 李翔1, 刘久翔1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院 江苏省人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-02 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘久翔

Comparation of clinical effect of acromioclavicular joint dislocation with suture stabilization technique of acromioclavicular ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation and total ligament repair technique with loop plates

Xiaowen Huang1, Tianrun Lv1, Qiang Zuo1, Xiang Li1, Jiuxiang Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2024-01-02 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiuxiang Liu
引用本文:

黄晓文, 吕天润, 左强, 李翔, 刘久翔. 肩锁韧带缝线稳定联合锁骨钩钢板固定与袢钢板韧带全修复治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 127-133.

Xiaowen Huang, Tianrun Lv, Qiang Zuo, Xiang Li, Jiuxiang Liu. Comparation of clinical effect of acromioclavicular joint dislocation with suture stabilization technique of acromioclavicular ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation and total ligament repair technique with loop plates[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(02): 127-133.

目的

对比肩锁韧带缝线稳定技术联合锁骨钩钢板固定和袢钢板韧带全修复技术治疗肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析于2022年1月至2023年6月南京医科大学第一附属医院骨科收治的肩锁关节脱位59例患者病历资料,分为缝线组和袢钢板组。缝线组31例患者,其中男20例,女11例;年龄(42.3±6.9)岁;运用缝线稳定技术行肩锁韧带修复并联合锁骨钩钢板固定进行治疗。袢钢板组28例患者,其中男18例,女10例;年龄(41.8±7.3)岁;运用韧带全修复理念,使用Endobutton袢钢板对喙锁韧带进行解剖学双束重建和肩锁韧带进行解剖学单束重建进行治疗。比较两组的手术一般情况、住院情况、并发症、复位情况、影像学参数和肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分等指标。

结果

入组患者均获得随访,随访时间6~15(平均9.6)个月。缝线组在手术时间、切口长度、术中出血、住院时间、住院费用等指标比较上明显优于袢钢板组(P<0.05)。缝线组在复位质量比较上明显优于袢钢板组(P<0.05)。在肩关节功能评分比较上,两组术前和术后6个月比较时差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但缝线组在取出内固定后的末次随访时Constant-Murley评分明显优于袢钢板组(P<0.05)。缝线、袢钢板两组在并发症和影像学参数比较上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

肩锁韧带缝线稳定技术联合锁骨钩钢板固定的治疗方法,将弹性固定和刚性固定相结合,提高了肩锁关节各方向稳定性,显著降低了肩锁关节周围的应力负荷,降低了手术并发症,有利于肩关节功能恢复,符合卫生经济学,建议在临床推广和使用。

Objective

To compare the clinical effect of suture stabilization technique of acromioclavicular ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation and total ligament repair technique with loop plates in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods

From January 2022 to June 2023, 59 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation according to inclusion-exclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Orthopedics Surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and were retrospectively analyzed as well as divided into stitches group and Endobutton group.31 cases were in stitches group, with an average age of 42.3±6.9 years old, including 20 males and 11 females, treated with suture stabilization technique of acromioclavicular ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation.28 cases were in Endobutton group, with an average age of 41.8±7.3 years old, including 18 males and 10 females, treated with total ligament repair technique with loop plates, to be specifically, by anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament and anatomical single-bundle reconstruction of acromioclavicular ligament with Endobutton loop plates.The general situation of operation, hospitalization situation, complications, reduction quality, imaging parameters and Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function were evaluated between the two groups.

Results

All patients were followed up for 6-15 months with average of 9.6 months.Compared with Endobutton group, stitches group had obvious advantages in operation time, incision length, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The reduction quality of stitches group was significantly better than that of Endobutton group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). On the comparison of shoulder joint function score, there were no significant statistical differences between the two groups before operation and 6 months post-operation(P>0.05), however the Constant-Murley score in stitches group was significantly better than that in Endobutton group at the last follow-up after removing internal fixation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in complications and imaging parameters between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

The suture stabilization technique of acromioclavicular ligament combined with clavicular hook plate fixation can improve the stability of acromioclavicular joint in all directions, significantly reduce the stress load around acromioclavicular joint and the surgical complications, benefit to the recovery of shoulder joint function and conform to health economics.This treatment method is suggested to be popularized and used in clinic.

表1 缝线组、袢钢板组两组患者基线资料比较
表2 缝线、袢钢板两组手术一般情况、住院情况和并发症的比较
表3 缝线、袢钢板两组肩锁关节复位情况、影像学参数的比较
表4 缝线、袢钢板两组肩关节功能和持续性肩胛骨区域疼痛的比较
图1 患者男,32岁。运动伤致肩锁关节脱位,运用缝线稳定技术行肩锁韧带修复联合锁骨钩钢板固定。A,B示用直径1.5 mm克氏针在肩峰处钻孔,用直径1.5 mm克氏针在锁骨远端钻孔;C示2号爱惜帮缝线分别穿过锁骨和肩峰的骨隧道;D示点式复位钳复位肩锁关节后收紧缝线打结,修复肩锁韧带并稳定肩锁关节;E示在低应力下置入锁骨钩钢板和螺钉;F示缝线稳定技术行肩锁韧带修复联合锁骨钩钢板固定;G,H示术前、术后X线片
图2 患者男,41岁。车祸伤致肩锁关节脱位,运用韧带全修复技术,使用Endobutton袢钢板行对喙锁韧带行解剖学双束重建联合肩锁韧带行解剖学单束重建。A示术前X线片显示肩锁关节脱位;B示术后X线片显示用6块Endobutton袢钢板行韧带全修复技术治疗
[1]
单志军,蔡卫华,江志俊. 带袢钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较研究[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2017(12):1601-1604.
[2]
Yan Y, Liao M, Lai H,et al.Comparison of effectiveness and safety in treating acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with five different surgical procedures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Orthop Surg, 202315(8):1944-1958.
[3]
陈东旭,李朝旭,王胜涛,等. 三种术式治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志202331(12):1075-1080.
[4]
李俊,牛和明,邓永,等. 锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗肩锁关节脱位术后肩峰下撞击综合征的影响因素分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志202338(11):1185-1188.
[5]
唐根林,郭曙光,陆奇峰,等. 钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位89例临床疗效分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 201434(10):1418-1421.
[6]
傅明辉,郑兴国,薛骋,等. 原止点解剖重建喙锁韧带与锁骨钩钢板固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志202343(14):951-958.
[7]
孙策勇,朱以明,张桂通,等. 小切口下无喙突骨隧道的喙锁间带袢钢板悬吊固定术治疗肩锁关节脱位的早期临床随访研究[J]. 中国运动医学杂志202342(2):118-122.
[8]
徐海波,薛骋,宋李军,等. 双束Endobutton解剖重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位的早期随访研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志20197(1):50-55.
[9]
唐国龙. 肩锁关节影像学测量及其意义[D]. 南京医科大学,2017.
[10]
Focsa LCPlomion MVignes J, et al.Quality and stability of reduction of operated acromioclavicular dislocation using dual acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular stabilization[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2023:103789.
[11]
Qiu DLai MWang Y.Comparative analysis of therapeutic outcomes between modified loop plate and hook plate for treating acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Altern Ther Health Med, 202329(8):924-928.
[12]
Cain EJ, Parker D.Open anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint injuries[J]. Clin Sports Med, 202342(4):589-598.
[13]
Vetter P, Eckl L, Bellmann F, et al. The V angle compliments radiographic assessment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations by differentiating between Rockwood types III versus V and by considering dynamic horizontal translation in coronal radiographs[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 202331(12):5962-5969.
[14]
陈晓烨,崔翔,欧阳春磊. 关节镜下三束重建技术与钩钢板固定技术治疗军事训练致急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J]. 创伤外科杂志202325(12):886-890.
[15]
江涛,刘涛,叶发刚. 改良Weaver-Dunn术式与应用锁骨钩钢板或Endobutton钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位效果比较[J]. 精准医学杂志202035(2):118-120.
[16]
黄伟权,江永发,黄晓炜,等. 锁骨钩钢板内固定联合喙锁韧带重建治疗急性完全性肩锁关节脱位效果观察[J]. 延安大学学报(医学科学版), 2020(2):59-62.
[17]
吴新宝,孙志坚.加速康复外科在创伤骨科的推广及展望[J].骨科临床与研究杂志20227(1):1-3.
[18]
付刚,李庭.四肢骨折内固定物处理方式的研究进展[J].骨科临床与研究杂志20238(5):318-321.
[1] 陈利, 王锦海, 董浩男, 李利军. 锁骨钩钢板在肩锁关节脱位治疗中的不足及改良[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 377-381.
[2] 王利航, 孙官文, 包呼和, 倪熙宇, 张万印, 黄斐, 杨鹏波. 三种手术方式治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 332-343.
[3] 蒋永东, 耿启砥, 吴宇峰, 高世华. 肩锁关节脱位的文献计量学分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 246-256.
[4] 唐晓俞, 唐小高, 王小芃, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 邓凯文. 喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位的趋势及争议[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 103-106.
[5] 杨仁豪, 庄澄宇, 王蕾. Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位的治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 88-93.
[6] 郭飞达, 陈晓俊, 邢文钊, 孙常胜, 李一然, 鹿青, 吴昊天. 非镜下专用定位/复位器辅助袢钢板治疗锁骨远端骨折和肩锁关节脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 40-48.
[7] 燕飞, 赵东旭, 金泽鉴, 胡斯乐, 王永刚, 苗雷, 宋鹤天, 刘斌, 赵胡日查. TightRope锥状韧带单束重建联合两种肩锁关节修复方式治疗急性肩锁关节脱位临床效果对比观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 27-33.
[8] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[9] 崔壮, 魏宽海, 陈滨, 胡岩君, 余斌. Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 279-283.
[10] 潘超, 张博, 韩磊, 刘俊阳, 崔鹏, 闫兵山, 田旭, 刘林涛, 东靖明. 肩锁关节脱位治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 186-191.
[11] 张涛, 崔进, 周启荣, 陈晓, 苏佳灿. 肩锁关节脱位的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 77-82.
[12] 郁凯. 陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的治疗[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 7-11.
[13] 王雄, 杨璐, 子树明, 魏文强, 梁志民, 顾峥嵘, 曹烈虎. TightRope钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗Rockwood III型急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 300-306.
[14] 何国文, 高大伟, 陈亮, 胡栢均. 保守治疗与锁骨钩钢板内固定手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期疗效对比研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 110-114.
[15] 何国文, 高大伟, 陈亮, 胡栢均, 吴宇峰. Endobutton带袢钢板内固定与锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 105-109.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?