切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 316 -321. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2020.04.017

所属专题: 文献

综述

脓毒症生物标志物研究进展
张杰1, 章雄1, 刘琰1,()   
  1. 1. 200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院灼伤整形科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-14 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 刘琰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81871564); 上海市科技委员会自然科学基金(18ZR1423800); 上海市综合医院中西医结合专项建设项目(ZHYY-ZXYJ-HZX-201911)

Progress in research on biomarkers of sepsis

Jie Zhang1, Xiong Zhang1, Yan Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2020-06-14 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Yan, Email:
引用本文:

张杰, 章雄, 刘琰. 脓毒症生物标志物研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(04): 316-321.

Jie Zhang, Xiong Zhang, Yan Liu. Progress in research on biomarkers of sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2020, 15(04): 316-321.

脓毒症是导致住院患者病死的主要原因之一,脓毒症的早期诊断及治疗对于降低患者病死率至关重要。脓毒症生物标志物是在机体对感染的应答过程中产生的,理想的脓毒症生物学标志物应该具有高灵敏度、高特异度、低成本、便于检测及可重复性好等特征,可用于脓毒症早期诊断、危险分层、预后判断及治疗反应监测等。脓毒症生物标志物层出不穷,但缺乏有效、统一的评价方法,可用于脓毒症诊断的具高灵敏度、高特异度的生物学标志物仍然缺乏。本文根据脓毒症的病理生理特性将脓毒症相关生物标志物进行分类梳理。目前诊断脓毒症的"金标准"生物学指标并不存在,任何单一的生物标志物的诊断价值都有限,多种生物学标志物联合应用可提高脓毒症诊断的灵敏度和特异度,提高对脓毒症预后判断的准确性。

Sepsis is one of the most common causes of death in hospitalized patients, early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis is essential to reduce mortality. Sepsis biomarkers are generated during the body′s response to infection. The ideal biomarkers of sepsis should have the characteristics of high sensitivity, high specificity, low cost, easy detection and good repeatability, which can be used for early diagnosis, risk stratification, prognosis and treatment response monitoring. Biomarkers of sepsis are emerging one after another, but there is no effective and unified evaluation method. Highly sensitive and specific biomarkers that can be used for the diagnosis of sepsis are still lacking. In this paper, sepsis-related biomarkers are sorted according to the pathophysiological characteristics of sepsis. At present, the " gold standard" biological indicators for the diagnosis of sepsis do not exist. The diagnostic value of any single biomarker is limited. The combination of multiple biomarkers can improve the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis and improve the accuracy of prognosis of sepsis.

表1 脓毒症多种生物标志物的联合应用
[1]
刘辉,冯永文,姚咏明. 脓毒症治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志,2018, 4(4): 299-303.
[2]
Dantes RB, Lauren E. Combatting Sepsis: A Public Health Perspective[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2018, 67(8): 1300-1302.
[3]
Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016, 193(3): 259-272.
[4]
Teggert A, Datta H, Ali Z. Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Sepsis[J]. Micromachines (Basel), 2020, 11(3): 286.
[5]
单亮,修建荣,李秀,等. 脓毒症早期诊断生物标志物的再评价[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2015, 27(6): 538-540.
[6]
Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Schmidt J, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein for monitoring of postoperative sepsis: complemental to C-reactive protein or redundant?[J]. PLOs One, 2011, 6(8): e23615.
[7]
Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Braun GG, et al. Predictive value of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein for survival in postoperative patients with severe sepsis[J]. J Crit Care, 2011, 26(1): 54-64.
[8]
Parlato M, Cavaillon JM. Host Response Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Sepsis: A General Overview[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2015, 1237: 149-211.
[9]
Shirali AS, Wu JX, Zhu CY, et al. The role of serum procalcitonin in predicting bacterial sepsis in patients with hypothyroidism[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019, 104(12): 5915-5922.
[10]
Uzzan B, Cohen R, Nicolas P, et al. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis in critically ill adults and after surgery or trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34(7): 1996-2003.
[11]
Tang BM, Eslick GD, Craig JC, et al. Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2007, 7(3): 210-217.
[12]
Vincent JL, Nuffelen MV, Lelubre C. Host Response Biomarkers in Sepsis: The Role of Procalcitonin[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2015, 1237: 213-224.
[13]
Arora S, Singh P, Singh PM, et al. Procalcitonin Levels in Survivors and Nonsurvivors of Sepsis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Shock, 2015, 43(3): 212-221.
[14]
Prkno A, Wacker C, Brunkhorst FM, et al. Procalcitonin-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients with severe sepsis and septic shock--a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(6): R291.
[15]
Andriolo BN, Andriolo RB, Salomão R, et al. Effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin evaluation for reducing mortality in adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 1(1): CD010959.
[16]
Rodríguez-Gaspar M, Santolaria F, Jarque-López A, et al. Prognostic value of cytokines in SIRS general medical patients[J]. Cytokine, 2001, 15(4): 232-236.
[17]
Gaïni S, Koldkjaer OG, Pedersen C, et al. Procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in community-acquired infections and sepsis: a prospective study[J]. Crit Care, 2006, 10(2): R53.
[18]
Reyes CS, García-Muñoz F, Reyes D, et al. Role of cytokines (interleukin-1beta, 6, 8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and soluble receptor of interleukin-2) and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2003, 92(2): 221-227.
[19]
Jekarl DW, Lee S-Y, Lee J, et al. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker and IL-6 as a prognostic marker for sepsis[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2013, 75(4): 342-347.
[20]
Hu P, Chen Y, Pang J, et al. Association between IL-6 polymorphisms and sepsis[J]. Innate Immun, 2019, 25(8): 465-472.
[21]
Tamayo E, Fernández A, Almansa R, et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory responses are regulated simultaneously from the first moments of septic shock[J]. Eur Cytokine Netw, 2011, 22(2): 82-87.
[22]
Guillaume M, Marie-Emmanuelle F, Fabienne V, et al. The anti-inflammatory response dominates after septic shock: association of low monocyte HLA-DR expression and high interleukin-10 concentration[J]. Immunol Lett, 2004, 95(2): 193-198.
[23]
Wong HR, Cvijanovich N, Wheeler DS, et al. Interleukin-8 as a stratification tool for interventional trials involving pediatric septic shock[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2008, 178(3): 276-282.
[24]
Winkler MS, Rissiek A, Priefler M, et al. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR) gene expression is reduced in sepsis and correlates with impaired TNFα response: A diagnostic tool for immunosuppression?[J]. PLOs One, 2017, 12(8): e0182427.
[25]
Fabienne V, Sylvie T, Anne-Lise D, et al. Decreased monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression after severe burn injury: Correlation with severity and secondary septic shock[J]. Crit Care Med, 2007, 35(8): 1910-1917.
[26]
Landelle C, Lepape A, Voirin N, et al. Low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR is independently associated with nosocomial infections after septic shock[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 36(11): 1859-1866.
[27]
Meisel C, Schefold JC, Pschowski R, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2009, 180(7): 640-648.
[28]
Wu J, Zhou L, Liu J, et al. The efficacy of thymosin alpha 1 for severe sepsis (ETASS): a multicenter, single-blind, randomized and controlled trial[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(1): R8.
[29]
Lewis SM, Treacher DF, Bergmeier L, et al. Plasma from patients with sepsis up-regulates the expression of CD49d and CD64 on blood neutrophils[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2009, 40(6): 724-732.
[30]
Dai J, Jiang W, Min Z, et al. Neutrophil CD64 as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis: Meta-analysis[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2017, 26(2): 327-332.
[31]
Livaditi O, Kotanidou A, Psarra A, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression and serum IL-8: sensitive early markers of severity and outcome in sepsis[J]. Cytokine, 2006, 36(5/6): 283-290.
[32]
Aikaterini D, Olivier P, Zaina K, et al. Serial determinations of neutrophil CD64 expression for the diagnosis and monitoring of sepsis in critically ill patients[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2014, 58(6): 820-829.
[33]
Lemarié J, Barraud D, Gibot S. Host Response Biomarkers in Sepsis: Overview on sTREM-1 Detection[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2015, 1237: 225-239.
[34]
Wu Y, Wang F, Fan X, et al. Accuracy of plasma sTREM-1 for sepsis diagnosis in systemic inflammatory patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care, 2012, 16(6): R229.
[35]
Dai X, Zeng Z, Fu C, et al. Diagnostic value of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, cystatin C, and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury[J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19(1): 223.
[36]
Donadello K, Scolletta S, Covajes C, et al. suPAR as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis[J]. BMC Med, 2012, 10: 2.
[37]
Suberviola B, Castellanos-Ortega A, Ruiz RA, et al. Hospital mortality prognostication in sepsis using the new biomarkers;suPAR and proADM in a single determination on ICU admission[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(11): 1945-1952.
[38]
Huang Q, Xiong H, Yan P, et al. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Supar in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Shock, 2020, 53(4): 416-425.
[39]
Koch A, Voigt S, Kruschinski C, et al. Circulating soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor is stably elevated during the first week of treatment in the intensive care unit and predicts mortality in critically ill patients[J]. Crit Care, 2011, 15(1): R63.
[40]
de Pablo R, Monserrat J, Reyes E. Circulating sICAM-1 and sE-Selectin as biomarker of infection and prognosis in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2013, 24(2): 132-138.
[41]
Kung CT, Hsiao SY, Su CM, et al. Serum adhesion molecules as predictors of bacteremia in adult severe sepsis patients at the emergency department[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2013, 421: 116-120.
[42]
Vassiliou AG, Mastora Z, Orfanos SE, et al. Elevated biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction/activation at ICU admission are associated with sepsis development[J]. Cytokine, 2014, 69(2): 240-247.
[43]
Kjaergaard AG, Dige A, Nielsen JS, et al. The use of the soluble adhesion molecules sE-selectin, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, sPECAM-1 and their ligands CD11a and CD49d as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in septic and critically ill non-septic ICU patients[J]. APMIS, 2016, 124(10): 846-855.
[44]
David S, Mukherjee A, Ghosh CC, et al. Angiopoietin-2 may contribute to multiple organ dysfunction and death in sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2012, 40(11): 3034-3041.
[45]
Davis JS, Yeo TW, Piera KA, et al. Angiopoietin-2 is increased in sepsis and inversely associated with nitric oxide-dependent microvascular reactivity[J]. Crit Care, 2010, 14(3): R89.
[46]
Ricciuto DR, dos Santos CC, Michael H, et al. Angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 as clinically informative prognostic biomarkers of morbidity and mortality in severe sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39(4): 702-710.
[47]
Leligdowicz A, Richard-Greenblatt M, Wright J, et al. Endothelial Activation: The Ang/Tie Axis in Sepsis[J]. Front Immunol, 2018, 9: 838.
[48]
赵蓉,董士民. 血清endocan和降钙素原对脓毒症早期诊断及预后评估的临床价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2017, 29(4): 321-326.
[49]
García-Segarra G, Espinosa G, Tassies D, et al. Increased mortality in septic shock with the 4G/4G genotype of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 in patients of white descent[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2007, 33(8): 1354-1362.
[50]
黄彩芝,莫丽亚,邓永超,等. 抗凝血酶Ⅲ、D-二聚体和血小板检测在儿童脓毒症中的价值[J]. 临床儿科杂志,2013, 31(6): 530-532.
[51]
Yang AP, Liu J, Yue LH, et al. Neutrophil CD64 combined with PCT, CRP and WBC improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 54(2): 345-351.
[52]
Edgar JDM, Gabriel V, Gallimore JR, et al. A prospective study of the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic performance of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, soluble E-selectin and serum amyloid A in the diagnosis of neonatal infection[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2010, 10: 22.
[53]
Kofoed K, Andersen O, Kronborg G, et al. Use of plasma C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, neutrophils, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 in combination to diagnose infections[J]. Crit Care, 2007, 11(2): R38.
[54]
Gibot S, Béné MC, Noel R, et al. Combination biomarkers to diagnose sepsis in the critically ill patient[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2012, 186(1): 65-71.
[55]
Kofoed K, Eugen-Olsen J, Petersen J, et al. Predicting mortality in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: an evaluation of two prognostic models, two soluble receptors, and a macrophage migration inhibitory factor[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2008, 27(5): 375-383.
[56]
Bauer PR, Kashyap R, League SC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance of an inflammatory biomarker panel for sepsis in adult critically ill patients[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2016, 84(2): 175-180.
[57]
Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Hollander JE, et al. A prospective, multicenter derivation of a biomarker panel to assess risk of organ dysfunction, shock, and death in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(1): 96-104.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[3] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[8] 吴蓉菊, 向平超. COPD频繁急性加重表型与炎性因子相关性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 939-947.
[9] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[10] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[11] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[12] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[13] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[14] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
[15] 谭睿, 王晶, 於江泉, 郑瑞强. 脓毒症中高密度脂蛋白、载脂蛋白A-I和血清淀粉样蛋白A的作用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 749-753.
阅读次数
全文


摘要