切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 32 -39. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.01.006

论著

组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂丙戊酸钠对致死性烫伤大鼠脑损伤保护作用的研究
刘锐1, 郭思佳1, 井维斌1, 马明明1, 王树明2,()   
  1. 1. 150036 哈尔滨,黑龙江省医院烧伤科
    2. 150040 哈尔滨,黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-10 出版日期:2022-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王树明
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省省院科技合作项目(YS20C02); 黑龙江省卫生健康委科研课题(20211010000021)

Protective effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor valproate on cerebral injury in fatally scalded rats

Rui Liu1, Sijia Guo1, Weibin Jing1, Mingming Ma1, Shuming Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burn Surgery, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin 150036, China
    2. Department of Emergency Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2021-11-10 Published:2022-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuming Wang
引用本文:

刘锐, 郭思佳, 井维斌, 马明明, 王树明. 组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂丙戊酸钠对致死性烫伤大鼠脑损伤保护作用的研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(01): 32-39.

Rui Liu, Sijia Guo, Weibin Jing, Mingming Ma, Shuming Wang. Protective effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor valproate on cerebral injury in fatally scalded rats[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(01): 32-39.

目的

研究组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂丙戊酸钠对50%总体表面积(TBSA)Ⅲ度烫伤大鼠脑损伤的保护作用。

方法

采用随机数字表法将80只清洁级雄性SD大鼠随机分为4组:假伤对照组,单纯烫伤组,2-甲基-2-戊烯酸(2M2P)组和丙戊酸钠(VPA)组,每组20只。假伤对照组大鼠浸入37 ℃水浴中制备假伤模型,单纯烫伤组、2M2P组和VPA组采用96 ℃水浴浸泡大鼠背部15 s、双下肢15 s、腹部8 s,制作50%TBSA Ⅲ度烫伤模型。烫伤后即刻,2M2P组和VPA组分别腹腔注射300 mg/kg 2M2P和VPA,假伤对照组和单纯烫伤组分别腹腔注射3 mL/kg 0.9%氯化钠溶液。各组大鼠分别于烫伤后4、8 h 2个时间点以腹主动脉采血法被处死,断脑取脑组织,采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测脑组织S-100β蛋白表达水平,干/湿重法测定大鼠脑组织含水率,采用蛋白质印迹法检测脑组织中热休克蛋白(HSP)70、组蛋白H3赖氨酸9位乙酰化(H3K9ac)及缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)的蛋白表达水平。另取80只大鼠用于观察各组烫伤后4、24 h生存率(大鼠分组、烫伤模型制备以及治疗方案同上)。数据比较采用单因素方差分析、t检验和χ2检验。

结果

烫伤后4、8 h,4组大鼠脑组织S-100β蛋白水平和含水率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。烫伤后4、8 h,单纯烫伤组、2M2P组和VPA组大鼠脑组织S-100β蛋白表达水平和含水率与假伤对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);烫伤后4、8 h,2M2P组和VPA组大鼠S-100β蛋白表达水平和含水率与单纯烫伤组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);烫伤后4、8 h,VPA组脑组织S-100β蛋白表达水平分别为(0.54±0.05)、(0.79±0.05)μg/L,与2M2P组[(1.02±0.07)、(1.41±0.08) μg/L]比较均显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.369、2.251,P<0.05)。烫伤后4、8 h,VPA组脑组织含水率分别为(78.62±0.58)%、(81.25±0.57)%,与2M2P组[(80.15±0.64)%、(83.15±0.61)%]比较均显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.054、2.191,P<0.05)。烫伤后4、8 h,4组大鼠脑组织HSP70、H3K9ac、HIF-1α蛋白表达水平比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。烫伤后4、8 h,单纯烫伤组、2M2P组和VPA组大鼠脑组织HSP70、H3K9ac、HIF-1α蛋白表达水平与假伤对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。烫伤后4、8 h,2M2P组和VPA组大鼠脑组织HSP70、H3K9ac、HIF-1α蛋白水平与单纯烫伤组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);烫伤后4、8 h,VPA组大鼠脑组织HSP70蛋白水平分别为0.63±0.05、0.81±0.04,与2M2P组(0.41±0.03、0.59±0.04)比较,VPA组大鼠脑组织HSP70蛋白水平升高更显著,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.413、2.152,P<0.05);烫伤后4、8 h,VPA组大鼠脑组织H3K9ac蛋白水平分别为1.26±0.09、1.58±0.07,与2M2P组(1.06±0.06、1.24±0.07)比较升高更显著,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.031、2.167,P<0.05);烫伤后4、8 h,VPA组HIF-1α蛋白表达水平分别为2.23±0.21、1.86±0.23,与2M2P组(3.01±0.24、2.74±0.21)比较均显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.157、2.425,P<0.05)。烫伤后4、24 h,单纯烫伤组大鼠的存活率为80.0%(16/20)和0(0/20);2M2P组为90%(18/20)和20%(4/20);VPA组为100%(20/20)和40%(8/20)。烫伤后4、24 h,VPA组和2M2P组大鼠存活率均显著高于单纯烫伤组,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=11.31、11.96,P<0.05)。烫伤后4、24 h,VPA组大鼠存活率均高于2M2P组,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=11.32、12.05,P<0.05)。

结论

VPA能减轻50%TBSAⅢ度烫伤大鼠的脑损伤并提高生存率,其机制可能与VPA降低脑组织S-100β的蛋白表达水平和脑组织含水率,促进脑组织HSP70和H3K9ac蛋白表达和抑制HIF-1α的活性有关。

Objective

To study the effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor valproate on cerebral injury of the rats with 50% total body surface area (TBSA) full thickness burn.

Methods

Eighty male clean-grade SD rats were divided into four groups according to the random number table method: sham injury control group, simple scald group, 2-methyl-2-pentenoic acid (2M2P) group and sodium valproate (VPA) group, with 20 rats in each group. Rats in the sham injury group were immersed in a 37 ℃ water bath to prepare a sham injury model. In the simple scald group, 2M2P group and VPA group, the rats were immersed in a 96 ℃ water bath for 15 s on the back, 15 s on both lower limbs, and 8 s on the abdomen to create 50% TBSA full thickness burn rats models. Immediately after scalding, the 2M2P group and the VPA group were intraperitoneally injected with 300 mg/kg 2M2P and VPA, respectively, and the sham injury control group and the simple scald group were intraperitoneally injected with 3 mL/kg 0.9% sodium chloride solution, respectively. Rats in each group were sacrificed by abdominal aorta blood sampling at 4 and 8 h after scalding, respectively. The expression level of S-100β protein in brain tissue was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the water content of rat brain tissue was determined by dry/wet weight method, and the protein expression levels of heat shock protein (HSP) 70, histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation (H3K9ac) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in brain tissue were detected by Western blotting. Another 80 rats were used to observe the survival rate of 4 and 24 h after scald in each group (rat grouping, scald model prepare and treatment plan were the same as above). Data were compared with one-way ANOVA, t test and chi-square test.

Results

At 4 and 8 h after scalding, there were statistically significant differences in the levels of S-100β protein and water content in the brain tissue of the four groups (P< 0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the expression levels of S-100β protein and water content in the brain tissue of the rats in the simple scald group, 2M2P group and VPA group were statistically significantly different from those in the sham-injured control group(P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the expression levels of S-100β protein and water content in the 2M2P group and the VPA group were statistically significantly different from those in the simple scalding group (P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the expression levels of S-100β protein in the brain tissue of the VPA group were (0.54±0.05), (0.79±0.05) μg/L, respectively, compared with [(1.02±0.07), (1.41±0.08) μg/L] in the 2M2P group were significantly decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.369, 2.251; P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the water content of brain tissue in the VPA group were (78.62±0.58)% and (81.25±0.57)%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the 2M2P group [(80.15±0.64)% and (83.15±0.61)%], the differences were statistically significant (t=2.054, 2.191; P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the protein expression levels of HSP70, H3K9ac and HIF-1α in the brain tissue of the four groups of rats were compared, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the protein expression levels of HSP70, H3K9ac and HIF-1α in the brain tissue of the rats in the simple scald group, the 2M2P group and the VPA group were statistically significantly different from those in the sham-injured control group (P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the protein levels of HSP70, H3K9ac and HIF-1α in the brain tissue of the 2M2P group and VPA group were statistically significantly different from those in the simple scalding group (P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the levels of HSP70 protein in the brain tissue of the VPA group were 0.63±0.05, 0.81±0.04, respectively, compared with the 2M2P group (0.41±0.03, 0.59±0.04), the level of HSP70 protein in the brain tissue of the rats in the VPA group increased significantly, and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.413, 2.152; P<0.05). At 4 and 8 h after scalding, the levels of H3K9ac protein in the brain tissue of the VPA group were 1.26±0.09, 1.58±0.07, which were higher than those in the 2M2P group (1.06±0.06, 1.24±0.07), the differences were statistically significant (t=2.031, 2.167; P<0.05); the expression levels of HIF-1α protein in the VPA group were 2.23±0.21 and 1.86±0.23, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the 2M2P group (3.01±0.24, 2.74±0.21), the differences were statistically significant (t=2.157, 2.425; P<0.05). At 4 and 24 h after scalding, the survival rates of the rats in the simple scald group were 80.0% (16/20) and 0 (0/20); those in the 2M2P group were 90% (18/20) and 20% (4/20); the VPA group was 100% (20/20) and 40% (8/20). At 4 and 24 h after scalding, the survival rates of the rats in the VPA group and 2M2P group were significantly higher than those in the simple scald group, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=11.31, 11.96; P<0.05). At 4 and 24 h after scalding, the survival rates of rats in the VPA group were higher than those in the 2M2P group, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=11.32, 12.05; P<0.05).

Conclusions

VPA can reduce the brain injury of 50% TBSA full thickness burn rats and improve the survival rate. The mechanism may be related to VPA reduces the protein expression level of S-100β and the water content of brain tissue, promots the expression of HSP70 and H3K9ac proteins in brain tissue and inhibits the activity of HIF-1α.

表1 各组大鼠烫伤后4、8 h脑组织S-100β蛋白水平和含水率的变化(±s)
表2 各组大鼠烫伤后各时相点脑组织HSP70、H3K9ac和HIF-1α蛋白表达灰度值的变化(±s)
图1 各组大鼠烫伤后4、8 h脑组织中HSP70表达水平变化情况注:2M2P为2-甲基-2-戊烯酸;VPA为丙戊酸钠;HSP为热休克蛋白;GAPDH为磷酸甘油醛脱氢酶
图2 各组大鼠烫伤后4、8 h脑组织中H3K9ac表达水平变化情况注:2M2P为2-甲基-2-戊烯酸;VPA为丙戊酸钠;H3K9ac为组蛋白H3赖氨酸9位乙酰化;GAPDH为磷酸甘油醛脱氢酶
图3 各组大鼠烫伤后4、8 h脑组织中HIF-1α活性的变化注:2M2P为2-甲基-2-戊烯酸;VPA为丙戊酸钠;HIF-1α为缺氧诱导因子-1α;GAPDH为磷酸甘油醛脱氢酶
[1]
Wakam GK, Biesterveld BE, Pai MP, et al. Administration of valproic acid in clinically approved dose improves neurologic recovery and decreases brain lesion size in swine subjected to hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021, 90(2): 346-352.
[2]
Nikolian VC, Dennahy IS, Higgins GA, et al. Transcriptomic Changes Following Valproic Acid Treatment Promote Neurogenesis and Minimize Secondary Brain Injury[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, 84(3): 459-465.
[3]
Ryb GE, Dischinger PC, Auman KM, et al. S-100β does not predict outcome after mild traumatic brain injury[J]. Brain Inj, 2014, 28(11): 1430-1435.
[4]
刘锐,王树明,曹卫红,等. 乌司他丁对烫伤大鼠脑组织的保护作用及可能机制[J]. 中华医学杂志2015, 95(36): 2952-2954.
[5]
Goggins BJ, Minahan K, Sherwin S, et al. Pharmacological HIF-1 stabilization promotes intestinal epithelial healing through regulation of α-integrin expression and function[J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2021, 320(4): G420-G438.
[6]
Liu R, Wang SM, Li ZY, et al. Pyruvate in Reduced Osmolarity Oral Rehydration Salt Corrected Lactic Acidosis in Sever Scald Rats[J]. J Surg Res, 2018, 226: 173-180.
[7]
Dong Z, Li R, Xu L, et al. Histone hyperacetylation mediates enhanced IL-1β production in LPS/IFN-γ-stimulated macrophages[J]. Immunology, 2020, 160(2): 183-197.
[8]
Lang TC, Zhao R, Kim A, et al. A Critical Update of the Assessment and Acute Management of Patients with Severe Burns[J]. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2019, 8(12): 607-633.
[9]
Yang J, Ma K, Zhang C, et al. Burns Impair Blood-Brain Barrier and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Can Reverse the Process in Mice[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11: 578879.
[10]
Dekker SE, Nikolian VC, Sillesen M, et al. Different resuscitation strategies and novel pharmacologic treatment with valproic acid in traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosci Res, 2018, 96(4): 711-719.
[11]
Soria-Castro R, Schcolnik-Cabrera A, Rodríguez-López G, et al. Exploring the Drug Repurposing Versatility of Valproic Acid as a Multifunctional Regulator of Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells[J]. J Immunol Res, 2019, 2019: 9678098.
[12]
罗红敏,胡森,白慧颖,等. 丙戊酸对致死性烫伤大鼠心肌的保护作用及机制研究[J]. 中华危重病急救医学2014, 26(8): 563-566.
[13]
Bartek J Jr, Thelin EP, Ghatan PH, et al. Neuron-specific enolase is correlated to compromised cerebral metabolism in patients suffering from acute bacterial meningitis:an observational cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3): e0152268.
[14]
Soria-Castro R, Chávez-Blanco AD, García-Pérez BE, et al. Valproic acid inhibits interferon-γ production by NK cells and increases susceptibility to Listeria monocytogenes infection[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 17802.
[15]
Gąssowska-Dobrowolska M, Kolasa-Wołosiuk A, Cielik M, et al. Alterations in Tau Protein Level and Phosphorylation State in the Brain of the Autistic-Like Rats Induced by Prenatal Exposure to Valproic Acid [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(6): 3209.
[16]
Kim JY, Han Y, Lee JE, et al. The 70-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70) as a therapeutic target for stroke [J]. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 2018, 22(3): 191-199.
[17]
Huang YC, Leong CP, Wang L, et al. Effect of kinesiology taping on hemiplegic shoulder pain and functional outcomes in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2016, 52(6): 774-781.
[18]
Liu T, Wen X, Kuang W, et al. Therapeutic effect of Fu′s subcutaneous needling for hem-iplegic shoulder pain among stroke survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98 (19): e15507.
[19]
Ogunshola OO, Al-Ahmad A. HIF-1 at the blood-brain barrier: a mediator of permeability?[J]. High Alt Med Biol, 2012, 13(3): 153-161.
[20]
Qi H, Wang P, Liu C, et al. Involvement of HIF-1α in MLCK-dependent endothelial barrier dysfunction in hypoxia[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2011, 27(3/4): 251-262.
[21]
Li Y, Alam HB. Creating a pro-survival and anti-inflammatory phenotype by modulation of acetylation in models of hemorrhagic and septic shock[J]. Adv Exp Med Biology, 2012, 710: 107-133.
[1] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[2] 王宏宇, 巴特, 黄瑞娟, 陈强, 闫增强. 亲属头皮加自体头皮混合移植接力在大面积深度烧伤创面修复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 554-554.
[3] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[4] 彭玲, 吴红, 宛仕勇, 陈斓, 叶子青, 周静. 胶原酶软膏联合水胶体敷料应用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 511-516.
[5] 林同辉, 杨卫玺. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣在电烧伤治疗中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 526-530.
[6] 张嘉炜, 王瑞, 张克诚, 易磊, 周增丁. 烧烫伤创面深度智能检测模型P-YOLO的建立及测试效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 379-385.
[7] 毛书雷, 张元海, 王杰, 倪良方, 王新刚, 邹雁, 王荣娟, 吴军梅, 张建芬. 区域性静脉灌注葡萄糖酸钙治疗手指氢氟酸烧伤的临床疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 386-392.
[8] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[9] 杨新园, 王淑君, 何成, 宋喜鹤, 刘丽芸. 预防与处理危重烧伤患者经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管堵塞的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 443-446.
[10] 孙勇, 彭曦. 重视烧伤创面愈合中的葡萄糖代谢以优化营养治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 277-281.
[11] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[12] 吴东阳, 林向丹, 石佐林, 赵玉龙, 王振, 文安国, 纪鑫, 李俊之, 赵明光. NF-L、NLRP3、S100B 蛋白在颅脑损伤严重程度及预后评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 279-285.
[13] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[14] 王如海, 王绅, 张敏, 李春, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后短期死亡风险的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-291.
[15] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?