切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 415 -418. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2020.05.017

所属专题： 文献；

护理园地

心理护理干预对二氧化碳点阵激光联合富血小板血浆美容效果的影响
王婷1, 刘婧妮1,†(), 程金梅1   
  1. 1. 223300　淮安市第一人民医院整形美容科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-11 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 刘婧妮

Effect of psychological nursing intervention on cosmetic effect of carbon dioxide lattice laser combined with platelet rich plasma

Ting Wang1, Jingni Liu1,†(), Jinmei Cheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, First People′s Hospital of Huai'an, Huai'an 223300, China
  • Received:2020-08-11 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jingni Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Jingni, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王婷, 刘婧妮, 程金梅. 心理护理干预对二氧化碳点阵激光联合富血小板血浆美容效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(05): 415-418.

Ting Wang, Jingni Liu, Jinmei Cheng. Effect of psychological nursing intervention on cosmetic effect of carbon dioxide lattice laser combined with platelet rich plasma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2020, 15(05): 415-418.

目的

探究心理护理对二氧化碳点阵激光联合富血小板血浆皮肤美容效果的影响。

方法

选取淮安市第一人民医院2018年9月至2019年9月收治的60例实施二氧化碳点阵激光联合PRP皮肤美容患者，按随机数字表法分成2组，对照组与研究组各30例。对照组采用常规护理，研究组采用常规护理加心理护理干预，对比2组并发症发生率、护理前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)与抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分及护理满意度。数据比较采用t检验和卡方检验。

结果

心理护理干预后，研究组并发症发生率(16.67%)低于对照组(46.67%)，差异有统计学意义(χ2＝6.372，P<0.05)；研究组SAS、SDS评分[(32.78±5.24)、(31.35±4.31)分]均低于对照组[(50.12±3.16)、(49.57±6.18)分]，差异有统计学意义(t＝-9.546、-8.657，P值均小于0.05)；研究组护理满意度(93.33%)高于对照组(73.33%)，差异有统计学意义(χ2＝5.218，P<0.05)。

结论

于二氧化碳点阵激光联合PRP美容皮肤中实施心理护理，可减少术后并发症发生率，降低患者术后焦虑、抑郁情绪，提高患者护理满意度，具有较好的临床效果。

关键词: 心理护理, 二氧化碳点阵激光, 富血小板血浆, 整形美容, 临床效果
Objective

To explore the effect of psychological nursing intervention in carbon dioxide laser combined with platelet rich plasma(PRP) cosmetic skin.

Methods

A total of 60 patients with PRP skin cosmetology were enrolled from September 2018 to September 2019 in our department of the First People′s Hospital of Huai'an. The patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table, 30 cases in control group and 30 cases in study group. The Control Group received routine nursing. The study group received routine nursing and psychological nursing intervention. The incidence of complications, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS) and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. The data were compared by t-test and chi-square test.

Results

After psychological nursing intervention, the incidence of complications in the study group (16.67%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (46.67%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.372, P<0.05) , and the scores of SAS and SDS[(32.78±5.24), (31.35±4.31) points] in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group [(50.12±3.16), (49.57±6.18) points], the differences were statistically significant (t=-9.546, -8.657; P<0.05; with P values below 0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the study group (93.33%) was higher than that of the control group (73.33%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.218, P<0.05) .

Conclusion

The application of psychological nursing in the combination of carbon dioxide dot-matrix laser and PRP cosmetology skin can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, patients′ anxiety and depression, and improve patients′ nursing satisfaction.

Key words: Psychological nursing intervention, Carbon dioxide dot-matrix laser, Platelet-rich plasma, Plastic and cosmetic, Clinical effect
表1 2组实施二氧化碳点阵激光联合PRP美容皮肤患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 色素沉着 红斑 水肿 局部感染 并发症发生率
研究组 30 2(6.67) 1(3.33) 1(3.33) 1(3.33) 5(16.67)
对照组 30 5(16.67) 3(10.00) 2(6.67) 4(13.33) 14(46.67)
χ2值           6.372
P值           <0.05
表2 2组实施二氧化碳点阵激光联合PRP美容皮肤患者SAS、SDS评分结果比较(分，±s)
组别 例数 SAS SDS
研究组 30 32.78±5.24 31.35±4.31
对照组 30 50.12±3.16 49.57±6.18
t值   -9.546 -8.657
P值   <0.05 <0.05
表3 2组实施二氧化碳点阵激光联合PRP美容皮肤患者护理满意度比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 A B C 满意度
研究组 30 22(73.33) 6(20.00) 2(6.37) 28(93.33)
对照组 30 12(40.00) 10(33.33) 8(26.67) 22(73.33)
χ2值         5.218
P值         <0.05
[1]
Abdel Kareem IM, Fouad MA, Ibrahim MK. Effectiveness of subcision using carboxytherapy plus fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: comparative split face study[J]. J Dermatolog Treat, 2020, 31(3): 296-299.
[2]
Datz E, Schönberger C, Zeman F, et al. Fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of skin grafts: long-term results of a prospective, randomized, split-scar, evaluator-blinded study[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2018, 50(10): 1010-1016.
[3]
Faghihi G, Nouraei S, Asilian A, et al. Efficacy of Punch Elevation Combined with Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing in Facial Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Randomized Split-face Clinical Study[J]. Indian J Dermatol, 2015, 60(5): 473-478.
[4]
徐旻，吕君，陈尚周，等. 超脉冲CO2点阵激光联合PRP治疗面部痤疮凹陷性瘢痕疗效分析[J]. 中国美容医学，2020, 29(5): 41-44.
[5]
Wu N, Sun H, Sun Q, et al. A meta-analysis of fractional CO2 laser combined with PRP in the treatment of acne scar[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2020, 8(10): 103-107.
[6]
Galal O, Tawfik A, Abdalla N, et al. Fractional CO2 laser versus combined platelet-rich plasma and fractional CO2 laser in treatment of acne scars: Image analysis system evaluation[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2019, 18(6): 1665-1671.
[7]
Mahamoud WA, El Barbary RA, Ibrahim NF, et al. Fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with intradermal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma versus noncross-linked hyaluronic acid in the treatment of atrophic postacne scars: A split face study[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020, 19(6): 1341-1352.
[8]
张旭，翟虹. 护理干预对二氧化碳点阵激光皮肤美容术患者负性情绪及防晒中效果的影响[J]. 中国社区医师，2020, 36(9): 131-132.
[9]
Na JI, Choi JW, Choi HR, et al. Rapid healing and reduced erythema after ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing combined with the application of autologous platelet-rich plasma[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2011, 37(4): 463-468.
[10]
Yuan XH, Zhong SX, Li SS. Comparison study of fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing using different fluences and densities for acne scars in Asians: a randomized split-face trial[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2014, 40(5): 545-552.
[11]
Kohl E, Meierhöfer J, Koller M, et al. Fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of rhytides and photoageing: a prospective study using profilometric analysis[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2014, 170(4): 858-865.
[12]
林玫伶，谢君，林德基，等. 以富血小板血浆(PRP)为基础的联合疗法治疗痤疮萎缩性瘢痕的疗效观察[J]. 中国医疗美容，2019, 9(12): 78-82.
[13]
李志民，谢培煜，吴丽惠，等. 点阵CO2激光联合自体富血小板血浆治疗面部痤疮瘢痕的临床效果[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志，2016, 22(5): 293-295.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[3] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[4] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[5] 张中斌, 付琨朋, 朱凯, 张玉, 李华. 胫骨高位截骨术与富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 633-641.
[6] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[7] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[8] 赵芊, 李亚坤, 李智. 同种异体富血小板血浆临床应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 364-367.
[9] 庹晓晔, 冯光. 复杂胸壁重建策略[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 276-276.
[10] 苏永涛, 王春雷, 徐广琪, 关中正, 焦伟, 隋颖. 胫骨骨膜牵张术联合富血小板血浆对治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 238-244.
[11] 韩李念, 王君. 放射性皮肤损伤治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 533-537.
[12] 窦恩, 郑磊, 徐通海, 邓先锐. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-445.
[13] 林建琴, 孔令敏, 陆银凤, 陈勇, 金凤, 叶磊, 陈方梅. PERMA模式对肺癌患者治疗获益感及生活质量的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 634-638.
[14] 薛伟, 康少英, 郭洪生, 高庆亮, 张英民, 高彦平. 电针联合富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 13-17.
[15] 扈姝琴, 许红燕, 曹丹, 丁亚艳. 云平台视频管理在患儿重症哮喘中的应用及对应对方式的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 218-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号