切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 454 -456. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.05.014

综述

脂质水胶体技术促进伤口愈合的研究进展
王春立1, 刘泽云2,(), 闫冰3, Emilio Galea4   
  1. 1. 518101 深圳,南方医科大学深圳医院整形烧伤科
    2. 100049 北京,航天中心医院神经内科
    3. 102399 北京京煤集团总医院急诊科
    4. 新加坡,HCP Healthcare Asia Pte. Ltd
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-14 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 刘泽云

Research progress of technology lipido-colloid for wound healing

Chunli Wang1, Zeyun Liu2,(), Bing Yan3, Emilio Galea4   

  1. 1. Department of Plastic and Burn Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518101, China
    2. Department of Neurology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China
    3. Department of Emergency, Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital, Beijing 102399, China
    4. HCP Healthcare Asia Pte. Ltd, Singapore
  • Received:2022-07-14 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Zeyun Liu
引用本文:

王春立, 刘泽云, 闫冰, Emilio Galea. 脂质水胶体技术促进伤口愈合的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 454-456.

Chunli Wang, Zeyun Liu, Bing Yan, Emilio Galea. Research progress of technology lipido-colloid for wound healing[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(05): 454-456.

急慢性伤口严重影响患者的生活质量。如何促进急性伤口愈合并防止其转化成慢性伤口,实现慢性伤口的完全愈合是医务人员持续关注的问题。在"湿性伤口愈合理论"的基础上,脂质水胶体技术(TLC)可有效提升伤口愈合速度、减轻患者疼痛、降低敷料更换频率。本文将国内外关于TLC的作用及机制的相关研究进行综述,从简介、体外作用及相关机制、临床作用3个方面探讨TLC促进伤口愈合的进展,为TLC的进一步应用提供新的思路。

Acute and chronic wounds seriously affect the quality of life of patients. How to promote acute wound healing and prevent its transformation into chronic wounds, and how to achieve complete healing of chronic wounds is a continuous concern for medical professionals. Based on the "wet wound healing theory" , technology lipid hydrocolloid (TLC) can effectively reduce patient pain, improve wound healing speed, and reduce the frequency of dressing changes. In this paper, we review the research on the effects and mechanisms of TLC at home and abroad, and discuss the progress of TLC in promoting wound healing from three aspects: introduction, in vitro effects and related mechanisms, and clinical effects, so as to provide new ideas for further application of TLC.

[1]
Ruggeri M, Bianchi E, Rossi S, et al. Nanotechnology-based medical devices for the treatment of chronic skin lesions: From research to the clinic[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12(9): 815.
[2]
Nicholas MN, Yeung J. Current status and future of skin substitutes for chronic wound healing[J]. J Cutan Med Surg, 2017, 21(1): 23-30
[3]
Ferriol A, Morán MDC. Enhanced performance of gelatin 5-fluorouracil-containing nanoparticles against squamous cell carcinoma in simulated chronic wounds conditions[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021, 124: 112073.
[4]
Khunkaew S, Fernandez R, Sim J. Health-related quality of life among adults living with diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis[J]. Qual Life Res, 2019, 28(6): 1413-1427.
[5]
Macioch T, Sobol E, Krakowiecki A, et al. Health related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulceration - translation and Polish adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale short form[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2017, 15(1): 15.
[6]
Banharak S, Panpanit L, Subindee S, et al. Prevention and Care for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2021, 14: 2983-3004.
[7]
Juchaux F, Berger S, Bouschbacher M. Effects of Urgotul and Atrauman dressings on human fibroblast viability[N]. Harrogate: Wounds UK, 2009.
[8]
Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig[J]. Nature1962, 193: 293-294.
[9]
White R, Cowan T, Glover D. Supporting evidence-based practice: a clinical review of TLC technology[J]. Wound Care, 2011, 20: 1-36.
[10]
Benbow M, Iosson G. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds[J]. Br J Nurs, 2004, 13(2): 105-109.
[11]
Broussard KC, Powers JG. Wound dressings: selecting the most appropriate type[J]. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2013, 14(6): 449-459.
[12]
Nair H, Venkateshwaran N, Seetharaman SS, et al. Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review[J]. J Wound Care, 2021, 30(Sup4): S42-S52.
[13]
Desroche N, Dropet C, Janod P, et al. Antibacterial properties and reduction of MRSA biofilm with a dressing combining polyabsorbent fibres and a silver matrix[J]. J Wound Care, 2016, 25(10): 577-584.
[14]
Bainbridge P. Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts[J]. J Wound Care, 2013, 22(8): 407-408, 410-412.
[15]
Lipp C, Kirker K, Agostinho A, et al. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model[J]. J Wound Care, 2010, 19(6): 220-226.
[16]
Viennet C, Bride J, Gabiot AC, et al. Comparison of different wound dressings on cultured human fibroblasts and collagen lattices[J]. J Wound Care, 2003, 12(10): 385-390.
[17]
Bernard FX, Barrault C, Juchaux F, et al. Stimulation of the proliferation of human dermal fibroblasts in vitro by a lipidocolloid dressing[J]. J Wound Care, 2005, 14(5): 215-220.
[18]
Bernard FX, Juchaux F, Laurensou C. Effects of a lipidocolloid dressing on the production of the extracellular matrix by human dermal fibroblasts in vitro[J]. Physical Chemistry, 2007, 12(58): 9-11.
[19]
Meaume S, Ourabah Z, Cartier H, et al. Evaluation of a lipidocolloid wound dressing in the local management of leg ulcers[J]. J Wound Care, 2005, 14(7): 329-334.
[20]
Benbow M, Iosson G. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds[J]. Br J Nurs, 2004, 13(2): 105-109.
[21]
Blanchet-Bardon C, Bohbot S. Using Urgotul dressing for the management of epidermolysis bullosa skin lesions[J]. Wound Care, 2005, 14(10): 490-491, 494-496.
[22]
Ma KK, Chan MF, Pang SM. The effectiveness of using a lipido-colloid dressing for patients with traumatic digital wounds[J]. Clin Nurs Res, 2006, 15(2): 119-134.
[23]
Baek W, Lee N, Han EJ, et al. A Prospective Randomized Study: The Usefulness and Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Lipidocolloid Polyester Mesh Compared to Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Treatment of Pressure Ulcers[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12(9): 813.
[24]
Meaume S, Téot L, Lazareth I, et al. The importance of pain reduction through dressing selection in routine wound management: the MAPP study[J].J Wound Care, 2004, 13(10): 409-413.
[25]
Denyer J, Pillay E, Clapham J. Best practice guidelines: skin and wound care in epidermolysis bullosa 2017[Z/OL]. Wounds International. [2017-05-03].

URL    
[26]
Letouze A, Voinchet V, Hoecht B, et al. Using a new lipidocolloid dressing in paediatric wounds: results of French and German clinical studies[J]. J Wound Care. 2004, 13(6): 221-225.
[27]
Malmsjö M, Ingemansson R, Martin R, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy using gauze or open-cell polyurethane foam: similar early effects on pressure transduction and tissue contraction in an experimental porcine wound model[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2009, 17(2): 200-205.
[28]
Téot L, Lambert L, Ourabah Z, et al. Use of topical negative pressure with a lipidocolloid dressing: results of a clinical evaluation[J]. J Wound Care, 2006, 15(8): 355-358.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 利洪艺, 杨浪, 温国洪, 关鸿, 茹江英, 王湘江. 全膝股骨假体矢状面位置与术后膝前痛及功能的关系[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 479-484.
[4] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[5] 朱凯思, 金剑, 杨玉坤. pH依赖的成膜性液体敷料对大鼠创面愈合的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 413-418.
[6] 陈继秋, 朱世辉. 皮肤牵张装置的临床应用现状[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 451-453.
[7] 钟轼, 李斌飞, 温君琳, 古晨, 廖小卒. 右美托咪定缓解神经病理性疼痛作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-240.
[8] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[9] 王琦, 陈新, 闵捷, 方露, 刘志奇, 孙伟, 于德新. 膀胱软镜镜检术中改良"Bag Squeeze"法的应用与疼痛焦虑影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-241.
[10] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[11] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[12] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[13] 周晓艳, 王志钢, 周冬喜. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 579-583.
[14] 付强, 秦丽媛, 李全波. 神经病理性疼痛患者血清miR-15a水平及意义分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 293-298.
[15] 黄涌, 邓宏平, 黄丽, 沈秋桐, 曹汉忠. 耳穴压籽联合经皮穴位电刺激对老年膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 285-290.
阅读次数
全文


摘要