随着科技的发展，越来越多的血流动力学监测技术相继涌现，从有创、微创到无创，每一种监测技术都有其自身的优势及局限性，而且烧伤患者因为皮肤的缺失，痂皮的形成，使得许多有创、无创操作开展比较困难。脉搏指数连续心输出量(PiCCO)相对于其他血流动力学监测技术，准确、安全、及时、有效、微创，优于传统的Swan-Ganz漂浮导管；与FloTrac/Vigileo技术比较，PiCCO临床所受限制更少，更适合于绝大多数的危重烧伤患者；无创血流动力学监测技术限于烧伤创面的存在，在烧伤临床中开展并不广泛。

With the development of science and technology, more and more hemodynamic monitoring techniques have emerged, from invasive and minimally invasive to noninvasive monitoring. Each technology has its own advantages and limitations, for burn patients, skin loss and form crust, so that is difficult to carry out many invasive, noninvasive operation. Compared to other hemodynamic monitoring technology, pulse indicated continuous cardiac output(PiCCO) is more accurate, safe, timely, effective, minimally invasive, better than the traditional Swan-Ganz catheter. Compared with FloTrac/Vigileo, PiCCO is less clinically restricted, more suitable for most severe burn patients. Non invasive hemodynamic monitoring technology is limited to the presence of burn wounds, so it is not widely carried out now.