切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 361 -365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.05.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

椎体成形术中注入不同剂量骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析
孙海波1, 景晓珊2, 唐海1,(), 李锦军1, 包利1, 张双江1, 陈浩1, 贾璞1, 冯飞1   
  1. 1. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院脊柱骨科
    2. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院急诊内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-15 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 唐海

Effect analysis of different cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Haibo Sun1, Xiaoshan Jing2, Hai Tang1,(), Jinjun Li1, Li Bao1, Shuangjiang Zhang1, Hao Chen1, Pu Jia1, Fei Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
    2. Department of Emergency, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2019-08-15 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Hai Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Hai, Email:
引用本文:

孙海波, 景晓珊, 唐海, 李锦军, 包利, 张双江, 陈浩, 贾璞, 冯飞. 椎体成形术中注入不同剂量骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(05): 361-365.

Haibo Sun, Xiaoshan Jing, Hai Tang, Jinjun Li, Li Bao, Shuangjiang Zhang, Hao Chen, Pu Jia, Fei Feng. Effect analysis of different cement volume in percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2019, 14(05): 361-365.

探讨经皮椎体成形术(PVP)注入不同剂量骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的有效性和安全性。

方法

自2015年6月至2017年1月,从首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院骨科随机挑选90例符合入选标准的OVCF患者,根据PVP术中骨水泥不同注入剂量,分为低剂量组(小于4 mL)、常规剂量组(4~6 mL)和高剂量组(大于6 mL),每组各30例,并对3组患者的手术时间、术中骨水泥用量、骨水泥渗漏,以及术前、术后1个月和术后1年的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分进行分析。对数据行单因素方差分析、Bonferroni校正法及χ2检验。

结果

3组患者均顺利完成手术,无严重手术并发症的发生。(1)手术时间:低剂量组(22.30±2.71) min、常规剂量组(23.10±5.00) min,高剂量组(26.17±3.50) min, 3组间总体比较差异有统计学意义(F=8.382, P=0.000),高剂量组的手术时间要明显高于前2组,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.008),而前2组的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)术中骨水泥用量:低剂量组(3.37±0.41) mL、常规剂量组(5.17±0.50) mL、高剂量组(6.53±0.64) mL,3组间总体比较差异有统计学意义(F=273.194, P=0.000)。(3)骨水泥渗漏:低剂量组8例、常规剂量组18例、高剂量组21例,高剂量组和常规剂量组骨水泥渗漏发生率明显高于低剂量组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.787、11.279, P=0.027、0.003);而高剂量组和常规剂量组骨水泥渗漏发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.659, P=1.251)。(4)VAS评分:低剂量组、常规剂量组、高剂量组患者术前VAS评分分别为(8.70±1.21)、(8.50±1.17)、(8.17±1.12)分;术后1个月VAS评分分别为(3.37±1.03)、(3.83±1.23)、(3.47±1.11)分;术后1年VAS评分分别为(0.93±0.87)、(0.97±0.77)、(1.23±0.86)分。3组患者术后1个月和术后1年VAS评分明显小于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05),但3组间总体比较差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05)。(5)ODI评分:低剂量组、常规剂量组、高剂量组患者术前ODI评分分别为(41.20±2.43)、(40.83±2.20)、(39.93±2.08)分;术后1个月ODI评分分别为(23.07±2.70)、(23.17±2.95)、(22.80±3.20)分;术后1年ODI评分分别为(11.33±1.83)、(11.27±1.82)、(11.47±1.78)分。3组患者术后1个月和术后1年ODI评分明显小于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P值均小于0.05),但3组间总体比较差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05)。

结论

PVP术中注入低剂量骨水泥可以达到同样良好的术后疼痛缓解以及功能恢复效果,可以明显缩短手术时间,降低骨水泥渗漏的风险。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with different cement volume in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures ( OVCF).

Methods

From June 2015 to January 2017, 30 patients with thoracolumbar OVCF in the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University were randomly selected from low dose group (less than 4 mL), conventional dose group (4-6 mL) and high dose group (more than 6 mL) according to the different cement volume injected during PVP. The operation time, cement volume, cement leakage, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and oswestry disability index (ODI) score before operation, 1 month after operation and 1 year after operation in the three groups were analyzed. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance, Bonferroni correction, and chi-square test.

Results

All patients of 3 groups were treated by PVP successfully, without serious complications. (1)Operative time: low dose group: (22.30±2.71) minutes, routine dose group: (23.10±5.00) minutes, high dose group: (26.17±3.50) minutes, there was statistically significant difference among the three groups(F=8.382, P=0.000); the operation time of high dose group was significantly higher than that of low dose group and routine dose group, the differences are statistically significant (P=0.001, 0.008), but there was no significant difference between low dose group and routine dose group (P>0.05). (2)The cement volume used during PVP: low dose group: (3.37±0.41) mL, routine dose group: (5.17±0.50) mL, high dose group: (6.53±0.64) mL, there were statistical differences among the 3 groups (F=273.194, P=0.000). (3)Bone cement leakage: low dose group: 8 cases, routine dose group: 18 cases, high dose group: 21 cases. The incidence of bone cement leakage in routine dose group and high dose group was significantly higher than that in low dose group, the differences are statistically significant (χ2=6.787, 11.279, P=0.027, 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of bone cement leakage between routine dose group and high dose group (χ2=0.659, P=1.251). (4)VAS scores: the preoperative VAS scores of the three groups were 8.70±1.21, 8.50 ±1.17 and 8.17±1.12 respectively; the VAS scores of 1 month after operation were 3.37 ±1.03, 3.83 ±1.23 and 3.47±1.11; the VAS scores of 1 year after operation were 0.93±0.87, 0.97±0.77 and 1.23±0.86. VAS score of 3 groups within 1 month and 1 year after PVP were significantly lower than those preoperatively, the differences are statistically significant(with P values below 0.05), but there were no significant differences among the three groups(with P values above 0.05). (5)ODI scores: the preoperative ODI scores of the three groups were 41.20±2.43, 40.83±2.20 and 39.93±2.08, respectively; the 1 month post-operative ODI scores were 23.07 ±2.70, 23.17±2.95 and 22.80 ±3.20; and the 1 year post-operative ODI scores were 11.33 ±1.83, 11.27±1.82 and 11.47±1.78. VAS score and ODI score of 3 groups within 1 month and 1 year after PVP were significantly lower than those preoperatively, the differences are statistically significant(with P values below 0.05), but there were no significant differences among the three groups(with P values above 0.05).

Conclusion

Low dose cement injected in PVP can achieve satisfied pain relief and functional recovery, and can significantly shorten the operation time and reduce the risk of cement leakage.

表1 3组OVCF患者一般资料比较
表2 3组OVCF患者PVP术前、术后1个月、术后1年VAS评分的比较(分,±s)
表3 3组OVCF患者PVP术前、术后1个月、术后1年ODI评分的比较(分,±s)
[1]
Yi HJ, Jeong JH, Im SB, et al. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty versus Conservative Treatment for One Level Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Compression Fracture: Results of an Over 2-Year Follow-up[J]. Pain Physician, 2016, 19(5): E743- E750.
[2]
Wang B, Guo H, Yuan L, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(11): 3486-3494.
[3]
Martikos K, Greggi T, Faldini C, et al. Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27 (Suppl 2): 244-247.
[4]
Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(14): 1537-1541.
[5]
黄宇,林晋,陈宣维,等. 经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的有限元力学分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2014, 34(22): 6277-6279.
[6]
Graham J, Ahn C, Hai N, et al. Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(18): E505- E511.
[7]
吕良庆,韦向东,蒙世远,等. 老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的治疗进展[J]. 中国临床新医学,2013, 6(11): 1123-1128.
[8]
史光华,李鹏翠,卫小春. 骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的治疗进展[J]. 中国骨伤,2013, 26(10): 878-882.
[9]
Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, et al. Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(5): 478-482.
[10]
Barakat AS, Owais T, Alhashash M, et al. Presentation and management of symptomatic central bone cement embolization[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27(10): 2584-2592.
[11]
Chew C, Craig L, Edwards R, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in malignancy: a systematic review[J]. Clin Radiol, 2011, 66(1): 63-72.
[12]
Eom KS, Kim TY. Percutaneous vertebroplasty-induced adjacent vertebral compression fracture[J].Pain Physician, 2012, 15(4): E527-E532.
[13]
Zhang H, Xu C, Zhang T, et al. Does Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Increase the Incidence of New Vertebral Fractures? A Meta-Analysis[J]. Pain Physician, 2017, 20(1): E13-E28.
[14]
Song D, Meng B, Gan M, et al. The incidence of secondary vertebral fracture of vertebral augmentation techniques versus conservative treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(8): 970-979.
[1] 赵雅玫, 谢斌, 陈艳, 吴健. 抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流对糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 427-433.
[2] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[3] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[4] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[5] 王红敏, 谢云波, 王彦虎, 王福生. 间充质干细胞治疗新冠病毒感染的临床研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-256.
[6] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[7] 娜荷雅, 朱丹. 红光疗法在儿童近视眼防控中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 252-256.
[8] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[9] 张乾龙, 王继荣, 宋晨辉, 刘修信, 任政, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 覃祺, 冉建. 两种髓内钉固定A3.1粗隆间骨折的有限元分析:增强型PFNA与InterTan[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 209-217.
[10] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[11] 陈婷婷, 江学良, 余佳丽, 柯剑林. 干细胞治疗炎症性肠病的安全性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[12] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
[13] 曹文玺, 陈箫, 竺来法, 周永平. 尼妥珠单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗胰腺癌的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 409-413.
[14] 梁君, 褚晨宇, 孙凤艳, 袁仪浪, 周曦, 王卫东. 胸壁完全植入式静脉输液港术中隧道针逆向穿刺的可行性和安全性[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 310-313.
[15] 李承玉, 徐连萍, 王圣松, 王群. 不同抗癫痫发作药物单药治疗在卒中后癫痫中的保留率和有效性分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 325-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要