切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 241 -248. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.03.011

论著

对GGTA1/β4GalNT2双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪皮进行异种移植的效果观察
李峰, 黎君友, 冯书堂(), 李国平, 杨洁蓉   
  1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心烧伤整形医学部
    100048 北京,解放军总医院第四医学中心创伤外科研究室
    102206 北京盖兰德生物科技有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 冯书堂
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0501606)

Clinical observation of skin xenotransplantation using GGTA1/β4GalNT2 double gene knockout inbred line Wuzhishan miniature pig

Feng Li, Junyou Li, Shutang Feng(), Guoping Li, Jierong Yang   

  1. Burns and Plastic Department, the Forth Medical Center of General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100048, China
    Trauma Research Center, the Forth Medical Center of General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100048, China
    Grand Life Science & Technology Ltd. Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2022-07-05 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Shutang Feng
引用本文:

李峰, 黎君友, 冯书堂, 李国平, 杨洁蓉. 对GGTA1/β4GalNT2双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪皮进行异种移植的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 241-248.

Feng Li, Junyou Li, Shutang Feng, Guoping Li, Jierong Yang. Clinical observation of skin xenotransplantation using GGTA1/β4GalNT2 double gene knockout inbred line Wuzhishan miniature pig[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(03): 241-248.

目的

评估采用GGTA1/β4GalNT2双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪皮进行猪-猴移植的效果。

方法

供体猪断层皮肤分别取自双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪、野生型五指山近交系小型猪,受体为恒河猴,按移植皮片不同分为实验组、对照组,每组4只。于每只恒河猴背部制成4个全层皮肤切除创面,分别移植双敲基因猪皮、野生型猪皮。术后不同时间点观察移植皮片的颜色、质地等,评估皮片活力,并取标本进行病理检查;不同时间点留取血清检测IL-2、IL-4、IL-12、IFN-γ含量与IFN-γ/IL-4。

结果

双敲基因猪皮片的平均存活时间为(13.9±3.1)d,长于野生型猪皮的(11.0±2.0)d(t=-3.0901,P=0.0043)。术后早期两组皮片均成活良好;术后第7天,双敲基因猪皮外观仍红润,部分野生型猪皮可见皮下大水疱或小水疱或紫绀等排异表现;术后第10天,双敲基因猪皮片的质地较野生型猪皮柔软,野生型猪皮于之前发现的紫绀表现仍存在;术后第12天,部分双敲基因猪皮片质地仍完整、柔软,野生型猪皮无完整红润的皮片存在;术后第14天,双敲基因猪皮与野生型猪皮分别有9块、14块皮片完全脱落,双敲基因猪皮脱落率低于野生猪皮(Pearson chi2=3.8647,P=0.049),仍存在于创面的7个双敲基因猪皮中的2块保持温暖、柔软,至术后第21天干燥、失活。病理观察显示两种皮肤移植后早期无明显差别;术后第7天,双敲基因猪皮和野生型猪皮表皮层细胞数量减少,真皮胶原组织水肿,野生型猪皮表皮层内出现小空泡;部分双敲基因猪皮和野生型猪皮与基底床紧密相连,形成嫁接;术后第10天,两种猪皮表皮细胞数量较前继续减少,表皮层均可见空泡,其中双敲基因猪皮表皮层出现的空泡与野生型猪皮在术后第7天的表现类似,而野生型猪皮表皮层的空泡较前明显增多增大,两种皮肤与基底床仍紧密连接;术后第14天,部分双敲基因猪皮整体结构仍基本保持完整,但表皮层空泡明显扩大,使得表皮层与真皮层大部分分离,真皮与基底仍形成连接;野生型猪皮脱落后基底床暴露,基底肉芽组织增生,大量炎细胞浸润。两组血清IL-2、IL-4、IL-12、IFN-γ水平与IFN-γ/IL-4比值比较未见规律性改变。

结论

GGTA1/β4GalNT2双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪皮免疫排异性减轻,存活时间延长,有应用于临床治疗烧伤创面的前景。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of pig-monkey skin transplantation using GGTA1/β4GalNT2 double gene knockout inbred Wuzhishan miniature pig.

Methods

Donor pig split skins were taken from double gene knockout inbred Wuzhishan miniature pigs and wild type Wuzhishan inbred miniature pigs. The recipients were rhesus monkeys. According to different skin graft donors, they were divided into experimental group and control group, 4 in each group. Four full-thickness skin excision wounds were made on the back of each rhesus monkey, and double-knocked-gene pig skin and wild-type pig skin were transplanted respectively. The color and texture of the grafted skin were observed at different time points after the operation, the vitality of the skin was evaluated, and specimens were taken for pathological examination. Serum were collected at different time points to detect the contents of IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, IFN-γ and IFN-γ/IL-4.

Results

The average survival time of double-knock-out pigskin was (13.9±3.1)days, which was longer than that of wild-type pigskin (11.0±2.0)d (t=-3.0901, P=0.0043). In the early postoperative period, both groups of skins survived well. On the 7th day after the operation, the double-knockout pig skin grafts were still ruddy, and some wild-type pig skins showed rejection manifestations such as big or small blisters, or cyanosis. On the 10th day after the operation, the texture of the double gene knockout skin grafts were softer than that of the wild type pig skin. The cyanosis of the wild type pig skin still exists. On the 12th day after the operation, some double gene knockout skin grafts were still intact and soft, however, intact and ruddy skin grafts could not be found in wild-type pigskin grafts. On the 14th day after the operation, 9 and 14 grafts of double-knock-out pigskin and wild-type pigskin were completely peeled off, respectively. The shedding rate of double-knock-out pigskin was lower than that of wild pig skin group (Pearson chi2=3.8647, P=0.049). Among the 7 double-knockout pig grafts still presented in the wound, two grafts were still ruddy, warm, and soft, and the two grafts turned to crust and lost viablity on the 21st day after surgery. Pathological observation showed that there was no significant difference in the early stage after the two types of skin transplantation. On the 7th day after the operation, the number of epidermal cells decreased and dermal collagen tissue were edema in the epidermis of two types of pig skin. Small vacuoles appeared in the epidermis of wild-type pig skin. A part of double-knocked pig skin and wild-type pig skin were closely connected to the wound bed to form an " engraft". On the 10th day after operation, the number of epidermal cells in the two types of pig skin continued to decrease compared with before, and vacuoles were seen in the epidermis. Among them, the vacuoles in the epidermis of the double-knock gene pigskin were similar to iof the wild-type pig skin increased significantly compared with the previous ones. Both grafts and the wound bed were still tightly connected. On the 14th day after the operation, the overall structure of some double-knocked pig skins remained basically intact, but the vacuoles in the epidermis were significantly enlarged, so that most of the epidermis and dermis were separated, and the dermis was still connected to the wound bed. After the wild-type pig skin fell off, the wound bed was exposed, the granulation tissue proliferated and a large number of inflammatory cells infiltrated. There was no regular change in the levels of serum IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, IFN-γ and IFN-γ/IL-4 between the two groups.

Conclusion

The immune rejection of GGTA1/β4GalNT2 double gene knockout inbred line Wuzhishan miniature pig skin is reduced and its survival time is prolonged. It has the prospect of clinical application to treat burn wounds.

图1 手术过程。A示于背部脊柱两侧各标记2个4 cm×4 cm的全层皮肤切除区域;B示全层皮肤切除后形成的4个创面;C示皮片移植于皮肤切除后形成的创面;D示植皮后打包包扎;E示穿上特制的马甲;F示动物单笼饲养
图2 实验组皮肤移植术后。A示移植当日;B示移植后第4天,皮片颜色红润;C示移植后第7天,皮片颜色仍红润;D示移植后第10天,皮片形态完整,质地柔软;E示移植后第12天,皮片完整,大部分质地柔软,色红润,局部干燥;F示移植后第14天,皮片大部分仍柔软、红润、温暖;G示移植后第21天,双敲基因猪皮片仍存在于创面,但已干燥、失活
图3 对照组皮肤移植术后。A示移植当日;B示移植后第4天,皮片颜色红润;C示移植后第7天,皮片形态完整,皮下可见小水疱(箭头所示为小水疱);D示移植后第7天,遍布皮下的大水疱(止血钳所指为大水疱);E示部分皮片颜色呈现紫绀(箭头所示为紫绀区域);F示移植后第10天,皮片形态仍完整,但部分皮片成为干痂,部分仍红润;G示移植后第12天,皮片干燥成痂;H示移植后第14天,皮片完全脱落,基底床裸露
图4 实验组移植皮肤的病理(HE,×100)。A示皮肤移植术前;B示移植术后第4天,皮肤组织结构完整;C示移植术后第7天,表皮层细胞数量减少,真皮胶原组织水肿;D示移植术后第7天,移植皮片与基底床之间形成嫁接,二者界限清晰(箭头所示);E示移植术后第10天,移植皮片的表皮层有空泡形成(箭头所示),表皮细胞数量减少;F示移植术后第10天的移植皮片与基底接触面(箭头所示),二者界限较前模糊,大量炎细胞浸润皮片真皮层;G示移植术后第14天,移植皮片整体结构仍基本完整,表皮层空泡增大使表皮与真皮层大部分分离(箭头所示),真皮层内有大量炎细胞浸润
图5 对照组移植皮肤的病理(HE,×100)。A示皮肤移植术前;B示移植术后第4天,皮肤组织结构完整;C示移植术后第7天,表皮层可见空泡(箭头所示),细胞数量减少,真皮胶原组织水肿;D示移植术后第10天,皮片表皮层空泡增多增大(箭头所示),与真皮交界面部分分离;E示移植术后第10天的皮肤与基底接触面(箭头所示),皮片与基底床形成嫁接;F示移植术后第14天,移植部位基底裸露,大量炎细胞浸润
表1 两组间血清IL-2、IL-4、IFN-γ、IL-12水平与IFN-γ/IL-4比值的比较(±s)
[1]
Porrett PM, Orandi BJ, Kumar V, et al. First clinical-grade porcine kidney xenotransplant using a human decedent model[J]. Am J Transplant, 2022, 22(4):1037-1053.
[2]
Reardon S. First pig-to-human heart transplant: what can scientists learn? [J].Nature, 2022, 601(7893):305-306.
[3]
Cooper DK. Modifying the sugar icing on the transplantation cake[J]. Glycobiology, 2016, 26(6): 571-81.
[4]
李楚,任雪洋,李琳,等. GGTA1/β4GalNT2双基因敲除近交系五指山小型猪的建立[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 201939(6): 835-840.
[5]
Leight GS, Kirman R, Rasmusen BA, et al. Transplantation in miniature swine Ⅲ:effects of MSLA and A-O blood group matching on skin allograft survival[J]. Tissue Antigens, 1978, 12: 65-74.
[6]
Leto Barone AA, Mastroianni M, Farkash EA, et al. Genetically modified porcine split-thickness skin grafts as an alternative to allograft for provision of temporary wound coverage: preliminary characterization[J]. Burns, 2015, 41(3): 565-574.
[7]
Weiner J, Yamada K, Ishikawa Y, et al. Prolonged survival of GalT-KO swine skin on baboons[J].Xenotransplantation, 201017(2): 147-152.
[8]
Leonard DA, Mallard C, Albritton A, et al. Skin grafts from genetically modified a-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout miniature swine: a functional equivalent to allografts[J]. Burns, 2017(43): 1717-1724.
[9]
Holzer PW, Chang E, Wicks J, et al. Immunological response in cynomolgus macaques to porcine α-1, 3 galactosyltransferase knockout viable skin xenotransplants-a pre-clinical study[J]. Xenotransplantation202027(6):e12632.
[10]
Gao B, Long C, Lee W, et al. Anti-Neu5Gc and anti-non-Neu5Gc antibodies in healthy humans[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7): e0180768.
[11]
Yamamoto T, Iwase H, King TW, et al. Skin xenotransplantation: historical review and clinical potential[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(7): 1738-1749.
[12]
李幼平,张立. 猪到人异种移植匹配性研究[J]. 医学研究杂志200736(2): 80-81.
[13]
周光炎,孙方臻. 异种移植[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2006: 270.
[14]
Gerenleaf G, Hansbrough JF. Current trends in the use of allograft skin for patients with burns and reflections on the future of skin banking in the United States[J]. J Burn Care Rehabil, 199415(5): 428-431.
[1] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[2] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[3] 王成, 张慧君, 覃凤均, 陈辉. 网状植皮与ReCell表皮细胞种植在深Ⅱ度烧伤治疗中的疗效对比[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 498-502.
[4] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[5] 蔡柔妹, 曾洁梅, 黄伟丽, 谢文敏, 刘燕丹, 吴漫君, 蔡楚燕. 利用QC小组干预降低经烧伤创面股静脉置管导管相关性感染发生率的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 399-404.
[6] 茹天峰, 戴浩楠, 袁林, 吴坤平, 谢卫国. 对肌肉超声在严重烧伤患者肌肉性能评估中应用的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 197-203.
[7] 杨姣, 王玲, 古兰, 安慎通, 胡大海, 韩军涛. 对艾司氯胺酮在烧伤后瘢痕手术患儿静脉穿刺中的应用效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 210-216.
[8] 麻艺群, 刘巍敏, 张梦思, 朱辉, 范鑫, 付晋凤. 对腹股沟区全厚皮片修复儿童皮肤缺损的疗效观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 235-240.
[9] 刘晓彬, 朱峰. 危重烧伤患者肾功能亢进的药物治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 260-264.
[10] 李东杰, 贾晓明. 加强研究皮肤低温损伤机制以提高皮肤储存质量[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 93-97.
[11] 马军, 周华, 陈浩, 黄毅, 陈如俊, 杨磊, 肖仕初. 比较人工真皮联合自体刃厚皮两步法与一步法移植修复皮肤缺损创面的疗效观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 109-115.
[12] 叶啟发, 兰佳男. 中国人体器官捐献与异种移植[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 221-226.
[13] 阎凯, 付雍, 章正涛, 卢文峰, 王毅州, 巫国谊, 张海斌. 中晚期肝癌疗效预测模型暨肝癌类器官模型研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 348-351.
[14] 王燕, 郭蕊, 王淑杰. 老年烧伤气管切开患者死亡风险诊断模型构建及对策分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 249-253.
[15] 高雷, 李全, 巴雅力嘎, 陈强, 侯智慧, 曹胜军, 巴特. 重度烧伤患者血小板外泌体对凝血功能调节作用的初步研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 149-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要