切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 223 -228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.03.008

论著

利用基于动脉穿支的双叶皮瓣修复不同部位4期压疮的临床效果观察
吴杭庆, 张希龙(), 邓向东, 李松涛, 王涛, 石旭, 林琛, 丁佳吉, 赵鹏翔   
  1. 221116 徐州市第一人民医院烧伤整形及创面修复科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-31 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张希龙
  • 基金资助:
    徐州市卫生健康委青年医学科技创新项目(XWKYSL20210223)

Clinical observation on repairing of stage 4 pressure sores at different sites with bilobed flap based on artery perforator

Hangqing Wu, Xilong Zhang(), Xiangdong Deng, Songtao Li, Tao Wang, Xu Shi, Chen Lin, Jiaji Ding, Pengxiang Zhao   

  1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery and Wound Repair, the First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou 221116, China
  • Received:2023-03-31 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xilong Zhang
引用本文:

吴杭庆, 张希龙, 邓向东, 李松涛, 王涛, 石旭, 林琛, 丁佳吉, 赵鹏翔. 利用基于动脉穿支的双叶皮瓣修复不同部位4期压疮的临床效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 223-228.

Hangqing Wu, Xilong Zhang, Xiangdong Deng, Songtao Li, Tao Wang, Xu Shi, Chen Lin, Jiaji Ding, Pengxiang Zhao. Clinical observation on repairing of stage 4 pressure sores at different sites with bilobed flap based on artery perforator[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(03): 223-228.

目的

探讨基于动脉穿支的双叶皮瓣在不同部位4期压疮治疗中的修复效果。

方法

选择2021年8月至2023年3月徐州市第一人民医院烧伤整形及创面修复科收治的25例符合入选标准的4期压疮患者,其中男19例,女6例,年龄12~82岁。坐骨结节压疮11例,利用基于股深动脉第1穿支的股后双叶皮瓣进行修复。骶尾部压疮14例,其中13例利用基于臀上动脉穿支的双叶皮瓣进行修复,1例利用基于臀下动脉穿支的双叶皮瓣进行修复。术后观察愈合效果及随访情况。

结果

25例双叶皮瓣均无需切断蒂部皮肤和皮下组织,也不需要分离穿支血管,均可达到良好的旋转及覆盖效果。23例皮瓣一期愈合,术后2周顺利拆线;2例皮瓣因术后受压导致局部切口裂开及皮缘发黑坏死,经清创换药治疗2周后愈合。术后随访1~18个月,所有患者压疮无复发,皮瓣均成活良好,质地柔软、弹性好、血运良好,术区仅遗留线性瘢痕。

结论

基于股深动脉第1穿支的股后双叶皮瓣及基于臀上/臀下动脉穿支的双叶皮瓣,方法简单可靠,在不同部位4期压疮的治疗中临床效果良好,对于老年患者可以作为修复坐骨结节及骶尾部4期压疮的理想皮瓣方案。

Objective

To explore the clinical application effect of bilobed flap based on artery perforator in the treatment of stage 4 pressure sores at different sites.

Methods

From August 2021 to March 2023, 25 patients with stage 4 pressure sores in the First People's Hospital of Xuzhou met the inclusion criteria were included in this study, including 19 males and 6 females aged 12 to 82 years. 11 patients suffered stage 4 pressure sores in ischial tuberosity and were repaired with a posterior femoral bilobed flap based on the first perforating branch of deep femoral artery. 14 patients developed stage 4 pressure sores in the sacrococcygeal region, of which 13 cases were treated with a bilobed flap based on the perforating branch of the superior gluteal artery, and the other one was treated with a bilobed flap based on the perforating branch of the inferior gluteal artery. The survivals of flaps and appearances of donor sites were followed up.

Results

All the 25 cases of bilobed flap did not need to cut off the pedicle skin and subcutaneous tissue, nor separate the perforator vessels, which can rotate well and cover the wound effectively. Flaps of 23 patients survived well and sutures were removed 2 weeks after operation. Local incision dehiscence and skin margin blackened and became necrotic due to post-operative compression in 2 cases, and healed after 2 weeks of debridement and dressing change. The follow-up period was 1~18 months. The results of follow-up showed that all the 25 pressure sores healed well without recurrence, and flaps survived with good elasticity, blood circulation, and soft texture. Only linear scar was left in the donor area.

Conclusion

The posterior femoral bilobed flap based on the first perforating branch of the deep femoral artery and the bilobed flap based on the perforating branch of the superior/inferior gluteal artery are simple and reliable, and have a good clinical effect in the treatment of stage 4 pressure sores at different sites. For the elderly patients with stage 4 pressure sores in the ischial tubercle and sacrococcygeal region, it can be used as an ideal flap scheme.

图1 应用臀上动脉穿支双叶皮瓣修复骶尾部4期压疮。A示入院时创面情况,空腔形成,骨膜外露;B示术中扩创,清除创缘老化肉芽、基底坏死组织及骨膜,设计双叶皮瓣;C示术后即刻;D示拆线即刻,皮瓣状态良好;E示术后4个月随访情况
[1]
贾晓明. 压疮的流行病学特点及诊断与治疗进展[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(1): 4-7.
[2]
刘本全,董德生,史明艳,等. En bloc切除清创联合臀大肌肌瓣治疗坐骨结节压疮合并慢性骨髓炎的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志2022, 38(4): 363-368.
[3]
European Preasure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Injuru Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: clinical practice guideline[S]. EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA, 2019.
[4]
胡咏. 慢性难愈性创面住院患者临床流行病学特征分析[D]. 南昌大学,2021.
[5]
苗盈盈,张武臣,韩秀斌,等. 改良双负压疗法联合清创减张缝合术治疗骶尾部及周围4期压疮并感染患者的效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2020, 36(7): 540-546.
[6]
徐永清,何晓清,范新宇,等. 臀部不同部位压疮治疗方法的选择[J]. 中华显微外科杂志2021, 44(3): 255-260.
[7]
冯光,郝岱峰,张新健,等. 坐骨结节压力性损伤的分型及修复策略[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2019, 14(5):339-343.
[8]
陈军,张楠. 负压封闭引流联合邻近皮瓣转位修复压疮的临床效果[J]. 临床骨科杂志2022, 25(4):515-517.
[9]
孙佳琳,郭鹏飞,崔正军,等. 臀上动脉穿支接力皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2020, 36(8):726-729.
[10]
曹世坤,余道江,安璐,等. 自由式穿支皮瓣在臀部压疮修复中的应用[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志2020, 25(4):365-370.
[11]
黄大波,韦仁杰,韦礼永,等. 臀下动脉穿支皮瓣修复臀部压疮的临床应用[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志2021, 32(3):143-145.
[12]
史宸硕,唐修俊,王达利,等. 臀上动脉穿支岛状皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2019, 35(5):367-370.
[13]
Lee HJ, Pyon JK, Lim SY, et al. Perforator-based bilobed flaps in patients with a sacral sore: application of a schematic design[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2011, 64(6): 790-795.
[14]
Iida N, Watanabe A. Usefulness of simple-designed bilobed flap for reconstruction of ischial decubitus ulcer[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2015, 3(9):e525.
[15]
储国平,吕国忠,朱宇刚,等. 部分去表皮的股后双叶皮瓣修复坐骨结节压疮15例[J]. 中华烧伤杂志2018, 34(8):559-561.
[16]
Peters F, Mücke M, Möhlhenrich SC, et al. Esthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction with paramedian forehead flap and bilobed flap[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2021, 74(4):740-746.
[17]
贺建雄,彭细峰,李啸晨,等. 应用腰臀双叶皮瓣修复骶尾部褥疮(附15例报告)[J]. 中国医师杂志2008, 10(10):1358-1359.
[18]
陈黎明,刘毅,王刚,等. 三叶形臀部穿支螺旋桨皮瓣修复骶尾部创面[J]. 中华整形外科杂志2018, 34(7):519-521.
[19]
刘小俊,刘云峰,金新源,等. 修复骶尾部缺损的皮瓣选择[J]. 中国医疗美容2020, 10(12):54-58.
[20]
刘卫华,严云登,贺振华. 药刀清创结合臀上动脉穿支双叶皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮[J]. 临床普外科电子杂志2020, 8(4):63-64.
[21]
Jiao X, Cui C, Ng SK, et al. The modified bilobed flap for reconstructing sacral decubitus ulcers[J]. Burns Trauma, 2020, 8:tkaa012.
[22]
黄兆伦,黄晓栋,万里,等. 持续双负压微压力引流联合重组人表皮生长因子在压疮皮瓣修复术后的应用效果[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志2021, 25(4):284-288.
[23]
李汉华,黄志锋,熊兵,等. 坐骨结节扩大清创降低坐骨压疮术后创面复发风险的临床研究[J].医学研究生学报2021, 34(4):379-383.
[24]
朱婷婷,方小魁,李光早,等. 臀上动脉穿支皮瓣在修复骶尾部压疮的应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报2019, 44(3):332-334.
[25]
Braafhart M, de Laat HEW, Wagner T, et al. Surgical reconstruction of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury individuals: a single- or two-stage approach?[J]. J Tissue Viability, 2020, 29(4):319-323.
[26]
Kyung HW, Ko G, Song SH, et al. Reconstruction of sacral pressure ulcer using a modified parasacral perforator-based flap (maple leaf design): an easier method for beginners[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2021, 20(4):374-378.
[27]
Kwon H, Ahn CH, Kim S, et al. Designing with relaxed skin tension line in perforator-based island flap for sacral sore reconstruction: a STROBE-compliant observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101(37):e30615.
[28]
Özkan B, Albayati A, Tatar BE, et al. The use of mathematically standardized bilobed design perforator flaps for coverage of sacral pressure ulcers[J]. Microsurgery, 2023, 43(3): 229-237.
[1] 王戏丹, 李颖如, 林平, 徐伟华, 许甜甜. 高频彩色多普勒超声联合红外线热成像技术在股前外侧穿支分叶皮瓣术前导航中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(03): 238-243.
[2] 张迈, 宋达疆, 张永林, 付玉梅, 徐晓蝶, 谭志华, 刘蜀. 自体组织乳房重建用于修复乳腺叶状肿瘤术后胸壁缺损[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 163-166.
[3] 唐朝易, 韦德飞, 卿佳林. 容积替代技术在乳腺癌保留乳房手术中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 247-252.
[4] 何建怀, 易石坚, 王先明, 朱芳, 宋达疆, 李赞, 屈洪波. 侧胸壁筋膜皮瓣在乳房外侧象限局部缺损修复中的临床应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 155-159.
[5] 黄佳鹏, 庄亚强, 周韬, 曹一鸣, 韦德飞, 石青梅. 游离真皮脂肪瓣在乳腺癌保留乳房手术中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 77-81.
[6] 陈永沛, 仲海燕, 陈勇, 王慜, 王倩, 邹鸣立, 袁斯明. 数字减影血管造影在腓动脉穿支皮瓣移植中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 507-510.
[7] 张浩, 张万福, 韩飞, 佟琳, 王运帷, 李少辉, 陈阳, 曹鹏, 官浩. 游离组织瓣治疗无吻合血管或需困难吻合血管创面的临床进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 442-446.
[8] 刘江涛, 王一勇, 欧阳容兰, 黄书润. 采用改良胸脐带蒂皮瓣修复手腕背部深度创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 321-325.
[9] 黄海华, 吴泽勇, 陈秀凤, 李小芳, 史玉仓, 徐舒豪, 罗奇志, 王绥江, 黄跃生. 带蒂腓肠内侧动脉或联合胫后动脉多穿支皮瓣修复小腿创面[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 496-501.
[10] 官浩. 串联血管预制皮瓣二次扩张后的残耳再造[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 552-552.
[11] 刘江涛, 王一勇, 欧阳容兰, 黄书润. 改良胸脐带蒂皮瓣修复手部毁损伤创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 421-425.
[12] 韩焱福, 陶然, 杜雪梅. 手术切除+局部推进皮瓣修复术后慢性难愈性切口的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 237-241.
[13] 魏在荣, 杨成兰, 蒋玲丽. 深度电烧伤创面的皮瓣修复[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(02): 100-105.
[14] 丰波, 邹英财, 张澜, 王永军, 张佩光, 田维庆. 游离上臂外侧穿支皮瓣修复手部中、小面积皮肤缺损的临床疗效[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(02): 109-114.
[15] 狄海萍, 邢培朋, 夏成德, 薛继东, 郭海娜, 刘磊, 张建, 苏增幅, 韩志新. 游离腹股沟皮瓣修复拇指环形电烧伤的临床研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(02): 104-108.
阅读次数
全文


摘要