切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 511 -516. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.06.011

论著

胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察
彭玲1, 吴红1, 宛仕勇1, 陈斓1, 叶子青1, 周静1,()   
  1. 1.430060 武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-08 出版日期:2024-12-01
  • 通信作者: 周静

Observation on the efficacy of collagenase ointment combined with hydrogel dressing in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn wounds

Ling Peng1, Hong Wu1, Shiyong Wan1, Lan Chen1, Ziqing Ye1, Jing Zhou1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Burns, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University & Wuhan Third Hospital, Wuhan 430060,China
  • Received:2024-04-08 Published:2024-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jing Zhou
引用本文:

彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.

Ling Peng, Hong Wu, Shiyong Wan, Lan Chen, Ziqing Ye, Jing Zhou. Observation on the efficacy of collagenase ointment combined with hydrogel dressing in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn wounds[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.

目的

观察胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床效果。

方法

选择武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院烧伤科2022 年1 月至2023 年6 月收治的符合纳入与排除标准的66 例深Ⅱ度烧伤患者为研究对象。 采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组33 例。观察组患者采用胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料治疗,对照组患者采用碘伏凡士林纱布常规换药治疗。记录2 组患者创面愈合时间、创面感染率及创面坏死组织清除率。 每次换药完毕时,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者疼痛程度。 采用改良温哥华瘢痕量表(mVSS)评估治疗后第3 个月和第12 个月创面瘢痕情况。

结果

观察组和对照组创面愈合时间分别为(12.09±1.75)d 和(12.97±1.88)d,差异无统计学意义(t=1.935, P=0.057)。 观察组创面感染率为9.09%(3/33),对照组为6.06%(2/33),差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。 在治疗后第5~7 天,观察组创面坏死组织清除率为(73.91±17.52)%,高于对照组的(58.91±13.30)%,差异有统计学意义(t=3.916, P<0.001)。 在治疗后第5~7 天,观察组患者换药时VAS 评分为(1.94±1.17)分,低于对照组的(2.68±1.03)分,差异有统计学意义(t=3.475, P=0.001)。 在治疗后第3 个月,观察组mVSS 评分厚度评分及总分[(1.54±0.60)分、(8.73±1.71)分]均低于对照组[(1.93±0.63)分、(9.85±1.65)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=2.198, P=0.032;t=2.666, P=0.010)。 在治疗后第12 个月,观察组mVSS 总分[(3.67±1.39)分]低于对照组[(4.38±1.39)分],差异有统计学意义(t=2.181, P=0.047);mVSS 各分项评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面具有良好的临床效果,能够减轻创面疼痛,减少坏死组织,抑制瘢痕增生。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of collagenase ointment combined with hydrogel dressing in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn wounds.

Methods

A total of 66 patients with deep partial-thickness burn wounds were admitted to Department of Burns, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University & Wuhan Third Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled as the study subjects.The patients were divided into observation group and control group according to random number table,with 33 patients in each group.The patients in the observation group received collagenase ointment combined with hydrogel dressing treatment, while the patients in the control group received iodine tincture vaseline gauze dressing treatment.The wound healing time, wound infection rate, necrotic tissue clearance rate, pain score, and modified Vancouver scar scale (mVSS) scores at 3 months and 12 months after treatment were recorded for both groups.

Results

The wound healing time in the observation group and the control group was (12.09±1.75)d and (12.97±1.88)d respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=1.935, P=0.057).No significant difference was found in wound infection rate between the two groups [9.09%(3/33) vs 6.06%(2/33),P=1.000].From day 5 to day 7 post-treatment,the necrotic tissue debridement rate in the observation group was (73.91±17.52)%, statistically higher than(58.91±13.30)% of the control group (t=3.916, P<0.001).From day 5 to day 7 post-treatment, the mVAS score during changing dressings was 1.94±1.17 in the observation group and 2.68±1.03 in the control group, with statistically significant difference (t= 3.475, P= 0.001).At 3 months post-treatment, the thickness score on the mVSS scale in the observation group was 1.54±0.60, lower than 1.93±0.63 in the control group (t=2.198, P=0.032), and the total mVSS score in the observation group was 8.73±1.71,lower than 9.85±1.65 in the control group, which was statistically different between the two groups(t=2.666,P=0.010).At 12 months post-treatment, the total mVSS score in the observation group was 3.67±1.39, lower than 4.38±1.39 in the control group, with statistically significant difference (t=2.181, P=0.047).There was no significant difference in sub-item scores of mVSS between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of collagenase ointment combined with hydrogel dressing has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn wounds.It can effectively alleviate wound pain, reduce necrotic tissue, and inhibit scar hypertrophy.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2 组创面愈合时间及创面感染率比较
表3 2 组创面坏死组织清除率比较(%,±s
表4 2 组患者创面换药疼痛VAS 评分比较(分,±s
表5 治疗后第3 个月2 组患者mVSS 评分比较(分,±s
表6 治疗后第12 个月2 组患者mVSS 评分比较(分,±s
图1 采用胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面。 A 示伤后第1 天;B 示治疗后第3 天;C 示治疗后第7 天;D 示治疗后第10 天;E示治疗后第3 个月;F 示治疗后第12 个月
图2 采用胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面。 A 示伤后第1 天;B 示治疗后第3 天;C 示治疗后第7 天;D 示治疗后第10 天;E示治疗后第3 个月;F 示治疗后第12 个月
[1]
Shoham Y, Rosenberg L, Hickerson W,et al.Early enzymatic burn debridement: results of the DETECT multicenter randomized controlled trial[J].J Burn Care Res,2024,45(2):297-307.
[2]
McCallon SK, Weir D, Lantis JC 2nd.Optimizing wound bed preparation with collagenase enzymatic debridement[J].J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec, 2015, 6(1-2): 14-23.
[3]
De Francesco F, De Francesco M, Riccio M.Hyaluronic acid/collagenase ointment in the treatment of chronic hard-to-heal wounds: an observational and retrospective study[J].J Clin Med,2022,11(3): 537.
[4]
中华医学会烧伤外科学分会,海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会暨烧创伤组织修复专委会.Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗专家共识(2024版)Ⅰ:院前急救和非手术治疗[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2024,40(1):1-18.
[5]
曹望北,高长有.多功能水凝胶敷料治疗糖尿病致慢性创面的研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2021, 37(11):1090-1098.
[6]
雷莉华,李小芳,邓琨,等.湿性敷料在体表慢性难愈合伤口中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2021,30(10):36-40.
[7]
汤云阳,林小飞,王嘉欣.皮肤内外同时减张联合术后早期放疗治疗胸部瘢痕疙瘩临床效果研究[J].中国美容医学,2023,32(3):35-38.
[8]
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health.Debridement procedures for managing diabetic foot ulcers: a review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and guidelines[M].Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health,2014.
[9]
肖虎,王一兵,薛文君,等.休克期磨痂对小儿深Ⅱ度烧伤创面愈合及瘢痕形成的影响[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2017,12(2):128-131.
[10]
高仪轩,周彪,巴特,等.新型敷料在创面修复中的应用与进展[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(1):68-71.
[11]
Sheets AR, Demidova-Rice TN, Shi L, et al.Identification and characterization of novel matrix-derived bioactive peptides: a role for collagenase from Santyl® ointment in post-debridement wound healing?[J].PLoS One, 2016, 11(7): e0159598.
[12]
Shi L, Carson D.Collagenase Santyl ointment: a selective agent for wound debridement[J].J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2009, 36(Suppl 6): S12-S16.
[13]
Lantis Ii JC, Gordon I.Clostridial collagenase for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: results of four randomized controlled trials[J].Wounds, 2017, 29(10): 297-305.
[14]
Waycaster C, Carter MJ,Gilligan AM,et al.Comparative cost and clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment for chronic dermal ulcers[J].J Comp Eff Res,2018,7(2):149-165.
[15]
王廷宇,叶子青,郭晓雨,等.夫西地酸治疗浅Ⅱ度烧伤的疗效及对烧伤常见菌的体外抗菌活性探讨[J].中国美容医学,2023,32(4):34-37.
[16]
谢卫国,雷芳,王娟,等.序贯激光治疗早期增生性烧伤瘢痕的临床效果[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2018, 34(9):615-623.
[17]
Galperin RC, Lange DL, Ramsay SJ, et al.Anti-inflammatory effects of clostridial collagenase: results from in vitro and clinical studies[J].J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 2015, 105(6): 509-519.
[18]
吕国忠.生物活性材料与瘢痕防治[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(2):160.
[1] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[2] 王智忠, 刘利华, 曹强, 查天建, 张娜, 禹学彬, 刘小龙. 水凝胶联合藻酸盐银敷料在面部深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(01): 50-54.
[3] 施祝英. 水胶体敷料对转化糖电解质致静脉炎的预防效果[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2017, 03(06): 382-384.
阅读次数
全文


摘要