切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 509 -514. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.06.009

论著

快速康复外科理念在老年患者首次单膝关节置换术围手术期中的应用效果
马鹏涛1, 毛玉陆1, 赵广利2, 李瑞博3, 张燕1, 孙秀艳1,()   
  1. 1. 100088 解放军火箭军特色医学中心麻醉科
    2. 100088 解放军火箭军特色医学中心健康管理科
    3. 100088 解放军火箭军特色医学中心护理部
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 孙秀艳

Application effect of fast tract surgery theory in the perioperative period of primary single knee arthroplasty in elderly patients

Pengtao Ma1, Yulu Mao1, Guangli Zhao2, Ruibo Li3, Yan Zhang1, Xiuyan Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100088, China
    2. Department of Health Management, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2021-10-13 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiuyan Sun
引用本文:

马鹏涛, 毛玉陆, 赵广利, 李瑞博, 张燕, 孙秀艳. 快速康复外科理念在老年患者首次单膝关节置换术围手术期中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(06): 509-514.

Pengtao Ma, Yulu Mao, Guangli Zhao, Ruibo Li, Yan Zhang, Xiuyan Sun. Application effect of fast tract surgery theory in the perioperative period of primary single knee arthroplasty in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(06): 509-514.

目的

探讨快速康复外科(FTS)理念在老年患者首次单膝关节置换术围手术期的应用效果。

方法

选取2019年2月至12月在解放军火箭军特色医学中心首次行单膝关节置换术的130例老年患者,纳入观察组,接受FTS理念的护理程序;选取2018年8月至2019年2月在解放军火箭军特色医学中心首次行单膝关节置换术的98例老年患者,纳入对照组,接受一般护理程序。比较2组手术患者术前宣教合格率、术中低体温发生率、手术时间、术后早期下床活动时间、住院费用、住院时间、术后并发症、术后患者对疼痛的满意度。对数据行t检验和χ2检验。

结果

观察组与对照组患者术前宣教合格率分别为95.38%、86.73%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.473,P=0.019)。观察组与对照组患者术中低体温发生率分别为5例(3.85%)、12例(12.24%),比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.712,P=0.017);观察组与对照组患者的手术时间分别为(223.38±10.46)、(249.90±9.90) min,比较差异有统计学意义(t=19.542,P=0.017);观察组与对照组患者术后早期下床活动时间分别为(3.08±1.02)、(56.74±6.89) h,比较差异有统计学意义(t=64.894,P<0.05);观察组与对照组患者的住院费用分别为(64 352.24±1 893.95)、(74 010.95±2 055.61)元,比较差异有统计学意义(t=36.323,P=0.029);观察组与对照组患者住院时间分别为(7.31±0.63)、(13.93±0.60) d,比较差异有统计学意义(t=80.816,P=0.042);观察组与对照组患者术后并发症发生率分别为3.07%(4/130)、14.28%(14/98),比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.644,P=0.034);观察组患者满意度为126例(96.92%),对照组患者满意度为89例(90.81%),比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.035,P=0.029)。

结论

FTS理念下的手术护理干预能促进患者术后早期恢复、提高患者对围手术期疼痛满意度、减少患者术后并发症、减轻患者的经济负担,值得临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the effect of fast tract surgery (FTS) theory in the perioperative period of primary single knee arthroplasty in elderly patients.

Methods

One hundred and thirty elderly patients underwent primary single knee arthroplasty at the PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from February to December 2019 were taken into the observation group which were assigned to receive perioperative nursing based on the FTS. Ninety-eight elderly patients underwent primary single knee arthroplasty at the PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from August 2018 to February 2019 were taken into the control group which received routine nursing. The qualified rate of preoperative education, the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia, time of the operation, postoperative early ambulation time, hospital expenses, the length of hospital stay, the incidence of postoperative complications and satisfaction to postoperative pain in the two groups were compared. Date were processed t test and chi-square test.

Results

The rates of qualified preoperative education were 95.38% in the FTS group and 86.73% in the control group respectively, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=25.473, P=0.019). The incidences of hypothermia were 5 cases (3.85%) in the FTS group and 12 case (12.24%) in control group respectively, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=25.712, P=0.017). The surgical time in the FTS group was (223.38±10.46) min, which was shorter than that in the control group (249.90±9.90) min, the difference was statistically significant(t=19.542, P=0.017). The time to ambulation in FTS group was (3.08 ± 1.02) h, which was shorter than that in the control group (56.74±6.89) h, the difference was statistically significant (t= 64.894, P<0.05). The hospitalization cost in the FTS group was (64 352.24±1 893.95) yuan, which was less than that in the control group [(74 010.95±2 055.61) yuan], the difference was statistically significant(t=36.323, P=0.029). The length of hospital stay in the observation group was (7.31±0.63) d, which was less than that in the control group [(13.93±0.60) d)], the difference was statistically significant (t=80.816, P=0.042). The incidence of postoperative complications in the FTS group was 3.07% (4/130), which was s lower than that in the control group [14.28% (14/98)], the difference was statistically significant(χ2=213.644, P=0.034). The satisfaction of patients in the FTS group was 126 cases (96.92%). In the control group, the satisfaction of patients was 89 cases (90.81%). The difference was statistically significant between groups (χ2=9.035, P=0.029).

Conclusions

Surgical nursing intervention under the concept of FTS can promote postoperative recovery, improve patients′ satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment, reduce postoperative complications and lower hospitalization cost compared with routine nursing. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组初次行单膝关节置换术的老年患者的基本资料比较
表2 2组初次行单膝关节置换术的老年患者术前、术中、术后护理措施比较
时间 观察组 对照组
术前 采取个性化健康教育和心理疏导 术前常规宣教
禁食6 h、术前2~3 h口服200 mL糖溶液或流质饮食 术前禁食12 h、禁水4 h
术前2 d口服塞来昔布,2次/d、0.2 g/次 未提前镇痛
术中 脊椎麻醉+内收肌管神经阻滞(1%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液10 mL+0.9%氯化钠溶液15 mL) 蛛网膜下腔麻醉和硬膜外阻滞联合麻醉
常规止血、徒手驱血、切开皮肤前气压止血带充气
常规止血、驱血带驱血、上假体前气压止血带充气、切皮前氨甲环酸1 g静脉滴注、关闭切口时氨甲环酸1 g关节腔局部注射,输液量控制在2 000 mL内 术前静脉输注氨甲环酸1 g,大量快速输液
采取一般保温措施
常规留置尿管、负压引流管
密切关注患者核心温度,采取综合保温措施  
原则上不留置尿管及负压引流管,特殊情况除外  
术后 术后2~4 h无恶心、呕吐时给予少量流质、半流质饮食,术后3~4 h再增加进食 术后严格禁食6 h,循序渐进给予流质饮食
早期卧床休息,术后3 d在护士的协助下下床站立或行走
麻醉恢复后经医师、康复理疗师及营养师评估,在助行器的辅助下,尽早离床下地活动,下地活动后抬高下肢、冰敷肿胀部位、口服乙哌立松300 mg/次,2次/d,内收肌神经阻滞联合应用镇痛泵、必要时使用阿片类药物等多种方法联合镇痛 切口局部注射1%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液10 mL+0.9%氯化钠溶液10 mL,口服镇痛药物,根据患者意愿使用镇痛泵
不给予吸氧及心电监测 常规吸氧、心电监护6 h
偶有尿潴留,给予导尿不留置尿管,注意女性患者偶发尿失禁 出院时间由医师决定
出院时间由医师、护士、患者及家属共同决定  
表3 2组初次行单膝关节置换术的老年患者术中及术后情况比较
表4 2组初次行单膝关节置换术的老年患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
表5 2组初次行单膝关节置换术的老年患者满意度比较
[1]
朱雪萍. 基于快速康复外科理念的手术室护理干预在全髋关节置换术患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究2018, 15(23): 109-111.
[2]
贾瑛,李潇. 快速康复护理在膝关节置换术患者围术期应用的护理研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志2017, 23(4): 382-384.
[3]
侯宝莲. 快速康复外科在腹部外科手术护理中的应用进展[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(3): 235-237.
[4]
Liu G, Jian F, Wang X, et al. Fast-track surgery protocol in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2016, 9: 3345-3351.
[5]
郑萍,高洁,张静,等. 快速康复外科在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用[J]. 淮海医药2019, 37(2): 212-214.
[6]
薛荣泉,韩晓月,夏医君,等. 快速康复外科在老年患者传统开腹与腹腔镜下胆囊切除加胆总管探查术手术期中的应用[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(3): 202-207.
[7]
王娟茹,张彩芳. ERAS在高龄患者全膝关节置换术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 护理与康复2019, 9(3): 149-151.
[8]
张静萍,刘欣伟,王宇,等. 快速康复干预在高龄全膝关节置换患者围手术期中的应用价值研究[J]. 中国医学装备2017, 14(3): 90-93.
[9]
严广斌.NRS疼痛数字评价量表numerical rating scale[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(3): 410.
[10]
苏琳,高建英,刘春荣. 快速康复外科在肝胆外科手术患者护理中的应用[J]. 中国卫生标准管理2019, 10(11): 98-100.
[11]
严晓云,李玉伟,温艳. 快速康复外科理念在全膝关节置换患者护理中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育2019, 16(6): 457-461.
[12]
杨朝君,孙智文,张爱民,等. 人工股骨头置换术结合快速康复理念治疗高龄不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的临床效果[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(4): 253-259.
[13]
夏新. 腰丛-坐骨神经阻滞麻醉和腰硬联合麻醉用于膝关节置换手术患者麻醉价值体会[J]. 中国社区医师2018, 34(29): 40-42.
[14]
王伟,丁小萍,葛显聪,等. 清单管理模式在初次全膝关节置换患者中的应用效果[J]. 解放军护理杂志2019, 36(6): 83-86.
[15]
张敏娟,陈娴. 快速康复理念在全膝关节置换术的护理实践及对预后影响[J]. 浙江医学教育2016, 15(6): 35-37.
[16]
林妙君,温国仪,周云飞,等. 快速康复理念下全膝关节置换患者早期下床活动的研究效果[J]. 广东医学2019, 40(12): 1719-1722.
[17]
向娜,马玉芬,李扬. 快速康复外科理念下全膝关节置换患者术后早期下床活动的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理2017, 17(9): 1268-1273.
[18]
Chan EY, Blyth FM, Naim L, et al. Acute postoperative pain following hospital discharge after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013, 21(9): 1257-1263.
[19]
程黎阳,谢正勇,陈俊勇,等. 中西医结合加速康复外科的研究现状与思考[J].实用医学杂志2015, 31(17): 2771-2774.
[20]
Huang ZY, Ma J, Shen B, et al. General anesthesia: to catheterize or not? A prospective randomizedcontrolledstudyof patients undergoingtotalknee Arthroplasty[J].J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(3): 502-506.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[4] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[5] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[6] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[7] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[8] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[9] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[10] 李美娜, 宋艳丽, 杨姗姗, 李聚彩, 罗慧利, 吕杰. 三联预康复策略在退行性脊柱侧弯患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 356-364.
[11] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[12] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[13] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要