切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 106 -112. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.02.003

电烧伤

高压电烧伤对大鼠心肌氧化应激的影响及N-乙酰半胱氨酸的干预作用
杨文飞1, 郝嘉文1, 鲁梦远1, 赵学刚1, 李聪颖1, 盖晨阳1, 张晶1, 张庆富1,()   
  1. 1. 050035 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院烧伤与创面修复中心 河北省烧伤救治技术创新中心
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-25 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张庆富
  • 基金资助:
    河北省创新能力提升计划项目(225676120H)

Effects of high-voltage electrical burns on myocardial oxidative stress in rats and the intervention effect of N-acetylcysteine

Wenfei Yang1, Jiawen Hao1, Mengyuan Lu1, Xuegang Zhao1, Congying Li1, Chenyang Gai1, Jing Zhang1, Qingfu Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Burn and Wound Repair Center, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Burn Treatment Technology Innovation Center, Shijiazhuang 050035, China
  • Received:2024-01-25 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qingfu Zhang
引用本文:

杨文飞, 郝嘉文, 鲁梦远, 赵学刚, 李聪颖, 盖晨阳, 张晶, 张庆富. 高压电烧伤对大鼠心肌氧化应激的影响及N-乙酰半胱氨酸的干预作用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 106-112.

Wenfei Yang, Jiawen Hao, Mengyuan Lu, Xuegang Zhao, Congying Li, Chenyang Gai, Jing Zhang, Qingfu Zhang. Effects of high-voltage electrical burns on myocardial oxidative stress in rats and the intervention effect of N-acetylcysteine[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(02): 106-112.

目的

探讨氧化应激在大鼠高压电烧伤心肌损伤中的作用及N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)的干预效果。

方法

采用随机数字表法将雄性SD大鼠220只分配至假伤组(60只)、电伤组(60只)、盐水组(50只)及NAC组(50只),观测时相为伤后0 h、8 h、24 h、48 h、72 h、1周,相应观测时相点各10只。采用实验高压电击系统,以大鼠左前肢及右后肢分别为电流入口和出口,制作电压3 kV、电击3 s的大鼠高压电烧伤模型。盐水组大鼠腹腔注射生理盐水1 mL/kg;NAC组大鼠腹腔注射10%NAC 1 mL/kg(100 mg/kg)。每组按时相采集心肌组织,检测心肌匀浆上清液超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性、丙二醛(MDA)水平、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)水平。光镜下观察心肌组织形态学改变。

结果

与假伤组比较,电伤组大鼠心肌组织总体SOD活性、MDA水平、MPO水平均增高(均P<0.001)。电伤组SOD活性在伤后48 h高于假伤组(P=0.037),MDA水平在伤后8 h(P=0.009)、24 h(P=0.006)、48 h(P<0.001)、72 h(P<0.001)均高于假伤组,MPO水平在伤后8 h(P<0.001)、24 h(P<0.001)、48 h(P=0.002)、72 h(P=0.008)均高于假伤组。电后1周内,SOD活性先增高后降低,48 h达峰值;MDA先增高后降低,48 h达峰值;MPO逐渐降低。与电伤组各时相相比,盐水组及NAC组SOD活性、MDA水平、MPO水平差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与假伤组比较,电伤组0~48 h内心肌细胞之间闰盘消失,横纹模糊,细胞水肿,炎性浸润,肌束分离,间质灶性出血;48 h心肌细胞水肿及炎性浸润最明显;48 h~1周心肌组织水肿、炎症等症状逐渐减轻。与电伤组比较,盐水组和NAC组心肌损伤均无明显改善。

结论

高压电烧伤通过提高大鼠心肌氧化应激水平导致心肌损伤。NAC对大鼠高压电烧伤后心肌组织SOD活性、MDA水平、MPO水平及伤后48 h的心肌损伤干预效果不明显。

Objective

To investigate the role of oxidative stress in myocardial injury induced by high-voltage electrical burns in rats and the intervention effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC).

Methods

A total of 220 male SD rats were randomly divided into sham injury group (n=60), electrical burn group (n=60), saline group (n=50) and NAC group (n=50). The observation time was 0 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 1 week after injury, with 10 rats in each group. The experimental high-voltage electrical shock system was used to establish a rat model of high-voltage electrical burn with a voltage of 3 kV and a shock of 3 s, with the left forelimb and right hind limb of rats as the inlet and outlet of current, respectively. Rats in the saline group were intraperitoneally injected with normal saline 1 mL/kg. Rats in NAC group were intraperitoneally injected with 10%NAC 1 mL/kg (100 mg/kg). Myocardial tissue was collected at regular intervals in each group, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in myocardial homogenate supernatant were detected. The morphological changes of myocardium were observed under light microscope.

Results

Compared with those in sham injury group, the SOD activity, MDA content and MPO content of myocardial tissue in electrical burn group increased (all P<0.001). The activity of SOD in myocardial tissue of rats in electrical burn group was higher than that in sham injury group at post-injury 48 h(P=0.037). The content of MDA in myocardial tissue of rats in electrical burn group was higher than that in sham injury group at post-injury 8 h(P=0.009), 24 h(P=0.006), 48 h(P< 0.001), and 72 h(P<0.001). The content of MPO in myocardial tissue of rats in electrical burn group was higher than that in sham injury group at post-injury 8 h(P<0.001), 24 h(P<0.001), 48 h (P=0.002), and 72 h(P=0.008). The SOD activity increased at first and then decreased within 1 week after electroacupuncture, and reached the peak at 48 hours. The content of MDA firstly increased and then decreased, and reached the peak at 48 hours. The content of MPO decreased gradually. Compared with the electrical burn group at each time point, the SOD activity, MDA and MPO content in the saline group and NAC group showed no statistical significance (all P>0.05). Compared with sham injury group, intercalated discs disappeared, horizontal lines blurred, cell edema, inflammatory infiltration, muscle bundle separation and interstitial focal hemorrhage were observed in electrical injury group within 0-48 hours. The edema and inflammatory infiltration of cardiomyocytes were the most obvious at 48 hours. Myocardial tissue edema and inflammation were gradually reduced during 48 h-1 week. Compared with the electrical burn group, there was no significant improvement in myocardial injury in the saline and NAC groups.

Conclusion

High-voltage electrical burns can cause myocardial injury by increasing myocardial oxidative stress level in rats. NAC has no significant effect on SOD activity, MDA content, MPO content in myocardial tissue of rats with high-voltage electrical burns and myocardial injury at 48 h post burn.

表1 高压电烧伤后即刻大鼠心肌组织SOD活性、MDA及MPO水平(±s)
表2 4组各时相点大鼠心肌组织SOD活性比较(U/mgprot,±s)
表3 4组各时相点大鼠心肌组织MDA水平比较(ng/mL,±s)
表4 4组各时相点大鼠心肌组织MPO水平比较(ng/mL,±s)
图1 高压电击后各时间点大鼠心肌组织损伤情况(HE染色,×400)。A示假伤组:大鼠心肌细胞形态正常,肌纤维排列规则、整齐,闰盘、横纹结构清晰;B示电伤0 h组:大鼠心肌细胞较假伤组形态未出现明显变化;C示电伤8 h组:大鼠心肌细胞水肿,肌纤维排列较规则;D示电伤24 h组:大鼠心肌细胞水肿,肌纤维排列紊乱,闰盘、横纹模糊,肌束间质散在出血点,可见炎细胞浸润;E示电伤48 h组:大鼠心肌细胞严重水肿,细胞周围炎细胞浸润,肌纤维排列紊乱、间隙明显增宽,纤维母细胞增多,闰盘及横纹不可见;F示电伤72 h组:大鼠心肌细胞水肿减轻,周围炎细胞浸润减少,肌纤维排列相对整齐;G示电伤1周组:大鼠心肌细胞水肿减轻,肌纤维排列整齐,无明显炎性浸润,闰盘及横纹可见;H示盐水48 h组:大鼠心肌细胞水肿,周围明显炎细胞浸润,肌纤维排列紊乱、间隙增宽,闰盘及横纹消失,纤维母细胞增多;I示NAC 48 h组:大鼠心肌细胞水肿,周围明显炎细胞浸润,肌纤维排列紊乱,呈波浪状改变,间隙增宽,肌束间质有出血点,纤维母细胞增多,闰盘及横纹不可见
[1]
狄海萍,曹大勇,薛继东,等.高压电烧伤后周围神经损害的调查研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志201720(14):84-86.
[2]
傅秀军,方勇.烧伤早期氧化损伤与抗氧化治疗[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版)201030(12):1481-1485.
[3]
王振花,李潮生,李晓丽.N-乙酰半胱氨酸在各系统疾病防治中的研究进展[J].医学综述201925(11):2138-2142.
[4]
张庆富,高志娟,张紫薇,等. 高压电烧伤对大鼠血清血小板相关因子及血小板聚集数的影响及血必净的干预作用[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2020, 36(6): 426-432.
[5]
孙斯琴,郭威,陈军,等.兔肢体高压电烧伤后骨骼肌MRI特征[J].放射学实践202237(5):605-610.
[6]
Baxter CR, Cook WA, Shires GT. Serum myocardial depressant factor of burn shock[J]. Surg Forum196617:1-2.
[7]
Tapking C, Popp D, Herndon DN, et al. Cardiac dysfunction in severely burned patients: current understanding of etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment[J]. Shock202053(6):669-678.
[8]
Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, et al. Burn injury[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers20206(1):11-13.
[9]
Burgess M, Valdera F, Varon D, et al. The immune and regenerative response to burn injury[J]. Cells202211(19):3073.
[10]
Huang Y, Li Z, Yang Z. Roles of ischemia and hypoxia and the molecular pathogenesis of post-burn cardiac shock[J]. Burns200329(8):828-833.
[11]
Sureshbabu A, Ryter SW, Choi ME. Oxidative stress and autophagy: crucial modulators of kidney injury[J]. Redox Biol20154:208-214.
[12]
Keck M, Herndon DH, Kamolz LP, et al.Pathophysiology of burns[J]. Wien Med Wochenschr2009159(13-14):327-336.
[13]
Maass DL, White J, Horton JW. IL-1beta and IL-6 act synergistically with TNF-alpha to alter cardiac contractile function after burn trauma[J]. Shock200218(4):360-366.
[14]
Li YGe SPeng Y,et al.Inflammation and cardiac dysfunction during sepsis, muscular dystrophy, and myocarditis[J]. Burns Trauma20131(3):109-121.
[15]
Housinger TA, Green L, Shahangian S, et al. A prospective study of myocardial damage in electrical injuries[J]. J Trauma198525(2):122-124.
[16]
卢均坤,初而复,李欣,等.SD大鼠电击损伤后心肌损伤与氧化应激关系的研究[J].临床心血管病杂志201632(5):513-516.
[17]
Fukai T, Ushio-Fukai M. Superoxide dismutases: role in redox signaling, vascular function, and diseases[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal201115(6):1583-1606.
[18]
Qin FJ, Hu XH, Chen Z, et al. Protective effects of tiopronin against oxidative stress in severely burned patients[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther201913:2827-2832.
[19]
Leong XF. Lipid oxidation products on inflammation-mediated hypertension and atherosclerosis: a mini review[J]. Front Nutr20218:717740.
[20]
Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 202122(4):266-282.
[21]
Ramachandra CJA, Ja KPMM, Chua J, et al. Myeloperoxidase as a multifaceted target for cardiovascular protection[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal202032(15):1135-1149.
[22]
Maiocchi SL, Ku J, Thai T, et al. Myeloperoxidase: a versatile mediator of endothelial dysfunction and therapeutic target during cardiovascular disease[J]. Pharmacol Ther2021221:107711.
[23]
张彬,翟蒙恩,段维勋,等.小檗胺在严重烧伤大鼠心肌损伤中的保护作用[J].中国体外循环杂志202220(4):240-247,252.
[24]
张庆富,周慧敏,王车江,等.高压电烧伤对兔心脏微循环的影响[J].中华烧伤杂志201228(3):173-177.
[25]
纪兆乐,秦超师,王芳芳,等.和厚朴酚对重度烧伤大鼠早期心肌损伤的保护作用及其机制[J].山西医科大学学报202152(5):580-587.
[26]
Bostancl ME, Hepokur C, Kisli E. The effects of sildenafil and N-acetylcysteine the zone of stasis in burns[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg202127(1):9-16.
[27]
Saputro I, Riestiano B, Hoekstra LT, et al. The effect of oral N-acetylcysteine on prevention of extensive tissue destruction in electrical burn injury[J]. Burns201844(8):2059-2063.
[28]
Deniz M, Borman H, Seyhan T, et al. An effective antioxidant drug on prevention of the necrosis of zone of stasis: N-acetylcysteine[J]. Burns201339(2):320-325.
[1] 孟庆国, 唐艺加, 王斯佳, 周杰, 冯天航, 刘学兵, 舒庆兰, 邓燕, 尹立雪, 李春梅. 斑点追踪成像和组织多普勒同步成像对不同起搏模式下左心室心肌同步性的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1223-1230.
[2] 陈佳易, 袁帅, 胡胜男, 步笑辉, 牟芸, 郑哲岚. 左心室压力-应变环联合Tei指数评价慢性中重度主动脉瓣反流患者左心功能的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1231-1236.
[3] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[4] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[5] 孙佳英, 黄云洲, 任书堂, 王翠华, 陈新华, 于艾嘉, 陈元禄. 无创心肌做功对左束支传导阻滞患者左心室整体及节段心肌收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 836-843.
[6] 李朋, 苗立帅, 朱智奇. 四氢嘧啶对大鼠关节软骨细胞的保护作用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-77.
[7] 柯晴潆, 沈延飞, 许强宏, 蔡国龙. 预测脓毒性心肌病患者院内死亡风险列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 10-18.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 张礼刚, 邹志辉, 许顺, 蔡可可, 胡永涛, 梁朝朝. 酒精对慢性非细菌性前列腺炎中T淋巴细胞变化的影响研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-81.
[10] 裴捷, 毛本亮, 郝定盈, 苑伟, 颜勇, 吴帆, 王鹏珍, 王百林. 槲皮素调控肝缺血-再灌注损伤的研究进展及应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 244-249.
[11] 王丽丽, 张春霞, 申磊, 吴立娜, 潘青, 冯雪. 吗替麦考酚酯联合雷公藤多苷及糖皮质激素治疗对IgA肾病患者肾功能、炎症因子和氧化应激的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1285-1290.
[12] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 赵海玥, 王雅晳. 超声心动图在围生期心肌病中的应用价值研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(11): 1196-1201.
[13] 姜晓宇, 付迪, 陈雪英, 申程, 甘立军. 胶原在心肌梗死后心脏重构中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 25-30.
[14] 田欢, 吴艳凯, 宋波, 魏榕辰, 张艳, 李月戈, 武柏林. 基于心脏磁共振多模态特征评估急性心肌梗死患者预后[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 17-25.
[15] 胡梦瑶, 宋怡沛, 龚良庚. 心肌应变成像在糖尿病心肌病评估中的研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 32-35.
阅读次数
全文


摘要