切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 426 -429. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.06.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

2010年至2018年北京市某烧伤中心化学性烧伤流行病学特征分析
王成1, 周业平1,(), 陈忠1, 沈余明1   
  1. 1. 100035 北京积水潭医院烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-12 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 周业平
  • 基金资助:
    北京积水潭医院"学科新星"计划(XKXX201617)

Epidemiologic characteristics of chemical burn in a major burn center in Beijing from 2010 to 2018

Cheng Wang1, Yeping Zhou1,(), Zhong Chen1, Yuming Shen1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2019-10-12 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yeping Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Yeping, Email:
引用本文:

王成, 周业平, 陈忠, 沈余明. 2010年至2018年北京市某烧伤中心化学性烧伤流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(06): 426-429.

Cheng Wang, Yeping Zhou, Zhong Chen, Yuming Shen. Epidemiologic characteristics of chemical burn in a major burn center in Beijing from 2010 to 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(06): 426-429.

目的

回顾性研究北京市某烧伤中心化学性烧伤流行病学特征。

方法

以2010年1月至2018年12月入住北京积水潭医院烧伤科的化学性烧伤患者为研究对象,对患者的性别、年龄、职业、致伤地点、致伤性质和致伤物的类型进行分析。同时研究化学性烧伤不同季节发生率、伤后应急处理情况、烧伤面积、烧伤部位、并发症、手术类型、住院时间和病死率。

结果

2010年1月至2018年12月共有456例患者入院。男328例,女128例。大多数患者年龄为21~40岁,占所有患者的74.6%(340/456)。在职业方面,273例(59.9%)患者是工人。大多数化学性烧伤[92.8%(423/456)]发生在远离居住地的地点,在工作环境中受伤的患者[70.4%(321/456)]最多。意外事故和故意伤害导致的化学性烧伤分别为383例(83.3%)和73例(16.7%)。强酸[62.9%(287/456)]是最常见的致伤因素。化学性烧伤的发生率与季节之间存在关联,4月至6月和7月至9月的患者人数较多。77.2%(352/456)患者的烧伤面积小于10%总体表面积(TBSA)。头部[24.6%(112/456)]和四肢[下肢为24.1%(110/456)、上肢为28.7%(131/456)]是最常见的受伤区域。最常见的并发症是眼烧伤[13.8%(63/456)]。其中243例(53.3%)患者进行了植皮手术和结膜自体移植手术。患者的平均住院时间为(34±2) d。本研究中仅有4例(0.9%)患者因化学性烧伤而死亡。

结论

化学性烧伤多发生于男性青壮年,工作中受伤最多,大多数是意外导致的。受伤季节多发生于夏、秋季,大多数烧伤面积较小,头部和四肢多见,并发症以眼烧伤多见。建议为工人制定专业培训计划,以降低化学性烧伤的发生率。

Objective

To analyze retrospectively the epidemiologic characteristics of chemical burn in a major burn center in Beijing.

Methods

Chemical burn patients admitted to the Department of Burns, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2010 to December 2018 were recruited as the research object. Data were collected on the basis of patients′ gender, age, occupation, places of injury, nature of injury, types of chemicals, and seasonal variations, emergency treatment, burn area, burn part of body, complication, type of operation, duration of hospitalization, mortality.

Results

A total of 456 patients (328 males and 128 females) were admitted during January 2010 to December 2018. Most of patients [74.6%(340/465)] were in an age group, which ranged from 21 to 40 years old. In terms of occupation, 273 patients (59.9%) were workers. Most of the chemical burns [92.8%(423/456)] occurred away from residential places, the highest number of injuries occurred in the work place [70.4%(321/456)]. Chemical burns due to accidents and criminal assaults were 383 patients (83.3%) and 73 patients (16.7%). Strong acids [62.9%(287/456)] were common causative agents. There was a relationship between the incidence of chemical burns and the season, with more patients in April to June and July to September. The burn area of 77.2%(352/456) patients were less than 10% total body surface area (TBSA). Head [24.6%(112/456)] and extremities [lower limb was 24.1%(110/456), and upper limb was 28.7%(131/456)] were the most frequent areas of injury. The most common accompanying injury was eye burn [13.8%(63/456)]. The skin grafting and conjunctival autograft surgeries were carried out on 243 patients (53.3%). The average period of hospitalization was (34±2) days, and in this study only 4 patients (0.9%) passed away because of chemical burns.

Conclusion

Most of the chemical burn patients are young male, hurt by accident during working. It occurres common during summer and autumn, and the burn area is small. Most patients are hurt on head, face and extremity. The most common complication is eye injury. It is eventually recommended to develop professional training programs for workers in order to reduce the incidence rate of chemical burns.

表1 456例化学性烧伤患者的年龄分布
表2 456例化学性烧伤患者的职业分布
图1 456例化学性烧伤患者烧伤部位分布
[1]
Tang K, Jian L, Qin Z, et al. Characteristics of burn patients at a major burn center in Shanghai[J]. Burn, 2006, 32(8): 1037-1043.
[2]
方之杨,吴中立,高学书. 烧伤理论与实践[M]. 沈阳:辽宁科技出版社,1989: 12.
[3]
Akhtar MS, Ahmad I, Khurram MF, et al. Epidemiology and Outcome of Chemical Burn Patients Admitted in Burn Unit of JNMC Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: A 5-year Experience[J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2015, 4(1): 106-109.
[4]
Vargo RJ, Warner B M, Potluri A, et al. Garlic burn of the oral mucosa: A case report and review of self-treatment chemical burns[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2017, 148(10): 767-771.
[5]
Miller R, Pywell S, Leon-Villapalos J, et al. Chemical burn assaults: Is the media coverage representative[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(4): 1021-1022.
[6]
吴晓宏,王丽华. 2006-2015年上海市金山区职业性化学中毒与化学灼伤的病因及防控策略[J]. 职业与健康,2018, 34(4): 554-556.
[7]
Kara A, Tezer H, Devrim I, et al. Chemical burn: a risk with outdated povidone iodine[J]. Pediatr Dermatol, 2010, 24(4): 449-450.
[8]
Miller R, Pywell S, Leon-Villapalos J, et al. Chemical burn assaults: Is the media coverage representative[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(4): 1012-1022.
[9]
Maghsoudi H, Gabraely N. Epidemiology and outcome of 121 cases of chemical burn in East Azarbaijan province, Iran[J]. Injury, 2008, 39(9): 1042-1046.
[10]
Wang Y, Yu X, Qian W, et al. Epidemiologic Investigation of Chemical Burns in Southwestern China from 2005 to 2016[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2018, 39(6): 1006-1016.
[11]
张元海,韩春茂,陈国贤,等. 浙江省化学烧伤流行病学调查[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2010, 26(4): 311-312.
[12]
Agbenorku P, Akpaloo J, Chirurgie F, et al. Chemical Burn Injury in Kumasi: The Trend and Complications following and Their Management[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2015, 3(10): e548.
[13]
Xie Y, Tan Y, Tang S. Epidemiology of 377 patients with chemical burns in Guangdong province[J]. Burns, 2004, 30(6): 569-572.
[14]
刘晓弟,闫璐,丁琳. 眼化学烧伤35例临床分析[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2018, 40(7): 500-503.
[15]
Rochlin DH, Rajasingh CM, Karanas YL, et al. Full-Thickness Chemical Burn From Trifluoroacetic Acid: A Case Report and Review of the Literature[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2018, 81(5): 528-530.
[16]
Westekemper H, Figueiredo FC, Siah WF, et al. Clinical outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation in the management of acute ocular chemical injury[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(2): 103-107.
[17]
Haring RS, Sheffield ID, Channa R, et al. Epidemiologic trends of chemical ocular burns in the United States[J]. JAMA ophthalmol, 2016, 134(10): 1119-1124.
[18]
Cancio LC, Sheridan RL, Dent R, et al. Guidelines for Burn Care Under Austere Conditions: Special Etiologies: Blast, Radiation, and Chemical Injuries[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2017, 38(1): e482-e496.
[19]
Nnabuko RE, Okoye CP, Ogbonnaya IS, et al. Decreasing incidence of cutaneous chemical burns in a resource limited burn centre: is this a positive effect of modernization[J]. Burns Trauma, 2017, 5(1): 7.
[1] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[4] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[5] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[6] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[7] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[8] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[9] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[10] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[11] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[12] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要