切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 25 -31. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.01.005

论著

供氧条件下负压封闭引流联合自体皮移植治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的临床研究
地里夏提·库尔班1, 陈召1, 刘小龙1,()   
  1. 1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院烧伤创面修复外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-05 出版日期:2022-02-01
  • 通信作者: 刘小龙
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院科技引进创新项目(20180111)

Clinical study of vacuum sealing drainage combined with autologous skin grafting under oxygen supply in the treatment of refractory diabetic foot ulcer

Kuerban Dilixiati·1, Zhao Chen1, Xiaolong Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Wound Repair Surgery, People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumuqi 830001, China
  • Received:2021-11-05 Published:2022-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaolong Liu
引用本文:

地里夏提·库尔班, 陈召, 刘小龙. 供氧条件下负压封闭引流联合自体皮移植治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的临床研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(01): 25-31.

Kuerban Dilixiati·, Zhao Chen, Xiaolong Liu. Clinical study of vacuum sealing drainage combined with autologous skin grafting under oxygen supply in the treatment of refractory diabetic foot ulcer[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2022, 17(01): 25-31.

目的

探讨供氧条件下负压封闭引流(VSD)联合自体皮移植治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的临床效果。

方法

选择新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院2018年3月至2020年3月收治的难愈性糖尿病足溃疡患者100例为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,每组各50例。观察组患者给予抗感染、换药、控制血糖及对症支持治疗,完善相关检查后择期给予清创手术。清创手术后,按照患者创面大小将Vacuseal材料进行裁剪后贴于创面,在距离创面3 cm正常皮肤处进行开口并将引流管从中引出,将贴附的材料与创面边缘间断缝合,再将生物半透膜紧贴于患者整个皮肤创面。贴附完成后将引流管与中心负压装置进行连接,保持持续性负压吸引,负压吸引压力值维持在40 kPa左右,每日负压吸引时间约为6 h。每天均按先纯氧再臭氧的顺序进行VSD供氧,纯氧氧流量为5 L/min,1 h/d;臭氧氧流量为10 mL/min,30 min/d。每天换药时对患者创面进行评估,当创面分泌物少,肉芽组织色泽鲜艳红润,质地坚实无水肿,无炎症现象,血糖控制达到标准,进行自体皮移植。术后要求患者绝对卧床休息,将患侧肢体抬高并制动。术后4 d进行首次换药,而后根据创面移植皮肤生长情况进行换药,间隔2~3 d。治疗期间使用胰岛素控制血糖。对照组患者不给予纯氧和臭氧治疗,其余治疗同观察组。比较2组患者治疗结束后1周临床疗效;治疗前和治疗结束后1周创面瘙痒、肉芽组织形态、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分;治疗结束后1个月截肢率、植皮存活率和植皮痊愈时间;治疗结束后1周基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-2和MMP-9水平变化。数据比较采用t检验和χ2检验。

结果

治疗结束后1周,观察组患者治疗的总有效率为98.00%(49/50),显著高于对照组患者[82.00%(41/50)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.111,P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗前创面瘙痒、肉芽组织形态和VAS评分分别为(2.18±0.34)、(2.10±0.29)、(5.49±0.87)分,治疗结束后1周分别为(1.03±0.26)、(1.07±0.18)、(2.43±0.41)分;对照组患者治疗前创面瘙痒、肉芽组织形态和VAS评分分别为(2.21±0.39)、(2.13±0.32)、(5.53±0.98)分,治疗结束后1周分别为(1.64±0.31)、(1.58±0.23)、(3.39±0.53)分,2组治疗前与治疗结束后1周各项指标评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且观察组患者治疗结束后1周创面瘙痒、肉芽组织形态和VAS评分均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=10.661、12.348、10.131,P<0.05)。2组患者截肢率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者植皮存活率为98.00%(49/50),显著高于对照组[84.00%(42/50)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.396,P=0.039);观察组患者植皮痊愈时间(14.73±1.42) d,少于对照组患者[(18.32±1.81) d],差异有统计学意义(t=11.034,P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗前MMP-2和MMP-9表达水平分别为285.34±28.19、363.29±20.81,治疗结束后1周分别为167.49±21.08、241.38±17.84;对照组患者治疗前MMP-2和MMP-9表达水平分别为279.81±29.35、359.89±24.31,治疗结束后1周分别为213.53±34.26、283.53±22.19,2组治疗前与治疗结束后1周MMP-2和MMP-9表达水平比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且观察组患者治疗结束后1周血清MMP-2和MMP-9表达水平均低于对照组患者,差异均有统计学意义(t=8.093、10.468,P<0.05)。

结论

供氧条件下VSD联合自体皮移植治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡疗效良好,且可以提高植皮存活率,缩短植皮痊愈时间,降低血清MMP-2和MMP-9表达水平。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with autologous skin grafting under oxygen supply in the treatment of refractory diabetic foot ulcer.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with refractory diabetic foot ulcers who were admitted to People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from March 2018 to March 2020 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into observation group and control group, with 50 patients in each group. Patients in the observation group were given anti-infection, dressing change, blood glucose control, and symptomatic supportive treatment, and debridement was given as scheduled after the improvement of relevant examinations. After debridement, the Vacuseal material was cut according to the size of the patient′s wound and then attached to the wound. An opening was made at a distance of 3 cm from the normal skin of the wound, and a drainage tube was drawn out. The attached material was sutured intermittently with the edge of the wound. The biological semipermeable membrane was tightly attached to the entire skin wound of the patient. After the attachment was completed, the drainage tube was connected to the central negative pressure device to maintain continuous negative pressure suction. The negative pressure suction pressure value was maintained at about 40 kPa, and the daily negative pressure suction time was about 6 h. VSD oxygen supply was performed in the order of pure oxygen first and then ozone every day, the oxygen flow rate of pure oxygen was 5 L/min for 1 h/d and the oxygen flow rate of ozone was 10 mL/min, 30 min/d. The wound surface of the patient was evaluated when the dressing was changed every day. When the wound surface had less secretions, the granulation tissue was bright and ruddy, the texture was firm without edema, and there was no inflammation, and the blood glucose control reached the standard, autologous skin grafting was performed. After the operation, the patients were required to rest in bed absolutely, and the affected limb was elevated and immobilized. The first dressing change was performed 4 d after the operation, and then the dressing change was performed according to the growth of the grafted skin on the wound surface, with an interval of 2 to 3 d. Insulin was used to control blood glucose during treatment. The patients in the control group were not given oxygen and ozone treatment, and the rest of the treatments were the same as those in the observation group. The clinical efficacy of the two groups at 1 week after the end of treatment; the wound pruritus score, granulation tissue morphology score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score before and 1 week after the end of treatment; the amputation rate and skin graft survival rate and healing time of skin grafting at 1 month after the end of treatment and the changes of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 levels 1 week after the end of treatment were compared. Data were compared with t test and chi-square test.

Results

One week after the end of treatment, the total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 98.00% (49/50), which was significantly higher than that in the control group [82.00% (41/50)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=7.111, P<0.05). The wound pruritus score, granulation tissue morphology score and VAS score of the observation group before treatment were (2.18±0.34), (2.10±0.29), (5.49±0.87) points, respectively, and 1 week after the end of treatment were (1.03±0.26), (1.07±0.18), (2.43±0.41) points; the wound pruritus score, granulation tissue morphology score and VAS score of the control group before treatment were (2.21±0.39), (2.13±0.32), (5.53±0.98) points, respectively, 1 week after the end of treatment, the scores were (1.64±0.31), (1.58±0.23), (3.39±0.53) points, respectively. There were significant differences in the scores of each index between the two groups before treatment and 1 week after the end of treatment, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). And the wound pruritus score, granulation tissue morphology score and VAS score of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group 1 week after the end of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (t=10.661, 12.348, 10.131; P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the amputation rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival rate of skin grafting in the observation group was 98.00% (49/50), which was significantly higher than that in the control group [84.00% (42/50)], and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.396, P=0.039). The recovery time of skin grafting in the observation group was (14.73±1.42) d, which was shorter than that in the control group [(18.32±1.81) d], and the difference was statistically significant (t=11.034, P<0.05). The expression levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the observation group were 285.34±28.19 and 363.29±20.81 before treatment, and 167.49±21.08 and 241.38±17.84 1 week after the end of treatment, respectively; the expression levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the control group were 279.81±29.35 and 359.89±24.31 before treatment, and 213.53±34.26 and 283.53±22.19 1 week after the end of treatment, respectively, there were statistically significant differences in the expression levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 between the two groups before treatment and 1 week after the end of treatment (P<0.05), and the expressions level of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the observation group 1 week after the end of treatment were lower than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=8.093, 10.468; P<0.05).

Conclusion

Under oxygen supply, VSD combined with autologous skin grafting has a good effect on refractory diabetic foot ulcer, and can improve the survival rate of skin grafting, shorten the healing time of skin grafting, and reduce the expression levels of serum MMP-2 and MMP-9.

表1 2组难愈性糖尿病足溃疡患者治疗结束后1周临床疗效比较
表2 2组难愈性糖尿病足溃疡患者治疗前及治疗结束后1周创面瘙痒、肉芽组织形态和VAS评分比较(分,±s)
表3 2组难愈性糖尿病足溃疡患者治疗结束后1个月截肢率、植皮存活率和植皮痊愈时间比较
表4 2组难愈性糖尿病足溃疡患者治疗前及治疗结束后1周血清MMP-2和MMP-9水平比较(ng/mL, ±s)
[1]
Subrata SA, Phuphaibul R. Diabetic foot ulcer care: a concept analysis of the term integrated into nursing practice[J]. Scand J Caring Sci, 2019, 33(2): 298-310.
[2]
周慧,杨晓萍,高玉镭,等. 负压封闭引流技术(VSD)治疗糖尿病足溃疡[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志2019, 27(13): 1244-1245.
[3]
王晓耽,陈利君. 中药三黄生肌愈足液湿敷治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J]. 中国中医药科技2019, 26(6): 969-970.
[4]
班绎娟,王爱红,许樟荣. 富血小板凝胶治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的随机对照研究[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志2015, 7(5): 306-310.
[5]
谷沛,王彦. 负压封闭引流联合高压氧治疗糖尿病足溃疡机制探讨[J]. 山西医药杂志2018, 47(11): 1296-1297.
[6]
邰菂,张承德,王进勇,等. 封闭式负压引流治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志2017, 21(1): 52-54.
[7]
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会糖尿病足病分会,国际血管联盟中国分部糖尿病足病专家委员会. 中国糖尿病足诊治指南[J]. 中国临床医生杂志2020, 48(1): 19-27.
[8]
杨岚清. VSD技术联合象皮生肌膏促4期压疮肉芽生长临床疗效评价[D]. 长沙:湖南中医药大学,2018: 10.
[9]
刘璇,吴磊. 自体富血小板凝胶联合封闭负压吸引治疗对老年烧伤整形术后患者创面愈合及肉芽组织中MMP-9及TIMP-1水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志2018, 38(23): 5764-5766.
[10]
宋爱波,孙劲. 糖尿病足溃疡基础及辅助治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国医药导报2020, 17(13): 66-68, 72.
[11]
Subrata SA, Phuphaibul R. A nursing metaparadigm perspective of diabetic foot ulcer care[J]. Br J Nurs, 2019, 28(6): S38-S50.
[12]
郭建,杨芳,温雅,等. 自体富血小板凝胶治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的效果研究[J]. 华西医学2018, 33(11): 1411-1414.
[13]
Paisey RB, Abbott A, Paisey CF, et al. Diabetic foot ulcer incidence and survival with improved diabetic foot services: an 18-year study[J]. Diabet Med, 2019, 36(11): 1424-1430.
[14]
袁佳沁,朱美冬,宋福晨,等. 糖足方联合负压封闭引流术治疗糖尿病足溃疡创面的疗效观察[J]. 世界中西医结合杂志2020, 15(1): 139-142.
[15]
张亮,张继春,张立才,等. 负压封闭引流联合前列地尔及依帕司他治疗糖尿病足溃疡[J]. 中国临床研究2020, 33(3): 359-362.
[16]
张旭艳,王中京,丁胜,等. 封闭负压引流治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效及对VEGF、MMP-2及TIMP-1的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志2018, 38(6): 1289-1291.
[17]
张延祠,王浩汀,崔树廷,等. 封闭负压引流技术联合皮瓣移植术治疗糖尿病足溃疡效果观察[J]. 临床误诊误治2018, 31(11): 76-80.
[18]
白现花,尹兰英,杨海庆,等. 中药熏蒸联合西医常规治疗对糖尿病足溃疡愈合及创面渗出液中VEGF、MMP-2及TIMP-1的影响[J]. 中医杂志2018, 59(20): 1763-1765, 1782.
[19]
孙梦婷,封岩,蒋立军,等. 医用臭氧在治疗糖尿病足慢性创面中的应用研究[J/CD]. 足踝外科电子杂志2021, 8(1): 57-61, 64.
[20]
李月姗,孙永,王华. 糖尿病足溃疡创面感染患者MMP-2、TIMP-2、Smad3蛋白表达状况及其诊断价值分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志2020, 19(3): 289-292.
[21]
陈斐,梁显南. MMP-9基因-1562 C>T多态性与2型糖尿病足溃疡的关联研究[J]. 解放军医药杂志2016, 28(9): 24-27.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 王珏, 陈赛君, 贲志飞, 詹锦勇, 徐开颖. 剪切波弹性成像联合极速脉搏波技术评估颈动脉弹性对糖尿病性视网膜病变的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 636-641.
[3] 王洁, 丁泊文, 尹健. 糖尿病性乳腺病52例临床分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 285-289.
[4] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] 张健, 刘小龙, 查天建, 姚俊杰, 王傑. 富含血小板血浆联合异种脱细胞真皮基质修复糖尿病足缺血性创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 503-506.
[6] 赵雅玫, 谢斌, 陈艳, 吴健. 抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流对糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 427-433.
[7] 王湘滔, 张爱娟, 王万春, 王芳萍, 徐颖婕, 孟洋. 中药白及在口腔疾病中的研究与应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 371-375.
[8] 叶弘, 吕婧喆, 钟良军. 白藜芦醇治疗牙周炎和糖尿病的新进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 376-380.
[9] 张剑明, 叶文慧, 牟廷裕, 蓝孝亮, 邓海军. 腹腔镜全结直肠切除、回肠J型储袋-肛管吻合术近期并发症及防治策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 388-395.
[10] 黄岩, 刘晓巍, 杨春玲, 兰烨. 急性胰腺炎合并糖尿病患者的临床特征及血糖代谢与病情严重度的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 439-442.
[11] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[12] 屈霄, 王靓, 陆萍, 何斌, 孙敏. 外周血炎症因子及肠道菌群特征与活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者病情的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 466-470.
[13] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[14] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
[15] 魏红涛, 普布仓决, 格桑央宗, 黎燕, 益西旺扎, 李鹏. 拉萨地区上消化道溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌感染及治疗分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 662-665.
阅读次数
全文


摘要