切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 357 -362. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2017.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

展肌肌瓣联合创面负压治疗在糖尿病足窦道的效果
杜伟力1, 张国安1,(), 胡骁骅1, 沈余明1   
  1. 1. 100035 北京大学第四临床医学院烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-25 出版日期:2017-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张国安
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科技计划课题(Z111107058811098)

Effect of abductor halluces muscle flap combined with negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of sinus tract in diabetic foot

Weili Du1, Guoan Zhang1,(), Xiaohua Hu1, Yuming Shen1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns, Fourth Clinical Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2017-08-25 Published:2017-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Guoan Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Guoan, Email:
引用本文:

杜伟力, 张国安, 胡骁骅, 沈余明. 展肌肌瓣联合创面负压治疗在糖尿病足窦道的效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(05): 357-362.

Weili Du, Guoan Zhang, Xiaohua Hu, Yuming Shen. Effect of abductor halluces muscle flap combined with negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of sinus tract in diabetic foot[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2017, 12(05): 357-362.

目的

探讨展肌肌瓣联合创面负压治疗糖尿病足窦道的疗效。

方法

选取2013年1月至2015年12月北京大学第四临床医学院烧伤科41例患者,按照简单随机化分为实验组(n=20)和对照组(n=21)。所有病例均在抗感染、抗凝、控制血糖、血压、血脂的前提下进行。实验组采取两次手术,第一次手术彻底清创后应用负压创面治疗,第二次手术采用展肌肌瓣填塞窦道腔。对照组清创手术后一直应用负压创面治疗。比较两组患者创面的愈合时间、平均住院时间、住院花费的平均费用以及手术次数。数据比较采用独立样本的t检验。

结果

实验组平均愈合时间(20.8±1.8) d比对照组(34.2±3.3) d明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(t=-16.40,P<0.05);实验组平均住院时间(23.4±2.3)d比对照组(36.7±3.7) d明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.87,P<0.05);实验组平均医疗花费(31710.45±1092.70) 元比对照组(42528.57±1071.05) 元明显降低,差异有统计学意义(t=-32.01,P<0.05);实验组手术次数(2.0±0.0)次比对照组(4.7±0.7) 次明显减少,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.87,P<0.05)。

结论

彻底清创是糖尿病足窦道愈合必要前提。展肌肌瓣联合创面负压装置治疗糖尿病足窦道,尤其足跟位置的窦道,能够取得满意的效果。

Objective

To explore the therapeutic effect of abductor halluces muscle flap combined with negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of sinus tract in diabetic foot.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2015, 41 patients suffering diabetic foot with sinus tract were included in the department of burns, Fourth Clinical Hospital of Peking University. They were divided into experimental group (n=20) and control group(n=21) by simple-randomization. All patients were under the effective treatments of anti-infection, anti-coagulation and control of blood sugar, blood pressure as well as blood lipid level. The patients in the experimental group were adopted two subsequent operations. In the first operation, they received rational debridement and negative pressure wound therapy. The sinus tract was filled by abductor halluces muscle flap in the second operation .The patients in the control group received rational debridement and negative pressure wound therapy throughout. The wound healing time, average hospital stays, average medical cost and operation times were compared between the two groups by using independent-samples t test.

Results

The average healing time of wound in experimental group (20.8±1.8) d was obviously shorter than the control group (34.2±3.3) d, there was significant difference between the two groups (t=-16.40, P<0.05). The average hospitalization time (23.4±2.3) d in experimental group was obviously less than the control group (36.7± 3.7) d, there was significant difference between the two groups (t=-13.87, P<0.05). The average medical cost in the experimental group (31710.45±1092.70) yuan was obviously less than the control group (42528.57±1071.05) yuan, there was significant difference between the two groups (t=-32.01, P<0.05). The number of operation in the experimental group (2.0±0.0) times was less than the control group (4.7±0.7) times, there was significant difference between the two groups (t=-13.87, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The treatment of abductor halluces muscle flap combined with negative pressure wound therapy can provide satisfactory healing for sinus tract in diabetic foot. Rational debridement is the key prerequisite for healing of sinus tract in diabetic foot.

表1 两组糖尿病足窦道患者临床资料比较
表2 两组糖尿病足窦道患者治疗效果比较(±s)
图1 患者男,45岁,左足跟底部与足跟内侧分别可见糖尿病足窦道,经清创、创面负压引流及展肌肌瓣填塞术,伤口直接缝合,且愈合良好
1
沈艳军,毕会民. 糖尿病足坏疽患者的危险因素分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2012, 32(2): 267-269.
2
刘志国. 糖尿病足溃疡诊治进展[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2012, 7(2): 191-193.
3
中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2013年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2014, 6(7): 447-498.
4
侯春林, 顾玉东. 皮瓣外科学[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2006: 715-720.
5
Xu Y,Wang L,He J, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults[J]. JAMA, 2013, 310(9): 948-959.
6
费扬帆,王椿,陈大伟, 等. 住院糖尿病足患者截肢率与截肢危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2012, 92(24): 1686-1689.
7
Oakley W,Cohen SM. Diabetic gongrene[J]. Trans Med Soc Lond, 1955, 71: 90-107.
8
Reiber GE. The epidemiology of diabetic foot problems[J]. Diabetic Med, 1996, 13(Suppl1): S6-S11.
9
Chantelau E,Kushner T,Spraul M. How effective is cushioned therapeutic footwear in protecting diabetic feet? A clinical study[J]. Diabetic Med, 1990, 7(4): 355-359.
10
Ammendola M,Sacco R,Butrico L, et al. The care of transmetatarsal amputation in diabetic foot gangrene[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(1): 9-15.
11
白艳峰,尤红. 肝纤维化形成中MMPs/TIMPs的动态变化及治疗进展[J]. 肝脏, 2009, 14(2): 162-164.
12
Liu Y,Min D,Bolton T, et al. Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 predicts poor wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: Response to Muller et al[J]. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32(1): e117-e119.
13
Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366(9498): 1736-1743.
14
胡骁骅,邓微,陈忠, 等. 糖尿病足创面的个性化处理[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2015, 10(2): 143-151.
15
中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国成人住院患者高血糖管理目标专家共识[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2013, 29(3): 189-195.
16
中华医学会内分泌学分会. 成人2型糖尿病胰岛素临床应用的中国专家共识[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2013, 29(1): 1-6.
17
姜玉峰,许樟荣,付小兵. 糖尿病足创面修复过程中清创问题[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2016, 36(1): 13-15.
18
Jiang Y,Xu Z,Fu X. Healing diabetic foot ulcers step by step[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wound, 2012, 11(4): 307-310.
19
Meloni M,Izzo V,Vainieri E, et al. Management of negtative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer[J]. World J Orthop, 2015, 6(4):387-393.
20
杨川,严励. 负压辅助创面愈合技术原理及在糖尿病足治疗的临床应用[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2016, 36(1): 1-2.
21
Ger R. The operative treatment of the advanced stasis ulcer. A preliminary communication[J]. Am J Surg, 1966, 111(5): 659-663.
22
Vega SJ,Sbitany H,Bossert RP. Vastus lateralis free flap for soft tissue coverage of a Lower extremity diabetic ulcer[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2007, 23(1): 51-53.
23
Leung PC. Diabetic foot ulcers-a comprehensive review[J]. Surgeon, 2007, 5(4): 219-231.
24
Attinger CE,Ducic I,Cooper P, et al. The role of intrinsic muscle flaps of the foot for bone coverage in foot and ankle defects in diabetic patients[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002, 110(4): 1047-1054.
25
刘熹,冉兴无,黄富国, 等. 筋膜瓣和关节融合在糖尿病足窦道治疗中的应用[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2012, 43(5): 766-769.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[3] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[4] 孙佳英, 黄云洲, 任书堂, 王翠华, 陈新华, 于艾嘉, 陈元禄. 无创心肌做功对左束支传导阻滞患者左心室整体及节段心肌收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 836-843.
[5] 李婷婷, 崔翔, 刘静, 吴鑫, 杨汐, 陈莉. 新型脐周按钮式切口在横向腹直肌肌瓣乳房重建中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 347-352.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[8] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[9] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[10] 王宁, 刘彦哲, 吴紫莺, 曾超, 雷光华, 沙婷婷, 王伊伦. 基于孟德尔随机化研究探讨肠道菌群与肌少症表型的因果关联[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 333-342.
[11] 王飞飞, 王光林, 孟泽松, 李保坤, 曹龙飞, 张娟, 周超熙, 丁源一, 王贵英. 敲低IMPDH1对结肠癌SW480、HT29细胞生物功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 884-890.
[12] 张生怀. 急性心肌梗死致心源性猝死救治分析一例[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 924-926.
[13] 王家圆, 王晓东. 消化系统恶性肿瘤相关肌少症的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 823-827.
[14] 许瑛杰, 朱佳, 康闽, 侯俊, 苏改秀, 李胜男, 张丹, 赖建铭. 风湿病合并消化道穿孔患儿的临床特点分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-654.
[15] 张敏洁, 张小杉, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 赵捷, 白天昊, 王雅晳. 氢气治疗心肌缺血再灌注损伤的作用机制及展望[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 744-748.
阅读次数
全文


摘要