切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 215 -219. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2018.03.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子漱口液含漱并吞咽预防造血干细胞移植患者预处理后口腔黏膜炎的效果观察
余旻虹1, 杨竹1, 陈芳1, 周萍1, 赵艳伟1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院,北京协和医院血液内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-15 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 赵艳伟

Effect of granulocyte- macrophage colony- stimulating factor gargle and deglutition to prevent oral mucositis in patients after conditioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Minhong Yu1, Zhu Yang1, Fang Chen1, Ping Zhou1, Yanwei Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical Collage Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2018-03-15 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yanwei Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Yanwei, Email:
引用本文:

余旻虹, 杨竹, 陈芳, 周萍, 赵艳伟. 粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子漱口液含漱并吞咽预防造血干细胞移植患者预处理后口腔黏膜炎的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(03): 215-219.

Minhong Yu, Zhu Yang, Fang Chen, Ping Zhou, Yanwei Zhao. Effect of granulocyte- macrophage colony- stimulating factor gargle and deglutition to prevent oral mucositis in patients after conditioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2018, 13(03): 215-219.

目的

观察使用粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)漱口液含漱并吞咽对预防造血干细胞移植(HSCT)患者预处理后口腔黏膜炎(OM)的效果。

方法

于2013年1月至12月,将在中国医学科学院北京协和医院血液科行HSCT的74例患者用随机数字发生器分为试验组(n=38)和对照组(n=36)。预处理方案:单纯化学治疗61例;全身放射治疗+化学治疗13例。对照组从预处理首日起,进行口腔护理及醋酸氯己定溶液含漱,均3次/d;试验组在对照组实施措施的基础上,从预处理首日起同时使用GM-CSF漱口液(GM-CSF 150 g,加入100 mL 0.9%氯化钠溶液中)含漱大于3 min/次,含漱后分次小口吞咽,每日4次,每次25 mL。组间比较采用χ2检验及秩和检验。

结果

实验组与对照组的OM发病率分别为68.4%(26/38)、72.2%(26/36),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.128,P=0.721);两组患者中、重度OM发病率比较差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.312、0.499,P=0.252、0.480);两组患者轻、中、重度OM的持续时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.900、-0.501、-0.894,P=0.368、0.616、0.371)。在预处理接受全身放射治疗+化学治疗的13例患者中,试验组7例患者发生重度OM 2例,对照组6例患者发生重度OM 6例,两组重度OM发病率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.964,P=0.008)。

结论

在接受全身放射治疗+化学治疗的HSCT患者中,在常规口腔护理的基础上,使用GM-CSF漱口液含漱并吞咽,对预防重度OM发生有一定作用。

Objective

To observe the effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) gargle and deglutition to prevent oral mucositis (OM) in patients after conditioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods

From January to December in 2013, in Department of Hepatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 74 patients in conditioning of HSCT were divided into treatment group (n=38) and control group (n=36) by random number generator. Sixty-one patients accepted only chemotherapy as conditioning regimen, and total body irradiation plus chemotherapy for the other 13 patients. From the first day of conditioning, the patients of control group accepted routine oral care and chlorhexidine acetate solution gargled three times a day. To the patients of treatment group, 25 mL GM-CSF solution (150 g GM-CSF in 100 mL 0.9% sodium chloride solution) gargle for more than 3 minutes a time and a small deglutition four times a day were added. The differences between the two groups were compared with chi-square test and Mann-Whitney Test.

Results

The incidence of OM in the treatment group and the control group were 68.4%(26/38) and 72.2%(26/36). There was no significant difference between the two groups(χ2=0.128, P=0.721), either mild or moderate-severe oral mucositis(χ2=1.312, 0.499; P=0.252, 0.480). For the duration of OM, there were no significant differences between the two groups among mild, moderate or severe oral mucositis(Z=-0.900, -0.501, -0.894; P=0.368, 0.616, 0.371). Among 13 patients who received total body irradiation plus chemotherapy, severe OM in the treatment group and the control group were (2/7) and (6/6). There was significant difference between the two groups(χ2=6.964, P=0.008).

Conclusion

Patients who received total body irradiation and chemotherapy, on the basis of routine oral care, GM-CSF solution gargle and deglutition had some benefit to prevent severe OM.

表1 两组符合HSCT适应证的血液系统疾病患者的一般资料比较
表2 两组符合HSCT适应证的血液系统疾病患者OM平均持续时间比较(d,M)
表3 两组符合HSCT适应证的血液系统疾病患者OM发病率比较[例(%)]
[1]
黄晓军. 实用造血干细胞移植[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 97-98.
[2]
Riley P, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, et al. Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 23(12):CD011552.
[3]
胡伟,莫晓冬,颜霞,等. 综合预防策略降低半相合造血干细胞移植口腔黏膜炎发生率及影响因素研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2015, 31(26):1962-1966.
[4]
Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy[J]. Cancer, 2014, 120(1):1453-1461.
[5]
李凯新,陈媛媛,陈明,等. 放射性口腔黏膜炎的研究进展[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志,2016, 36(11):875-880.
[6]
Peterson DE, Boers-Doets CB, Bensadoun RJ, et a1. Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis,treatment, and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(suppl 5):v139-151.
[7]
边专. 口腔生物学[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2012: 110-116.
[8]
赵建伟. 造血干细胞移植期间口腔黏膜炎防治和护理的研究进展[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2015, 5(31):226-227.
[9]
Castrogiovanni P, Ventimiglia P, lmbesi R. Wound Healing: Experience With rHuGM—CSF[J]. Wounds, 2010, 22(10):256-260.
[10]
崔文慧,黄宏,徐祥,等. 粒细胞巨噬细胞刺激因子对大鼠创面哺乳动物西罗莫司靶蛋白信号通路的作用[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2012, 28(1):36-41.
[11]
Saarilahti K, Kajanti M, Joensuu T, et al. Comparison of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and sucralfate mouthwashes in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a double-blind prospective randomized phase III study[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 54(2):479-485.
[12]
Dazzi C, Cariello A, Giovanis P, et al. Prophylaxis with GM-CSF mouthwashes does not reduce frequency and duration of severe oral mucositis in patients with solid tumors undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2003, 14(4):559-563.
[13]
Lang DS. Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment[J]. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2013, 17(3):340.
[14]
Riley P, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, et al. Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and growth factors[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 11:CD011990.
[15]
敬雪明,梅小平,李芸,等. 粒-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子治疗血液肿瘤化疗所致口腔黏膜炎的疗效观察[J]. 护理研究,2012, 26(25):2355-2357.
[16]
胡婉梅,牟庆云,田继书,等. rhGM-CSF雾化吸入及漱口治疗急性白血病病人化疗所致口腔炎的疗效观察[J]. 护理研究,2016, 30(8):1016-1018.
[17]
胡伟,颜霞,王婷,等. 粒-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子漱口液治疗异基因造血干细胞移植相关的口腔黏膜炎的效果评价[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2017, 33(22):1687-1690.
[1] 陈帅, 刘文宾, 吴迪炯, 俞庆宏, 陈均法, 庄海峰, 胡致平, 武利强, 郑智茵, 沈建平, 叶宝东. 改良FAC预处理方案在不同供者类型行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗再生障碍性贫血中的疗效分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 296-299.
[2] 孔欣, 宋宝全, 刘吟, 张剑, 仇惠英, 吴德沛. 异基因造血干细胞移植并发难治性呃逆一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 253-255.
[3] 赵爽, 马梁明, 朱秋娟, 贡蓉, 高志林, 田卫伟, 王涛. 不同预处理方案对重型再生障碍性贫血患者单倍体造血干细胞移植的疗效分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 224-230.
[4] 陈敏, 潘田中, 孙自敏. 祛铁治疗异基因造血干细胞移植术后三系植入不良一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 168-171.
[5] 刘文慧, 吴涛, 张曦. 间充质干细胞联合血小板生成素受体激动剂在异基因造血干细胞移植后血小板恢复中的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 242-246.
[6] 李芸芸, 吴涛, 毛东锋, 鱼玲玲, 刘文慧. 轻型β-地中海贫血供者异基因造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血1例[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 84-86.
[7] 苏春艳, 吴涛, 毛东锋, 刘文慧, 鱼玲玲, 白海. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗急性混合细胞白血病后继发外周T细胞淋巴瘤1例[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 289-292.
[8] 尤素伟. 老年脑卒中后吞咽障碍与卒中相关性肺炎的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 150-155.
[9] 郭晋朝, 张新杰, 杨璐, 王贵玲. 间歇经口至食管管饲联合吞咽训练对脑卒中吞咽障碍患者营养状态和预后的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 102-107.
[10] 张建萍, 邓海鹏, 焦黛妍, 赵洁. 高频重复经颅磁刺激联合肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 285-290.
[11] 盛超, 周斌. 低频电刺激喉部肌肉治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的疗效及对患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 279-284.
[12] 赵洁, 王岚, 杨红枚, 何屹, 袁红. 异基因造血干细胞移植后并发自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者产生类抗体血清学检测方法及输血策略[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 452-456.
[13] 邱敏霞, 孔灿灿, 陈文妹, 毛苇. 内镜下环周切开术与球囊扩张术治疗食管吻合口良性狭窄临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 27-30.
[14] 陈笑梅, 陈文辉, 赵宛鄂, 郭婕, 苏超, 付志菊, 杨华, 董志勇, 王存川. 可吞咽自吸收新型胃内球囊治疗轻度肥胖症:一例病例报告[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 215-217.
[15] 程培丽, 李霞, 王亚丽. 孤立性脑桥梗死合并吞咽障碍的临床影响因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
阅读次数
全文


摘要