切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 507 -510. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.06.010

论著

Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果
郭杰坤1,(), 王楹1, 杨轩1, 晏欢欣1, 钟豪1   
  1. 1.512026 韶关,汕头大学附属粤北人民医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-05 出版日期:2024-12-01
  • 通信作者: 郭杰坤

Clinical effect of Ilizarov bone transfer technique on emergency primary repair of type Gustilo ⅢB tibia long-segment open comminuted fractures

Jiekun Guo1,(), Ying Wang1, Xuan Yang1, Huanxin Yan1, Hao Zhong1   

  1. 1.Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University,Shaoguan 512026,China
  • Received:2024-06-05 Published:2024-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiekun Guo
引用本文:

郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.

Jiekun Guo, Ying Wang, Xuan Yang, Huanxin Yan, Hao Zhong. Clinical effect of Ilizarov bone transfer technique on emergency primary repair of type Gustilo ⅢB tibia long-segment open comminuted fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.

目的

探讨应用Ilizarov 环形外固定架结合骨搬移技术急诊一期治疗严重胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2019 年1 月至2022 年12 月汕头大学附属粤北人民医院创伤骨科收治的14 例Gustilo ⅢB 型严重胫骨长段开放粉碎性性骨折患者资料。 急诊手术清除患者粉碎无活力骨块,钢板或克氏针固定腓骨,一期使用Ilizarov 环形外固定架固定胫骨,胫骨干骺端截骨后搬移。 清创后胫骨存在大段骨缺损,达6.5 cm 以上。 术后定期随访,记录骨段搬移时间,骨折端愈合时间;采用Johner-Wruhs 标准评定患肢功能,Kofoed 标准评定踝关节功能。

结果

14 例患者平均随访时间14.50(11~23)个月;平均搬移时间4.39(3~8)个月;平均骨愈合时间11.50 个月。 所有患者伤口经过骨搬移后愈合良好,骨折端经过自体骨移植并加压后愈合。 2 例出现搬移骨段轴向偏移,及时调整外固定架后恢复;2 例出现成骨不全,植骨后愈合。 患肢功能优11 例,良3 例;踝关节功能优11 例,良2 例,及格1 例。

结论

一期应用Ilizarov 骨搬移技术治疗胫骨严重长段开放粉碎性骨折,可使手术次数减少,病程缩短,临床疗效良好。

Objective

To demonstrate the clinical efficacy of Ilizarov ring external fixator combined with bone moving technique in treating severe tibial open comminuted fractures.

Methods

14 cases of severe Gustilo ⅢB tibia fractures admitted to Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University from January 2019 to December 2022.Emergency surgery to crush the nonvital bone block, plate or Kirschner wire to fix the fibula, using Ilizarov ring external holder to fix the tibia.After debridement, the tibia was over 6.5 cm.The time of bone segment removal and fracture-end healing were recorded by regular follow-up after operation.Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to assess the function of the affected limb and Kofoed criteria to assess the function of the ankle joint.

Results

The average follow-up time for 14 patients was 14.50(11-23)months.The average time of relocation is 4.39(3-8)months and the average time of bone healing is 11.50 months.All the wounds healed well after bone migration, and the fracture end healed after autologous bone grafting and compression.In 2 cases, axial deviation of the displaced bone segment, and recovery after timely adjustment of the external fixator.2 cases showed osteogenesis insufficiency and healing after bone grafting.The Johner-Wruhs criteria showed 11 excellent and 3 good.And ankle functions showed 11 excellent, 2 good and 1 pass.

Conclusion

Ilizarov bone transfer technique yields benefits for tibia fracture with severe long open comminuted fracture, few operation times, short duration and good clinical effect.

图1 患者男,22 岁,车祸外伤后入院,诊断为致左小腿Gustilo ⅢB 型开放性骨折。 A、B 示外伤时三维CT 片;C、D 示术后X 线片,骨缺损为7 cm;E、F 示术后2.5 个月时X 线片;G、H 示术后8 个月时X 线片
[1]
吴新宝,孙志坚.加速康复外科在创伤骨科的推广及展望[J].骨科临床与研究杂志, 2022,7(1):1-3.
[2]
Hand TL,Hand EO,Welborn A,et al.Gram-negative antibiotic coverage in gustilo-anderson type-iii open fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2020,102(16):1468-1474.
[3]
龚子顺,史宗新,杨勇,等.多学科协作诊疗在老年髋部骨折治疗中的临床应用[J].骨科临床与研究杂志, 2022,7(1):4-8.
[4]
Yim GH, Hardwicke JT.The evolution and interpretation of the gustilo and anderson classification[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2018,100(24):e152.
[5]
Myatt A,Saleeb H,Robertson GAJ,et al.Management of Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open tibial fractures in adults-a systematic review[J].Br Med Bull,2021,139(1):48-58.
[6]
Cheng HT,Hsu YC,Wu CI.Risk of infection with delayed wound coverage by using negative-pressure wound therapy in gustilo Grade IIIB/IIIC open tibial fracture: an evidence-based review[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2013,66(6):876-878.
[7]
Singh A, Jiong Hao JT, Wei DT, et al.Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures:an analysis of infection and nonunion rates[J].Indian J Orthop,2018,52(4):406-410.
[8]
Paul S, Vathulya M, Kandwal P, et al.Comparative analysis of free vascularized fibula grafting and Ilizarov bone transport in management of segmental long bone defect of the lower limb: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Orthop,2023,50:84-91.
[9]
Chatelet M,Afota F,Savoldelli C.Review of bone graft and implant survival rate:a comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration [J].J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg,2022,123(2):222-227.
[10]
Masquelet AC, Kishi T, Benko PE.Very long-term results of post-traumatic bone defect reconstruction by the induced membrane technique[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2019,105(1):159-166.
[11]
Levin LS.Vascularized fibula graft for the traumatically induced long-bone defect[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2006,14(10 Spec No.):S175-S176.
[12]
Aktuglu K, Erol K, Vahabi A.Ilizarov bone transport and treatment of critical-sized tibial bone defects: a narrative review[J].J Orthop Traumatol,2019,20(1):22.
[13]
Aronson J.Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1997,79(8):1243-1258.
[14]
Messori M, Touloupakis G, Gilli A,et al.The risk of infection in open distal tibial fracture: the DANGER score[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2023,33(7):2965-2970.
[15]
Li Z, Liu J, Li C, et al.Advances in the application of bone transport techniques in the treatment of bone nonunion and bone defects[J].Orthop Surg,2023,15(12):3046-3054.
[1] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[2] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[3] 丁镇涛, 邢博涵, 曲洋, 王泊江, 张培训. 老年肱骨近端骨折的围手术期治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 292-294.
[4] 王晓梅, 刘宇, 董金磊, 刘凡孝, 王成龙, 李连欣. 单一前方入路内固定对肱骨近端骨折合并肱骨头后脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 319-325.
[5] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[6] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[7] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[8] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[11] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?