切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05) : 386 -392. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.05.003

论著

区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤的临床疗效和安全性分析
毛书雷1, 张元海1, 王杰2, 倪良方1, 王新刚2, 邹雁1, 王荣娟1, 吴军梅1, 张建芬1,()   
  1. 1. 324004 衢州,浙江衢化医院烧伤与创面修复科
    2. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院烧伤与创面修复科 浙江省严重创伤与烧伤诊治重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-19 出版日期:2024-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张建芬
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省严重创伤与烧伤诊治重点实验室开放课题(2022K03); 浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y202249345)

Clinical effectiveness and safety of regional intravenous perfusion of calcium gluconate for treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns in fingers

Shulei Mao1, Yuanhai Zhang1, Jie Wang2, Liangfang Ni1, Xingang Wang2, Yan Zou1, Rongjuan Wang1, Junmei Wu1, Jianfen Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Wound Repair, Zhejiang Quhua Hospital, Quzhou 324004, China
    2. Department of Burns and Wound Repair, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Trauma and Burn of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2024-05-19 Published:2024-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianfen Zhang
引用本文:

毛书雷, 张元海, 王杰, 倪良方, 王新刚, 邹雁, 王荣娟, 吴军梅, 张建芬. 区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤的临床疗效和安全性分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 386-392.

Shulei Mao, Yuanhai Zhang, Jie Wang, Liangfang Ni, Xingang Wang, Yan Zou, Rongjuan Wang, Junmei Wu, Jianfen Zhang. Clinical effectiveness and safety of regional intravenous perfusion of calcium gluconate for treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns in fingers[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(05): 386-392.

目的

探讨区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

2018年5月至2022年6月,浙江衢化医院烧伤与创面修复科收治符合纳入与排除标准的手指氢氟酸烧伤患者40例。收集患者一般临床资料,包括受伤手指分布、创面面积及深度、致伤氢氟酸质量分数、持续接触氢氟酸时间以及院前时间。患者均采用区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗,灌注液为100 g/L葡萄糖酸钙溶液15 ml、生理盐水35 ml及肝素钠0.1 ml。创面彻底清创,拔除受累指甲,每天1次常规换药。记录患者入院时血清总钙、游离钙、血清钾、血清镁、血氟、尿氟和心电图情况。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者灌注前、灌注后即刻、灌注后4 h以及灌注后24 h疼痛程度。统计患者灌注后4、12及24 h血清总钙、游离钙、尿氟及灌注后24 h血氟水平。统计灌注过程中及灌注结束后24 h内发生的不良反应,以及烧伤创面愈合情况。

结果

(1)本组患者中男32例,女8例,年龄主要集中在30~50岁(24例),所在企业以非氟化工企业为主,单手烧伤35例,双手烧伤5例,共累及83指,烧伤总面积均<1%总体表面积(TBSA),烧伤深度为Ⅱ~Ⅳ度,其中以Ⅱ度为主(30例)。仅有18例患者致伤氢氟酸质量分数已知,持续接触氢氟酸时间为30.0(14.3,48.8)min,院前时间为9.0(3.3,19.0)h。(2)患者均经单次区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗后,疼痛明显缓解。灌注前、灌注后即刻、灌注后4 h、灌注后24 h之间比较,疼痛评分呈进行性下降(P<0.01)。(3)患者入院时,以游离钙为参考有11例低钙血症,另外有5例低钾血症。与入院时比较,灌注后4 h血清总钙水平明显升高(P<0.05);与灌注后4 h比较,灌注后12、24 h血清总钙水平明显下降(P<0.01)。与入院时比较,灌注后4 h游离钙水平明显升高(P<0.01);灌注后4、12、24 h之间比较,游离钙水平逐渐下降(P<0.01)。(4)患者入院时,有15例血氟高于正常值,尿氟均高于正常值。与入院时比较,灌注后24 h血氟水平明显下降(P<0.01);入院时及灌注后4、12、24 h之间比较,尿氟水平逐渐下降(P<0.01)。(5)所有患者在灌注过程中及灌注结束后24 h内,未发生不良反应。创面愈合时间为4.0~30.0(11.1±5.9)d,35例经换药治疗创面愈合,5例通过手术治疗后愈合。

结论

即使手指氢氟酸烧伤总面积<1%TBSA,伤后患者血氟、尿氟水平仍可升高数十倍,并伴有电解质紊乱。采用区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤,临床疗效显著,操作简单且安全性高,可以明显减轻疼痛,有效阻断氟离子进行性损害。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of regional intravenous perfusion of calcium gluconate for treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns in fingers.

Methods

A total of 40 patients with finger hydrofluoric acid burns who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burns and Wound Repair, Zhejiang Quhua Hospital from May 2018 to June 2022. Collected the general clinical data of the patients, including the distribution of injured fingers, the area and depth of wounds, the mass fraction of injured hydrofluoric acid, the time of continuous exposure to hydrofluoric acid, and the pre-hospital time. All patients were treated with regional intravenous infusion of calcium gluconate, with an infusion solution of 15 ml of 100 g/L calcium gluconate solution, 35 ml of physiological saline, and 0.1 ml of heparin sodium. The wounds were thoroughly debrided, the affected nails were removed, and routine dressing changes were performed once a day. Recorded the serum total calcium, free calcium, serum potassium, serum magnesium, blood fluoride, urine fluoride, and electrocardiogram of the patients at admission. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain before perfusion, immediately after perfusion, 4 and 24 h after perfusion. Recorded the serum total calcium, free calcium, urinary fluoride, and 24-hour blood fluoride levels of patients after perfusion. Counted the adverse reactions during the perfusion and within 24 h after perfusion, as well as the healing of burn wounds.

Results

(1) The patients included 32 males and 8 females, with majority aged 30 to 50 years (24 patients). The company were mainly non-fluorine chemical enterprises. There were 35 patients with single hand burns and 5 patients with double hand burns, and 83 fingers were involved. The total burn area was below 1% of the total body surface area (TBSA). The depth of burn was Ⅱ to Ⅳ degrees, the majority depth was Ⅱ degrees (30 patients). The hydrofluoric acid mass fraction was known in only 18 patients. The time of continuous exposure to hydrofluoric acid was 30.0(14.3, 48.8)min, and the pre-hospital time was 9.0(3.3, 19.0)h. (2) After single regional intravenous perfusion of calcium gluconate, the pain of all patients was significantly relieved. The pain score progressively decreased compared among before perfusion, immediately after perfusion, at 4 h and 24 h after perfusion (P<0.01). (3) When the patients were admitted to the hospital, according to the free calcium, there were 11 patients with hypocalcemia. In addition, there were 5 patients with hypokalemia. Compared with that at admission, the serum total calcium level was increased significantly at 4 h after perfusion (P<0.05); compared with 4 h after perfusion, the serum total calcium level was decreased significantly at 12 and 24 h after perfusion (P<0.01). Compared with that at admission, the free calcium was increased significantly at 4 h after perfusion (P<0.01); the free calcium level gradually decreased at 4, 12 and 24 h after perfusion (P<0.01). (4) When the patients were admitted to the hospital, there were 15 patients whose blood fluoride levels were higher than the normal value, the urine fluoride levels were all higher than the normal value. Compared with that at admission, the blood fluoride level was decreased significantly at 24 h after perfusion (P<0.01).The urine fluoride level was gradually decreased at admission and 4, 12 and 24 h after perfusion (P<0.01). (5) All patients had no adverse reactions during the perfusion process and within 24 h after perfusion. The wound healing time was 4.0-30.0 (11.1±5.9)d. Thirty-five patients healed after dressing change, and 5 patients healed after surgical treatment.

Conclusion

Even if the total area of hydrofluoric acid burn in fingers is below 1% TBSA, the level of blood fluoride and urine fluoride can still increase ten times after injury, with electrolyte disorder. Regional intravenous perfusion of calcium gluconate for treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns in fingers has significant clinical effectiveness, with simple operation and high safety. It can not only significantly reduce pain, but also effectively block the progressive damage of fluoride ions.

表1 患者不同时间点血电解质比较(mmol/L,±s)
表2 患者不同时间点血氟、尿氟比较(mg/L,±s)
[10]
Tan HHTeo S, Tseng HC. Work-related chemical exposures presenting to an emergency department in Singapore[J].Occup Med(Lond)201464(2):113-119.
[11]
张元海,王新刚,田鹏飞,等.改良葡萄糖酸钙给药剂量对非手足部的氢氟酸烧伤患者的治疗效果分析[J].中华烧伤杂志201834(5):277-282.
[12]
Han HH, Kwon BY, Jung SN, et al. Importance of initial management and surgical treatment after hydrofluoric acid burn of the finger[J].Burns201743(1):e1-e6.
[13]
张德荣,张秀荣.不同速度静脉注射葡萄糖酸钙所致不良反应的观察[J].护理学杂志200722(3):67-68.
[14]
毛书雷,张元海,吴军梅,等.氢氟酸烧伤救治研究进展[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志202238(9):878-882.
[15]
张建芬,吴晓霞,吴军梅,等.动脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手部氢氟酸灼伤的疗效和安全性[J].环境与职业医学201835(8):725-728.
[16]
毛书雷,张建芬,叶春江,等.成功救治危重氢氟酸烧伤1例[J/OL].中国临床案例成果数据库2022(2022-09-05).

URL    
[17]
张曼佳,毛书雷,张建芬,等.229例手部氢氟酸烧伤患者的流行病学特征和治疗结局分析[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志202238(2):156-164.
[18]
Lippert JDesai B, Falgiani M, et al.Management of hydrofluoric acid burns in the emergency department[J].Cureus202012(3):e7152.
[19]
胡大海,王耘川.进一步重视特殊原因及部位烧伤创面处理[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志202339(3):209-214.
[20]
李琳,潘琼,徐乐,等.成年烧伤患者疼痛经历的质性研究[J].中华烧伤杂志201834(3):165-170.
[21]
尤彩珠,陈翠娟.集束化疼痛护理干预在严重烧伤患者疼痛管理中的应用[J].国际护理学杂志201837(24):3416-3419.
[22]
周湘桂,辛国华.严重烧伤疼痛治疗研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志200723(6):472-475.
[23]
《中华烧伤杂志》编辑委员会.成人烧伤疼痛管理指南(2013版)[J].中华烧伤杂志201329(3):225-231.
[24]
田鹏飞,王新刚,张元海,等.316例氢氟酸烧伤患者临床特征性分析[J].中华烧伤杂志201834(5):271-276.
[25]
张建芬,王新刚,张元海,等.氢氟酸烧伤患者检测尿氟的临床意义[J].中华急诊医学杂志201524(3):328-329.
[1]
Hoffmann S, Parikh P, Bohnenberger K. Dermal hydrofluoric acid toxicity case review:looks can be deceiving[J].J Emerg Nurs202147(1):28-32.
[2]
Ye C, Wang X, Zhang Y, et al. Ten-year epidemiology of chemical burns in western Zhejiang Province,China[J].Burns201642:668-674.
[3]
Zhang Y, Zhang J, Jiang X, et al. Hydrofluoric acid burns in the western Zhejiang province of China:a 10-year epidemiological study[J].J Occup Med Toxicol201611:55.
[4]
田鹏飞,张建芬,胡祖良,等.浙西地区316例职业性氢氟酸灼伤病例流行病学分析[J].环境与职业医学201835(6):578-581.
[5]
Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Georgieva S, et al. Hydrofluoric acid: burns and systemic toxicity, protective measures, immediate and hospital medical treatment[J].Open Access Maced J Med Sci20186(11):2257-2269.
[6]
Stuke LE, Arnoldo BD, Hunt IL, et al.Hydrofluoric acid burns:a 15-year experience[J].J Burn Care Res200829(6):893-896.
[7]
王新刚,张元海,韩春茂.氢氟酸烧伤的致伤机制及其治疗的研究进展[J].中华急诊医学杂志201423(11):1295-1297.
[8]
McKee D, Thoma A, Biley K, et al.A review of hydrofluoric acid burn management[J].Plast Surge(Oakv)201422(2):95-98.
[9]
Ozcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dandar M. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach:a review[J].Clin Oral Investig201216(1):15-23.
[26]
张元海,田鹏飞,张惟,等.急救网络建设在危重氢氟酸烧伤患者早期救治中的作用[J].中华烧伤杂志202137(10):921-928.
[27]
Ozsoy G, Kendirli T, Ates U, et al. Fatal refractory ventricular fibrillation due to ingestion of hydrofluoric acid[J].Pediatr Emerg Care201935(11):e201-e202.
[28]
毛书雷,张建芬,张元海,等.致命性氢氟酸烧伤六例分析[J].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)202316(1):60-63.
[1] 马捷, 邓津菊, 吴健, 路若楠. 氢氟酸烧伤的临床表现及治疗进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(06): 466-470.
阅读次数
全文


摘要