切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 417 -426. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2021.05.008

论著

大面积严重烧伤住院患者流行病学分析
秦小锋1, 赵宇辉2,()   
  1. 1. 063210 唐山,华北理工大学
    2. 063000 唐山市工人医院烧伤整形外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-17 出版日期:2021-10-01
  • 通信作者: 赵宇辉
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20210758)

Epidemiological analysis of hospitalized patients with extensive severe burns

Xiaofeng Qin1, Yuhui Zhao2,()   

  1. 1. North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China
    2. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Tangshan Worker Hospital in Hebei Province, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Received:2021-07-17 Published:2021-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuhui Zhao
引用本文:

秦小锋, 赵宇辉. 大面积严重烧伤住院患者流行病学分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(05): 417-426.

Xiaofeng Qin, Yuhui Zhao. Epidemiological analysis of hospitalized patients with extensive severe burns[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2021, 16(05): 417-426.

目的

分析大面积严重烧伤住院患者的流行病学特征,为今后在烧伤治疗领域可能存在的问题及烧伤预防策略提供更详细的依据。

方法

收集河北省唐山市工人医院烧伤研究所2013年8月1日至2020年7月31日的烧伤总面积≥30%总体表面积(TBSA)或烧伤严重程度为重度、特重度住院患者的病历资料。将患者分为3个年龄段:≤18岁;>18岁且<60岁;≥60岁,将居住地分为农村和城市,统计分析患者的一般人口学资料、受伤情况、临床特征、治疗情况。对数据行χ2检验,Fisher确切概率法、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验,对影响大面积严重烧伤患者临床预后因素行Logistic回归分析。

结果

本次研究调查共收集了大面积严重烧伤住院患者病历资料414例,占同期烧伤住院患者总数(4 222例)的9.8%。男女比例为3.14∶1.0;3个年龄段中>18岁且<60岁患者最多(70.0%);居住地为农村有371例(89.6%),农村与城市的患者比例为8.6∶1.0。不同年龄段患者在性别分布上,差异有统计学意义(χ2=31.530,P<0.01),不同年龄段患者居住地构成比分布比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.899,P=0.626)。本研究患者受伤时间在4~9月较多,其中7月(71例,17.1%)为高峰期,烧伤多发生在夏季175例(42.3%),各季节中烧伤患者构成比比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.749,P=0.711)。致伤地点主要为家里215例(51.9%),不同年龄段患者在致伤地点分布上,差异有统计学意义(χ2=99.366, P<0.01),患者致伤原因以火焰烧伤为主287例(69.3%)。不同年龄段患者在致伤原因分布上,差异有统计学意义(χ2=83.569, P<0.01)。本研究患者的烧伤总面积在30%~39% TBSA的范围患者最多为127例(30.7%),不同年龄段患者在烧伤总面积的分布上差异有统计学意义(H =54.914,P<0.01),大部分患者呈特重度烧伤者有277例(54.8%),不同年龄段患者在烧伤严重程度的分布上差异有统计学意义(χ2=35.292, P<0.01)。本研究患者致伤部位比例从高到低依次为躯干、双下肢、双上肢、头面颈部、臀部及会阴,各年龄段患者在烧伤部位为双上肢、双下肢、头面颈、臀部及会阴构成比比较上,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=20.328、39.067、17.133、8.349,P<0.01),各年龄段患者在烧伤部位为躯干构成比比较上,差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.587, P=0.166)。本研究患者伤后入院时间<6 h入院者355例(85.7%)最多,3个年龄段患者在伤后入院时间上,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.253, P=0.691)。本研究患者院前处理以在现场未行任何处理者393例(94.9%)为主,3个年龄段患者在院前处理上,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.931, P=0.543)。本研究患者中绝大部分未合并吸入性损伤342例(82.6%),各年龄段患者在合并吸入性损伤构成比比较上,差异无统计学意义(χ2=5.892, P =0.053),各种致伤原因中火焰烧伤是合并吸入性损伤,患者数最多72例(25.1%),各种致伤原因患者在合并吸入性损伤构成比比较上,差异有统计学意义(χ2=38.568, P<0.01),居住地为城市的患者合并吸入性损伤为10例(23.3%),各居住地患者在合并吸入性损伤构成比比较上,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.149, P=0.284)。本研究患者有219例采取手术治疗,手术率为52.9%,其中住院期间实施4次手术的患者最多为99例(23.9%)。本研究绝大部分患者付费方式为自费381例(92.0%),各年龄段患者付费方式比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=5.435, P=0.066),自费患者中又以居住地为农村的最多,比例为92.7%,农村与城市患者付费方式比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究患者住院时间均以>21 d为主,各年龄段烧伤住院患者在住院时间构成比比较上,差异无统计学意义(χ2=11.764, P=0.067)。本研究患者临床预后以痊愈、好转为主有358例(86.5%),痊愈130例(31.4%)、好转228例(55.1%)、恶化26例(6.3%)、死亡30例(7.2%),不同年龄烧伤患者在临床预后分布上差异有统计学意义(H=13.607, P=0.001)。本研究患者病死率为7.2%,年龄和Ⅲ度烧伤面积是大面积严重烧伤患者临床未愈的独立危险因素(OR=1.046、1.098,95%CI=1.021~1.071、1.066~1.131,P<0.01)。

结论

我国大面积严重烧伤主要见于中青年及老年,农村男性居多、致伤原因多为火焰烧伤,高发与春夏季常见于工作场所烧伤,病情往往较严重,致伤部位以躯干、双下肢、双上肢较多,自费为主要付费方式。不同年龄患者在性别、致伤原因、致伤场所、烧伤总面积、烧伤严重程度、烧伤部位及临床预后存在明显差异。

Objective

To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized patients with severe burns over a large area to provide a more detailed basis for possible future problems in the field of burn treatment and burn prevention strategies.

Methods

Medical records of patients hospitalized with total burn area≥30% total body surface area (TBSA) or burn severity of severe or extra-severe were collected from August 1, 2013, to July 31, 2020, at Department of the Burn Institute, Tangshan Workers′ Hospital in Hebei province. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: ≤18 years, >18 and <60 years, ≥60 years, and the place of residence was divided into rural and urban areas, and the general demographic data, injuries, clinical characteristics, and treatment of patients were statistically analyzed. The data were analyzed by χ2 test, Fisher′s exact probability method, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression analysis of factors affecting the clinical prognosis of patients with large and severe burns.

Results

A total of 414 cases of medical records of patients hospitalized with severe burns over a large area were collected in this study survey, accounting for 9.8% of the total number of patients hospitalized with burns during the same period (4 222 cases). The ratio of male to female was 3.14∶1.00; patients aged>18 and <60 years accounted for 70.0% of the total number of patients in the three age groups; there were 371 cases (89.6%) with rural residence, and the ratio of rural to urban patients was 8.6∶1.0. The difference in the distribution of patients in different age groups by gender was statistically significant (χ2=31.530, P<0.01), and the distribution of patients in different age groups by residence composition ratio was not statistically significant, the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.899, P=0.626). There were more patients with burns from April to September, with July (71 cases, 17.1%) being the peak month. One hundred and seventy-five cases (42.3%) of burns happened in summer, and the difference in the composition ratio of patients with burns in each season was not statistically significant (χ2=3.749, P=0.711). The location of injury was mainly at home in 215 cases (51.9%), and the difference in the distribution of injury locations was statistically significant in different age groups (χ2=99.366, P< 0.01), and the cause of injury was mainly flame burns in 287 cases (69.3%). The difference in the distribution of causes of injury among different age groups was statistically significant (χ2=83.569, P< 0.01). The maximum number of patients in this group with total burn area in the range of 30% to 39% TBSA was 127 (30.7%), and there was a significant difference in the distribution of total burn area between different age groups (H=54.914, P< 0.01), and most of the patients had extra-severe burns in 277 cases (54.8%). There was a significant difference in the distribution of burn severity among different age groups (χ2=35.292, P< 0.01). In this group of patients, the proportion of injury sites in descending order was the trunk, lower extremities, upper extremities, head, face and neck, buttocks, and perineum, and there were statistically significant differences in the ratio of burn sites for upper extremities, lower extremities, head, face and neck, buttocks and perineum in each age group (χ2=20.328, 39.067, 17.133, 8.349; P< 0.01), and there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of burn sites for the trunk, lower extremities, head, face and neck, buttocks and perineum in each age group. The difference was not statistically significant in the comparison of the composition ratio of patients with burns at the site of the trunk (χ2=3.587, P=0.166). The time of post-injury admission in this group was 355 (85.7%), and the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (χ2=2.253, P=0.691). The pre-hospital management of patients in this group was mainly 393 cases (94.9%) who did not have any treatment at the scene, and the difference in pre-hospital management was not statistically significant among the three groups (χ2=2.931, P=0.543). The majority of the patients in this group did not have combined inhalation injury 342 cases (82.6%), and the difference in the composition of combined inhalation injury among patients of all ages was not statistically significant (χ2=5.892, P=0.053), and the number of patients with combined inhalation injury was 72 cases (25.1%) among all causes of injury. The difference was statistically significant (χ2=38.568, P<0.01), and the number of patients with combined inhalation injury was 10 cases (23.3%) for patients with the urban residence). In this study, 219 patients were treated surgically, with a surgical rate of 52.9%, of which 99 cases (23.9%) underwent four surgeries during hospitalization. The majority of patients in this group were self-pay 381 cases (92.0%), and the difference between the payment methods of patients of all ages was not significant (χ2=5.435, P=0.066), and the most self-pay patients were those who lived in rural areas, with a proportion of 92.7%. The number of days of hospitalization in this group of patients was mainly greater than 21 d. The difference in the composition of the number of days of hospitalization among burn patients of all ages was not statistically significant (χ2=11.764, P=0.067). The clinical prognosis of our patients was mainly healed and improved in 358 cases (86.5%), healed in 130 cases (31.4%), improved in 228 cases (55.1%), deteriorated in 26 cases (6.3%), and died in 30 cases (7.2%), and there was a significant difference in the distribution of clinical prognosis of burn patients in different age groups (H=13.607, P=0.001). The mortality rate in this group was 7.2%, and age and third-degree burn area was independent risk factors for clinical failure in patients with large severe burns (odds ratio=1.046, 1.098, 95%confidence interval=1.021-1.071, 1.066-1.131; P<0.01).

Conclusions

Large severe burns in China are mainly seen in young and middle-aged people and the elderly, with a predominance of rural males, and the cause of injury is mostly flame burns, which are common in workplace burns in spring and summer, and are often more severe, with more injury sites on the trunk, both lower extremities, and both upper extremities, and self-payment is the main payment method. There were significant differences in gender, cause of injury, place of the injury, the total burn area, burn severity, burn site, and clinical prognosis among different age groups of patients.

表1 烧伤严重程度的分类
表2 不同年龄患者在性别和居住地上的分布情况[例(%)]
表3 不同年龄烧伤住院患者受伤季节分布[例(%)]
图1 3个年龄段烧伤住院患者受伤时间分布
表4 不同年龄患者在致伤场所上的分布情况[例(%)]
表5 不同年龄烧伤住院患者致伤原因分布[例(%)]
表6 不同年龄患者在烧伤严重程度上的分布[例(%)]
图2 各年龄段烧伤患者付费方式分布
表7 2组大面积严重烧伤患者临床预后影响因素分析
[1]
Wang Y, Tang HT, Xia ZF, et al. Factors affecting survival in adult patients with massive burns[J]. Burns, 2010, 36(1): 57-64.
[2]
Cheng W, Yan-hua R, Fang-gang N, et al. Epidemiology of 1974 burn patients at a major burn center in Beijing: a nine-year study[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2012, 33(5): e228-e233.
[3]
Smolle C, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Forbes AA, et al. Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review[J]. Burns, 2017, 43(2): 249-257.
[4]
Yao Y, Liu Y, Zhou J, et al. The epidemiology of civilian inpatients′ burns in Chinese military hospitals, 2001-2007[J]. Burns, 2011, 37(6): 1023-1032.
[5]
谢卫国. 从中外比较看我国烧伤防治体系建设[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2013, 29(2): 126-129.
[6]
孙永华. 大面积深度烧伤感染的防治[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2008, 3(4): 497-502.
[7]
Przkora R, Fram RY, Herndon DN, et al. Influence of inhalation injury on energy expenditure in severely burned children[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(8): 1487-1491.
[8]
Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. Burns in children: standard and new treatments[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9923):1168-1178.
[9]
Liu Y, Chen JJ, Crook N, et al. Epidemiologic investigation of burns in the elderly in Sichuan Province[J]. Burns, 2013, 39(3): 389-394.
[10]
吴直惠,黄建琼,周敏,等. 老年烧伤原因的调查与分析[J]. 华西医学2010, 25(7): 1235-1237.
[11]
尚新志,唐乾利,张力,等. 280例老年烧伤住院患者流行病学调查[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2008, 24(2): 128.
[12]
Yin Z, Qin Z, Xin W, et al. The characteristics of elderly burns in Shanghai[J]. Burns, 2010, 36(3): 430-435.
[13]
孙永华. 烧伤流行病学与防治的思考[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2007, 2(2): 68-70.
[14]
黄跃生,肖光夏,汪仕良,等. 我国烧伤医学60年回顾与展望[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2018, 34(7): 437-441.
[15]
Kai-Yang L, Zhao-Fan X, Luo-Man Z, et al. Epidemiology of pediatric burns requiring hospitalization in China: a literature review of retrospective studies[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 122(1): 132-142.
[16]
Xu JH, Qiu J, Zhou JH, et al. Pediatric burns in military hospitals of China from 2001 to 2007: a retrospective study[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(8): 1780-1788.
[17]
Zhu L, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. Hospitalized Pediatric Burns in North China: A 10-year epidemiologic review[J]. Burns, 2013, 39(5): 1004-1011.
[18]
刘萌,张勤,刘健,等. 2005年至2016年上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院老年严重烧伤特点分析[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(3): 195-202.
[19]
汤勇,王良喜,谢卫国,等. 多中心老年和中青年严重烧伤住院患者流行病学调查分析[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2017, 33(9): 537-544.
[20]
Dokter J, Vloemans AF, Beerthuizen GI, et al. Epidemiology and trends in severe burns in the Netherlands[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(7): 1406-1414.
[21]
Zhou B, Zhou X, Ouyang LZ, et al. An epidemiological analysis of paediatric burns in urban and rural areas in south central China[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(1): 150-156.
[22]
李二. 职业性别隔离的国际比较研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳师范大学,2016.
[23]
Yongqiang F, Yibing W, Dechang W , et al. Epidemiology of hospitalized burn patients in Shandong Province: 2001-2005[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2007, 28(3): 468-473.
[24]
Liu Y, Cen Y, Chen JJ, et al. Characteristics of paediatric burns in Sichuan province: epidemiology and prevention[J]. Burns, 2012, 38(1): 26-31.
[25]
程文凤,申传安,赵东旭,等. 中国老年烧伤患者流行病学研究现状分析[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(1): 69-71.
[26]
Bayuo J, Botchway AE. Burns among older persons: A narrative review[J]. Burns Open, 2017: S246891221730010X.
[27]
Xie B, Xiao SC, Peng XD, et al. Epidemiology and outcome analysis of severe extensive burns: a 12-year summary of 103 cases in a burn center in China[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2012, 33(3): e127-e132.
[28]
汤勇,王良喜,陈俊杰,等. 多中心严重烧伤住院患儿流行病学调查分析[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2016, 32(10): 599-605.
[29]
程文凤,赵东旭,申传安,等. 14岁以下儿童大面积烧伤的多中心流行病学调查[J]. 中华医学杂志2017, 97(6): 462-467.
[30]
Brusselaers N, Monstrey S, Vogelaers D , et al. Severe burn injury in europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality[J]. Crit Care, 2010, 14(5): R188.
[31]
桂莉,周彬,霍正禄,等. 美英日德国的急诊医疗服务体系综观[J]. 中国危重病急救医学2001, 13(6): 325-326.
[32]
程文凤. 中国烧伤流行病学研究现状及多中心大面积烧伤患者流行病学调查分析[D]. 北京:中国人民解放军医学院,2017.
[33]
中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会. 吸入性损伤临床诊疗全国专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中华创伤杂志2018, 34(11): 971-976.
[34]
Kim Y, Kym D, Hur J, et al. Does inhalation injury predict mortality in burns patients or require redefinition[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(9): e0185195.
[35]
王文盛. 老年严重烧伤患者单中心流行病学调查及早期脏器损伤特点的研究[D]. 上海:中国人民解放军陆军军医大学,2019.
[36]
刘萌. 12年严重烧伤患者流行病学特点及变化趋势[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2018.
[1] 阚艳敏, 王东, 丁建民, 经翔. 住院医师规范化培训教学活动指南在超声医学教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 537-541.
[2] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[3] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[4] 王成, 张慧君, 覃凤均, 陈辉. 网状植皮与ReCell表皮细胞种植在深Ⅱ度烧伤治疗中的疗效对比[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 498-502.
[5] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[6] 蔡柔妹, 曾洁梅, 黄伟丽, 谢文敏, 刘燕丹, 吴漫君, 蔡楚燕. 利用QC小组干预降低经烧伤创面股静脉置管导管相关性感染发生率的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 399-404.
[7] 茹天峰, 戴浩楠, 袁林, 吴坤平, 谢卫国. 对肌肉超声在严重烧伤患者肌肉性能评估中应用的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 197-203.
[8] 杨姣, 王玲, 古兰, 安慎通, 胡大海, 韩军涛. 对艾司氯胺酮在烧伤后瘢痕手术患儿静脉穿刺中的应用效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 210-216.
[9] 李峰, 黎君友, 冯书堂, 李国平, 杨洁蓉. 对GGTA1/β4GalNT2双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪皮进行异种移植的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 241-248.
[10] 刘晓彬, 朱峰. 危重烧伤患者肾功能亢进的药物治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 260-264.
[11] 王帆, 马秋月, 刘小莉. 基于分位数回归模型的切口疝手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[12] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[13] 杨旭希, 郑吉洋, 陈秀梅, 陈淑玲, 杨峻青, 苏芝琪, 左咏臻, 广东省医师协会心力衰竭专业医师分会, 广东省护士协会介入护士分会. 慢性心力衰竭患者容量管理护理专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 201-207.
[14] 王燕, 郭蕊, 王淑杰. 老年烧伤气管切开患者死亡风险诊断模型构建及对策分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 249-253.
[15] 高雷, 李全, 巴雅力嘎, 陈强, 侯智慧, 曹胜军, 巴特. 重度烧伤患者血小板外泌体对凝血功能调节作用的初步研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 149-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要