切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 59 -63. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.01.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

老年重症感染性休克患者病原菌分布特点及心功能、炎性因子指标变化的临床分析
刘英1, 李群2, 常文静2, 郑云辉2, 臧学峰2,()   
  1. 1. 100038 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院感染科
    2. 100038 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-08 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 臧学峰

Clinical analysis of pathogenic bacteria distribution characteristics and changes of cardiac function and inflammatory factors in elderly patients with severe septic shock

Ying Liu1, Qun Li2, Wenjing Chang2, Yunhui Zheng2, Xuefeng Zang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Infections Diseases, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
    2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2020-12-08 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xuefeng Zang
引用本文:

刘英, 李群, 常文静, 郑云辉, 臧学峰. 老年重症感染性休克患者病原菌分布特点及心功能、炎性因子指标变化的临床分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(01): 59-63.

Ying Liu, Qun Li, Wenjing Chang, Yunhui Zheng, Xuefeng Zang. Clinical analysis of pathogenic bacteria distribution characteristics and changes of cardiac function and inflammatory factors in elderly patients with severe septic shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(01): 59-63.

目的

探讨老年重症感染性休克患者病原菌分布特点及心功能状态、炎性因子变化趋势与病情的关系。

方法

选取首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院2017年6月至2019年6月收治的96例老年重症感染性休克患者为研究对象,根据患者预后情况分为存活组(n=66)和死亡组(n=30)。对患者进行病原菌的采集与鉴定;检测患者入院后心功能指标如左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)及左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)并计算左心室射血分数(LVEF);分别于入院即刻,入院6、24 h采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测2组患者白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)水平,对患者进行急性生理学与慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHE-Ⅱ)评分,对炎性因子IL-6、CRP、PCT水平与APACHE-Ⅱ评分进行Pearson相关系数分析。数据比较采用t检验、卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

96例患者中共分离出病原菌111株,其中革兰氏阴性菌76株,占比68.47%,以大肠杆菌为主,有27株(24.32%);革兰阳性菌32株占28.83%,以金黄色葡萄球菌为主,有17株(15.31%);真菌3株,占比2.70%。存活组患者心功能指标LVESD (40.87±2.04) mm、LVEDD (51.56±1.97) mm明显低于死亡组[(42.88±1.77)、(53.78±1.88) mm],LVEF 59.54±8.43明显高于死亡组(50.33±7.86),2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=5.582、5.190、5.065, P<0.05);存活组患者的炎性因子IL-6、CRP、PCT水平及APACHE-Ⅱ评分在入院即刻,入院6、24 h呈逐渐降低趋势,各指标3个时间点整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=70.375、563.830、1 461.640、236.414, P<0.05);死亡组患者IL-6、CRP、PCT水平及APACHE-Ⅱ评分随时间推移均呈显著增高趋势,各指标3个时间点整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(F=65.059、549.720、1 190.989、173.083, P<0.05);存活组各时间点IL-6、CRP、PCT水平及APACHE-Ⅱ评分均低于死亡组,差异均有统计学意义(IL-6:t=-4.294、-13.414、-35.499, P<0.05;CRP:t=-10.599、-37.678、-79.754, P<0.05;PCT:t=-28.501、-44.848、-113.978, P<0.05;APACHE-Ⅱ评分:t=-9.972、-16.834、-56.426, P<0.05)。炎性因子IL-6、CRP、PCT水平与APACHE-Ⅱ评分的Pearson相关性分析得出,IL-6、CRP、PCT水平与APACHE-Ⅱ评分呈正相关(r=0.674、0.889、0.763, P<0.05)。

结论

老年重症感染性休克患者的病原菌分布以革兰氏阴性菌为主,心功能指标LVESD和LVEDD水平越低,LVEF水平越高,越利于预后,炎性因子IL-6、CRP及PCT水平与APACHE-Ⅱ评分呈正相关,动态监测炎性因子IL-6、CRP及PCT水平有助于判断患者病情的危重程度及预后并为治疗提供依据。

Objective

To investigate the distribution characteristics of pathogenic bacteria in elderly patients with severe septic shock and the relationship between the state of cardiac function, the change trend of inflammatory factors and the condition of the disease.

Methods

A total of 96 elderly patients with severe septic shock who were admitted to Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2017 to June 2019 were selected as the research objects. According to the prognosis of the patients, they were divided into survival group (n=66) and death group (n=30). Collected and identified the pathogenic bacteria of the patients; detected the cardiac function indicators such as left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and calculated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after admission. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect the levels of interlukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in the two groups were collected immediately after admission, 6 and 24 hours after admission. Acute physiology and chronic health score Ⅱ (APACHE-Ⅱ) were performed on patients, and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed on the levels of inflammatory factors IL-6, CRP, PCT and APACHE-Ⅱ. Data were compared with t test, chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method.

Results

A total of 111 strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated from 96 patients, of which 76 were gram-negative bacteria, accounting for 68.47%, with 27 strains (24.32%) dominated by E. coli; while 32 gram-positive bacteria accounted for 28.83%, with 17 strains by Staphylococcus aureus (15.31%); 3 strains were fungus, accounted for 2.7%. The cardiac function indexes LVESD (40.87±2.04) mm and LVEDD (51.56±1.97) mm of survival group were significantly lower than those of the death group [(42.88±1.77) and (53.78±1.88) mm], and the LVEF 59.54±8.43 was significantly higher than that of the death group (50.33±7.86), the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t=5.582, 5.190, 5.065; P<0.05). The levels of inflammatory factors IL-6, CRP, PCT and APACHE-Ⅱ scores of patients in the survival group showed a gradual decrease immediately after admission, 6 and 24 hours after admission. The overall comparison of each index at 3 time points showed statistically significance (F=70.375, 563.830, 1 461.640, 236.414; P<0.05); the levels of IL-6, CRP, PCT and APACHE-Ⅱ scores of the death group showed a significant increase over time. The overall comparison of each index at 3 time points showed statistically significant (F=65.059, 549.720, 1 190.989, 173.083; P<0.05); the levels of IL-6, CRP, PCT and APACHE-Ⅱ scores in the survival group at each time point were lower than those in the death group, and the differences were statistically significant (IL-6: t=-4.294, -13.414, -35.499, P<0.05; CRP: t=-10.599, -37.678, -79.754, P<0.05; PCT: t=-28.501, -44.848, -113.978, P<0.05; APACHE-Ⅱ score: t=-9.972, -16.834, -56.426, P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis between the levels of inflammatory factors IL-6, CRP, PCT and APACHE-Ⅱ score showed that IL-6, CRP, PCT levels were positively correlated with APACHE-Ⅱ score (r=0.674, 0.889, 0.763; P< 0.05).

Conclusions

The distribution of pathogenic bacteria in elderly patients with severe septic shock is mainly gram-negative bacteria. For cardiac function indexes: the lower of the LVESD and LVEDD, the higher the level of LVEF, the better of the prognosis. The levels of inflammatory factors (IL-6, CRP and PCT) are positively correlated with APACHE-Ⅱ score. Dynamic monitoring of inflammatory factors levels can help determine the criticality and prognosis of the patient′s condition and provide evidence for treatment.

表1 96例老年重症感染性休克患者病原菌分布
表2 2组老年重症感染性休克患者心功能指标比较(±s)
表3 2组老年重症感染性休克患者炎性因子水平及APACHE-Ⅱ评分比较(±s)
1
Potjo M, Theron AJ, Cockeran R, et al. Interleukin-10 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist distinguish between patients with sepsis and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)[J]. Cytokine, 2019, 120: 227-233.
2
吕颖,李渊. 感染性休克应用小剂量血管加压素联合多巴胺治疗的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志,2018, 4(3): 233-239.
3
Jou C, Shah R, Figueroa A, et al. The Role of Inflammatory Cytokines in Cardiac Arrest[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2020, 35(3): 219-224.
4
方翔,王锦权,陶小根,等. 感染性休克引起心肌损伤的临床研究[J]. 安徽医科大学学报,2019, 54(5): 771-775.
5
Zhang H, Wang X, Zhang Q, et al. Comparison of procalcitonin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock in the oldest old patients[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2017, 17(1): 173.
6
Diament D, Salomão R, Rigatto O, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock - management of the infectious agent - diagnosis[J]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2011, 23(2): 134-144.
7
尚红,王毓三,申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015: 96-105.
8
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Istitute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S22[S]. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2012.
9
苑仁祥,赵卉,刘云峰,等. 两种评分系统对预测AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者无创通气治疗效果分析[J]. 安徽医科大学学报,2019, 54(3): 495-497, 502.
10
刘莉,邹科见,吴月丽,等. ICU特异性干预对感染性休克的干预效果[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2019, 29(11): 1634-1637.
11
陈鹏,郭瑞敏,李艳君,等. 参附注射液治疗升压药依赖性感染性休克患者临床疗效观察[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志,2019, 39(4): 437-440.
12
曾小康,胡炜,朱英,等. ICU感染性休克患者病原菌分布及相关指标变化临床意义[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2019, 29(5): 668-672.
13
洪丽,张春秀,石红蕾. CRP、TNF-α和NO在病毒性脑炎患儿脑脊液中的表达及临床意义[J]. 河北医药,2019, 41(9): 1404-1406, 1409.
14
卢秋维,廖美娟,林雪珍. 多种炎性因子在脓毒血症中的诊断和预后价值比较[J]. 中国临床新医学,2019, 12(4): 402-406.
15
徐键,王梓瑜,陈耀祥,等. PCT、CRP检测在老年肺炎合并脓毒症患者中的应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2019, 40(4): 97-100.
[1] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[2] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[3] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[4] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[5] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[6] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[9] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[10] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[11] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[12] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[13] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[14] 毛树文, 袁方, 唐昊, 王建民. 针刀调节交感神经对老年胃溃疡患者胃功能和溃疡愈合的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 326-330.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要