切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 361 -365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.05.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

椎体成形术中注入不同剂量骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析
孙海波1, 景晓珊2, 唐海1,(), 李锦军1, 包利1, 张双江1, 陈浩1, 贾璞1, 冯飞1   
  1. 1. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院脊柱骨科
    2. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院急诊内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-15 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 唐海

Effect analysis of different cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Haibo Sun1, Xiaoshan Jing2, Hai Tang1,(), Jinjun Li1, Li Bao1, Shuangjiang Zhang1, Hao Chen1, Pu Jia1, Fei Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
    2. Department of Emergency, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2019-08-15 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Hai Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Hai, Email:
引用本文:

孙海波, 景晓珊, 唐海, 李锦军, 包利, 张双江, 陈浩, 贾璞, 冯飞. 椎体成形术中注入不同剂量骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(05): 361-365.

Haibo Sun, Xiaoshan Jing, Hai Tang, Jinjun Li, Li Bao, Shuangjiang Zhang, Hao Chen, Pu Jia, Fei Feng. Effect analysis of different cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(05): 361-365.

探讨经皮椎体成形术(PVP)注入不同剂量骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的有效性和安全性。

方法

自2015年6月至2017年1月,从首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院骨科随机挑选90例符合入选标准的OVCF患者,根据PVP术中骨水泥不同注入剂量,分为低剂量组(小于4 mL)、常规剂量组(4~6 mL)和高剂量组(大于6 mL),每组各30例,并对3组患者的手术时间、术中骨水泥用量、骨水泥渗漏,以及术前、术后1个月和术后1年的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分进行分析。对数据行单因素方差分析、Bonferroni校正法及χ2检验。

结果

3组患者均顺利完成手术,无严重手术并发症的发生。(1)手术时间:低剂量组(22.30±2.71) min、常规剂量组(23.10±5.00) min,高剂量组(26.17±3.50) min, 3组间总体比较差异有统计学意义(F=8.382, P=0.000),高剂量组的手术时间要明显高于前2组,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.008),而前2组的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)术中骨水泥用量:低剂量组(3.37±0.41) mL、常规剂量组(5.17±0.50) mL、高剂量组(6.53±0.64) mL,3组间总体比较差异有统计学意义(F=273.194, P=0.000)。(3)骨水泥渗漏:低剂量组8例、常规剂量组18例、高剂量组21例,高剂量组和常规剂量组骨水泥渗漏发生率明显高于低剂量组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.787、11.279, P=0.027、0.003);而高剂量组和常规剂量组骨水泥渗漏发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.659, P=1.251)。(4)VAS评分:低剂量组、常规剂量组、高剂量组患者术前VAS评分分别为(8.70±1.21)、(8.50±1.17)、(8.17±1.12)分;术后1个月VAS评分分别为(3.37±1.03)、(3.83±1.23)、(3.47±1.11)分;术后1年VAS评分分别为(0.93±0.87)、(0.97±0.77)、(1.23±0.86)分。3组患者术后1个月和术后1年VAS评分明显小于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05),但3组间总体比较差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05)。(5)ODI评分:低剂量组、常规剂量组、高剂量组患者术前ODI评分分别为(41.20±2.43)、(40.83±2.20)、(39.93±2.08)分;术后1个月ODI评分分别为(23.07±2.70)、(23.17±2.95)、(22.80±3.20)分;术后1年ODI评分分别为(11.33±1.83)、(11.27±1.82)、(11.47±1.78)分。3组患者术后1个月和术后1年ODI评分明显小于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05),但3组间总体比较差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05)。

结论

PVP术中注入低剂量骨水泥可以达到同样良好的术后疼痛缓解以及功能恢复效果,可以明显缩短手术时间,降低骨水泥渗漏的风险。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with different cement volume in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures ( OVCF).

Methods

From June 2015 to January 2017, 30 patients with thoracolumbar OVCF in the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University were randomly selected from low dose group (less than 4 mL), conventional dose group (4-6 mL) and high dose group (more than 6 mL) according to the different cement volume injected during PVP. The operation time, cement volume, cement leakage, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and oswestry disability index (ODI) score before operation, 1 month after operation and 1 year after operation in the three groups were analyzed. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance, Bonferroni correction, and chi-square test.

Results

All patients of 3 groups were treated by PVP successfully, without serious complications. (1)Operative time: low dose group: (22.30±2.71) minutes, routine dose group: (23.10±5.00) minutes, high dose group: (26.17±3.50) minutes, there was statistically significant difference among the three groups(F=8.382, P=0.000); the operation time of high dose group was significantly higher than that of low dose group and routine dose group, the differences are statistically significant (P=0.001, 0.008), but there was no significant difference between low dose group and routine dose group (P>0.05). (2)The cement volume used during PVP: low dose group: (3.37±0.41) mL, routine dose group: (5.17±0.50) mL, high dose group: (6.53±0.64) mL, there were statistical differences among the 3 groups (F=273.194, P=0.000). (3)Bone cement leakage: low dose group: 8 cases, routine dose group: 18 cases, high dose group: 21 cases. The incidence of bone cement leakage in routine dose group and high dose group was significantly higher than that in low dose group, the differences are statistically significant (χ2=6.787, 11.279, P=0.027, 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of bone cement leakage between routine dose group and high dose group (χ2=0.659, P=1.251). (4)VAS scores: the preoperative VAS scores of the three groups were 8.70±1.21, 8.50 ±1.17 and 8.17±1.12 respectively; the VAS scores of 1 month after operation were 3.37 ±1.03, 3.83 ±1.23 and 3.47±1.11; the VAS scores of 1 year after operation were 0.93±0.87, 0.97±0.77 and 1.23±0.86. VAS score of 3 groups within 1 month and 1 year after PVP were significantly lower than those preoperatively, the differences are statistically significant(with P values below 0.05), but there were no significant differences among the three groups(with P values above 0.05). (5)ODI scores: the preoperative ODI scores of the three groups were 41.20±2.43, 40.83±2.20 and 39.93±2.08, respectively; the 1 month post-operative ODI scores were 23.07 ±2.70, 23.17±2.95 and 22.80 ±3.20; and the 1 year post-operative ODI scores were 11.33 ±1.83, 11.27±1.82 and 11.47±1.78. VAS score and ODI score of 3 groups within 1 month and 1 year after PVP were significantly lower than those preoperatively, the differences are statistically significant(with P values below 0.05), but there were no significant differences among the three groups(with P values above 0.05).

Conclusion

Low dose cement injected in PVP can achieve satisfied pain relief and functional recovery, and can significantly shorten the operation time and reduce the risk of cement leakage.

表1 3组OVCF患者一般资料比较
表2 3组OVCF患者PVP术前、术后1个月、术后1年VAS评分的比较(分,±s)
表3 3组OVCF患者PVP术前、术后1个月、术后1年ODI评分的比较(分,±s)
[1]
Yi HJ, Jeong JH, Im SB, et al. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty versus Conservative Treatment for One Level Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Compression Fracture: Results of an Over 2-Year Follow-up[J]. Pain Physician, 2016, 19(5): E743- E750.
[2]
Wang B, Guo H, Yuan L, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(11): 3486-3494.
[3]
Martikos K, Greggi T, Faldini C, et al. Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27 (Suppl 2): 244-247.
[4]
Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(14): 1537-1541.
[5]
黄宇,林晋,陈宣维,等. 经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的有限元力学分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2014, 34(22): 6277-6279.
[6]
Graham J, Ahn C, Hai N, et al. Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(18): E505- E511.
[7]
吕良庆,韦向东,蒙世远,等. 老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的治疗进展[J]. 中国临床新医学,2013, 6(11): 1123-1128.
[8]
史光华,李鹏翠,卫小春. 骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的治疗进展[J]. 中国骨伤,2013, 26(10): 878-882.
[9]
Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, et al. Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(5): 478-482.
[10]
Barakat AS, Owais T, Alhashash M, et al. Presentation and management of symptomatic central bone cement embolization[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27(10): 2584-2592.
[11]
Chew C, Craig L, Edwards R, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in malignancy: a systematic review[J]. Clin Radiol, 2011, 66(1): 63-72.
[12]
Eom KS, Kim TY. Percutaneous vertebroplasty-induced adjacent vertebral compression fracture[J].Pain Physician, 2012, 15(4): E527-E532.
[13]
Zhang H, Xu C, Zhang T, et al. Does Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Increase the Incidence of New Vertebral Fractures? A Meta-Analysis[J]. Pain Physician, 2017, 20(1): E13-E28.
[14]
Song D, Meng B, Gan M, et al. The incidence of secondary vertebral fracture of vertebral augmentation techniques versus conservative treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(8): 970-979.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 徐志刚, 曹涛, 何亭, 李博奥, 魏婧韬, 张栋梁, 官浩, 杨薛康. 采用抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病患者心脏术后胸骨骨髓炎的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 498-502.
[4] 蒋敏, 刘馨竹, 李大伟, 冯柏塨, 申传安. 点阵CO2激光联合其他非手术方式治疗痤疮瘢痕有效性的网状荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 429-439.
[5] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[6] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[7] 韦雅丽, 范利杰. 术前右美托咪定滴鼻在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 446-450.
[8] 黄建朋, 邹建强, 宗华. 肝移植术后腹壁疝诊治初步经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 471-473.
[9] 王鹏, 邵欣欣, 胡海涛, 田艳涛, 钟宇新. 改良MOBS 吻合法在全腹腔镜近端胃大部分切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 267-270.
[10] 顾一帆, 潘璐. 关注近视眼防控措施及其面临的形势[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 129-133.
[11] 冯献礼, 高彤, 张喜善. 骨水泥注射量及弥散程度与PVP治疗OVCF的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 193-201.
[12] 伦登兴, 徐丽娜, 李思影, 李世龙, 张伟航, 胡永成. 酸碱调节对硫酸钙骨水泥理化性能影响的体外研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 125-131.
[13] 郭昆, 杨晓峰, 李传明. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅣ型以上复杂胫骨平台骨折的安全性及中远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 159-164.
[14] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[15] 李子健, 王锐, 钟云鹏, 张迪轩, 梁韵娟, 杨超, 何建行, 李树本. 自体肺移植术在胸部恶性肿瘤中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 193-200.
阅读次数
全文


摘要