切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 502 -506. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.06.007

论著

危重烧伤患者中心静脉导管相关感染的病原菌分布及耐药性分析
李凤1, 吴红1,(), 蒋南红1   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-15 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 吴红
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金项目(2021CFB532); 武汉市临床医学科研项目(WX15C08)

Distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria associated with central venous catheter-related infection in severe burn patients

Feng Li1, Hong Wu1,(), Nanhong Jiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Burn, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University & Wuhan Third Hospital, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2022-09-15 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Wu
引用本文:

李凤, 吴红, 蒋南红. 危重烧伤患者中心静脉导管相关感染的病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 502-506.

Feng Li, Hong Wu, Nanhong Jiang. Distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria associated with central venous catheter-related infection in severe burn patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(06): 502-506.

目的

探讨危重烧伤患者中心静脉导管(CVC)相关感染的病原菌分布及其耐药性,为预防和减少CVC相关感染提供依据。

方法

采用前瞻性研究方法。选择2018年1月至2021年12月在武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院收治的符合入选标准的行CVC置管的危重烧伤患者148例。对CVC穿刺口根据有无创面行不同的护理。经正常皮肤置管处每7 d以5 g/L碘伏消毒穿刺点及周围皮肤,待干后贴上无菌3M透明敷贴覆盖导管。经创面置管处每天以5 g/L碘伏消毒穿刺点及周围皮肤,待干后用双层无菌纱布覆盖穿刺口,分泌物多时随时更换纱布。CVC拔管时行静脉导管尖端细菌半定量培养,并通过纸片扩散法对培养出的阳性菌株行药物敏感试验,观察病原菌种类及其耐药性。

结果

所有患者共行261例次置管,分离病原菌62株,其中革兰阴性菌41株,占66.13%;革兰阳性菌18株,占29.03%;真菌3株,占4.84%。排在前5位的病原菌分别是铜绿假单胞菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌与表皮葡萄球菌,分别占比为35.48%、19.35%、14.52%、8.06%、6.45%。铜绿假单胞菌对多黏菌素B耐药率为0,对头孢吡肟、哌拉西林耐药率均为75.00%以上,对其他抗菌药物均有不同程度的耐药。鲍曼不动杆菌对多黏菌素B耐药率为0,对除亚胺培南以外的9种抗菌药物耐药率均为100.00%;金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素、利奈唑胺及奎奴普丁/达福普汀耐药率均为0,对氨苄西林、青霉素耐药率均为100.00%,对其他抗菌药物均有严重耐药。

结论

危重烧伤患者CVC相关感染以革兰阴性菌为主,其中铜绿假单胞菌居首位,且耐药形式严峻,医务人员应引起重视,加强观察及护理,根据药物敏感试验结果合理应用抗菌药物,减少CVC相关感染的发生。

Objective

To explore the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens bacteria associated with central venous catheter (CVC)-related infection in severe burn patients, so as to provide clinical basis for prevention and reduction of CVC-related infection.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted. From January 2018 to December 2021, 148 patients with severe burn who met the inclusion criteria for CVC catheterization and hospitalized in Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University & Wuhan Third Hospital were recruited in the prospective study. Different nursing cares of patients were given to the CVC puncture site according to whether there was a wound or not. The puncture site and surrounding skin were disinfected with 5 g/L iodophor every 7 days at the place where the catheter was placed through normal skin. After drying, sterile 3M transparent application was applied to cover the catheter. The puncture site and surrounding skin were disinfected with 5 g/L iodophor every day at the wound catheterization site. After drying, the puncture site was covered with a double layer of sterile gauze, and the secretions were mostly changed when discharge was excessive. Semi-quantitative culture of bacteria at the tip of venous catheter was performed when CVC was decannulated. The drug sensitivity test was performed on the positive strains cultured by disk diffusion method to observe the species of pathogenic bacteria and their drug resistance.

Results

All patients underwent 261 catheterizations. A total of 62 strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated from all patients, including 41 strains of Gram negative bacteria accounting for 66.13%, 18 strains of Gram positive bacteria accounting for 29.03%, and 3 fungi accounting for 4.84%. The top five pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus epidermidis, and accounting for 35.48%, 19.35%, 14.52%, 8.06% and 6.45% respectively. The resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to polymyxin B was 0, and were both more than 75.00% to cefepime and piperacillin, and it had different degrees of resistant to other antibiotics. The resistance rate of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin B was 0, and to nine kinds of antibiotics except imipenem were all 100.00%. The resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin, linezolid and quinuputin/dapfoptin were all 0, and to ampicillin and penicillin were all 100.00%. Staphylococcus aureus was severely resistant to other antibiotics.

Conclusions

Gram-negative bacteria are the main infections of CVC-related infection in sever burn patients, among which Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the first, and the drug resistance is severe. Medical staff should pay attention to it, strengthen observation and nursing, and rationally apply antibiotics according to the results of drug sensitivity test, so as to reduce the occurrence of CVC-related infections.

表1 148例危重症烧伤患者CVC相关感染的病原菌分布及构成比(%)
表2 2种革兰阴性菌对常用抗菌药物的耐药性分析(%)
表3 主要革兰阳性菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)对常用抗菌药物的耐药性分析(%)
[1]
陈星,周筱琴. 1例特重烧伤患者行经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管的护理[J]. 中国实用护理杂志2015, 31(7): 510-511.
[2]
吴红,李凤,席毛毛,等. 烧伤患者中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的危险因素研究[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(4): 333-339.
[3]
Rajasekhar A, Streiff MB. How I treat central venous access device-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis[J]. Blood, 2017, 129(20): 2727-2736.
[4]
尚新芳,薛蓉,任丽平. 化疗患者留置经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管后导管相关性感染的危险因素[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志2022, 22(2): 151-155.
[5]
韩如慧,金美娟,钱雪峰,等. 造血干细胞移植患者发生中心静脉导管相关血流感染的多因素研究[J]. 中国感染控制杂志2019, 18(2): 127-131.
[6]
Ciofi Silva CL, Rossi LA, Canini SR, et al. Site of catheter insertion in burn patients and infection: a systematic review[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(3): 365-373.
[7]
徐丽华,钱培芬. 重症护理学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008: 5.
[8]
陈孝平,汪建平. 外科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 140.
[9]
尚红,王毓三,申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015: 563-646.
[10]
Kao Y, Loh EW, Hsu CC, et al. Fluid resuscitation in patients with severe burns:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2018, 25(3): 320-329.
[11]
Yoshino Y, Ohtsuka M, Kawaguchi M, et al. The wound/burn guidelines-6:guidelines for the management of bures[J]. J Dermatol, 2016, 43(9): 989-1010.
[12]
吴芦英,蓝庆景,吴雪清. 外科ICU中心静脉导管相关性血流感染病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2016, 28(5): 578-580.
[13]
Asari AIA, Barros RAV, Borges MAP. Anatomic variant of the internal jugular vein and its importance in vascular access for hemodialysis[J]. J Vasc Bras, 2019, 18: e20190014.
[14]
Timsit JF, Baleine J, Bernard L, et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2020, 10(1): 118.
[15]
Kikuchi M, Sato T, Okada S, et al. Maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-onset central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine[J]. J Infect Chemother, 2020, 26(2): 188-193.
[16]
Tang CQ, Li JQ, Shou BM, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infections in 177 severe burn patients from an industrial disaster:a multicentre retrospective study[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2018, 24(2): 199.el-199.e7.
[17]
李红英,刘丽华,王静,等. 烧伤创面病原菌感染的相关因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志2017, 27(2): 345-347.
[18]
马巧红,群英,何娟妃,等. 2011年-2015年宁波市烧伤儿童创面感染病原菌分布特点及耐药性分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志2017, 27(9): 1347-1350.
[19]
李英兰,庞久玲,王静,等. 烧伤患者中心静脉导管相关性感染危险因素及防控对策[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志2017, 27(7): 1655-1658.
[20]
Moralar DG, Turkmen UA, Bilen A, et al. Our central venous port catheter system practice - a retrospective study[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2021, 71(5): 1442-1445.
[21]
Lara MO, Lucas TC, Kalapothakis E, et al. Molecular tracking of pathogens in central venous catheter[J]. J Vasc Access, 2021, 22(2): 209-217.
[22]
Bekcibasi M, Dayan S, Aslan E, et al. Risk factors for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections[J]. Infez Med, 2019, 27(3): 258-265.
[23]
Patel PK, Olmsted RN, Hung L, et al. A Tiered Approach for Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2019, 171(7_Suppl): S16-S22.
[1] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[2] 王宏宇, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 陈强, 闫增强. 亲属头皮加自体头皮混合移植接力在大面积深度烧伤创面修复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 554-554.
[3] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[4] 彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.
[5] 林同辉, 杨卫玺. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣在电烧伤治疗中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 526-530.
[6] 张嘉炜, 王瑞, 张克诚, 易磊, 周增丁. 烧烫伤创面深度智能检测模型P-YOLO的建立及测试效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 379-385.
[7] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[8] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[9] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[10] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[11] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[12] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[13] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?