切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 96 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2016.02.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

人羊膜匀浆上清液对大鼠角朊细胞生长的影响
吕璐1, 杨文贤2, 童亚林3,(), 王磊4, 莫永亮1, 刘亮2, 詹球5, 李泳2, 朱富军3, 辛海明3, 龚震宇3   
  1. 1. 541002 桂林,广西师范大学生命科学学院;541002 桂林,解放军第一八一医院烧伤整形科
    2. 541002 桂林,解放军第一八一医院动物实验中心
    3. 541002 桂林,解放军第一八一医院烧伤整形科
    4. 541002 桂林,广西师范大学生命科学学院
    5. 541002 桂林,解放军第一八一医院动物实验中心;广州军区烧伤整形中心实验室
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-05 出版日期:2016-04-01
  • 通信作者: 童亚林
  • 基金资助:
    广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(1140003A-39); 广西自然科学基金(0991290); 广西自然科学基金(2011GXNSFB018107); 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81301634); 全军医学科学技术研究"十二五"计划课题项目(CWS11J277)

Effects of human amniotic homogenates supernatant on rat keratinocytes vitro culture

Lu Lyu1, Wenxian Yang2, Yalin Tong3,(), Lei Wang4, Yongliang Mo1, Liang Liu2, Qiu Zhan5, Yong Li2, Fujun Zhu3, Haiming Xin3, Zhenyu Gong3   

  1. 1. College of Life Science of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541002, China; Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, 181st Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Guilin 541002, China
    2. Lab of Animal Center, 181st Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Guilin 541002, China
    3. Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, 181st Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Guilin 541002, China
    4. College of Life Science of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541002, China
    5. Lab of Animal Center, 181st Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Guilin 541002, China; Lab of Burn and Plastic Surgery Center of Guangzhou Millitary Command, 181st Hospital of People′s Liberation Army, Guilin 541002, China
  • Received:2015-11-05 Published:2016-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yalin Tong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tong Yalin, Email:
引用本文:

吕璐, 杨文贤, 童亚林, 王磊, 莫永亮, 刘亮, 詹球, 李泳, 朱富军, 辛海明, 龚震宇. 人羊膜匀浆上清液对大鼠角朊细胞生长的影响[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2016, 11(02): 96-100.

Lu Lyu, Wenxian Yang, Yalin Tong, Lei Wang, Yongliang Mo, Liang Liu, Qiu Zhan, Yong Li, Fujun Zhu, Haiming Xin, Zhenyu Gong. Effects of human amniotic homogenates supernatant on rat keratinocytes vitro culture[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2016, 11(02): 96-100.

目的

观察不同浓度人羊膜匀浆上清液(hAHS)对体外培养的SD大鼠角朊细胞生长的影响。

方法

取SD大鼠背部皮肤,采用中性蛋白酶与胰蛋白酶复合消化的方法,分离第一代角朊细胞。将新鲜人羊膜制备成hAHS,采用考马斯亮蓝法、酶联免疫吸附试验分别测定hAHS中总蛋白含量和表皮生长因子(EGF)、碱性成纤维生长因子(bFGF)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的浓度。用不同浓度hAHS对第一代角朊细胞进行体外培养:将细胞以2.5×104个/mL密度接种于96孔板中(每孔100 μL),随机数字表法将其分为体积分数0(对照组)及10%、15%、20%、25% hAHS组,用含10%胎牛血清低糖培养基培养24 h后,根据hAHS在低糖DMEM培养基中的不同体积分数进行换液,分别于培养即刻和培养24、48、96 h,用噻唑兰法检测各孔的吸光度值并绘制角朊细胞的生长曲线和计算各组细胞增殖率。采用SPSS13.0统计软件进行分析,各不同体积分数hAHS组的数据与对照组比较采用Dunnettt检验。

结果

hAHS中总蛋白含量为(675.435±9.215)×10-3 g/L,EGF、bFGF和VEGF的浓度分别为(470.625±2.546)×10-6、(4.121±0.026)×10-6和(0.172±0.002)×10-6 g/L。与对照组比较,10% hAHS组培养48、96 h角朊细胞增殖率明显高于对照组,差异均有显著性统计学意义(t=4.644、9.694,P值均小于0.01),15% hAHS组培养48、96 h角朊细胞增殖率均明显高于对照组,差异均有显著性统计学意义(t=4.766、6.648,P值均小于0.01);20% hAHS组培养24 h角朊细胞增殖率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.272,P<0.05),培养48、96 h增殖率均明显高于对照组,差异有显著性统计学意义(t=5.027、8.861,P值均小于0.01);25% hAHS组培养48 h增殖率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.188,P<0.05),培养96 h增殖率明显低于对照组,差异有显著性统计学意义(t=5.147,P<0.01)。

结论

体积分数10%、15%、20% hAHS对体外培养的角朊细胞增殖有明显促进作用,且促增殖的效果随hAHS体积分数的增加而增强,但hAHS的体积分数在25%时角朊细胞的增殖受到抑制,平稳期相对缩短。

Objective

To observe the effects of different concentrations of human amniotic homogenates supernatant on the growth of SD rat keratinocytes in vitro.

Methods

The skin was taken from back of young SD rats. The skin was digested by dispase and trypsin to seperate the keratinocytes. Fresh human amniotic were made into human amniotic homogenates supernatant. Coomassie Brilliant Blue method was used to determinate the total protein in human amniotic homogenates supernatant. The concentrations of epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Different concentrations of human amniotic homogenates supernatant was used to culture the first generation of rat keratinocytes in vitro: the cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates at density of 2.5×104/mL. After 24 h incubation, cells were divided into five groups (0, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% hAHS in low sugar DMEM medium), At 0 (the right day), 24 h, 48 h, 96 h, thiazolyl blue assay was used to detect absorbance values in each well and calculate the rate of each group cell proliferation after incubation. By using SPSS13.0 statistical software for analysis, the data of different volume fraction hAHS group was compared with the control group by Dunnett-t.

Results

The total protein concentration of hAHS was (675.435±9.215)×10-3 g/L, in which the concentration of EGF, bFGF and VEGF were(470.625±2.546), (4.121±0.026), (0.172±0.002)×10-6 g/L. 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% hAHS group was separately compared with the control group in proliferation rate. The proliferation rate of 10% hAHS group had no statistical difference at 24 h compared with control group (P>0.05) and was greater than the control group with a statistically significant difference at 48, 96 h(t=4.644, 9.694, all P values were less than 0.01); The proliferation rate of 15% hAHS group had no statistical difference at 24 h compared with control group (P>0.05)and was greater than the control group with a statistically significant difference at 48, 96 h(t=4.766, 6.648, all P values were less than 0.01). The proliferation rate of 20% hAHS group was greater than the control group with a statistically significant difference at 24, 48, 96 h(t=2.272, 5.027, 8.861, all P values were less than 0.05). The proliferation rate of 25% hAHS group had no statistical difference at 24 h compared with control group(P>0.05) and was smaller than control group with a statistically significant difference at 48, 96 h(t=2.188, 5.147, all P values were less than 0.05).

Conclusion

hAHS plays a significant role in promoting the SD rat KCs vitro culture at 10%, 15%, 20% concentration. The effect of promoting proliferation gets better with the increasing concentration. But hAHS inhibits rat keratinocytes proliferation at 25% concentration and the stable period gets shorter.

图1 对照组及各hAHS干预组角朊细胞的生长曲线
表1 对照组及各hAHS干预组各时间点角朊细胞增殖率(%,±s)
[1]
Machesney M, Tidman N, Waseem A, et al. Activated keratinocytes in the epidermis of hypertrophic scars[J]. Am J Pathol, 1998, 152(5): 1133-1141.
[2]
贾赤宇,陈壁. 角朊细胞与创面愈合[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2001, 17(6): 373-375.
[3]
Nie J, Fu X, Han W. Microenvironment-dependent homeostasis and differentiation of epidermal basal undifferentiated keratinocytes and their clinical applications in skin repair[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2013, 27(5): 531-535.
[4]
唐敏,席兴华,唐罗生,等. 人羊膜匀浆提取液对兔角膜成纤维细胞增殖及TGF-β1 mRNA表达的影响[J]. 眼科新进展,2013, 33(11): 1029-1032
[5]
高髻云,张伟. 羊膜匀浆液对兔小梁切除术后滤过泡及TGFβ1、CTGF表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(2): 163-166.
[6]
Steed DL, Trumpower C, Duffy D, et al. Amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution: a physiological combination of cytokines for wound healing[J]. Eplasty, 2008, 8: e18.
[7]
Payne WG, Wachtel TL, Smith CA, et al. Effect of amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution on healing of experimental partial-thickness burns[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(7): 1663-1668.
[8]
朱富军,杨文贤,童亚林,等. 新鲜人羊膜微粒与自体微粒皮混合移植对创面愈合的实验研究[J]. 华南国防医学杂志,2013, 27(5): 294-298.
[9]
马刚,杨同书,颜炜群,等. 复合培养人工皮肤的制备[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志,1998, 31(2): 121.
[10]
杨文贤,刘亮,朱富军,等. 液氮快速冻存法保存人羊膜抗冻剂筛选研究[J]. 华南国防医学杂志,2013, 27(4): 229-233.
[11]
杨文贤,朱富军,詹球,等. 锥虫蓝直接染色法鉴定人羊膜细胞活力方案研究[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2013, 29(3): 312-314.
[12]
王孝平,邢树礼. 考马斯亮蓝法测定蛋白含量的研究[J]. 天津化工,2009, 23(3): 40-42.
[13]
Yan L, Wu W, Wang Z, et al. Comparative study of the effects of recombinant human epidermal growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor on corneal epithelial wound healing and neovascularization in vivo and in vitro[J]. Ophthalmic Res, 2013, 49(3): 150-160.
[14]
陈惠,杨耀防. bFGF的生物作用分子机制研究进展[J]. 九江医学,2009, 24(1): 73-75.
[15]
Fitsialos G, Chassot AA, Turchi L, et al. Transcriptional signature of epidermal keratinocytes subjected to in vitro scratch wounding reveals selective roles for ERK1/2, p38, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathways[J]. J Biol Chem, 2007, 282(20): 15090-15102.
[16]
蔡源源,李光早. 血管内皮生长因子的调控及其作用研究进展[J]. 组织工程与重建外科,2011, 7(1): 51-54.
[17]
郑灿镔,朱庆棠,刘小林,等. 富血小板血浆对大鼠许旺细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2013, 36(2): 137-143.
[18]
张云松,何井华,戴丽冰,等. 富血小板血浆对血管内皮细胞增殖及血管形成的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2011, 27(7): 1145-1147.
[19]
廖琼,刘翔. 羊膜匀浆上清液对兔角膜上皮细胞增殖的影响[J]. 眼科新进展,2004, 24(4): 264-265.
[20]
李世洋,王一. 羊膜对培养的人视网膜色素上皮细胞增殖影响的实验研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2003, 25(5): 407-409.
[21]
刘亮,王磊,童亚林,等. 不同浓度人羊膜匀浆上清液培养大鼠许旺细胞的增殖[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2014, 18(20): 3218-3222.
[22]
李妍,金伯泉. 可溶型细胞因子受体产生机制的研究进展[J]. 细胞与分子免疫学杂志,2012, 28(5): 551-553.
[23]
窦肇华,张远强,郭顺根. 免疫细胞学与疾病[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2004.
[24]
张兴安,吴蜀江,卢海彬,等. 自体富血小板血浆修复面神经损伤[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2013, 17(28): 5145-5150.
[25]
陈富禄,黎洪棉,韩良枢. 自体富血小板血浆凝胶修复儿童面部Ⅱ度烧伤创面[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011, 15(34): 6453-6456.
[26]
Lee HW, Reddy MS, Geurs N, et al. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma on wound healing in rabbits[J]. J Periodontol, 2008, 79(4): 691-696.
[27]
Diaz-Prado S, Muinos-Lopez E, Hermida-Gomez T, et al. Human amniotic membrane as an alternative source of stem cells for regenerative medicine[J]. Differentiation, 2011, 81(3): 162-171.
[28]
Insausti CL, Blanquer M, Bleda P, et al. The amniotic membrane as a source of stem cells[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2010, 25(1): 91-98.
[29]
郑淑娟,贾赤宇,邱亚斌,等. 骨髓间充质干细胞对SD大鼠糖尿病溃疡创面成纤维细胞的影响[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2013, 8(4): 354-360.
[1] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[2] 钟雅雯, 王煜, 王海臻, 黄莉萍. 肌苷通过抑制线粒体通透性转换孔开放缓解缺氧/复氧诱导的人绒毛膜滋养层细胞凋亡[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 525-533.
[3] 黄蓉, 梁自毓, 祁文瑾. NLRP3炎症小体在胎膜早破孕妇血清中的表达及其意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 540-548.
[4] 韩肖燕, 杨桦. 中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.
[5] 李雪, 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 人表皮生长因子受体2低表达乳腺癌的研究进展及挑战[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 308-312.
[6] 刘伟, 安杰, 智亮辉, 陈金辉. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对局部晚期结肠癌的临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 199-203.
[7] 黄福, 王黔, 金相任, 唐云川. VEGFR2、miR-27a-5p在胃癌组织中的表达与临床病理参数及预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 558-561.
[8] 郑俊, 吴杰英, 谭海波, 郑安全, 李腾成. EGFR-MEK-TZ三联合分子的构建及其对去势抵抗性前列腺癌细胞增殖与凋亡的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 503-508.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张敏龙, 杨翠平, 王博, 崔云杰, 金发光. MiR-200b-3p 通过抑制HIF-1α 表达减轻海水吸入诱导的肺水肿作用及机制[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 696-700.
[11] 赖淼, 景鑫, 李桂珍, 李怡. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR 突变亚型的临床病理和预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 731-737.
[12] 周璇, 谢莉, 邹娟. 尼达尼布对特发性肺纤维化肺功能、肺纤维化程度及PDGF、PGE2、TGF-β1的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 368-372.
[13] 刘先勇, 秦东梅, 张若梅, 李俊娇, 孟春芹, 邬明歆, 王玉红, 赵新鲜, 徐瑞联, 洪文文, 马玲, 仇玮, 周宇. Her2/Hes1在肠型胃癌Correa级联反应3个病理阶段中的表达及意义[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 321-327.
[14] 王静, 丁红. 益肾化湿颗粒对慢性肾衰竭大鼠肾组织转化生长因子-β1、α-平滑肌肌动蛋白表达的影响[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 161-165.
[15] 徐立, 阎岩. aFGF修饰自体成纤维细胞治疗食管吻合口瘘的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 180-187.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?