切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 454 -456. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.05.014

综述

脂质水胶体技术促进伤口愈合的研究进展
王春立1, 刘泽云2,(), 闫冰3, Emilio Galea4   
  1. 1. 518101 深圳,南方医科大学深圳医院整形烧伤科
    2. 100049 北京,航天中心医院神经内科
    3. 102399 北京京煤集团总医院急诊科
    4. 新加坡,HCP Healthcare Asia Pte. Ltd
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-14 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 刘泽云

Research progress of technology lipido-colloid for wound healing

Chunli Wang1, Zeyun Liu2,(), Bing Yan3, Emilio Galea4   

  1. 1. Department of Plastic and Burn Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518101, China
    2. Department of Neurology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China
    3. Department of Emergency, Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital, Beijing 102399, China
    4. HCP Healthcare Asia Pte. Ltd, Singapore
  • Received:2022-07-14 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Zeyun Liu
引用本文:

王春立, 刘泽云, 闫冰, Emilio Galea. 脂质水胶体技术促进伤口愈合的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 454-456.

Chunli Wang, Zeyun Liu, Bing Yan, Emilio Galea. Research progress of technology lipido-colloid for wound healing[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(05): 454-456.

急慢性伤口严重影响患者的生活质量。如何促进急性伤口愈合并防止其转化成慢性伤口,实现慢性伤口的完全愈合是医务人员持续关注的问题。在"湿性伤口愈合理论"的基础上,脂质水胶体技术(TLC)可有效提升伤口愈合速度、减轻患者疼痛、降低敷料更换频率。本文将国内外关于TLC的作用及机制的相关研究进行综述,从简介、体外作用及相关机制、临床作用3个方面探讨TLC促进伤口愈合的进展,为TLC的进一步应用提供新的思路。

Acute and chronic wounds seriously affect the quality of life of patients. How to promote acute wound healing and prevent its transformation into chronic wounds, and how to achieve complete healing of chronic wounds is a continuous concern for medical professionals. Based on the "wet wound healing theory" , technology lipid hydrocolloid (TLC) can effectively reduce patient pain, improve wound healing speed, and reduce the frequency of dressing changes. In this paper, we review the research on the effects and mechanisms of TLC at home and abroad, and discuss the progress of TLC in promoting wound healing from three aspects: introduction, in vitro effects and related mechanisms, and clinical effects, so as to provide new ideas for further application of TLC.

[1]
Ruggeri M, Bianchi E, Rossi S, et al. Nanotechnology-based medical devices for the treatment of chronic skin lesions: From research to the clinic[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12(9): 815.
[2]
Nicholas MN, Yeung J. Current status and future of skin substitutes for chronic wound healing[J]. J Cutan Med Surg, 2017, 21(1): 23-30
[3]
Ferriol A, Morán MDC. Enhanced performance of gelatin 5-fluorouracil-containing nanoparticles against squamous cell carcinoma in simulated chronic wounds conditions[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021, 124: 112073.
[4]
Khunkaew S, Fernandez R, Sim J. Health-related quality of life among adults living with diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis[J]. Qual Life Res, 2019, 28(6): 1413-1427.
[5]
Macioch T, Sobol E, Krakowiecki A, et al. Health related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulceration - translation and Polish adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale short form[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2017, 15(1): 15.
[6]
Banharak S, Panpanit L, Subindee S, et al. Prevention and Care for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2021, 14: 2983-3004.
[7]
Juchaux F, Berger S, Bouschbacher M. Effects of Urgotul and Atrauman dressings on human fibroblast viability[N]. Harrogate: Wounds UK, 2009.
[8]
Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig[J]. Nature1962, 193: 293-294.
[9]
White R, Cowan T, Glover D. Supporting evidence-based practice: a clinical review of TLC technology[J]. Wound Care, 2011, 20: 1-36.
[10]
Benbow M, Iosson G. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds[J]. Br J Nurs, 2004, 13(2): 105-109.
[11]
Broussard KC, Powers JG. Wound dressings: selecting the most appropriate type[J]. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2013, 14(6): 449-459.
[12]
Nair H, Venkateshwaran N, Seetharaman SS, et al. Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review[J]. J Wound Care, 2021, 30(Sup4): S42-S52.
[13]
Desroche N, Dropet C, Janod P, et al. Antibacterial properties and reduction of MRSA biofilm with a dressing combining polyabsorbent fibres and a silver matrix[J]. J Wound Care, 2016, 25(10): 577-584.
[14]
Bainbridge P. Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts[J]. J Wound Care, 2013, 22(8): 407-408, 410-412.
[15]
Lipp C, Kirker K, Agostinho A, et al. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model[J]. J Wound Care, 2010, 19(6): 220-226.
[16]
Viennet C, Bride J, Gabiot AC, et al. Comparison of different wound dressings on cultured human fibroblasts and collagen lattices[J]. J Wound Care, 2003, 12(10): 385-390.
[17]
Bernard FX, Barrault C, Juchaux F, et al. Stimulation of the proliferation of human dermal fibroblasts in vitro by a lipidocolloid dressing[J]. J Wound Care, 2005, 14(5): 215-220.
[18]
Bernard FX, Juchaux F, Laurensou C. Effects of a lipidocolloid dressing on the production of the extracellular matrix by human dermal fibroblasts in vitro[J]. Physical Chemistry, 2007, 12(58): 9-11.
[19]
Meaume S, Ourabah Z, Cartier H, et al. Evaluation of a lipidocolloid wound dressing in the local management of leg ulcers[J]. J Wound Care, 2005, 14(7): 329-334.
[20]
Benbow M, Iosson G. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds[J]. Br J Nurs, 2004, 13(2): 105-109.
[21]
Blanchet-Bardon C, Bohbot S. Using Urgotul dressing for the management of epidermolysis bullosa skin lesions[J]. Wound Care, 2005, 14(10): 490-491, 494-496.
[22]
Ma KK, Chan MF, Pang SM. The effectiveness of using a lipido-colloid dressing for patients with traumatic digital wounds[J]. Clin Nurs Res, 2006, 15(2): 119-134.
[23]
Baek W, Lee N, Han EJ, et al. A Prospective Randomized Study: The Usefulness and Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Lipidocolloid Polyester Mesh Compared to Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Treatment of Pressure Ulcers[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12(9): 813.
[24]
Meaume S, Téot L, Lazareth I, et al. The importance of pain reduction through dressing selection in routine wound management: the MAPP study[J].J Wound Care, 2004, 13(10): 409-413.
[25]
Denyer J, Pillay E, Clapham J. Best practice guidelines: skin and wound care in epidermolysis bullosa 2017[Z/OL]. Wounds International. [2017-05-03].

URL    
[26]
Letouze A, Voinchet V, Hoecht B, et al. Using a new lipidocolloid dressing in paediatric wounds: results of French and German clinical studies[J]. J Wound Care. 2004, 13(6): 221-225.
[27]
Malmsjö M, Ingemansson R, Martin R, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy using gauze or open-cell polyurethane foam: similar early effects on pressure transduction and tissue contraction in an experimental porcine wound model[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2009, 17(2): 200-205.
[28]
Téot L, Lambert L, Ourabah Z, et al. Use of topical negative pressure with a lipidocolloid dressing: results of a clinical evaluation[J]. J Wound Care, 2006, 15(8): 355-358.
[1] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[2] 彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.
[3] 周清洁, 蒋萍萍, 梁云, 李琰. 脂质水胶体技术在创面愈合中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 360-363.
[4] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[5] 易颖煜, 朱亚琴. 口颌面疼痛的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 300-306.
[6] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[7] 闫亚飞, 范学圣, 张舰, 吴勇. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[8] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[9] 许文娟, 伍翠云, 许燕, 倪超. 标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-460.
[10] 徐淑英, 张汪, 王玲, 江照凤. 个体化护理对腹股沟疝无张力修补术后疼痛及舒适度的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 461-465.
[11] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[12] 吴孝琦, 罗飞, 史凡凡, 方青. 移动健康在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者自我管理中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 251-256.
[13] 汪鹏飞, 程莹莹, 赵海康. 骨髓间充质干细胞改善神经病理性疼痛的机制探讨[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 230-234.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?