切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (01) : 12 -19. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2026.01.003

论著

带血管蒂腓骨移植一期修复股骨感染性骨缺损的效果分析
刘贝贝, 张朝, 李朵, 焦健, 石宇, 牛峰, 许平安, 高方, 马宁, 刘重()   
  1. 710065 西安,兵器工业总医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-20 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 刘重

Analysis of the efficacy of vascularized fibular graft for one-stage repair of infectious femoral bone defects

Beibei Liu, Zhao Zhang, Duo Li, Jian Jiao, Yu Shi, Feng Niu, Ping'an Xu, Fang Gao, Ning Ma, Zhong Liu()   

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Norinco General Hospital, Xi'an 710065,China
  • Received:2025-06-20 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhong Liu
引用本文:

刘贝贝, 张朝, 李朵, 焦健, 石宇, 牛峰, 许平安, 高方, 马宁, 刘重. 带血管蒂腓骨移植一期修复股骨感染性骨缺损的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(01): 12-19.

Beibei Liu, Zhao Zhang, Duo Li, Jian Jiao, Yu Shi, Feng Niu, Ping'an Xu, Fang Gao, Ning Ma, Zhong Liu. Analysis of the efficacy of vascularized fibular graft for one-stage repair of infectious femoral bone defects[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2026, 21(01): 12-19.

目的

探讨应用自体带血管蒂腓骨移植治疗股骨感染性骨缺损的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析自2018年1月至2022年1月兵器工业总医院创伤骨科收治的 11例股骨感染性骨缺损患者的病例资料,其中男 8例,女3例,平均年龄(34.0±4.5)岁,平均骨缺损长度(9.5±1.7) cm。术中对骨缺损端彻底清创后固定股骨,切取自体带血管蒂腓骨复合组织瓣行一期重建。游离并修剪腓骨血管蒂后,将其与受区血管实施端侧吻合。其中5例采用单段腓骨移植,6例采用双段腓骨移植,平均移植腓骨长度(14.5±3.2) cm,采用钢板或外固定支架固定带血管蒂腓骨。术后常规予以抗感染、抗凝及抗血管痉挛治疗(抗感染治疗疗程 4~6 周,抗凝及抗血管痉挛治疗持续 2 周),密切观察感染控制情况及带血管蒂腓骨成活状态;通过复诊影像学检查随访评估带血管蒂腓骨与受区结合处的愈合情况,指导患者行下肢功能锻炼,并根据Enneking评分、Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分、Ilizarov技术研究与推广学会(ASAMI)评价标准及下肢功能量表(LEFS)评分评估患肢与供区愈合情况及肢体功能。

结果

11例患者均获得随访,平均随访时间(24.5±12.8)个月。所有患者伤口均一期愈合,无感染复发,带血管蒂腓骨均成活,无血管危象发生,供区未出现明显功能障碍。所有移植的带血管蒂腓骨均获得稳定骨性连接,无骨吸收、骨质硬化及再骨折等并发症,平均骨性愈合时间(5.5±1.2)个月。术后 12个月,患肢平均 Enneking 评分(24.0±3.3)分,供区平均 Enneking 评分(27.2±1.1)分,供区平均 Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分(95.5±1.6)分;末次随访时,患肢 ASAMI 评价结果显示11例患者骨评价均为优,功能评价优7例、良4例,患肢平均LEFS评分(75.5±2.2)分。

结论

应用带血管蒂腓骨移植及血管重建有助于改善局部血运、控制感染,能有效修复大范围股骨感染性骨缺损,提高骨愈合率,是该类疾病临床治疗的有效手段。

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of autologous vascularized fibula flap transplantation for the treatment of infectious femoral bone defects.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 11 patients with infectious femoral bone defects treated in the Department of Orthopedic Trauma, Norinco General Hospital from January 2018 to January 2022. There were 8 males and 3 females, with an average age of (34.0±4.5) years and an average bone defect length of (9.5±1.7) cm. During surgery, after thorough debridement of the bone defect ends, the femur was fixed. An autologous vascularized fibula composite tissue flap was harvested for one-stage reconstruction. The vascular pedicle of the vascularized fibula was anastomosed to the recipient vessels via end-to-side technique after isolating and trimming the vascularized fibula. Among them, 5 cases were repaired with a single fibula graft, and 6 cases were repaired with a two-segment fibula graft, with an average transplanted fibula length of (14.5±3.2) cm. The vascularized fibula was fixed with plates or an external fixator. Postoperatively, routine anti-infection, anticoagulation, and antivasospasm treatments were administered (anti-infection treatment course lasted 4-6 weeks, and anticoagulation and antivasospasm treatments lasted for 2 weeks). Infection control and vascularized fibula survival were closely observed. The healing status at the junction of the vascularized fibula and the recipient site was evaluated by follow-up radiological examinations during reconsultations. Patients were instructed to perform lower limb functional exercises, and the healing conditions of the affected limb and donor site, as well as limb function, were evaluated using the Enneking score, Baird-Jackson ankle function score, association for the study and application of the method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) score.

Results

All 11 patients were followed up, with an average follow-up time of (24.5±12.8) months. All wounds healed primarily without infection recurrence, all vascularized fibula survived with no vascular crisis observed, and there was no significant functional impairment at the donor sites. All transplanted vascularized fibula achieved stable bony union, without bone resorption, osteosclerosis, or refracture. The average time to bony union was (5.5±1.2) months. At 12 months postoperatively, the average Enneking score of the affected limb was (24.0±3.3) points, the average Enneking score of the donor site was (27.2±1.1) points, and the average Baird-Jackson ankle function score of the donor site was (95.5±1.6) points. At the final follow-up, ASAMI criteria assessment of the affected limb showed excellent bone results in all 11 patients, with 7 cases of excellent functional results and 4 cases of good functional results. The average LEFS score of the affected limb was (75.5±2.2) points.

Conclusion

The application of vascularized fibula transplantation and vascular reconstruction helps improve local blood supply and control infection, can effectively repair large-scale infectious femoral bone defects, and improve the bone healing rate. It is an effective clinical treatment for this type of disease.

表1 11例股骨感染性骨缺损患者的临床资料
表2 11例股骨感染性骨缺损患者手术疗效评价结果
图1 患者男,24岁,因车祸伤致左股骨转子下开放性骨折,急诊行股骨近端骨折清创、闭合复位髓内钉内固定术。A示内固定术后正、侧位X线片可见左股骨上段骨缺损;B示内固定术后3个月原切口仍间断性脓液渗出并切口处窦道形成;C示股骨转子下区域节段性缺损;D示术中截取携带腓动脉穿支皮瓣的游离腓骨约13.6 cm;E示术中置入钢板固定骨缺损近、远端,矫正肢体力线至满意,随后移植带血管蒂腓骨;F示术后半年复查正、侧位X线片可见移植带血管蒂腓骨位置良好,对位、对线良好,骨折线模糊,已形成骨性愈合;G示术后半年复查可见皮瓣愈合及周围血运良好,未见感染复发
[1]
Hou GLiu BTian Y, et al. An innovative strategy to treat large metaphyseal segmental femoral bone defect using customized design and 3D printed micro-porous prosthesis: a prospective clinical study[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med202031(8):66. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-06406-5.
[2]
Taylor GIMiller GDHam FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg197555(5):533-544. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197505000- 00002.
[3]
Pederson WCPerson DW. Long bone reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts[J]. Orthop Clin North Am200738(1):23-35,v. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2006.10.006.
[4]
Baird RAJackson ST. Fractures of the distal part of the fibula with associated disruption of the deltoid ligament. Treatment without repair of the deltoid ligament[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am198769(9): 1346-1352. PMID: 3440794.
[5]
Paley DCatagni MAArgnani F, et al. Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res1989 (241): 146-165. PMID: 2924458.
[6]
Binkley JMStratford PWLott SA, et al. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network[J]. Phys Ther199979(4): 371-383. PMID: 10201543.
[7]
Paul SVathulya MKandwal P, et al. Comparative analysis of free vascularized fibula grafting and Ilizarov bone transport in management of segmental long bone defect of the lower limb: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop202350:84-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.12.001.
[8]
Prasarn MLAhn JAchor T, et al. Management of infected femoral nonunions with a single-staged protocol utilizing internal fixation[J]. Injury200940(1):1220-1225. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.009.
[9]
Masquelet ACBegue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long-bone defects[J]. Orthop Clin North Am201041:27-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011.
[10]
Keating JFSimpson AHRobinson CM. The management of fractures with bone loss[J]. J Bone Joint Surg200587(2):142-150. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15874.
[11]
Ilizarov GA. The tension–stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. PartI. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res1989(238): 249-281. PMID: 2910611.
[12]
Wumaierjiang YHamiti YYalikun A,et al. Comparison of orthofix external fixator combined with vascularized fibula graft versus single segmental femoral lengthening for treating femoral defects ≥ 6 cm:a retrospective study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord202526(1):175. DOI: 10.1186/s12891 -025-08381-w.
[13]
Bienger KStefan VDragu A, et al. Free vascularized fibula transfer in single- or double-barrel technique for reconstruction of segmental bone defects following oncological resection or posttraumatic bone loss[J]. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW202413:Doc07. DOI: 10.3205/iprs000189.
[14]
Cashin MCoombs CTorode I. A-frame free vascularized fibular graft and femoral lengthening for osteosarcoma pediatric patients[J]. J Pediatr Orthop201838(2):e83-e90. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000866.
[15]
Isber JTriantafillou KBoukovalas S. Single-stage segmental tibial defect reconstruction with double-barrel free fibula flap and intramedullary nail: an innovative technique facilitating early load bearing[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open202513(6):e6859. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.000000000000 6859.
[16]
Korompilias AVPaschos NK. Recent updates of surgical tech-niques and applications of free vascularized fibular graft in extremity and trunk reconstruction[J]. Microsurgery201131(3): 171-175. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20848.
[17]
Falder SSinclair JSRogers CA,et al. Long-term behaviour of the free vascularised fibula following reconstruction of large bony defects[J]. Br J Plast Surg200356(6):571-584. DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00186-3.
[18]
Muhib FWilliams KELaBelle SA,et al. Development of a subject-specific finite element analysis workflow to assess local biomechanics during segmental bone defect healing[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2025169:107065. DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107065.
[19]
Kempný THoloubek JPolovko J, et al. Reconstruction of large post-traumatic segmental femoral defects using vascularised bone flaps: a retrospective case series[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord202425(1):919. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08031-7.
[20]
Black CFan KLDefazio MV,et al. Limb salvage rates and functional outcomes using a longitudinal slit arteriotomy end-to-side anastomosis for limb-threatening defects in a high-risk patient population[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg2020145(5):1302-1312. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006791.
[21]
Abula ACheng EAbulaiti A, et al. Risk factors of transport gap bending deformity in the treatment of critical-size bone defect after bone transport[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord202223(1):900. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05852-2.
[22]
林金銮,陈尧清,谢昀,等. 成人腓骨切除术后下肢功能评价与步态特征研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志202438(2):162-168.
[23]
Di Giuli RZago MBeltramini GA, et al. Donor-site morbidity after osteocutaneous free fibula transfer: longitudinal analysis of gait performance[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg201977(3):648-657. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.016.
[1] 中国康复医学会骨与关节康复专业委员会, 中国中医药研究促进会骨伤科分会, 程立明, 李泰贤, 何伟, 刘又文, 何海军, 王卫国, 钱东阳, 王荣田, 陈卫衡. 股骨头坏死血管介入治疗中国专家共识[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 654-660.
[2] 吴超, 王争刚, 罗晓东, 范斌, 刘彬. 骨科机器人辅助动力交叉钉治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 669-676.
[3] 张耀林, 徐永清. 蚓激酶治疗股骨头坏死的作用机制及应用研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 728-734.
[4] 黄嘉楠, 杨均政, 张华, 陈柏豪, 陈楚仪, 何琪, 陈鹏. 环状RNA调控激素性股骨头坏死的机制与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 755-760.
[5] 温瑛钰, 刘轶鹏, 时建文. 全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折的近期效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 767-771.
[6] 北京人体损伤修复研究会创面规范化治疗专家共识组. 创面换药疼痛控制专家共识[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(06): 467-475.
[7] 许月芳, 杨林森, 黎春彤. 外科术后感染使用利奈唑胺致血小板减少症的高危因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 682-684.
[8] 谷瑞辰, 林福杨, 刘永达. 术前尿培养阴性患者PCNL术后尿路感染的预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 772-777.
[9] 郑静, 毕周奎, 王家瑞, 游雅婷, 徐智, 白莉. 惠普尔养障体感染肺空洞结节一例及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 1007-1011.
[10] 郑庆藩, 徐嘉鸿, 胡新娅, 苏浩东, 林弘恺, 郑凯滨, 郭晓玲, 马泽珠. 免疫球蛋白在69例反复上呼吸道感染患儿中的表达及意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 1015-1018.
[11] 李晓颜, 邢爱花, 董瑞生, 王瑞玲, 贾子江, 郑丽琴. 血管细胞黏附分子-1、肝素结合蛋白蛋白及调节性T细胞水平检测对支气管哮喘并发肺部感染患者的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 911-916.
[12] 贾贝丽, 冯雅琳, 林苏杰, 刘婧, 张雪丽, 周亚菲. 肺癌患者化疗期间院内肺部感染临床特征及其影响因素[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 742-746.
[13] 李浩楠, 左建林, 徐琪博, 张栋捷, 李玮峰, 宗辰旭, 肖建林. Agili-C®治疗膝关节骨软骨损伤的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 315-320.
[14] 王超, 张晓会, 李晓帆, 赵海丹. 维持性血液透析患者感染与心脑血管死亡风险的比较及联合预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 675-681.
[15] 姜彤彤, 戎萍, 马融, 付乾芳, 张亚同, 赵书艺, 刘晖, 马榕, 李悦, 李瑞本. 抽动障碍儿童呼吸道感染后的临床特征及抽动症状加重的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 426-432.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?