切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 208 -214. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.03.005

淋巴水肿

亚甲蓝淋巴管显影结合吲哚菁绿造影应用于淋巴管-静脉吻合术的效果观察
刘建科1, 夏林曦1, 周煦川1, 马戈甲1, 王文飞1, 秦傲霜1, 苏学峰1, 刘宾1,()   
  1. 1. 710003 西安交通大学附属西安市中心医院烧伤整形美容外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-03 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘宾
  • 基金资助:
    西安市创新能力强基计划-医学研究项目(22YXYJ0077)

Effect of methylene blue lymphangiography combined with indocyanine green angiography in lymphaticovenular anastomosis

Jianke Liu1, Linxi Xia1, Xuchuan Zhou1, Gejia Ma1, Wenfei Wang1, Aoshuang Qin1, Xuefeng Su1, Bin Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi′an Central Hospital, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710003, China
  • Received:2024-04-03 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Bin Liu
引用本文:

刘建科, 夏林曦, 周煦川, 马戈甲, 王文飞, 秦傲霜, 苏学峰, 刘宾. 亚甲蓝淋巴管显影结合吲哚菁绿造影应用于淋巴管-静脉吻合术的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 208-214.

Jianke Liu, Linxi Xia, Xuchuan Zhou, Gejia Ma, Wenfei Wang, Aoshuang Qin, Xuefeng Su, Bin Liu. Effect of methylene blue lymphangiography combined with indocyanine green angiography in lymphaticovenular anastomosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(03): 208-214.

目的

探讨亚甲蓝淋巴管显影结合吲哚菁绿(ICG)造影在淋巴管-静脉吻合术(LVA)术前淋巴管定位中的应用效果。

方法

选择2021年2月至2023年5月西安交通大学附属西安市中心医院烧伤整形美容外科收治的行LVA治疗下肢淋巴水肿患者53例。根据术前淋巴管定位方法将患者分为对照组(24例)和研究组(29例),对照组术前淋巴管定位采用传统亚甲蓝淋巴管显影,研究组采用亚甲蓝淋巴管显影结合ICG造影。比较两组患者亚甲蓝内染色结果、寻找淋巴管时间、手术时间、每切口吻合淋巴管数、淋巴管外蓝色污染及表皮溃疡情况;对比两组术前及术后3、6个月下肢淋巴水肿指数(LELI)及下肢淋巴水肿功能、残疾和健康问卷(Lymph-ICF-LL)。

结果

研究组寻找淋巴管时间[14(8,22)min]及手术时间[(185.93±33.43)min]均较对照组[20(13,30)min、(217.00±59.19)min]缩短,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-3.592,P<0.001;t=2.404,P=0.020)。研究组亚甲蓝内染色成功率(65.52%)高于对照组(46.88%),淋巴管外蓝色污染比例(4.31%)低于对照组(13.54%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=7.451、5.761,P=0.006、0.016)。两组每切口吻合淋巴管数差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.757,P=0.079)。术后3、6个月,两组患者LELI较术前明显下降(F=112.889、136.113,P<0.001),同时Lymph-ICF-LL评分也较术前降低(F=71.956、113.342, P<0.001),患者预后改善。

结论

亚甲蓝淋巴管显影结合ICG造影应用于LVA术前淋巴管定位,可使亚甲蓝染色淋巴管更精准,缩短寻找淋巴管时间及手术时间。

Objective

To explore the application effect of methylene blue lymphangiography combined with indocyanine green angiography for the preoperative localization of lymphatic vessels in lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA).

Methods

Fifty-three cases of lower extremity lymphedema patients underwent LVA in the Department of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery of Xi′an Central Hospital, Xi′an Jiaotong University from February 2021 to May 2023 were selected. The patients were divided into control group (24 cases) and study group (29 cases), according to different methods for preoperative lymphatic vessel localization in LVA. The control group used traditional methylene blue lymphangiography, while the study group used methylene blue lymphangiography combined with indocyanine green angiography for preoperative lymphatic vessel localization.Observed internal methylene blue staining, lymphatic vessel identification time, operation time, the number of anastomosed lymphatics per incision, extra-lymphatic blue contamination, epidermal ulceration of the patients. Lower extremity lymphedema index (LELI) and lymphoedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire for lower limb lymphoedema (Lymph-ICF-LL) before and 3, 6 months after operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

The lymphatic vessel identification time [14 (8, 22) min] and the operative time [(185.93 ± 33.43) min] in the study group were both shorter than those in the control group [20 (13, 30) min, (217.00 ± 59.19) min], and the differences were statistically significant (Z=-3.592, P<0.001; t=2.404, P=0.020). The success rate of methylene blue staining in the study group (65.52%) was higher than that in the control group (46.88%), and the proportion of extra-lymphatic blue contamination (4.31%) was lower than that in the control group (13.54%), with statistically significant differences (χ2=7.451, 5.761; P=0.006, 0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of anastomosed lymphatics per incision between the two groups (Z=-1.757, P=0.079). The LELI(F=112.889, 136.113; P<0.001) and Lymph-ICF-LL scores (F=71.956, 113.342; P<0.001) were significantly reduced in both groups at 3 and 6 months after surgery compared to preoperative, and the prognosis improved.

Conclusion

Methylene blue lymphangiography combined with indocyanine green angiography used in LVA for the preoperative localization of lymphatic vessels, can make methylene blue staining of lymphatic vessels more accurate and shorten the lymphatic vessel identification time and operation time.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
图1 内部蓝染淋巴管
图2 内部蓝染淋巴管与周围小静脉
表2 两组亚甲蓝染色及手术情况比较
表3 两组患者LELI随时间变化比较
表4 两组患者Lymph-ICF-LL评分随时间变化比较
[1]
Okajima S, Hirota A, Kimura E, et al. Health-related quality of life and associated factors in patients with primary lymphedema [J]. Jpn J Nurs Sci, 2013, 10(2): 202-211.
[2]
Cemal Y, Jewell S, Albornoz CR, et al. Systematic review of quality of life and patient reported outcomes in patients with oncologic related lower extremity lymphedema [J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2013, 11(1): 14-19.
[3]
Taghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, et al. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: a review [J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2014, 92(3): 227-234.
[4]
Schaverien MV, Coroneos CJ. Surgical treatment of lymphedema [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 144(3): 738-758.
[5]
Chen WF, Tuncer FB, Zeng W. Advanced technical pearls for successful supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2021, 86(Suppl 2): S165-S172.
[6]
Ayestaray B, Bekara F, Andreoletti JB. Patent blue-enhanced lymphaticovenular anastomosis [J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2013, 66(3): 382-389.
[7]
Yap YL, Lim J, Shim TW, et al. Patent blue dye in lymphaticovenular anastomosis [J]. Ann Acad Med Singap, 2009, 38(8): 704-706.
[8]
Hassanein AH, Sacks JM, Cooney DS. Optimizing perioperative lymphatic-venous anastomosis localization using transcutaneous vein illumination, isosulfan blue, and indocyanine green lymphangiography [J]. Microsurgery, 2017, 37(8): 956-957.
[9]
Lin CH, Yamamoto T. Identification of lymph vessels using an indocyanine green camera-integrated operative microscope for lymphovenous anastomosis in the treatment of secondary lymphedema [J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2023, 11(1): 161-166.
[10]
周煦川,刘宾,王文飞,等. 多点注射吲哚菁绿红外显影在下肢淋巴管-静脉吻合术中的应用 [J]. 组织工程与重建外科2023, 19(5): 459-463.
[11]
Mihara M, Seki Y, Hara H, et al. Predictive lymphatic mapping: a method for mapping lymphatic channels in patients with advanced unilateral lymphedema using indocyanine green lymphography [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2014, 72(6): 706-710.
[12]
Zhou X, Liu B, Guo X, et al. Application of indocyanine green lymphography combined with methylene blue staining in lymphaticovenular anastomosis of lower limb vessels: a prospective study [J]. Phlebology, 2023, 38(7): 466-473.
[13]
陈珺,章一新. 章氏超减张缝合在闭合高张力创面中的临床应用效果 [J]. 中华烧伤杂志2020, 36(5): 339-345.
[14]
Wang X, Ding Y, Cai HY, et al. Effectiveness of modified complex decongestive physiotherapy for preventing lower extremity lymphedema after radical surgery for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020, 30(6): 757-763.
[15]
Yamamoto T, Matsuda N, Todokoro T, et al. Lower extremity lymphedema index: a simple method for severity evaluation of lower extremity lymphedema [J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2011, 67(6): 637-640.
[16]
周煦川,马戈甲,王文飞,等. 简体中文版下肢淋巴水肿功能、残疾与健康问卷的信度和效度分析 [J]. 中华整形外科杂志2023, 39(6):634-641.
[17]
Bona AF, Ferreira KR, Carvalho RBM, et al. Psychometric evaluation of a brazilian version of the lymphedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire for lower limb lymphedema in patients after cancer treatment [J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2022, 20(1): 82-88.
[18]
Chu CK, Hanasono MM, Chang EI. Treatment of multiple limb lymphedema with combined supermicrosurgical techniques [J]. Microsurgery, 2022, 43(1): 13-19.
[19]
Will PA, Wan Z, Seide SE, et al. Supermicrosurgical treatment for lymphedema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol [J]. Syst Rev, 2022, 11(1): 18.
[20]
牛梦晔,杨朝昕,邢壹,等. 双示踪法应用在早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检术的远期随访结果及预后分析[J]. 中国医师杂志2020, 22(10): 1511-1515.
[1] 晏伍兵, 杨明秀. 乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的治疗现状[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 115-118.
[2] 杨明秀, 杨雪, 富莉萍. 新型肢体围长测量尺在乳腺癌术后患者康复中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 13-16.
[3] 李丹, 王寅欢, 肖佳, 张晔, 杨英. 力量训练联合综合消肿治疗对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的疗效分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 225-230.
[4] 徐海萍, 孙莉, 王开慧, 卢静, 岳朝丽, 王水. 综合消肿治疗联合互联网护理指导在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿护理门诊中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 359-365.
[5] 刘思尧, 刘淼, 王殊. 生物电阻抗在乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿诊断中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 242-246.
[6] 蒙燕, 唐如冰, 蒋奕, 陆华, 苏玉兰, 张琼, 何英煜. 基于多学科协作的预防性淋巴管-静脉吻合术在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫患者中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 204-207.
[7] 王季, 王淑婷, 肖聪慧, 廖鑫, 严鹭慧, 徐姗姗, 邓呈亮, 王玉龙. 采用综合消肿疗法联合淋巴管-静脉吻合术治疗继发性淋巴水肿的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 198-203.
[8] 周煦川, 马戈甲, 苏学峰, 王文飞, 秦傲霜, 刘宾. 规范化综合消肿治疗在亚临床期下肢淋巴水肿中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 192-197.
[9] 邓呈亮, 陈君哲, 章一新. 继发性肢体淋巴水肿的外科整合治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 185-191.
[10] 刘英, 李群, 吕大鹏, 黄颖, 王婷婷. 有氧运动联合康复护理干预在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(02): 170-174.
[11] 颜敏, 周莉娜, 钱海蓉, 姜一坤, 顾瑞香, 刘学敏, 常清语, 王海强. 超声乳管造影联合亚甲蓝染色在乳头溢液手术中的可行性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-434.
[12] 白雪, 李珺, 邢婵, 高济越, 赵海东. 中华医学会乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿临床实践指南解读[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 245-249.
[13] 孙传伟, 林师佈, 蒋曼妃, 吴煌福, 王璐瑶, 王锐, 杨彦. 三种不同示踪显示方案在乳腺癌手术中的临床价值对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 518-521.
[14] 毛婷, 王越, 李倩雯, 吕淑贞. 逆向腋淋巴显影技术在乳腺癌患者中的临床运用及上肢回流淋巴结的分布与转移特点分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 203-206.
[15] 陈小玲, 孙乐妹, 吴纪萍, 桂翠, 莫御姬. 居家康复锻炼对乳腺癌患者术后淋巴水肿治疗的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 362-367.
阅读次数
全文


摘要