切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 107 -111. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2018.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

多学科协作治疗濒临截肢伤的临床应用研究
宋渊1, 赵继荣1,(), 李树君1, 杜自忠1, 蒋振兴1, 李岩1, 张海清1, 赵宁1, 慕向前1, 程如意1, 赵生鑫2   
  1. 1. 730050 兰州,甘肃省中医院手外科
    2. 730020 兰州,甘肃中医药大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-05 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 赵继荣
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省中医药管理局科研课题(GZK-2016-73)

Clinical application of multidisciplinary team in the treatment of amputated wounds

Yuan Song1, Jirong Zhao1,(), Shujun Li1, Zizhong Du1, Zhenxing Jiang1, Yan Li1, Haiqing Zhang1, Ning Zhao1, Xiangqian Mu1, Ruyi Cheng1, Shengxin Zhao2   

  1. 1. Department of Hand Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, Lanzhou 730050, China
    2. Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2018-02-05 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jirong Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Jirong, Email:
引用本文:

宋渊, 赵继荣, 李树君, 杜自忠, 蒋振兴, 李岩, 张海清, 赵宁, 慕向前, 程如意, 赵生鑫. 多学科协作治疗濒临截肢伤的临床应用研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(02): 107-111.

Yuan Song, Jirong Zhao, Shujun Li, Zizhong Du, Zhenxing Jiang, Yan Li, Haiqing Zhang, Ning Zhao, Xiangqian Mu, Ruyi Cheng, Shengxin Zhao. Clinical application of multidisciplinary team in the treatment of amputated wounds[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2018, 13(02): 107-111.

目的

探讨多学科协作(MDT)治疗下肢濒临截肢伤的临床疗效,分析MDT在濒临截肢伤治疗中的应用价值。

方法

本研究通过对前期治疗的86例濒临截肢伤患者的资料做为对照组进行回顾性分析,与2016年1月至2017年6月甘肃省中医院采用中西医MDT治疗的60例患者(试验组)进行对比分析,观察统计治疗后两组手术次数、住院时间、住院费用、保肢率;随访试验组术后6个月患者远期生活质量评估(KPS)及临床疗效评价。两组间手术次数、住院时间及住院费用显著性差异比较采用t检验,保肢成功率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

试验组保肢成功46例,成功率为76.7%,对照组保肢成功51例,成功率为59.3%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.779,P=0.029);其中试验组手术次数(2.47±0.98)次、住院时间(67.71±24.50)d分别比对照组[(2.98±1.05)次、(72.71±19.38)d]少,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.426、-2.237,P=0.017、0.029),住院总费用分别为(9.20±4.16)、(10.43±3.46)万元,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=-1.577,P=0.118)。试验组末次术后随访6个月,KPS为(62.39±11.77)分,临床总优良率为78.26%。

结论

MDT在濒临截肢伤的救治中可明显降低手术次数及住院时间,且患者远期生活质量高,具有较好的临床疗效,但患者住院费用无明显缩减。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the treatment of lower extremity threatened amputation, and to analyze the value of MDT in the treatment of lower extremity threatened amputation.

Methods

In this study, 86 patients who were at risk of amputation were retrospectively analyzed as control group. From January 2016 to June 2017, 60 patients (experimental group) who were treated with multi-disciplinary cooperation of traditional Chinese and western medicine in Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM were compared and analyzed. The operation times, hospitalization time, hospitalization cost and limb salvage rate of the two groups were statistically analyzed. The long-term quality of life of patients in the trial group was evaluated by karnofsky performance scale(KPS) and the total clinical effective rate. T test was used to compare the number of operations, hospitalization time and hospitalization cost between the two groups, the success rate of limb salvage was compared with the χ2 test.

Results

Forty-six cases of limb salvage were successful in the experimental group, the success rate was 76.7%, while fifty-one cases in the control group, whose limb salvage success rate was 59.3%, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.779, P=0.029). There were (2.47±0.98) times of operation and (67.71±24.50) days of hospitalization in the experimental group, which were less than that in the control group, (2.98±1.05) times and (72.71±19.38) days, and the differences were statistically significant (t=-2.426, -2.237, P=0.017, 0.029). The total hospitalization expenses of the experimental group and control group were (9.20±4.16), (10.43±3.46) million yuan respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=-1.577, P=0.118). The KPS score was 62.39±11.77 in the last 6 months after operation in the experimental group, and the total clinical excellent and good rate was 78.26%.

Conclusion

MDT in the treatment of limb injury can significantly reduce the number of operations and hospital stay, and the long-term quality of life of patients with better clinical efficacy, but there is no significant reduction in hospitalization costs for patients.

图1 濒临截肢伤处理流程
表1 两组濒临截肢伤患者基本情况
表2 两组濒临截肢伤患者治疗后保肢成功率、手术次数、住院时间及住院费用比较
[1]
赵刚. 濒临截肢伤的保肢策略[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2014, 16(6):569-571.
[2]
Lamb BW, Jalil RT, Sevdalis N, et al. Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2014, 14:377.
[3]
朱桂全,冯梅,张石川,等. 多学科团队(MDT)模式在头颈肿瘤综合治疗中的探索及意义[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2016, 29(2):88-93.
[4]
Orditura M, Petrillo A, Ventriglia J, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Nosography, management and treatment[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 28(1):S156-S162.
[5]
McAlister FA, Stewart S, Ferrua S, et al. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(4):810-819.
[6]
陈世豪. 显微外科技术治疗小腿骨折合并严重软组织缺损的疗效观察[J]. 世界临床医学,2016, 10(10):18.
[7]
张雪,危蕾. 濒临截肢伤患者的术后护理[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2012, 28(33):26-27.
[8]
唐烽明,樊毫军,侯世科,等. 下肢毁损伤灾民伤情分类与转归的关系[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2015, 10(1):22-24.
[9]
中华医学会创伤学分会交通伤与创伤数据库学组,中华医学会创伤学分会创伤急救与多发伤学组. 严重创伤规范化救治[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2013, 29(6):485-488.
[10]
寇玉辉,殷晓峰,王天兵,等. 严重创伤救治规范的研究与推广[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(2):207-210.
[11]
尹刚,李容飞,刘海恩,等. 严重创伤急救程序-时间控制模式研究[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2015, 17(2):117-119.
[1] 刘佳璇, 徐兵河. 中国乳腺癌临床研究年度进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 259-265.
[2] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[3] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[4] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[5] 高玲, 于哲, 范然, 臧银善. 外周血细胞计数比值评估类风湿关节炎疗效的价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[6] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[7] 闫兆龙, 张镇斌, 李广兴, 赵璋, 张业勇, 殷鲁旭, 李树锋. 胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的早期效果及影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 492-499.
[8] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[9] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[10] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[11] 黎熊, 曹永宽. 不同远切缘距离的ISR在局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 443-446.
[12] 冯树森, 张东成, 郭奇, 张皓露, 陈阔. 两种手术方法对急性阑尾炎患者的临床疗效及对炎性因子的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 447-450.
[13] 王红敏, 谢云波, 王彦虎, 王福生. 间充质干细胞治疗新冠病毒感染的临床研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-256.
[14] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[15] 任加发, 邬步云, 邢昌赢, 毛慧娟. 2022年急性肾损伤领域基础与临床研究进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 276-281.
阅读次数
全文


摘要