切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 393 -397. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.05.015

所属专题: 文献

护理园地

总责任护士主导的医护一体化护理模式在创伤骨科的应用
程蓓1, 傅巧美2, 贾赤宇3,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院创伤骨科
    2. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院大外科
    3. 361101 厦门大学附属翔安医院烧伤整形科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-06 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 贾赤宇
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(81372051); 北京市科技计划"首都特色"专项(Z151100004015199)

Application of medical and nursing integration model led by general responsible nurses in department of orthopedics

Bei Chen1, Qiaomei Fu2, Chiyu Jia3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
    3. Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Xiang’an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China
  • Received:2019-08-06 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Chiyu Jia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jia Chiyu, Email:
引用本文:

程蓓, 傅巧美, 贾赤宇. 总责任护士主导的医护一体化护理模式在创伤骨科的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(05): 393-397.

Bei Chen, Qiaomei Fu, Chiyu Jia. Application of medical and nursing integration model led by general responsible nurses in department of orthopedics[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(05): 393-397.

目的

探讨总责任护士主导的医护一体化临床护理模式在创伤骨科的应用效果。

方法

选择2016年7月至2017年6月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院创伤骨科行手术治疗的骨折患者200例,按照入院先后顺序分为对照组90例(实施创伤骨科常规护理)和观察组110例(实施医护一体化工作模式,包括成立医护合作小组、实施总责任护士主导的医护一体化查房、个体化诊疗方案的共同决策、疼痛管理、早期出院计划与延续护理)。比较2组患者的术后护理效果和医护合作满意度。对数据行t检验和χ2检验。

结果

总责任护士主导的医护一体化模式下,观察组患者术后72 h内数字评分法(NRS)评分为(4.09±1.64)分,疼痛干预有效率为77.57%,对照组术后72 h内NRS评分为(5.15±1.69)分,疼痛干预有效率为57.95%,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05);观察组下肢深静脉血栓、泌尿系统感染、便秘的发生例数分别为2、1、3,对照组下肢深静脉血栓、泌尿系统感染、便秘的发生例数分别为9、7、11,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(χ2=4.486、4.296、6.812,P=0.027、0.036、0.009)。观察组术后康复开始时间为(21.48±6.41)h,术后住院时间为(11.08±2.19)d;对照组术后康复开始时间为(36.48±10.75)h,术后住院时间为(13.95±2.93)d,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=11.670、-7.616,P值均小于0.05)。2组医护合作满意度结果显示,观察组患者信息的交流得分为(3.78±0.85)分,共同参与治疗或护理决策得分为(3.86±0.87)分,医师和护士的关系得分为(4.00±0.84)分,总分为(3.87±0.67)分;对照组患者信息的交流得分为(3.32±1.00)分,共同参与治疗或护理决策得分为(3.23±0.93)分,医师和护士的关系得分为(3.45±0.96)分,总分为(3.33±0.84)分,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05)。

结论

总责任护士主导的医护一体化护理模式的应用,以亚专科为核心,重新整合医护资源,共同参与制订患者的诊疗护理方案,共同聚焦患者安全与质量,加强了医护间的配合,提高了医疗护理服务质量,提升医护合作满意度。

Objective

To explore the application effect of integrated clinical nursing mode led by general responsible nurses in department of orthopedics.

Methods

From July 2016 to June 2017, 200 patients with fractures who underwent surgical treatment in orthopedics trauma department of Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University were selected and divided into two groups: control group (90 cases) and observation group (110 cases). The control group only accepted the conventional mode of nursing care, which was mainly carried out according to doctor′s orders. The observation group was given medical and nursing integration model on the basis of this including the establishment of a medical and nursing cooperation group, the implementation of the medical and nursing one led by the general responsible nurses, integrative ward rounds, joint decision-making of individualized diagnosis, treatment programs, pain management, early discharge plans and continuing care. The effect of nursing after operation and the satisfaction degree of cooperation between doctors and nurses in different periods were compared between the two groups. Data were processed with t test and chi-square test.

Results

Under the integrated medical and nursing mode dominated by general responsible nurses within 72 hours after operation, the numerical rating scale(NRS) score of the observation group was (4.09±1.64) points, and the effective rate of pain intervention was 77.57%. The NRS score of the control group was (5.15±1.69) points, and the effective rate of pain intervention was 57.95%. There were significant differences between the two groups (with P values below 0.05). After application, the incidence of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, urinary system infection and constipation in the observation group were 2, 1 and 3 respectively, and in the control group, the incidence of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, urinary system infection and constipation were 9, 7 and 11 respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (χ2=4.486, 4.296, 6.812; P=0.027, 0.036, 0.009). The starting time of rehabilitation exercise was (21.48±6.41) h in the observation group and the hospital stays after operation were (11.08±2.19) d; the starting time of rehabilitation exercise was (36.48±10.75) h in the control group and the hospital stays after operation were (13.95±2.93) d. There were significant differences between the two groups (t=11.670, -7.616, with P values below 0.05). The results of cooperation satisfaction between the two groups showed that in the observation group, the score of patients’ information exchange was (3.78±0.85) points, the score of co-participation in treatment or nursing decision-making was (3.86±0.87) points, the score of doctor-nurse relationship was (4.00±0.84) points, and the total score was (3.87±0.67) points; in the control group, the score of patients′ information exchange was (3.32±1.00) points, the score of co-participation was (3.86±0.87) points, the score of treatment or nursing decision-making was (3.23±0.93) points, the score of doctor-nurse relationship was (3.45±0.96) points and the total score was (3.33±0.84) points. There were significant differences between the two groups (with P values below 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of integrated nursing mode led by general responsible nurses regards sub-specialty as the core, re-integrates medical and nursing resources. Doctors and nurses can jointly participate in the formulation of patient′s diagnosis and treatment nursing program, and focuse on patients′ safety and quality, which strengthens the cooperation between doctors and nurses, improves the quality of medical and nursing services, and improves the satisfaction of medical and nursing cooperation.

表1 2组骨折患者术后72 h内NRS评分及疼痛干预有效率比较
表2 2组骨折患者术后并发症发生率(例)
表3 2组骨折患者术后康复开始时间与术后住院时间(±s)
表4 2组骨折患者医护合作量表各维度得分情况比较(分,±s)
[1]
邱雪,吴荷玉. 3D打印技术用于创伤骨科手术的护理配合[J]. 护理学杂志,2015, 30(20): 52-53.
[2]
王艳,易祖玲. 医护一体化模式在骨科护理中的应用研究[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2014, 9(4): 446-448.
[3]
邱彬彬,苏娅丽,王丕琳,等. 医护一体化在乳腺科患者全程管理中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理,2015, 15(1): 1-4.
[4]
王引侠,冯小菊,张亚军,等. 医护一体化分层级责任制整体护理模式的应用与效果[J]. 护理管理杂志,2012, 12(9): 683-684.
[5]
蔡宇,周华军,程文俊,等. 加速康复外科联合标准化康复路径在全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折患者中的应用[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2016, 18(8): 673-678.
[6]
王丽,舒春梅. 医护一体化模式在我国护理工作中应用的文献计量学分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2017, 23(28): 3596-3599.
[7]
黄天雯,陈晓玲,谭运娟,等. 疼痛护理质量指标的建立及在骨科病房的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志,2015, 50(2): 148-151.
[8]
李卉梅,刘小芳,李秀云,等. 实施延伸康复训练对四肢骨折患者疗效的影响[J]. 护理学杂志,2014, 29(12): 72-74.
[9]
张仙梦,李莉,王淑茹. 加速康复外科理论在股骨颈骨折老年患者围术期护理中的应用[J]. 现代临床护理,2016, 15(7): 22-26.
[10]
陈静,张贤,张振香,等. 医护合作量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志,2014, 49(2): 236-240.
[11]
徐春艳,康璇,杨丽红,等. 医护一体化护理干预促进肝癌患者快速康复的效果[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016, 33(24): 53-55.
[12]
李卡,胡艳杰,汪晓东,等. 医护一体模式下实施快速流程方案对护理工作环境的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志,2015, 50(2): 141-144.
[13]
秦淑娟. 探讨组内责任制整体护理在创伤骨科工作中的应用效果[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘,2017, 17(53): 203.
[14]
张春玲,孙胜男,张春燕,等. 创伤骨科以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2012, 27(2): 25-27.
[1] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[2] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[3] 朱前拯, 付中国, 陈瀛. 反向肩关节置换治疗老年肱骨近端四部分骨折[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 190-190.
[4] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[5] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[6] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[7] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[8] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[9] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[10] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[11] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[12] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[13] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[14] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
[15] 刘建, 王文珠, 王倩. 老年髋部骨折术后肺损伤现状调查分析及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 260-264.
阅读次数
全文


摘要