切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 235 -240. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.03.010

论著

对腹股沟区全厚皮片修复儿童皮肤缺损的疗效观察
麻艺群, 刘巍敏, 张梦思, 朱辉, 范鑫, 付晋凤()   
  1. 650031 昆明医科大学附属儿童医院 云南省儿童医学中心烧伤整形外科
    650021 昆明,云南大学附属医院 云南省第二人民医院皮肤科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-04 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 付晋凤

Efficacy of full-thickness inguinal skin graft to repair skin defects in children

Yiqun Ma, Weimin Liu, Mengsi Zhang, Hui Zhu, Xin Fan, Jinfeng Fu()   

  1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Yunnan Children's Medical Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650031, China
    Department of Dermatological, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, the Second People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650021, China
  • Received:2022-08-04 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jinfeng Fu
引用本文:

麻艺群, 刘巍敏, 张梦思, 朱辉, 范鑫, 付晋凤. 对腹股沟区全厚皮片修复儿童皮肤缺损的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 235-240.

Yiqun Ma, Weimin Liu, Mengsi Zhang, Hui Zhu, Xin Fan, Jinfeng Fu. Efficacy of full-thickness inguinal skin graft to repair skin defects in children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(03): 235-240.

目的

比较腹股沟区全厚皮片、大腿中厚皮片修复儿童皮肤缺损的术后效果,探讨儿童皮肤缺损修复的更优化供区选择。

方法

选择2019年8月至2021年1月昆明医科大学附属儿童医院收治的皮肤缺损需行游离皮片植皮术患儿50例作为研究对象,其中腹股沟区全厚皮片供皮(腹股沟组)26例,大腿中厚皮片供皮(对照组)24例。观察对比两组供区愈合时间、疼痛、瘙痒及瘢痕情况,受区皮片色素沉着、柔软度、挛缩度、皮片边缘瘢痕情况。数据比较采用独立样本t检验、χ2检验、秩和检验。

结果

两组患者性别、年龄、致伤原因、植皮面积差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P>0.05)。腹股沟区全厚皮片及大腿中厚皮片术后均存活良好,成活率差异无统计学意义(84.0%±6.9% vs 88.0%±7.7%,P>0.05);腹股沟组供区愈合时间[(7.80±1.67)d]明显短于对照组[(11.67±1.95)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);腹股沟组供区术后疼痛、瘙痒评分[(0.73±0.53)、(0.62±0.57)分]明显低于对照组[(1.42±0.65)、(1.78±0.46)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);术后6个月随访,腹股沟组供区瘢痕评分[(0.57±0.58)分]明显低于对照组[(1.58±0.50)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。腹股沟组受区色素沉着、皮片柔软度、挛缩度[(1.04±0.54)、(0.39±0.50)、(0.36±0.49)分]优于对照组[(1.48±0.66)、(0.70±0.56)、(0.71±0.55)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹股沟组受区皮片边缘瘢痕与对照组比较差异无统计学意义[(1.04±0.72)分vs (1.00±0.60)分,P>0.05]。

结论

对于儿童皮肤缺损修复,腹股沟区全厚皮片能有效缩短供区术后愈合时间,减少术后不良反应,供区及受区均有较好的美观效果,安全有效。

Objective

To compare the postoperative effects of full-thickness inguinal skin graft and medium-thickness thigh skin graft in children, and to explore more optimal donor site selection for repairing skin defects in children.

Methods

From August 2019 to January 2021, 50 children with skin defects who needed free skin grafting were selected as the research objects. Among them, 26 cases received inguinal skin donors (inguinal group) and 24 cases received thigh medium thickness skin donors (control group). The healing time, pain, itching and scar of the donor area, pigmentation, softness, contracture and marginal scar of the recipient area were observed and compared between the two groups. Data were compared by t-test, chi-square test and rank sum test.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, age, cause of injury and skin graft area between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival rate of full-thickness inguinal skin grafts and medium-thickness thigh skin grafts had no significant differences (84.0%±6.9% vs 88.0%±7.7%, P>0.05). The healing time of donor site [(7.80±1.67)d] in inguinal group was significantly shorter than that of the control group [(11.67±1.95)d], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The pain and pruritus score of the donor site in inguinal group after operation (0.73±0.53, 0.62±0.57) were significantly lower than those of the control group (1.42±0.65, 1.78±0.46), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The scar score of donor site (0.57±0.58) in inguinal group was significantly lower than that of the control group (1.58±0.50), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The pigmentation, skin softness and contracture of the recipient area (1.04±0.54, 0.39±0.50, 0.36±0.49) in inguinal group were better than those of the control group (1.48±0.66, 0.70±0.56, 0.71±0.55), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in marginal scar between the two groups (1.04±0.72 vs 1.00±0.60, P>0.05).

Conclusion

For the repair of skin defects in children, full-thickness inguinal skin graft, which is safe and effective can effectively shorten the postoperative healing time of the donor site, reduce postoperative adverse reactions, and has good aesthetic effect in both the donor site and the recipient site.

表1 两组患儿一般资料比较
表2 两组供区术后评估比较(±s)
表3 两组受区术后评估比较(±s)
图1 腹股沟区全厚皮片修复儿童皮肤缺损。A示左手背Ⅲ°擦伤创面,皮肤如皮革样;B示清除创面坏死皮肤,见皮肤坏死达深筋膜表面;C示大张全厚皮移植于左手创面;D示术后6个月随访皮片存活良好,色泽、柔软度、挛缩度均良好;E示腹股沟梭型切取皮肤范围;F示切取皮肤至深筋膜表面;G示充分减张缝合术后;H示腹股沟供区术后6个月随访,仅见线状瘢痕,未见明显增生
图2 大腿中厚皮片修复儿童皮肤缺损。A示右手背深Ⅱ°擦伤创面,皮肤发白;B示伤后2周右手背创面大部分坏死物质溶解;C示清除右手背创面坏死皮肤,见皮肤坏死达脂肪层;D示大张中厚皮移植术后12 d,皮片完全存活;E示术后6个月随访,移植皮片存活良好,皮片有轻度色素沉着,轻度挛缩,柔软度尚可,皮片边缘轻度瘢痕增生;F示右大腿内侧供皮区见轻度瘢痕增生,稍凸出皮肤表面,充血明显
[1]
张雄. VSD结合游离植皮治疗儿童下肢大面积皮肤缺损[J]. 中国美容医学2021, 30(1): 42-45.
[2]
代涛. 多种手术方法修复儿童巨大黑色素痣的临床研究[D]. 郑州大学,2017.
[3]
杨茜,王斌. 先天性短指畸形的发病机制、分类及治疗进展[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志2015, 11(6): 389-395.
[4]
甘立强,王华,倪思利,等. 高频皮肤超声测量中国儿童皮肤厚度和密度的临床研究[J]. 激光杂志2017, 38(12): 159-161.
[5]
柳舟,周博洋,李邻峰. 儿童与孕妇皮肤特点及护肤品的选择[J]. 皮肤性病诊疗学杂志2019, 26(6): 386-389.
[6]
陈珺,章一新. 章氏超减张缝合在闭合高张力创面中的临床应用效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2020, 36(5): 339-345.
[7]
Phan NQ, Blome C, Fritz F, et al. Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus[J]. Acta Derm Venereol, 2012, 92(5) : 502-507.
[8]
Yeong EK, Mann R, Engrav LH, et al. Improved burn scar assessment with use of a new scar-rating scale[J]. Journal of Burn Care Rehabilitation, 1997, 18(4): 353-355.
[9]
施晓晓,汤諹. 瘢痕评估量表的文献复习[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志2014, 28(5): 527-529.
[10]
Akan M, Misirlioǧlu A, Yildirim S, et al. Ice application to minimize pain in the split-thickness skin graft donor site[J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2003, 27(4): 305-307.
[11]
Oliveira GV, Chinkes D, Mitchell C, et al. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2005, 31(1): 48-58.
[12]
Ray Saikat, Rao Krishna. Skin grafts-indications, applications and current research[M]. 2011: 43-54.
[13]
Tong L, Zhang WF, Hu XL, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study on the repair of skin and soft tissue defect in functional areas of children with full-thickness skin grafts from different sites of abdomen[J]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi, 2022, 38(8): 744-752.
[14]
Cho JM, Jeong JH, Woo KV, et al. Versatility of retroauricular mastoid donor site: a convenient valuable warehouse of various free graft tissues in cosmetic and reconstructive surgery[J]. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2013, 25(4): e486-e490.
[15]
Avery CM, Iqbal M, Orr R, et al. Repair of radial free flap donor site by full-thickness skin graft from inner arm[J]. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2005, 43(2): 161-165.
[16]
Sleeman D, Carton AT, Stassen LF. Closure of radial forearm free flap defect using full-thickness skin from the anterior abdominal wall[J]. British Jourml of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1994, 32(1): 54-55.
[17]
Kim S, Chung SW, Cha IH. Full thickness skin grafts from the groin: donor site morbidity and graft survival rate from 50 cases[J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 39(1): 21-26.
[18]
Lutz BS, Wei FC, Chang SC, et al. Donor site morbidity after suprafascial elevation of the radial forearm flap: a prospective study in 95 consecutive cases[J]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1999, 103(1): 132-137.
[19]
Ho T, Couch M, Carson K, et al. Radial forearm free flap donor site outcomes comparison by closure methods[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134(2): 309-315.
[20]
周永红. 童年创伤经历与研究生主观幸福感的关系:应对方式的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志2016, 24(3): 509-513.
[21]
王帅,吕大伦,丁伟,等. 复合植皮技术在小儿外伤创面中的疗效观察[J]. 长治医学院学报2020, 34(2): 134-137.
[22]
曹大勇,狄海萍,邢培朋,等. 中厚皮切取后取皮区直接植皮修复在儿童烧伤后腘窝瘢痕挛缩治疗的临床应用[J]. 中国医疗美容2019, 9(8): 58-62.
[23]
覃秋海. 自体刃厚皮移植联合生物敷料覆盖治疗混合度烧伤的临床分析[J]. 吉林医学2014, 35(4): 729-730.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 司钦亮, 毕世龙, 焦慧骁, 李世照, 陈哲禹, 武玉东. 精索去分化脂肪肉瘤两例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 585-590.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[12] 赵静. 高频超声对腹股沟斜疝的诊断价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-578.
[13] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[14] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要