切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 122 -127. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2025.02.007

论著

坏死性筋膜炎临床特征及预后影响因素分析
陈英斌1, 黄银涛2, 首家保1,(), 崔泽龙1, 宋蕊1, 龙照忠1, 徐海永1   
  1. 1. 545000 柳州市工人医院广西医科大学第四附属医院创伤修复烧伤整形外科
    2. 545000 柳州市工人医院广西医科大学第四附属医院急诊医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-16 出版日期:2025-04-01
  • 通信作者: 首家保
  • 基金资助:
    广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z20191105)柳州市科技计划项目(2022CAC0109)

Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with necrotizing fasciitis

Yingbin Chen1, Yintao Huang2, Jiabao Shou1,(), Zelong Cui1, Rui Song1, Zhaozhong Long1, Haiyong Xu1   

  1. 1. Department of Trauma Repair,Burns and Plastic SurgeryLiuzhou Workers' Hospital,the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Liuzhou 545000,China
    2. Department of Emergency Medicine,Liuzhou Workers' Hospital,the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Liuzhou 545000,China
  • Received:2024-10-16 Published:2025-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiabao Shou
引用本文:

陈英斌, 黄银涛, 首家保, 崔泽龙, 宋蕊, 龙照忠, 徐海永. 坏死性筋膜炎临床特征及预后影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(02): 122-127.

Yingbin Chen, Yintao Huang, Jiabao Shou, Zelong Cui, Rui Song, Zhaozhong Long, Haiyong Xu. Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with necrotizing fasciitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2025, 20(02): 122-127.

目的

总结66例坏死性筋膜炎(NF)患者的临床特征并分析其预后影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2017 年1 月至2023 年12 月柳州市工人医院创伤修复烧伤整形外科收治的66 例NF 患者临床资料,总结NF 的临床特征。 比较预后良好和预后不良患者之间各临床因素的差异,筛选NF 患者预后不良的独立危险因素。 绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价可能的独立危险因素对NF 预后不良的预测价值。

结果

66 例NF 患者中男52 例,女14 例,男女比例为3.71 ∶1,年龄(55.98±13.71)岁,50~70 岁患者占59.09%,少数民族患者占53.03%,住院时间为40.50(27.75,55.00)d,医疗费用79 976.00(60 676.75,122 300.25)元。 创面主要位于下肢(84.85%),致病因素以糖尿病为主(59.09%),截肢率为15.15%,死亡率为3.03%。 创面共培养出77 株细菌,肺炎克雷伯菌为最常见细菌(16.88%),耐药菌株占22.08%。 坏死性筋膜炎实验室风险指数(LRINEC)评分为8.00(5.75,9.00)分,炎症扩散范围(ISR)评分为1(1,2)分。 预后不良患者LRINEC 评分明显高于预后良好患者(Z=-2.341,P=0.019),LRINEC 评分是NF 患者预后不良的独立危险因素(OR=1.373,95% CI:1.022~1.844,P=0.035)。 LRINEC 评分预测NF 发生预后不良的曲线下面积为0.723(95%CI:0.546 ~0.900,P=0.020),最佳截断点为7.5 分,敏感度、特异性分别为81.8%、54.5%。

结论

合并糖尿病的中老年男性为NF 的易感人群,该病好发于下肢,以肺炎克雷伯菌感染多见。 LRINEC 评分为NF 患者预后不良的独立危险因素,对NF 发生不良预后有一定的预测价值,LRINEC 评分≥7.5 提示NF 患者预后不良。

Objective

To summarize the clinical characteristics of 66 patients with necrotizing fasciitis (NF) and analyze the factors influencing prognosis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 66 NF patients admitted to the Department of Trauma Repair, Burns and Plastic Surgery, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital from January 2017 to December 2023 to summarize the disease characteristics.Clinical factors between the patients with good and poor prognosis were compared, identifed independent risk factors for poor prognosis in NF patients.ROC curves were plotted to evaluate the predictive value of potential independent risk factors for poor prognosis in NF.

Results

Among the 66 patients with NF, there were 52 males and 14 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.71 ∶1, the average age was(55.98±13.71) years, patients aged 50 to 70 years accounted for 59.09%, ethnic minority patients account for 53.03%, the average hospital stay was 40.50 (27.75,55.00) days, and the medical costs was 79 976.00(60 676.75, 122 300.25) yuan.The majority of wounds were located in the lower limbs (84.85%).Diabetes was the main pathogenic factor (59.09%), the amputation rate was 15.15% and the mortality rate was 3.03%.A total of 77 bacterial strains were cultured from the wounds, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most common (16.88%), and drug-resistant strains accounting for 22.08%.The laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) score was 8.00 (5.75,9.00), and the inflammation spread range (ISR)score was 1 (1,2).The LRINEC score in the poor prognosis patients was significantly higher than that in the good prognosis patients (Z=-2.341, P=0.019), and LRINEC score was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in NF patients (OR=1.373, 95%CI:1.022-1.844, P=0.035).The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve for LRINEC score predicting poor prognosis in NF was 0.723 (95%CI:0.546-0.900,P=0.020).The optimal cutoff value was 7.5, with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 54.5%.

Conclusion

Middle-aged and elderly men with diabetes are more susceptible to NF, which commonly affects the lower limbs, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most common strain.The LRINEC score is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in NF patients and has certain predictive value for poor prognosis.LRINEC score greater than or equal to 7.5 indicates poor prognosis in NF patients.

表1 影响NF 患者预后不良的单因素分析
表2 影响NF 患者预后不良的多因素Logistic 回归分析
图1 LRINEC 评分预测NF 患者预后不良的ROC 曲线
[1]
Diab J, Bannan A, Pollitt T.Necrotising fasciitis[J].BMJ,2020, 369:m1428.
[2]
Nawijn F, de Gier B, Brandwagt DAH, et al.Incidence and mortality of necrotizing fasciitis in The Netherlands:the impact of group A Streptococcus[J].BMC Infect Dis,2021,21(1):1217.
[3]
中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 中国研究型医院学会休克与脓毒症专业委员会.中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J].感染、炎症、修复, 2019, 20(1):3-22.
[4]
Wong CH, Khin LW, Heng KS, et al.The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score:a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections[J].Crit Care Med, 2004, 32(7):1535-1541.
[5]
Albadri Z, Salman K.Necrotizing fasciitis of the finger[J].IDCases, 2019, 17:e00560.
[6]
Abdalla TSA, Grotelüschen R, Abdalla ASA, et al.Prognostic factors for intraoperative detection of necrotizing fasciitis in severe soft tissue infections[J].PLoS One, 2023, 18(5):e0285048.
[7]
崔真, 孙旭, 田彭, 等.重症坏死性软组织感染13 例分析[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2021, 14(7):621-625,637.
[8]
夏一丹.四肢坏死性筋膜炎患者的临床特征和结局:五年回溯性研究结果[D].吉林大学, 2021.
[9]
Cen H, Jin R, Yin J, et al.Risk factors for predicting mortality and amputation of patients with necrotizing soft-tissue infections:retrospective analysis of 111 cases from a single medical center[J].Emerg Med Int, 2023, 2023:6316896.
[10]
Gunaratne DA,Tseros EA,Hasan Z,et al.Cervical necrotizing fasciitis:systematic review and analysis of 1235 reported cases from the literature[J].Head Neck, 2018, 40(9):2094-2102.
[11]
Leiblein M, Marzi I, Sander AL, et al.Necrotizing fasciitis:treatment concepts and clinical results[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2018, 44(2):279-290.
[12]
Rahim GR,Gupta N,Maheshwari P,et al.Monomicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae necrotizing fasciitis:an emerging lifethreatening entity[J].Clin Microbiol Infect, 2019, 25(3):316-323.
[13]
Magala J,Makobore P,Makumbi T,et al.The clinical presentation and early outcomes of necrotizing fasciitis in a Ugandan Tertiary Hospital-a prospective study[J].BMC Res Notes,2014,7:476.
[14]
Bystritsky RJ.Cellulitis[J].Infect Dis Clin North Am,2021,35(1):49-60.
[15]
Erichsen Andersson A, Egerod I, Knudsen VE, et al.Signs,symptoms and diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis experienced by survivors and family:a qualitative Nordic multi-center study[J].BMC Infect Dis, 2018, 18(1):429.
[16]
Park SY, Yu SN, Lee EJ, et al.Monomicrobial gram-negative necrotizing fasciitis:an uncommon but fatal syndrome[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2019, 94(2):183-187.
[17]
窦懿, 张勤.九年间烧伤患者病原菌分布特点及耐药情况分析[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2018, 34(3):153-159.
[18]
Li X, Du Z, Tang Z, et al.Distribution and drug sensitivity of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot ulcer patients with necrotizing fasciitis at a diabetic foot center in China[J].BMC Infect Dis,2022, 22(1):396.
[19]
赵健芳, 谢昆, 何睿, 等.坏死性筋膜炎的病原菌分布与细菌耐药性分析[J].中国临床药理学杂志, 2022, 38(23):2870-2873.
[20]
Park HG, Yang JH, Park BH, et al.Necrotizing soft-tissue infections:a retrospective review of predictive factors for limb loss[J].Clin Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(2):297-309.
[21]
Wong CH, Yam AK, Tan AB, et al.Approach to debridement in necrotizing fasciitis[J].Am J Surg, 2008, 196(3):e19-e24.
[22]
Wronski M, Slodkowski M, Cebulski W, et al.Necrotizing fasciitis:early sonographic diagnosis[J].J Clin Ultrasound, 2011,39(4):236-239.
[23]
Chang CP, Hsiao CT.Unreliable diagnostic accuracy of laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) score but good outcome predictor in necrotizing fasciitis due to Vibrio vulnificus:a retrospective and matched-pair study[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2023,102(27):e34207.
[24]
Bechar J, Sepehripour S, Hardwicke J, et al.Laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis ( LRINEC) score for the assessment of early necrotising fasciitis:a systematic review of the literature[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2017, 99(5):341-346.
[25]
Kumar S, Agarwal S, Patel G, et al.The efficacy of LRINEC scoring in patients with necrotizing fasciitis and its correlation with the outcomes[J].Pol Przegl Chir, 2024, 96(3):1-7.
[26]
Van Stigt S, Knubben M, Schrooten T, et al.Prognostic factors for mortality in 123 severe cases of necrotizing fasciitis in 5 hospitals in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2017[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022, 48(2):1189-1195.
[27]
宋立兴, 曾静.感染性疾病患者血清肌酸激酶变化分析[J].检验医学与临床, 2012, 9(9):1048-1049.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后预置造口与襻式回肠造口短期疗效评价:一项倾向性评分匹配队列研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 21-27.
[2] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[3] 韦洋, 赵远权, 王小波, 黄海, 陈洁. BCLC 0/A期肝细胞癌患者术后辅助治疗后早期复发风险分析及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 157-161.
[4] 李峥, 马晋峰. 基于炎症反应评分系统构建预测根治性术后食管胃结合部腺癌患者预后的列线图模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 170-175.
[5] 董家旭, 宋美姿, 毕讯. 射频消融术联合TSH抑制治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的效果及生存预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 200-203.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[7] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[8] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[9] 万颂, 刘璇, 黄源兴, 江文聪, 周宇林, 习明. 胆固醇生物合成相关基因对前列腺癌预后和治疗的意义[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 205-215.
[10] 郑希彦, 吴润鹏, 杜飞, 谢玉芬, 王平根, 张广权, 翟航, 何函樨, 李瑞曦. 基于生信分析SLC29A3 在肝癌中的表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 290-295.
[11] 董芸, 陈佩玥, 邓大炜, 龚财芳, 赵俊宇, 游川. 预后营养指数和控制营养状态评分在肝癌治疗和预后中应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 296-301.
[12] 朱锴, 李爽, 刘艳成, 张净宇, 张宏, 张洪亮, 刘金伟, 胡永成. 肾癌脊柱转移瘤手术疗效及预后因素分析报道:附系统综述[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 87-101.
[13] 李政, 陆永刚, 杨轶婷, 聂升波, 刘敏杰, 杨勇, 季小娟, 樊健. 改良Henry入路保留旋前方肌内固定术对桡骨远端骨折患者手术疗效及远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(02): 117-122.
[14] 汪玥, 陆衡, 曹洁, 陆博文. GNG4蛋白在胃肠道间质瘤中的表达及预后意义[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 6-10.
[15] 赵鸿鹰, 江荣科, 王宇, 朱梅, 李艳芳. CEACAM19调控PI3K/AKT信号通路对胃癌发病及预后判断的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 16-22.
阅读次数
全文


摘要