切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 496 -501. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.06.006

论著

带蒂腓肠内侧动脉或联合胫后动脉多穿支皮瓣修复小腿创面
黄海华1, 吴泽勇2, 陈秀凤2, 李小芳2, 史玉仓2, 徐舒豪2, 罗奇志1, 王绥江3, 黄跃生1,()   
  1. 1. 518055 深圳,南方科技大学医院创面修复科,南方科技大学医学院创面修复与再生医学研究所
    2. 524001 湛江,广东医科大学附属医院整形外科
    3. 510317 广州,广东省第二人民医院整形外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-12 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 黄跃生

Pedicled medial sural artery or combined posterior tibial artery multiple perforator flap for the repair of lower leg wound

Haihua Huang1, Zeyong Wu2, Xiufeng Chen2, Xiaofang Li2, Yucang Shi2, Shuhao Xu2, Qizhi Luo1, Suijiang Wang3, Yuesheng Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Wound Repair, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Institute of Wound Repair and Regeneration Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology School of Medicine, Shenzhen 518055, China
    2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, China
    3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China
  • Received:2022-10-12 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuesheng Huang
引用本文:

黄海华, 吴泽勇, 陈秀凤, 李小芳, 史玉仓, 徐舒豪, 罗奇志, 王绥江, 黄跃生. 带蒂腓肠内侧动脉或联合胫后动脉多穿支皮瓣修复小腿创面[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 496-501.

Haihua Huang, Zeyong Wu, Xiufeng Chen, Xiaofang Li, Yucang Shi, Shuhao Xu, Qizhi Luo, Suijiang Wang, Yuesheng Huang. Pedicled medial sural artery or combined posterior tibial artery multiple perforator flap for the repair of lower leg wound[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(06): 496-501.

目的

探讨带蒂腓肠内侧动脉或联合胫后动脉多穿支皮瓣修复小腿创面的临床应用。

方法

2012年1月至2021年12月,选取广东医科大学附属医院整形外科小腿创面患者13例(共14处创面),男9例,女4例。年龄6.0~75.0岁,平均年龄为(41.2±22.2)岁。膝部3例、腘窝2例(其中1例为双侧腘窝)、小腿上段3例、小腿中段2例和小腿下段3例。创面准备待局部血供良好、感染较轻时予皮瓣修复术,创面面积为4.0 cm×3.0 cm~21.0 cm×5.5 cm。以腘窝中点与内踝中点连线为皮瓣轴线,腘窝下约8 cm和15 cm为穿支血管位置,以此设计皮瓣。行切口探查技术定位穿支血管位置后,根据小腿创面位置、大小及形状选择合适的带蒂腓肠内侧动脉或联合胫后动脉多穿支皮瓣。术后给予常规抗炎、抗凝及解痉等治疗。观察并记录术后皮瓣成活情况、伤口愈合时间。通过门诊随访记录受区及供区的外形、质地及功能恢复情况。

结果

13例患者14处皮瓣修复。蒂部穿支血管数目2支者9例,3支者5例;螺旋桨皮瓣5例,皮瓣面积大小为11.2 cm×3.2 cm~20.0 cm×5.5 cm;V-Y推进皮瓣9例,面积大小为8.0 cm×5.0 cm~20.0 cm×11.0 cm。2例患者术后皮瓣尖端淤血,均自行缓解。14处皮瓣均成活,所有创面得到有效修复,平均愈合时间为(14.5±1.7) d,随访时间为13.0(2.5,26.5)个月。所有患者皮瓣颜色、质地良好,外形无臃肿,与周围皮肤接近,功能良好。供区愈合良好,未见明显功能障碍。

结论

带蒂腓肠内侧动脉或联合胫后动脉多穿支皮瓣的血供更为可靠、伤口愈合能力更强。可根据创面的位置、形状及大小,灵活设计皮瓣,扩大其适应证。该皮瓣在修复除踝前区之外的小腿创面中具有较大的推广价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical application of pedicled medial sural artery or combined posterior tibial artery multiple perforator flap in the repair of lower leg wound.

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2021, a total of 14 wounds were selected from 13 patients with lower leg wound in the Department of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, including 9 males and 4 females. The average age was (41.2±22.2) years, ranging from 6.0 to 75.0 years. There were 3 cases in the knee, 2 cases in the popliteal fossa (1 of which was bilateral popliteal fossa), 3 cases in the upper leg segment, 2 cases in the middle leg segment and 3 cases in the lower leg segment. When the local blood supply was good and the infection was mild, the flap was repaired. The area of the wound was 4.0 cm×3.0 cm-21.0 cm×5.5 cm.The flap was designed by taking the line between the midpoint of the popliteal fossa and the midpoint of the medial malleolus as the axis of the flap, and about 8 cm and 15 cm below the popliteal fossa as the locations of the perforating vessels. After the perforator vessel location was determined by the incision exploration technique, the pedicled medial sural artery or combined posterior tibial artery multiple perforator flaps were selected according to the location, size and shape of the lower leg wound. After operation, conventional anti-inflammation, anticoagulation and spasmolytic treatment were given. The survival of flap and wound healing time were observed and recorded. The appearance, texture and functional recovery of the recipient and donor areas were recorded by outpatient follow-up.

Results

There were 14 flap repairs in 13 patients. The number of pedicle perforating vessels was 9 cases with 2 vessels and 5 cases with 3 vessels. Propeller flaps were found in 5 cases, and the flap area was 11.2 cm×3.2 cm-20.0 cm×5.5 cm. There were 9 cases of V-Y propulsion flaps, the size of which was 8.0 cm×5.0 cm-20.0 cm×11.0 cm. Postoperative congestion in the tip of the flap was resolved in 2 patients. All the 14 flaps survived and all the wounds were effectively repaired. The mean healing time was (14.5±1.7) d, and the follow-up was 13.0(2.5, 26.5) months. The skin flap of all patients had good color and texture, no bloatiness in appearance, and was close to the surrounding skin with good function. The donor area healed well and no obvious dysfunction was observed.

Conclusions

Pedicled medial sural artery or combined posterior tibial artery multiple perforator flap has more reliable blood supply and better wound healing ability. According to the location, shape and size of the wound, the flap can be flexibly designed to expand its indications. The flap is of great value in the repair of lower leg wounds except the anterior ankle area.

图1 应用腓肠内侧动脉双穿支血管蒂皮瓣修复右膝部创面。A示右膝部术前创面,创面大小为6.0 cm×2.0 cm;B示皮瓣设计,皮瓣面积大小为8.5 cm×4.5 cm;C示术中穿支血管探查切口及皮瓣重新设计(a为原设计皮瓣,b为重新设计皮瓣,箭头所示术中探查切口);D示皮瓣形成,显示腓肠内侧动脉第1、第2穿支血管;E示皮瓣修复术后即刻,间断缝合供区及受区伤口并放置负压引流管1条;F示随访9个月,皮瓣功能、外观均良好
[1]
Scaglioni MF, Rodi T, Fritsche E. The Versatility of the Pedicled Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: From Simple to Its Chimeric Pattern and Clinical Experience with 37 Cases[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2021, 147(4): 960-969.
[2]
Liang JL, Liu XY, Qiu T, et al. Microdissected thin anterolateral thigh perforator flaps with multiple perforators: A series of case reports[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(4): 1-6.
[3]
郭佳,刘勇,韩宁. 腓肠内侧动脉和胫后动脉穿支螺旋桨皮瓣接力修复足踝部皮肤软组织缺损[J]. 中华整形外科杂志2021, 37(10): 1158-1162.
[4]
Anghel EL, DeFazio MV, Barker JC, et al. Current Concepts in Debridement: Science and Strategies[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 138(3 Suppl): 82S-93S.
[5]
Agarwal A. Evolution of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Orthopaedic Trauma[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2022, 36(Suppl 4): S1-S5.
[6]
Zapata-Ospina A, Chen J, Tee R, et al. Harvesting the anterolateral thigh flap with non-sizable perforators[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2021, 74(5): 1022-1030.
[7]
Kim HH, Jeong JH, Seul JH, et al. New design and identification of the medial sural perforator flap: an anatomical study and its clinical applications[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006, 117(5): 1609-1618.
[8]
张世民,王欣,唐茂林,等. 穿支皮瓣的争论与当前共识[J]. 中华显微外科杂志2014, 37(1): 3-4.
[9]
Juto H, Hultin M, Möller M, et al. Routine use of LMWH prophylaxis is associated with a lower incidence of venous thromboembolic events following an ankle fracture[J]. Injury, 2022, 53(2): 732-738.
[10]
Cavadas PC, Sanz-Giménez-Rico JR, Gutierrez-de la Cámara A, et al.The medial sural artery perforator free flap[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001, 108(6): 1609-1615; discussion 1616-1617.
[11]
Taylor GI, Hallock GG. In Pursuit of the "Perforator" in the Perforator Skin Flap[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2021, 37(3): 182-192.
[12]
Fitzgerald O′Connor E, Ruston J, Loh CYY, et al.Technical refinements of the free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap in reconstruction of multifaceted ankle soft tissue defects[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2020, 26(2): 233-238.
[13]
Luca-Pozner V, Delgove A, Kerfant N, et al. Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap for Leg and Knee Coverage: Extended Skin Paddle With 2 Perforators[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2020, 85(6): 650-655.
[14]
王欣,张世民,章一新,等. "带蒂穿支皮瓣常见并发症原因分析与防治"专家共识[J]. 中华显微外科杂志2017, 40(2): 105-108.
[15]
Lin CH, Hsieh YH, Lin CH.The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap in Lower Extremity Reconstruction[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2021, 48(2): 249-257.
[16]
刘元波,朱珊,臧梦青,等. 穿支螺旋桨皮瓣简史、概念、手术设计和临床应用[J]. 中华整形外科杂志2020, 36(9): 947-960.
[17]
Deek NFA, Hsiao JC, Do NT, et al.The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: Lessons Learned from 200 Consecutive Cases[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2020, 146(5): 630e-641e.
[18]
Dorafshar AH, Januszyk M, Song DH. Anatomical and technical tips for use of the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap in breast reconstructive surgery[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2010, 26(6): 381-389.
[19]
黄海华,王绥江,吴泽勇,等. 面动脉穿支蒂螺旋桨皮瓣修复外鼻皮肤软组织缺损之蒂部浅析[J]. 中华显微外科杂志2017, 40(5): 499-502.
[20]
Baumann DP, Lin HY, Chevray PM. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2010, 125(5): 1335-1341.
[1] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体:路在何方?[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[2] 仇申强, 王增涛, 郝丽文, 陈超, 刘林峰, 张迪. 拇手指全形再造二期整形的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 485-490.
[3] 张健, 刘小龙, 查天建, 姚俊杰, 王傑. 富含血小板血浆联合异种脱细胞真皮基质修复糖尿病足缺血性创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 503-506.
[4] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[5] 朴广昊, 李屹洲, 刘瑞, 赵建民, 王凌峰. 皮肤撕脱伤撕脱皮瓣活力早期评估与修复的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 528-532.
[6] 张熙浩, 陈作观, 李拥军. 钝性主动脉损伤诊治的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 438-441.
[7] 张浩, 张万福, 韩飞, 佟琳, 王运帷, 李少辉, 陈阳, 曹鹏, 官浩. 游离组织瓣治疗无吻合血管或需困难吻合血管创面的临床进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 442-446.
[8] 李芸, 乔栒柏, 邓华颉, 游云华. 增材制造Ti-6Al-4V钛合金种植体在牙缺失种植修复中的临床应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 359-364.
[9] 叶长缨, 谢静, 丁桂聪. 乳牙龋病的过渡性治疗研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 365-370.
[10] 李秋兰, 李希庭, 王晓东. 数字化技术引导下的美学修复一例[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 260-264.
[11] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[12] 王博, 郭利君, 李二强, 张贺林, 徐鹏, 杨晓春. 消化道与口腔黏膜组织在输尿管重建中的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 434-439.
[13] 钟文文, 李科, 刘碧好, 蔡炳, 脱颖, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 汪中扬, 王德娟, 邱剑光. 不同比例聚乳酸/丝素蛋白复合支架在兔尿道缺损修复中的疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 516-522.
[14] 刘卓, 段虎斌. 生物电相关疗法在神经损伤修复中的应用进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 257-260.
[15] 王延召, 牛鹏飞, 丁长民, 高庆坤, 高兆亚, 安柯, 翟志超, 曾庆敏, 黄文生, 雷福明, 顾晋. 结直肠癌致腹壁巨大缺损的一期修补经验(附13例报告)[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 557-561.
阅读次数
全文


摘要