切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 344 -349. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.05.005

所属专题: 经典病例 经典病例 文献

论著

2017年度北京市某三甲医院创面修复专科住院病例回顾分析
杨义1, 郝岱峰2,(), 褚万立2, 冯光2, 张海军2   
  1. 1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心烧伤整形暨创面修复中心;100853 北京,解放军医学院
    2. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心烧伤整形暨创面修复中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-05 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 郝岱峰
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金面上项目(7182160)

Retrospective analysis of hospitalized cases in wound repair center from a tertiary hospital at Beijing in 2017

Yi Yang1, Daifeng Hao2,(), Wanli Chu2, Guang Feng2, Haijun Zhang2   

  1. 1. People′s Liberation Army Medical College, Beijing 100853, China; Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Wound Repair Center, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
    2. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Wound Repair Center, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2019-09-05 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Daifeng Hao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hao Daifeng, Email:
引用本文:

杨义, 郝岱峰, 褚万立, 冯光, 张海军. 2017年度北京市某三甲医院创面修复专科住院病例回顾分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(05): 344-349.

Yi Yang, Daifeng Hao, Wanli Chu, Guang Feng, Haijun Zhang. Retrospective analysis of hospitalized cases in wound repair center from a tertiary hospital at Beijing in 2017[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(05): 344-349.

目的

调查北京市某区三甲医院创面修复专科皮肤软组织损伤住院病例,探讨其流行病学特征以及相关诊疗信息。

方法

回顾性分析解放军总医院第四医学中心烧伤整形暨创面修复中心2017年1月1日至12月31日收治的全部住院患者资料。统计患者基本信息,创面的类型、部位与创面微生物培养结果,治疗方式和结果,以及卫生经济学信息。描述住院患者流行病学特征,分别比较性别、病程、类型、治疗方式因素对创面细菌感染、疗效、住院时间及住院费用的影响。数据行单因素方差分析、Wilcoxon秩和检验、Kruskal-Wallis H检验、χ2检验与H检验。

结果

最终纳入研究639例患者,男420例,女219例。(1)患者平均年龄为57.00(43.00~67.00)岁,女性患者平均年龄大于男性患者,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.605, P<0.05);(2)290例患者合并有慢性基础性疾病,最常见的疾病依次为糖尿病、高血压、冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病;(3)慢性皮肤软组织损伤患者数量多于急性皮肤软组织损伤患者;(4)最常见的创面类型依次为术后难愈性伤口、糖尿病足部溃疡、压力性损伤与皮肤软组织感染,最常见的创面部位依次为足部、下肢及胸部;(5)创面细菌学检查显示革兰氏阴性菌构成比最高(57.61%),常见细菌依次为金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯氏菌、奇异变形杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌;(6)136例患者行单纯换药治疗,118例行单纯持续负压封闭引流治疗,385例行手术治疗,其中130例行多次手术治疗。治愈282例,好转313例,未愈39例,死亡5例;(7)人均花费34 354.15(16 449.72~75 018.24)元;人均住院时间21.00(11.00~40.00) d。按创面类型分类,免疫疾病性皮肤溃疡患者的住院费用和时间最高,肥厚性瘢痕患者的住院费用和时间最低。按费用类型划分,工伤保险患者的住院费用和时间最高,自费医疗患者的住院费用和时间最低。

结论

患者多为中老年,多合并慢性基础性疾病;病程主要以慢性皮肤软组织损伤为主,常见创面类型为术后难愈性伤口、糖尿病足部溃疡、压力性损伤及皮肤软组织感染,创面部位集中于下肢、足部及胸部;革兰氏阴性菌感染的比例较高,需要加强对此类病菌的抗生素治疗;外科清创术、负压封闭引流技术是治疗皮肤软组织损伤患者的有效措施。

Objective

To retrospectively investigate the epidemiological characteristics and related medical information of hospitalized cases of skin and soft tissue injury in wound repair center from a tertiary hospital in Beijing.

Methods

All data of hospitalized cases from January 1, 2017 to December 31 in the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Wound Repair Center, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital were collected and analyzed. The information included patients basic data, wound types, locations and microbiology information, therapies, outcomes, and health economics information. The epidemiological features of hospitalized patients was described, and the effects of gender, course of wound, wound type, treatment on wound infection, curative effects, hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses were compared. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance, Wilcoxon rank test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, chi-square test and H test.

Results

Six hundred and thirty-nine patients were finally included in this study, including 420 males and 219 females. (1) The mean age of patients was 57.00 (43.00-67.00) years old, the mean age of female was greater than that of male, the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.605, P<0, 05). (2) Two hundred and ninty patients with chronic basic diseases, the most common diseases were diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. (3) The number of patients with chronic skin and soft tissue injuries was more than acute skin and soft tissue injuries. (4) The most common causes were postoperative non-healing wounds, diabetic foot ulcer, pressure injury and soft tissue infections, the most common locations were the feet, lower extremities and chests. (5) Bacterial examination of the wound showed Gram-negative bacteria composition ratio was the highest (57.61%). Common bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (6) One hundred and thirty-six patients underwent simple dressing treatment, 118 underwent simple continuous negative pressure drainage, and 385 underwent surgical treatment, of which 130 underwent multiple surgical treatments. Two hundred and eighty-two patients were cured, 313 improved, 39 not healed, and 5 people dead. (7) The average hospitalization expense was 34, 354.15 (16 449.72-75 018.24) yuan. The average length of hospital stay was 21.00 (11.00-40.00) days. According to the wound types, the hospitalization expense and day of immune-mediated skin ulcer were the highest, and the hospitalization expense and day of hypertrophic scar were the lowest. According to the cost types, the hospitalization expense and day of patients with employment injury insurance are the highest, and the hospitalization expense and day of self-paying patients were the lowest.

Conclusion

Most of the patients are middle-aged and older, and with chronic basic diseases. The main course of the disease is chronic skin and soft tissue injury. The common causes are postoperative non-healing wounds, diabetic foot ulcer, pressure injuries and soft tissue infections. The sites are concentrated in the feet, lower limbs and chests. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria infection is higher, which showes that it is necessary to strengthen the antibiotic treatment of such microbiology. Surgical debridement, continuous negative pressure drainage are effective measures for the treatment of patients with skin and soft tissue injury.

图1 皮肤软组织损伤患者创面类型构成
图2 皮肤软组织损伤患者创面部位构成
表1 不同病程的皮肤软组织损伤患者治疗结果比较[例(%)]
表2 不同性别的皮肤软组织损伤患者治疗结果比较[例(%)]
表3 不同类型皮肤软组织患者治疗的卫生经济学信息比较[M(P25P75)]
表4 皮肤软组织损伤治疗不同费用类型患者住院费用、住院时间比较(±s)
[1]
Gottrup F. A specialized wound-healing center concept: importance of a multidisciplinary department structure and surgical treatment facilities in the treatment of chronic wounds [J]. Am J Surg, 2004, 187(5A): 38S-43S.
[2]
Gottrup F. Organization of wound healing services: the Danish experience and the importance of surgery [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2003, 11(6): 452-457.
[3]
贾赤宇,柴家科. 以循证医学的视角分析我国目前创面修复领域的不足及改进对策[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2007, 9(4): 379-381.
[4]
Shai A, Maibach H. Wound Healing and Ulcers of the Skin Diagnosis and Therapy [M]. Springer, 2005: 31-48.
[5]
Trøstrup H, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, et al. What Is New in the Understanding of Non Healing Wounds Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapies [J]. Ulcers, 2013, 2013: 1-8.
[6]
廖新成,郭光华. 慢性难愈性创面的分类鉴别及临床评估 [J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(4): 303-305.
[7]
Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 1994, 2(3): 165-170.
[8]
姚远. 住院创伤病人流行病学特点及严重创伤结局研究[D]. 重庆:第三军医大学,2011.
[9]
Lindholm C, Searle R. Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiency [J]. Int Wound J, 2016, 13 Suppl 2: 5-15.
[10]
姜玉峰. 中国体表慢性难愈合创面流行病学研究[D]. 北京:中国人民解放军军医进修学院,2011.
[11]
孙鹃娟,高秀文. 国际比较中的中国人口老龄化:趋势、特点及建议[J]. 教学与研究,2018, 52(5): 59-66.
[12]
曹丰,王亚斌,薛万国,等. 中国老年疾病临床多中心报告[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2018, 17(11): 801-808.
[13]
杨文英. 中国糖尿病的流行特点及变化趋势[J]. 中国科学:生命科学,2018, 48(8): 812-819.
[14]
Reddy M. Skin and wound care: important considerations in the older adult [J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2008, 21(9): 424-436; quiz 437-438.
[15]
Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes [J]. J Clin Invest, 2007, 117(5): 1219-1222.
[16]
Mills JL, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2014, 59(1): 220-234. e1-2.
[17]
蒋国群. 近5年慢性难愈创面住院患者临床特点调查分析[D]. 衡阳:南华大学,2014.
[18]
Heyer K, Herberger K, Protz K, et al. Epidemiology of chronic wounds in Germany: Analysis of statutory health insurance data [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2016, 24(2): 434-442.
[19]
He J, Neal B, Gu D, et al. International collaborative study of cardiovascular disease in Asia: design, rationale, and preliminary results [J]. Ethn Dis, 2004, 14(2): 260-268.
[20]
Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al, 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 46(4): 517-592.
[21]
Lemaignen A, Birgand G, Ghodhbane W, et al. Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2015, 21(7): 674.e11-8.
[22]
Goh SSC. Post-sternotomy mediastinitis in the modern era [J]. J Card Surg, 2017, 32(9): 556-566.
[23]
Gudbjartsson T, Jeppsson A, Sjögren J, et al. Sternal wound infections following open heart surgery - a review [J]. Scand Cardiovasc J, 2016, 50(5/6): 341-348.
[24]
Young PY, Khadaroo RG. Surgical site infections [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2014, 94(6): 1245-1264.
[25]
Stevens SM, O′connell BP, Meyer TA. Obesity related complications in surgery [J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 23(5): 341-347.
[26]
Lawrence TM, Ahmadi S, Morrey BF, et al. Wound complications after distal humerus fracture fixation: incidence, risk factors, and outcome [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(2): 258-264.
[27]
Black CE, Costerton JW. Current concepts regarding the effect of wound microbial ecology and biofilms on wound healing [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2010, 90(6): 1147-1160.
[28]
Serra R, Grande R, Butrico L, et al. Chronic wound infections: the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus [J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2015, 13(5): 605-613.
[29]
Sollid JU, Furberg AS, Hanssen AM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus: determinants of human carriage [J]. Infect Genet Evol, 2014, 21: 531-541.
[30]
Rahim K, Saleha S, Zhu X, et al. Bacterial Contribution in Chronicity of Wounds [J]. Microb Ecol, 2017, 73(3): 710-721.
[31]
Barrett S. Wound-bed preparation: a vital step in the healing process [J]. Br J Nurs, 2017, 26(12 Suppl): S24-S31.
[32]
王宇潇,李昊,韩长晋,等. 山西省某三甲医院普外科患者住院天数影响因素的分析[J]. 中国药物与临床,2016, 16(12): 1714-1717.
[33]
郭志伟. DRGs的原理与方法及在我国的应用对策[J]. 中国卫生经济,2010, 29(8): 37-39.
[1] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[2] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[3] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[4] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[9] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[10] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[14] 李瑞琦, 吴子健, 吴杰斌, 任佳佳, 翟敬芳. 动脉血气分析判读Excel电子表格在实习生酸碱平衡紊乱教学中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 737-743.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要