Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 176-181. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2017.03.004

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prevention and treatment of scar drugs based on Meta analysis

Zhenhua Gong1, Feng Zhou2, Jian Yao1,(), Xuanliang Pan3, Jianfeng Ji1, Jun Yang1, Tie Xiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Nantong, Nantong 226001, China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, the First People′s Hospital of Nantong, Nantong 226001, China
    3. Department of Burn Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2017-03-29 Online:2017-06-01 Published:2017-06-01
  • Contact: Jian Yao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yao Jian, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate existing drugs for the treatment and prevention of scars and keloids through network meta-analysis methods.

Methods

By searching the PubMed, Blackwell, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Ovid, and Scopus database and the domestic Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang database and the Chinese Journal Full-text Database database, literatures were retrieved relevant to the scar medication and prevention research, the data provided by the relevant documents into the Excel spreadsheet, and then import the spreadsheet into the R (2.15.1 version) software (http: //www.r-project.org/), the use of Meta software package and Q test for analysis.

Results

A total of 35 studies were included in the research which contained 28 literatures in English and 7 literatures in Chinese by database searches. Pooled analysis indicated that the drug′s effect on keloids treatment of the overall response rate was (80.0±3.0)%. The overall recurrence rate was (28.0±3.0)%. The effect size of the keloid treatment roughly in the order: steroids, bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C, verapamil and collagenase. The OR for collagenase was less than 1, suggesting that it was ineffective and potentially harmful, and 95% CI of OR for 5-fluorouracil covered 1, thus its therapeutic effect had yet to be further confirmed. The recurrence ORs for adjuvant treatment of the drugs for keloids were: bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, verapamil, hormone, imiquimod colchicine and tamoxifen. The drugs which confidence interval exceeds 50% were imiquimod, tamoxifen and verapamil. The comparison between the drugs for the treatment of keloid was not significant. As for the keloid adjuvant therapy, steroids and imiquimod were superior to other drugs in term of the recurrence rate whereas tamoxifen had the highest recurrence rate.

Conclusions

Options of drugs for keloid treatment: steroids, bleomycin, mitomycin C, and verapamil, while for the prevention of recurrence was steroids, the role of other drugs had yet to be confirmed.

Key words: Meta-analysis, Cicatrix, Drug therapy, Prevention

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-58517075 E-mail: zhssyxf@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd