切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 254 -261. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2017.04.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

阻断糖基化终末产物受体效应对小鼠糖尿病创面炎症反应的影响
王齐1, 朱冠娅1, 牛轶雯1,(), 曹晓赞1, 董叫云1, 宋菲1, 陆树良1   
  1. 1. 200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院 上海烧伤研究所
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-27 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 牛轶雯
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(81272111,81671917)

Effect of blocking receptor for advanced glycation end product pathway on inflammation of diabetic wound healing in mice

Qi Wang1, Guanya Zhu1, Yiwen Niu1,(), Xiaoza Cao1, Jiaoyun Dong1, Fei Song1, Shuliang Lu1   

  1. 1. Shanghai Burn Institute, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2017-04-27 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yiwen Niu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Niu Yiwen, Email:
引用本文:

王齐, 朱冠娅, 牛轶雯, 曹晓赞, 董叫云, 宋菲, 陆树良. 阻断糖基化终末产物受体效应对小鼠糖尿病创面炎症反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(04): 254-261.

Qi Wang, Guanya Zhu, Yiwen Niu, Xiaoza Cao, Jiaoyun Dong, Fei Song, Shuliang Lu. Effect of blocking receptor for advanced glycation end product pathway on inflammation of diabetic wound healing in mice[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2017, 12(04): 254-261.

目的

通过观察阻断糖基化终末产物受体(RAGE)效应后对小鼠糖尿病创面炎性细胞浸润及炎症因子分泌情况的影响,推测RAGE对创面炎症反应的可能影响和效应环节。

方法

96只雄性8周龄C57BL/6J小鼠随机分成糖尿病组(n=72)和正常对照组(N组)(n=24)。糖尿病组小鼠多次小剂量链脲佐菌素腹腔注射,诱导糖尿病小鼠模型,并运用灭菌9 mm直径环钻于所有小鼠背部,制造全层皮肤缺损创面模型,伤后N组小鼠创面局部运用0.9%氯化钠溶液20 μL,糖尿病组随机分成3组,糖尿病空白对照组(C组)局部外用0.9%氯化钠溶液20 μL、糖尿病IgG对照组(I组)局部外用兔IgG 20 μL、糖尿病RAGE干预组(R组)创面局部外用兔抗鼠RAGE多克隆抗体20 μL。隔日分别给予上述对应的药物,直至伤后7 d。致伤当日及伤后1、3、7 d取材,制备标本待用,苏木精-伊红(HE)染色观察各组创面愈合的情况及愈合过程中中性粒细胞的浸润变化,免疫组织化学染色观察RAGE表达和巨噬细胞的浸润,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测创周组织炎症因子肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、γ干扰素、白细胞介素-1α(IL-1α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)含量;透射电子显微镜下观察创面巨噬细胞吞噬现象的情况。对数据行方差分析、t检验。

结果

N组和C组小鼠皮肤组织中均可见RAGE阳性表达,且C组小鼠创面表达明显强于N组,RAGE主要分布于细胞表面。伤后14 d,R组创面愈合率为(89.65±1.49)%,明显高于C组(76.21±0.69)%与Ⅰ组(78.81±1.01)%,差异均有统计学意义(t=18.771、14.026,P值均小于0.05)。伤后1 d,N组TNF-α、IL-1α、IL-6水平均明显高于C组,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.871、34.005、17.698,P值均小于0.05);R组TNF-α、IL-1α、IL-6水平均明显高于C组,差异均有统计学意义(t=10.275、27.295、18.591,P值均小于0.05)。伤后3 d,N组TNF-α、IL-1α、IL-6水平均明显低于C组,差异均有统计学意义(t=24.758、26.674、27.275,P值均小于0.05);R组TNF-α、IL-1α、IL-6水平均明显低于C组,差异均有统计学意义(t=17.819、15.584、29.360,P值均小于0.05)。伤后1 d,MPO含量N组(444.71±28.27) pg/mL和R组(476.65±38.76) pg/mL均明显高于C组(173.73±28.27) pg/mL,差异均有统计学意义(t=11.759、10.937,P值均小于0.05);相反,伤后3 d,MPO含量N组(214.05±46.55) pg/mL和R组(267.07±52.49) pg/mL均明显低于C组(491.90±38.21) pg/mL,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.991、5.998,P值均小于0.05)。伤后3 d,中性粒细胞个数,相比于N组(35.67±5.03)个和R组(36.67±4.16)个,C组创面创周中性粒细胞数量(83.00±4.58)个明显增多,差异均有统计学意义(t=10.833、5.376,P值均小于0.05)。伤后1、3 d,CD68细胞数量计数N组(76.60±9.07)、(121.40±9.96)个和R组(51.00±8.92)、(89.60±7.89)个均明显多于C组(15.00±4.93)、(50.00±8.40)个,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05)。伤后3 d,N组和R组均可探测到典型巨噬细胞吞噬中性粒细胞现象存在,而C组和R组未及此现象。

结论

糖尿病创面环境中,中性粒细胞的消退、早期巨噬细胞的浸润及吞噬均受到了抑制,伤后炎症因子分泌表现为早期不足和消退迟滞的现象,且均呈现RAGE途径依赖性,提示糖尿病创面早期炎症反应失调,创面迁延难愈与RAGE介导效应相关。

Objective

To investigate the influence of blocking receptor for advanced glycation end product(RAGE) pathway on inflammatory cells infiltration and inflammatory cytokines secretion on diabetic wound in mice, and to explore the effects of RAGE on inflammatory response of wound healing and the possible action pathway.

Methods

Ninty-six C57BL/6J mice (male, 8 weeks old) were divided into diabetic groups (n=72) and normal group (group N) (n=24) randomly. Diabetic mice were induced by streptozocin multiple intraperitoneal injection. One full-thickness excisional wound (9 mm diameter) was created by a sterilized punch for all the mice. Diabetic mice were divided into 3 groups in which different topical treatments were applied to the wounds: anti-RAGE antibody for 20 μL applied topically (group R), rabbit IgG for 20 μL applied topically (group I) and saline for 20 μL applied topically (group C), while normal mice group N were applied with saline for 20 μL topically. All treatments were applied every 2 days from days 0-7 after wounding. The wound and surrounding tissues (a margin of approximately 5 mm into the unwounded skin) from animals in each group were excised on 1, 3, and 7 days after wounding. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was used to observe granulation tissues and neutrophils infiltration. Immunohistochemistry was utilized to investigate expression of RAGE and macrophage infiltrations. Inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ, interleukin-1α(IL-1α), interleukin-6(IL-6) and myeloperoxidase deficiency(MPO) were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Macrophage phagocytosis was observed through transmission electron microscopy. All data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and the Student′s t-test.

Results

RAGE were expressed in both normal and diabetic mice skin tissue which had a higher level in diabetic mice. On day 14, the rate of wound healing of group R was (89.65±1.49)%, which was higher than group C(78.81±1.01)%, group I (78.81±1.01)%, (t=18.771, 14.026, with P values below 0.05). On day 1, the contents of TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-6 in group N and R [(444.71±28.27) pg/mL, (476.65±38.76)pg/mL] were higher than group C (173.73±28.27) pg/mL, (t=5.871 and 10.275, 34.005 and 27.295, 17.698 and 18.591, with P values below 0.05). On day 3, the contents of TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-6 in group N and R [(1214.05±46.55) pg/mL, (267.07±52.49) pg/mL] were lower than group C (t=24.758 and 17.819, 26.674 and 15.584, 27.275 and 29.360, with P values below 0.05). On day 1, the contents of MPO in group N and R [(444.71±28.27) pg/mL, (476.65±38.76) pg/mL] were higher than group C (173.73±28.27) pg/mL (t=11.759, 10.937, with P values below 0.05); while on day 3, the contents of MPO in group N and R [(214.05±46.55) pg/mL, (267.07±52.49) pg/mL] were lower than group C (491.90±38.21) pg/mL (t=7.991, 5.998, with P values below 0.05). On day 3, neutrophils infiltration in group N and R were 35.67±5.03 and 36.67±4.16, when group C 83.00±4.58 was obvious higher (t=10.833, 5.376, with P values below 0.05). The number of macrophages infiltration on day 1 and 3, group N and R were 76.60±9.07, 121.40±9.96 and 51.00±8.92, 89.60±7.89, while group C 15.00±4.93, 50.00±8.40 was obvious lower (with P values below 0.05). Phagocytosis on the wound edge was observed in day 3 in group N and R, while not in group C and I.

Conclusions

Subsiding of neutrophils, macrophage infiltration and phagocytosis in the inflammatory stage are all been inhibited on diabetic wound. Secretion of pro-inflammatory factors are insufficient in early stage and subsided lingeringly. All of the phenomenon showed RAGE pathway depending manner. It suggests inflammatory disorders and impaired healing of diabetic wound are both closely related to RAGE pathway.

图1 光学显微镜下观察两组小鼠致伤当日皮肤组织RAGE表达情况,阳性显示棕黄色(↑)(免疫组织化学染色,×200)
表1 各组小鼠伤后14 d创面愈合率比较(%,±s)
图2 光学显微镜下观察4组小鼠伤后7 d创面组织的肉芽和新生血管形成情况(苏木精-伊红染色×100)
图3 伤后1、3 d,各组小鼠创缘皮肤组织炎症因子含量水平比较
表2 各组小鼠伤后不同时间创面组织MPO的含量(pg/mL,±s)
表3 各组创面伤后3 d创缘皮肤组织中性粒细胞数量(个,±s)
表4 各组小鼠伤后免疫组织化学染色计数CD68细胞数量(个,±s)
图4 伤后1、3 d,光学显微镜下观察各组小鼠创面组织CD68细胞的分布情况,阳性呈棕黄色(免疫组织化学染色,×100)
图5 伤后3 d,透射电子显微镜下各组创面巨噬细胞吞噬现象(×3400)
1
Jeffcoate WJ, Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, et al. Unresolved issues in the management of ulcers of the foot in diabetes[J]. Diabet Med, 2008, 25(12):1380-1389.
2
Snyder RJ, Lantis J, Kirsner RS, et al. Macrophages: A review of their role in wound healing and their therapeutic use[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2016, 24(4):613-629.
3
Xu Y, Wang L, He J, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults[J]. Jama, 2013, 310(9):948-959.
4
Niu Y, Xie T, Ge K, et al. Effects of extracellular matrix glycosylation on proliferation and apoptosis of human dermal fibroblasts via the receptor for advanced glycosylated end products[J]. Am J Dermatopathol, 2008, 30(4):344-351.
5
Alexiou P, Chatzopoulou M, Pegklidou K, et al. RAGE: a multi-ligand receptor unveiling novel insights in health and disease[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2010, 17(21):2232-2252.
6
Chia JS, McRae JL, Thomas HE, et al. The protective effects of CD39 overexpression in multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice[J]. Diabetes, 2013, 62(6):2026-2035.
7
Wear-Maggitti K, Lee J, Conejero A, et al. Use of topical sRAGE in diabetic wounds increases neovascularization and granulation tissue formation[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2004, 52(5):519-521; discussion 22.
8
Pradhan L, Nabzdyk C, Andersen ND, et al. Inflammation and neuropeptides: the connection in diabetic wound healing[J]. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2009, 11:e2.
9
Wicks K, Torbica T, Mace KA. Myeloid cell dysfunction and the pathogenesis of the diabetic chronic wound[J]. Semin Immunol, 2014, 26(4):341-353.
10
Okizaki S, Ito Y, Hosono K, et al. Suppressed recruitment of alternatively activated macrophages reduces TGF-beta1 and impairs wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2015, 70:317-325.
11
Haegens A, Vernooy JH, Heeringa P, et al. Myeloperoxidase modulates lung epithelial responses to pro-inflammatory agents[J]. Eur Respir J, 2008, 31(2):252-260.
12
Bradley PP, Priebat DA, Christensen RD, et al. Measurement of cutaneous inflammation: estimation of neutrophil content with an enzyme marker[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1982, 78(3):206-209.
13
Rieger AM, Hall BE, Barreda DR. Macrophage activation differentially modulates particle binding, phagocytosis and downstream antimicrobial mechanisms[J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2010, 34(11):1144-1159.
14
Sindrilaru A, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Disclosure of the Culprits: Macrophages-Versatile Regulators of Wound Healing[J]. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2013, 2(7):357-368.
15
Galli SJ, Borregaard N, Wynn TA. Phenotypic and functional plasticity of cells of innate immunity: macrophages, mast cells and neutrophils[J]. Nat Immunol, 2011, 12(11):1035-1044.
16
Mantovani A, Biswas SK, Galdiero MR, et al. Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling[J]. J Pathol, 2013, 229(2):176-185.
[1] 曹雯佳, 刘学兵, 罗安果, 钟释敏, 邓岚, 王玉琳, 李赵欢. 超声矢量血流成像对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉壁剪切应力的研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 709-717.
[2] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[3] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[4] 徐志刚, 曹涛, 何亭, 李博奥, 魏婧韬, 张栋梁, 官浩, 杨薛康. 采用抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病患者心脏术后胸骨骨髓炎的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 498-502.
[5] 周涵, 武胡雯, 张培深, 邓晗彬, 范闻轩, 李嘉诚, 程少文. 蛋白质组学在慢性难愈合创面研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 536-540.
[6] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[7] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[8] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[11] 孙璐, 蒋亚玲, 陈凌君. 布托啡诺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经炎症和JAK2/STAT3信号通路的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 344-350.
[12] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[13] 周学锋, 董哲毅, 冯哲, 蔡广研, 陈香美. 糖尿病肾脏疾病中西医结合诊疗指南计划书[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 301-305.
[14] 杜军霞, 赵小淋, 王浩然, 高志远, 王曼茜, 万楠熙, 张冬, 丁潇楠, 任琴琴, 段颖洁, 汤力, 朱晗玉. 2 型糖尿病的血液透析患者肠道微生物组学高通量测序分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 313-320.
[15] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
阅读次数
全文


摘要