切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 454 -458. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2017.06.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜下微骨折术治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎
吕欣1, 孙智文1,(), 张爱民1, 杨朝君1, 郭峰1, 张志峰2   
  1. 1. 024000 内蒙古自治区赤峰市医院骨关节科
    2. 010030 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学第二附属医院骨关节科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-02 出版日期:2017-12-01
  • 通信作者: 孙智文
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2016MS08130)

High tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic microfracture to treat the single compartment osteoarthritis of the medial of knee joint

Xin Lyu1, Zhiwen Sun1,(), Aimin Zhang1, Zhaojun Yang1, Feng Guo1, Zhifeng Zhang2   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Chifeng Municipal Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Chifeng 024000, China
    2. Department of Joint Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010030, China
  • Received:2017-10-02 Published:2017-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhiwen Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Zhiwen, Email:
引用本文:

吕欣, 孙智文, 张爱民, 杨朝君, 郭峰, 张志峰. 胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜下微骨折术治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(06): 454-458.

Xin Lyu, Zhiwen Sun, Aimin Zhang, Zhaojun Yang, Feng Guo, Zhifeng Zhang. High tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic microfracture to treat the single compartment osteoarthritis of the medial of knee joint[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2017, 12(06): 454-458.

目的

研究胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜下微骨折术治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎的临床疗效。

方法

选取内蒙古自治区赤峰市医院2012年1月至2014年12月诊断为膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎的患者60例,按照单纯随机抽样法分为3组:将行胫骨高位截骨术的患者设为胫骨高位截骨术组(简称截骨术组),将行关节镜微骨折术的患者设为关节镜微骨折术组(简称微骨折术组),将行胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜微骨折术的患者设为胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜微骨折术组(简称联合组),各组均20例。分别评估3组患者术前、术后12个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国膝关节协会(AKS)评分、美国西大略湖和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分,利用负重膝关节正位X线平片分别测量术前、术后胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)和股胫角,并对术前、术后进行美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节功能评分。数据处理采用配对t检验、方差分析及SNK法。

结果

3组患者术后12个月的VAS、AKS评分、WOMAC评分、HSS评分较术前均有明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05)。微骨折术组患者术前、术后12个月MPTA、股胫角比较差异无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05)。联合组患者术前与术后VAS、AKS评分、WOMAC评分、HSS评分、MPTA、股胫角差值为(4.9±0.6) 分、(20.1±5.3) 分、(62.1±7.4) 分、(24.9±11.7) 分、(11.2±2.1)°、(24.2±2.4)°,与截骨术组、微骨折术组比较有明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05)。

结论

治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎的3种手术方案均可在短期内对患者症状和体征有所改善,但胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜下微骨折术治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎可处理关节内病变,同时改善下肢生物学力线,术后效果要明显优于其他两种。

Objective

To study the clinical effect of high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic microfracture in the treatment of the single compartment osteoarthritis of the medial compartment lesions of knee joint.

Methods

Sixty patients with the single compartment osteoarthritis of the medial compartment lesions of knee joint were diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2014 in Chifeng Municipal Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, which were divided into 3 groups according to the simple random sampling method. The patients with high tibial osteotomy were established as the high tibial osteotomy group (osteotomy group), the patients with arthroscopic microfracture surgery were treated as arthroscopic microfracture group (microfracture group), the patients with high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic microfracture were established as high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic microfracture surgery group (combined group), and each group were 20 cases. Evaluation of 3 groups of patients before operation, 12 months after surgery, the visual analogue score (VAS), the American Knee Association (AKS)score, the American West Lake and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were used to measure anterior and posterior tibial proximal medial angle (MPTA) and femoral shank angle, and preoperative and postoperative knee joint scoring (HSS). The data were processed with t test, analysis of variance and SNK test.

Results

The scores of VAS, AKS, WOMAC and HSS for 12 months after operation were significantly improved in the 3 groups and the differences were statistically significant (with P values below 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between MPTA and femoral shank angles before and after operation in microfracture group (with P values above 0.05). The differences between the preoperative and postoperative of VAS, AKS score, WOMAC score, HSS score and MPTA, femoral shank angle in combined group were (4.9±0.6) points, (20.1±5.3) points, (62.1±7.4) points, (24.9±11.7) points, (11.2±2.1) °, (24.2±2.4) °, which were significantly improved compared with the osteotomy group and the microfracture group(with P values below 0.05).

Conclusions

Three kinds of surgical procedures for the treatment of the single compartment osteoarthritis of the medial knee joint can improve the symptoms and signs of the patients in the short term. However, high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic microfracture treatment can deal with intra articular lesions and improve the biological lines of the lower limbs, and the postoperative effect is significantly better than others.

表1 3组膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎患者术前、术后12个月相关指标比较(n=20,±s)
表2 3组膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎患者术前、术后12个月相关指标差值比较(n=20,±s)
[1]
宋德臣,李瑞,张有磊. 胫骨高位截骨术治疗伴膝内翻的膝关节骨性关节炎[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2013, 21(9):897-899.
[2]
Khan M, Evaniew N, Bedi A, et al. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. CMAJ, 2014, 186(14):1057-1064.
[3]
Canale ST, Beaty JH. 坎贝尔骨科手术学——关节外科[M].王岩,陈继营,周勇刚,等,译. 12版. 北京:人民军医出版社,2015: 436-446.
[4]
徐亚风,罗从风,张长青,等. 内侧张开胫骨高位截骨术中未植骨的预后研究[J]. 国际骨科学杂志,2015, 36(2):146-150.
[5]
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods[J]. Pain, 1986, 27(1):117-126.
[6]
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, (248):13-14.
[7]
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee[J]. J Rheumatol, 1988, 15(12):1833-1840.
[8]
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1976, 58(6):754-765.
[9]
薛庆云,王坤正,裴福兴,等. 中国40岁以上人群原发性骨关节炎患病状况调查[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2015, 35(12):1206-1212.
[10]
Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R, et al. Osteoarthritis[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(9991):376-387.
[11]
徐思越,张廷,李浩鹏,等. 影响膝骨关节炎关节镜下清理术疗效因素分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2013, 42(3):301-303.
[12]
Livesley PJ, Doherty M, Needoff M, et al. Arthroscopic lavage of osteoarthritic knees[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991, 73(6):922-926.
[13]
Johnson LL. Arthroscopic Surgery[M]. 3rd ed. St.Louis.Toronto. Princeton: The C.V Mosby Company, 1986: 730-760.
[14]
Roelofs AJ, Rocke JP, De Bari C. Cell-based approaches to joint surface repair: a research perspective[J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013, 21(7):892-900.
[15]
Hu YZ, Wen H, Pan XY, et al. [Application of orientation to the mechanical alignment of lower limbs in operation of high tibial osteotomy][J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2012, 25(9):751-754.
[16]
庄至坤,吴昭克,龚志兵,等. 微创倒U形胫骨高位截骨联合孟氏外固定架治疗膝关节骨性关节炎并膝内翻5年随访观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015, 30(8):815-817.
[17]
El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, et al. Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open-and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38(2):323-329.
[18]
Schröter S, Gonser CE, Konstantinidis L, et al. High complication rate after biplanar open wedge high tibial osteotomy stabilized with a new spacer plate ( Position HTO plate) without bone substitute[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(5):644-652.
[19]
LaPrade RF, Oro FB, Ziegler CG, et al. Patellar height and tibial slope after opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy: a prospective study[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38(1):160-170.
[1] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[2] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[3] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[4] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[5] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[6] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[7] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[8] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[9] 张中斌, 付琨朋, 朱凯, 张玉, 李华. 胫骨高位截骨术与富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 633-641.
[10] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[11] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[12] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[13] 吴萍, 刘永林, 陈能彬, 季明军, 万晓波. 应用皮瓣联合负压封闭引流及灌洗引流治疗胫骨骨折术后钢板外露的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 317-320.
[14] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
[15] 宋碧萱, 郭海川, 韩子钰, 周瑞娟, 李承思, 姬晨妮. 开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的危险因素分析及预测列线图的构建[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 226-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要