切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 170 -174. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.02.016

所属专题: 文献

护理园地

有氧运动联合康复护理干预在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的应用效果
刘英1, 李群2, 吕大鹏2, 黄颖3, 王婷婷3,()   
  1. 1. 100038 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院感染科
    2. 100038 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院乳腺科
    3. 100038 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院淋巴外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-13 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王婷婷

Application effect of aerobic exercise combined with rehabilitation nursing intervention in postoperative lymphedema of breast cancer patients

Ying Liu1, Qun Li2, Dapeng Lyu2, Ying Huang3, Tingting Wang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Infection, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
    2. Department of Breast Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
    3. Department of Lymphatic Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2021-01-13 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Tingting Wang
引用本文:

刘英, 李群, 吕大鹏, 黄颖, 王婷婷. 有氧运动联合康复护理干预在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(02): 170-174.

Ying Liu, Qun Li, Dapeng Lyu, Ying Huang, Tingting Wang. Application effect of aerobic exercise combined with rehabilitation nursing intervention in postoperative lymphedema of breast cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(02): 170-174.

目的

探讨有氧运动联合康复护理干预乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿的应用效果。

方法

选取2018年1月至2020年1月间于首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院住院治疗的120例乳腺癌根治术后淋巴水肿患者纳入研究,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组和康复组,每组各60例,对照组实施常规临床护理;康复组在常规护理基础上运用有氧运动联合康复护理干预;于干预后3个月及干预后6个月检测2组患者患肢与健肢的周径差以及肩关节活动情况,采用上肢功能评定(DASH)量表评估2组患者上肢功能障碍情况,采用乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表(FACT-B)评价患者生活质量。数据比较采用单因素方差分析、两独立样本t检验及χ2检验。

结果

2组患者干预前周径差未显示差异(P=0.836),干预后3个月及6个月,康复组周径差小于对照组周径差,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);康复组患者肩关节外旋、后伸、内收、前屈、外展活动角度均优于对照组患者(P<0.05);干预前2组患者DASH评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预后3个月,2组患者较干预前DASH评分均显著降低,康复组患者评分低于对照组(P<0.05);术后6个月,2组DASH评分低于干预后3个月,康复组患者评分低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后3个月及干预后6个月,康复组在FACT-B生理状况、社会/家庭状况、情感状况、功能状况、附加关注状况各个维度以及总分,均低于对照组,干预后6个月,2组患者各维度得分及总分均低于干预后3个月,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

有氧运动联合康复护理有利于乳腺癌根治术后淋巴水肿的康复,改善患者肩关节活动度,提高患者生活质量。

Objective

To explore the application effect of aerobic exercise combined with rehabilitation nursing intervention on lymphedema after breast cancer surgery.

Methods

120 patients with lymphedema after radical mastectomy in Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020 were included in the study. According to random number table, patients were randomly divided into control group and rehabilitation group, 60 cases in each group; the control group received routine clinical nursing, the rehabilitation group received aerobic exercise combined with rehabilitation nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing. The circumference difference between the affected limb and healthy limb and shoulder joint activity were detected at 3 months after intervention and 6 months after intervention. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance, two independent samples t-test and Chi-square test.

Results

There was no significant difference in the circumference difference between the two groups before the intervention(P=0.836). After 3 months and 6 months of the intervention, the circumference difference of the rehabilitation group was smaller than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the DASH score between the two groups(P>0.05). Three months after the intervention, the DASH scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention, and the scores of the rehabilitation group were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05); six months after the operation, the DASH scores of the two groups were lower than those of the three months after the intervention, and the scores of the patients in the rehabilitation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05), In FACT-B scale, physical status, social/family status, emotional status, functional status, additional attention status and total scores of the rehabilitation group were lower than those of the control group. After 6 months of intervention, the scores of each dimension and total score of the two groups were lower than those of 3 months after the intervention, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusion

aerobic exercise combined with nursing care is conducive to the rehabilitation of lymphedema after radical mastectomy, improve the range of motion of shoulder joint and improve the quality of life of patients.

表1 2组乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者不同时间点上肢周径差(cm, ±s)
表2 2组乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者干预后不同时间肩关节活动角度(°, ±s)
表3 2组乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者不同时间点DASH量表评分情况(分, ±s)
表4 2组乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者干预后3个月及干预后6个月FACT-B评分情况(分, ±s)
[1]
高宇,郭仁德. 乳腺癌根治术后上肢淋巴结水肿发病机制及治疗研究进展[J]. 四川解剖学杂志, 2020, 28(2): 196-197.
[2]
孔荣华,王圣芳,徐志娟, 等. 聚焦解决护理模式预防乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿效果评价[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2020, 27(9): 735-739.
[3]
邓娟,厉红元,沈薇. 综合康复干预预防乳腺癌改良根治术患者患肢淋巴水肿及促进肢体功能的效果分析[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 1309-1312.
[4]
佘秋熳,方珍,陈玉峰. 乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的综合护理干预措施探讨[J]. 中国现代医生, 2019, 57(36): 138-141.
[5]
张惠婷,张慧珍,钟巧玲, 等. 个案管理模式对乳腺癌患者术后患肢淋巴水肿的效果研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(33): 2605-2611.
[6]
张丽娟,黄中英,朱晓丽, 等. 徒手淋巴引流预防乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的效果[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(17): 53-55.
[7]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2013版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2013, 23(8): 637-684.
[8]
吴清时,伦丽芳,陈红梅, 等. 阶段性功能锻炼操对乳腺癌术后患者康复效果的影响[J]. 现代临床护理, 2011, 10(2): 37-39.
[9]
徐文红,杨碎胜,张晓华, 等. 以有氧运动为基础的术侧上肢针对性医疗体操对乳腺癌术后上肢功能康复的临床效果[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(7): 82-88.
[10]
刘婉丽. 康复小组干预模式在乳腺癌患者术后上肢淋巴水肿康复护理中的应用[J]. 中国社区医师, 2020, 36(15): 145-146.
[11]
刘维,娄小平,王芳. 乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿护理管理的应用效果[J].临床医学研究与实践, 2020, 5(14): 158-160.
[12]
Wajngarten D, Campos JADB, Botta AC, et al. Validity and reliability of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale in dental students: A transnational study[J]. Arch Environ Occup Health, 2018, 73(4): 258-266.
[13]
宋盈盈. 康复护理干预应用于乳腺癌患者的效果及对改善上肢水肿的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2020, 43(2): 185-186.
[14]
程云,李玲,陈莺, 等. 早期康复护理对乳腺癌患者术后淋巴水肿的影响[J/CD]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2019, 4(44): 155, 179.
[15]
宋美华,童笑笑,张国娣. 居家康复护理联合综合消肿治疗在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者康复中的应用效果研究[J]. 护理与康复, 2019, 18(7): 16-20.
[16]
周凯娜,李津,李小妹. 早期渐进性功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患肢淋巴水肿干预效果的meta分析[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2016, 35(16): 134-135.
[17]
汤小丹. 不同护理干预对乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的影响分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2019, 14(21): 160-161.
[18]
沈良盛,彭丽丽,赖陪芬, 等. 早期康复护理对乳腺癌患者术后淋巴水肿的影响[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2019, 23(18): 2586-2588.
[19]
曹方凝. 渐进性康复训练对乳腺癌患者术后患侧活动度及淋巴水肿的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(18): 4148-4151.
[20]
李嘉宝,杜丽娜,王星力, 等. 乳腺癌术后渐进式阻力训练预防上肢淋巴水肿的效果观察[J]. 现代临床护理, 2019, 18(5): 34-38.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 自动乳腺超声联合免疫组化早期预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 361-369.
[3] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[4] 杨柳, 宋振川, 王新乐. 乳腺癌改良根治术联合背阔肌复位的临床疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 269-273.
[5] 牛海刚, 郭文科. 三阴性乳腺癌组织中双特异性磷酸酶14与核受体相互作用蛋白1的表达及预后价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 199-205.
[6] 唐丹萍, 王萍, 江孟蝶, 杨晓蓉. 自体脂肪移植在乳腺癌术后乳房重建的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 582-585.
[7] 孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[8] 宋佳, 汪波, 孙凯律, 商江峰, 吴旦平, 肇毅. 吲哚菁绿荧光显影联合亚甲蓝染色在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 498-501.
[9] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[10] 黄程鑫, 陈莉, 刘伊楚, 王水良, 赖晓凤. OPA1 在乳腺癌组织的表达特征及在ER阳性乳腺癌细胞中的生物学功能研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 275-284.
[11] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[12] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
[15] 张梦婷, 穷拉姆, 色珍, 李逸群, 德庆旺姆. 西藏地区藏族乳腺癌新辅助化疗的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-446.
阅读次数
全文


摘要