切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 270 -274. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.04.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

认知行为疗法在合并焦虑的慢性难愈合创面患者中的临床研究
宋增美1, 冷向锋2,(), 扈西一3, 刘小溪3, 唐公杰3   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛大学医学部;276400 临沂市中心医院烧伤整形科
    2. 266003 青岛大学附属医院
    3. 276400 临沂市中心医院烧伤整形科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-23 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 冷向锋

Clinical study of cognitive behavioral therapy on patients with chronic refractory wounds complicated with anxiety

Zengmei Song1, Xiangfeng Leng2,(), Xiyi Hu3, Xiaoxi Liu3, Gongjie Tang3   

  1. 1. Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China; Department of Burns and Plastic Surger, Linyi Central Hospital, Yishui 276400, China
    2. the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
    3. Department of Burns and Plastic Surger, Linyi Central Hospital, Yishui 276400, China
  • Received:2019-06-23 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangfeng Leng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Leng Xiangfeng, Email:
引用本文:

宋增美, 冷向锋, 扈西一, 刘小溪, 唐公杰. 认知行为疗法在合并焦虑的慢性难愈合创面患者中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(04): 270-274.

Zengmei Song, Xiangfeng Leng, Xiyi Hu, Xiaoxi Liu, Gongjie Tang. Clinical study of cognitive behavioral therapy on patients with chronic refractory wounds complicated with anxiety[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(04): 270-274.

目的

探讨认知行为疗法对合并焦虑的慢性难愈合创面患者创面治疗效果的影响。

方法

选取2018年2月至9月于临沂市中心医院烧伤整形科住院治疗的符合入选标准的40例合并焦虑的慢性难愈合创面患者,将所有患者随机编号,编号为奇数的设为干预组,编号为偶数的设为对照组,每组各20例。2组患者均接受常规慢性难愈合创面的治疗和护理,干预组患者在此基础上给予认知行为疗法干预,包括会谈治疗、音乐治疗及腹式呼吸放松治疗,共4周,对照组未予任何心理干预治疗。分别于入院时、治疗2周、治疗4周采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)对2组患者进行焦虑程度评分;应用毫米网格纸法测量患者入院时、治疗2周、治疗4周创面面积并计算创面愈合率。数据比较采用t检验。

结果

入院时,干预组患者SAS评分(67.1±2.4) 分,对照组(65.9±2.2) 分,2组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.49, P=0.65);认知行为疗法干预治疗2、4周后,干预组患者SAS评分分别为(55.6±1.9)、(49.3±2.6) 分,低于同期对照组(59.8±2.1)、(53.5±2.7) 分,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.17、2.54,P=0.04、0.02);入院时,干预组患者HAMA评分(23.8±3.3) 分,对照组(24.1±3.6) 分,2组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.96, P=0.34);干预2、4周后,干预组患者HAMA评分分别为(17.2±2.7)、(11.9±2.1) 分,低于同期对照组(20.8±3.4)、(15.3±3.0) 分,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.23、2.86,P=0.03、0.01)。治疗2、4周后,干预组患者创面愈合率分别为(26.2±2.4)%、(80.5±4.2)%,均高于同期对照组(22.3±2.1)%、(59.2±3.9)%,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=2.54、2.86,P=0.02、0.01)。

结论

认知行为疗法干预有助于缓解慢性难愈合创面患者的焦虑情绪,提高慢性难愈合创面的愈合速度。

Objective

To investigate the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on wound healing in patients with chronic refractory wounds with anxiety.

Methods

From February 2018 to September 2018, 40 cases of patients with chronic refractory wounds combined with anxiety who were hospitalized in Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Linyi Central Hospital and meeted the inclusion criteria were selected. All patients were randomly numbered, the odd number was set as the intervention group, and the even number was set as the control group, 20 cases in each group. Patients in both groups received conventional treatment and nursing care of chronic refractory wounds. On this basis, patients in the intervention group were given cognitive behavioral therapy intervention, including talk therapy, music therapy and abdominal breathing relaxation therapy, for a total of 4 weeks. The control group received no psychological intervention. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) were used to score the 2 groups at admission, 2 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks of treatment respectively. The wound area at admission, 2 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks of treatment were measured by using mm mesh paper method, and wound healing rate was calculated. Data were compared with t test.

Results

At admission, the SAS score of patients in the intervention group was (67.1±2.4) points and those in the control group was (65.9±2.2) points, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=0.49, P=0.65). After 2 and 4 weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy, the SAS scores of the intervention group were (55.6±1.9) and (49.3±2.6) points, respectively, which were lower than those of the control group [(59.8±2.1) and (53.5±2.7) points], the differences were statistically significant (t=2.17, 2.54; P=0.04, 0.02). At admission, the intervention group had a HAMA score of (23.8±3.3) points, and the control group was (24.1±3.6) points, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.96, P=0.34). After 2 and 4 weeks of intervention, HAMA scores of patients in the intervention group were (17.2±2.7) and (11.9±2.1) points, respectively, lower than those of the control group [(20.8±3.4) and (15.3±3.0) points], the differences were statistically significant (t=2.23, 2.86; P=0.03, 0.01). After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, the wound healing rates of the intervention group were (26.2±2.4)% and (80.5±4.2)%, which were higher than those of the control group (22.3±2.1)% and (59.2±3.9)%, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t=2.54, 2.86; P=0.02, 0.01).

Conclusion

Cognitive behavioral therapy intervention can relieve anxiety in patients with chronic refractory wounds and improve the healing rate of chronic refractory wounds.

表1 2组合并焦虑的慢性难愈合创面患者一般资料比较
表2 2组合并焦虑的慢性难愈合创面患者不同时间焦虑程度评分(分,±s)
[1]
Werdin F,Tenenhaus M,Rennekampff HO. Chronic wound care[J]. Lancet, 2008, 372(9653): 1860-1862.
[2]
廖新成, 郭光华. 慢性难愈性创面的分类鉴别及临床评估[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(4): 303-305.
[3]
刘晖, 佘文莉, 黄海玲,等. 165例慢性创面住院患者临床特点调查及分析[J]. 广东医学,2010, 31(9): 1183-1185.
[4]
Lazarus GS,Cooper DM,Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing[J]. Arch Dermatol, 1994, 130(4): 489-493.
[5]
Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorder[J]. Psychosomatics, 1971, 12(6): 371-379.
[6]
HAMILTON M. The assessment of anxiety by rating scale[J]. Br J Med Psychol, 1959, 32(1): 50-55.
[7]
姜玉峰, 付小兵. 体表慢性难愈合创面的研究进展[J]. 感染、炎症、修复,2011, 12(1): 59-61.
[8]
Phillips TJ,Al-Amoudi HO,Leverkus M, et al. Effect of chronic wound fluid on fibroblasts[J]. J Wound Care, 1998, 7(10): 527-532.
[9]
付小兵, 王德文. 现代创伤修复学[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社,1999: 82.
[10]
陈静, 陈传成, 支胜利. 认知行为治疗和症状特异性药物治疗伴焦虑和抑郁的喉切除术后咽喉癌患者的回顾性比较[J]. 上海精神医学,2014(2): 95-100.
[11]
吴文源, 刘美兰, 李春波. 综合性医院就诊病人伴发的抑郁焦虑症状及其治疗[J]. 中华医学杂志,1999, 79(7): 509.
[12]
Anderson RJ,Freedland KE,Clouse RE, et a1. The prevalence of eomorbid depressionin adtdts with diabetes:a meta-analysis[J]. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24(6): 1069-1078.
[13]
Mulsant BH,Reynolds CF 3rd,Shear MK, et al. Comorbid anxiety disorders in late-life depression[J]. Anxiety, 1996, 2(5): 242-247.
[14]
Lee S,Tsang A,Chui H, et a1. A community epidemiological survey of generalized anxiety disorder in Hong Kong[J]. Community Ment Health J, 2007, 43(4): 305-319.
[15]
Collins MM,Corcoran P,Perry IJ. Anxiety and depression symptomsin patients with diabetes[J]. Diabet Med, 2009, 26(2): 153-161.
[16]
刘晓玲, 曾朝阳, 田晓年,等. 住院2型糖尿病患者抑郁情况临床分析[J]. 中华全科医学,2012, 10(9): 1416-1417.
[17]
唐伟, 蔡娅, 黄晓萍,等. 2型糖尿病患者焦虑状况调查及危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(9): 1487-1493.
[18]
Lloyd CE,Dyer PH,Lancashire RJ, et al. Association between stress and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 1999, 22(8): 1278-1283.
[19]
Paddison CA,Eborall HC,French DP, et, al. Predictorsof anxiety and depression among people attending diabetes screening:A prospective cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge)randomized control trial[J]. Br J Health Psychol, 2011, 16(Pt 1): 213-226.
[20]
罗跃嘉. 认知神经科学教程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社,2006: 332-334.
[21]
Thimm JC,Antonsen L. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy for depression in routine practice[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2014, 14: 292.
[22]
Conroy DA,Ebben MR. Referral practices for cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a survey study[J]. Behav Neurol, 2015, 2015: 819402.
[23]
Martin J. Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2004, 39(2): 135-145.
[24]
何燕玲, 马弘, 张岚,等. 综合医院就诊者中抑郁焦虑障碍的患病率调查[J]. 中华内科杂志,2009, 48(9): 748-751.
[25]
瞿玮, 孟萍. 伴抑郁、焦虑情绪障碍的12型糖尿病患者血糖水平与抗抑郁焦虑干预(英文)[J]. 中国临床康复,2005, 9(24): 213-215.
[26]
吴文源, 魏镜, 陶明. 综合医院焦虑抑郁诊断和治疗的专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志,2012, 92(31): 2174-2181.
[27]
Gelenberg AJ,Freeman MP,Markowitz JC, et al. PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Third Edition[J]. Ame J Psychiatry, 2010, 167(10): 1-3, 9-11, 13-118.
[1] 程宇欣, 张伟, 孔维诗, 孙瑜. 胶原蛋白敷料在创面修复中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(01): 73-77.
[2] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[3] 张熙东, 贾贺杰, 冯锐, 李路亚, 乔永志, 郑颖. 急诊患者家属焦虑的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 319-324.
[4] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[5] 陈小艳, 何康, 黄明珠. 儿童肝移植术前患儿父母睡眠质量与心理社会问题的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 30-34.
[6] 袁雪涛, 王星傑, 黑赫, 田泓漪, 刘俊矣, 魏光兵, 李徐奇, 蒋正东. 不同材料疝补片对大鼠腹壁缺损修补术后行为学影响的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 154-160.
[7] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[8] 王玲, 樊文彬, 倪嘉淳, 蔡增进. 功能性便秘与焦虑抑郁共病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 411-416.
[9] 汪毅仁, 江晓丹, 李佳曦, 赵天瑶, 李学民. 干眼的症状、体征与焦虑及抑郁相关性的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 212-216.
[10] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
[11] 王亚飞, 邓婷, 许江涛, 耿聃聃, 王小梅. 黄连温胆汤对伴焦虑抑郁的慢性萎缩性胃炎患者的效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 155-158.
[12] 杨星, 刘梅, 刘思远, 张科. 胃肠癌患者术前焦虑情绪和术后苏醒期躁动情况及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 159-163.
[13] 马云霞, 于金勇, 魏淑凤, 韩臣子. 耳穴疗法对肝气郁结型甲状腺结节合并焦虑抑郁的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 348-354.
[14] 华丽, 仲卫冬, 胡根, 张丽英, 邵国益. 手术治疗胃食管反流病对患者生活质量和心理状态影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 126-129.
[15] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
阅读次数
全文


摘要