切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 314 -318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.04.007

论著

水动力清创系统在大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面清创中的应用效果
陈宏泽1, 刘晟1,(), 陈旭林1   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院烧伤科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-25 出版日期:2024-08-01
  • 通信作者: 刘晟

Efficacy of hydrosurgery system applied in the debridement of patients with extensive and deep second-degree burns

Hongze Chen1, Sheng Liu1,(), Xulin Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Burns, the First Affiliated Hosptial of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2023-11-25 Published:2024-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Liu
引用本文:

陈宏泽, 刘晟, 陈旭林. 水动力清创系统在大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面清创中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 314-318.

Hongze Chen, Sheng Liu, Xulin Chen. Efficacy of hydrosurgery system applied in the debridement of patients with extensive and deep second-degree burns[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(04): 314-318.

目的

探讨水动力清创系统(简称水刀)在大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤中的清创效果。

方法

选取2019年10月至2022年10月安徽医科大学第一附属医院烧伤科收治的41例大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤患者进行回顾性队列研究,按照是否使用水刀清创分为水刀清创组(20例)和传统清创组(21例),均联合自体Meek皮片封闭创面。术后采取常规抗感染、定期换药等治疗。观察两组患者术后7 d植皮存活率、手术区愈合时间,记录并计算术后降钙素原(PCT)及C反应蛋白(CRP)降低率。数据比较采用t检验、χ2检验、Mann-Whitney U检验。

结果

水刀清创组的手术区植皮存活率为95.9%(87.7%,96.7%),高于传统清创组的83.3%(80.0%,87.7%),差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.748,P<0.001)。水刀清创组术后PCT降低率[(59.5±21.5)%]高于传统清创组[(26.1±32.7)%],差异有统计学意义(t =3.839,P<0.001)。水刀清创组术后CRP降低率为55.8%(32.3%,66.8%),高于传统清创组[32.3%(15.4%,37.3%)],差异有统计学意义(Z =-3.170,P=0.002)。水刀清创组手术区愈合时间为(37.1±17.3)d,短于传统清创组[(48.9±4.2)d],差异有统计学意义(t =-2.058,P=0.046)。

结论

与传统清创术比较,水动力清创系统联合Meek皮片移植治疗大面积深Ⅱ度烧伤能更精准地清除坏死组织,减轻全身炎症反应,创造有利的植皮环境,提高植皮存活率,加快创面愈合。

Objective

To explore the effect of the hydrosurgery system in the debridement of patients with extensive and deep second-degree burns.

Methods

Forty-one patients with extensive and deep second-degree burns admitted to the Department of Burns, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2019 to October 2022 were selected for a retrospective cohort study, and were divided into a hydrosurgery system debridement group (20 cases) and a traditional debridement group (21 cases) according to whether or not hydrosurgery system was used, combined with autologous Meek micrograft technique to heal the wounds. Post-operative care included routine anti-infection and regular dressing changes. The survival rate of the implant at 7 days after surgery and the healing time of the surgical area were observed in both groups, and the postoperative procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction rates were recorded and calculated. Data were analysed using t-test, chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

The implant survival rate of the hydrosurgery system debridement group was 95.9%(87.7%, 96.7%), which was significantly higher than that of the traditional debridement group [83.3%(80.0%, 87.7%)], and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.748, P<0.001). The post-operative PCT reduction rate of the hydrosurgery system debridement group was (59.5±21.5)%, which was significantly higher than that of the traditional debridement group [(26.1±32.7)%], and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.839, P<0.001). The post-operative CRP reduction rate of the hydrosurgery system debridement group was 55.8%(32.3%, 66.8%), which was significantly higher than that of the traditional debridement group [32.3%(15.4%, 37.3%)], with a statistically significant difference (Z=-3.170, P=0.002). The healing time of the surgical area in the hydrosurgery system debridement group was (37.1±17.3) days, which was significantly shorter than that of the traditional debridement group (48.9±4.2) days, with a statistically significant difference (t=-2.058, P=0.046).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional debridement, hydrosurgery system debridement combined with Meek micrograft technique can more precisely remove necrotic tissue, reduce systemic inflammation, create a favourable environment for skin grafting, improve skin grafting survival rate, accelerate wound healing for patients with extensive and deep second-degree burns.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组手术区植皮存活率、术后PCT及CRP降低率、手术区愈合时间比较
图1 采用水动力清创系统对大面积深Ⅱ度创面行清创术。A示右上肢清创;B示水动力清创系统清创后创面无明显坏死组织,少许渗血;C示术后第7天Meek皮片无明显皮下积液,无分泌物,存活良好;D示术后第17天,创面全部愈合
[1]
宋国栋,石文,高聪,等. 大面积深度烧伤的早期切除与皮肤移植[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(1): 56-60.
[2]
Orgill DP.Excision and skin grafting of thermal burns[J].N Engl J Med2009360(9):893-901.
[3]
毕帆,许修,姜瑞瑶,等. 水动力清创系统技术评估和临床应用评价[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志2018, 42(2): 144-146,156.
[4]
王磊,蔡玉辉,胡克苏,等. 水动力清创系统用于深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗临床疗效的回顾性研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(3): 245-250.
[5]
刘淑岩,赵宇辉,刘铁成,等. 水刀与削痂清创治疗中等面积深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的效果对比[J].中华实验外科杂志202340(5):916.
[6]
Cao YL, Liu ZC, Chen XL. Efficacy of hydrosurgical excision combined with skin grafting in the treatment of deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns: a two-year retrospective study[J].Burns202349(5):1087-1095.
[7]
Hihara M, Takegawa M, Kakudo N, et al. A stylized two-stage debridement strategy using an electric dermatome and a Versajet™ hydrosurgery system for deep axillary burns[J]. J Surg Case Rep20222022(10):rjac481.
[8]
Kazemi-Darabadi S, Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei F, Farshid AA, et al. Allogenous skin fibroblast transplantation enhances excisional wound healing following alloxan diabetes in sheep, a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2014, 12(8): 751-756.
[9]
Mensík I, Lamme EN, Brychta P. Depth of the graft bed influences split-skin graft contraction[J]. Acta Chir Plast, 2003, 45(3): 105-108.
[10]
Ziegler B, Fischer S, Pieper D, et al. Evidence and trends in burn wound debridement: an evidence map[J].Plast Surg (Oakv), 202028(4):232-242.
[11]
陈旭,覃凤均,陈辉,等. MEEK植皮技术在修复大面积深度烧伤创面中的应用[J]. 兰州大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(4): 4-7.
[12]
Gibson BHY, Wollenman CC, Moore-Lotridge SN, et al. Plasmin drives burn-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome[J]. JCI Insight, 20216(23):e154439.
[13]
Olson ME, Hornick MG, Stefanski A, et al.A biofunctional review of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a mediator of inflammatory and immune responses: differentiating pentameric and modified CRP isoform effects[J]. Front Immunol, 202314:1264383.
[14]
Schuetz P. How to best use procalcitonin to diagnose infections and manage antibiotic treatment[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med2022, 61(5):822-828.
[15]
Yiǧit E, Demir Yiǧit Y. Diagnostic importance of serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in sepsis after burn[J]. Int J Burns Trauma, 202111(5):391-396.
[16]
Hassan J, Khan S, Zahra R, et al.Role of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as predictors of pepsis and in managing sepsis in postoperative patients: a systematic review[J]. Cureus202214(11):e31067.
[1] 孙勇, 彭曦. 重视烧伤创面愈合中的葡萄糖代谢以优化营养治疗策略[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 277-281.
[2] 张锦丽, 席毛毛, 褚志刚, 栾夏刚, 陈诺, 王德运, 谢卫国. 大面积烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 282-287.
[3] 温春泉, 陈欣, 尹凯, 赵筱卓, 张琮, 程琳, 陈辉. 旋肩胛动脉穿支皮瓣在烧伤后重度腋窝瘢痕挛缩畸形整形修复治疗中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 294-298.
[4] 沈余明. 进一步重视多部位毁损性高压电烧伤的治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 93-98.
[5] 杜伟力, 沈余明, 陈忠, 张慧君, 曹彤瑜. 多部位电烧伤毁损性创面修复方法的探讨[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 99-105.
[6] 杨文飞, 郝嘉文, 鲁梦远, 赵学刚, 李聪颖, 盖晨阳, 张晶, 张庆富. 高压电烧伤对大鼠心肌氧化应激的影响及N-乙酰半胱氨酸的干预作用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 106-112.
[7] 鲁梦远, 赵学刚, 郝嘉文, 盖晨阳, 李聪颖, 张晶, 张庆富. 高压电烧伤大鼠肝脏氧化应激损伤及灯盏花素的干预作用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 113-118.
[8] 黄瑞娟, 王睿甲, 杜伟栋, 杨欢, 王宏宇, 巴特. 强脉冲光联合长脉冲1064 nm Nd:YAG激光治疗早期增生性烧伤瘢痕的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 119-126.
[9] 刘芳, 黄纯渊, 王凤林, 马轶美, 汤焘, 侯文佳, 刘蕾. 儿童烧伤创面操作性疼痛非药物管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 159-164.
[10] 胡瑞斌, 周丹亚, 朱亮, 黄天翔, 沈航崇, 王欣. 人工真皮联合自体刃厚皮移植在手部严重烧伤后瘢痕挛缩治疗中的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(01): 8-11.
[11] 李馨, 薛雅心, 樊佳俊, 顾晓丁, 许佳, 韩冬. 体外冲击波在烧伤爪形手整形术后康复治疗中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(01): 12-15.
[12] 李鹏, 崔庆伟, 张盼, 唐浩, 庄梦梦, 孙晗, 孙媛, 李丹, 陈文娣, 毛学飞, 孙勇. 应用床旁超声监测胃残余量指导重症烧伤患者早期肠内营养的临床价值[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(01): 24-33.
[13] 史娜, 金晓燕, 陈辉. 成年手烧伤患者延续性康复护理的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(01): 68-72.
[14] 韩智君, 李春, 艾力江·吾斯满, 帕合尔丁·买买提, 韩勇桥, 塔依尔·塔里甫, 西尔扎提·吐尔地. 三镜与双镜联合清创术在感染坏死性胰腺炎中应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 342-345.
[15] 刘霞, 赵双平. TDM指导特重度烧伤脓毒症患者多黏菌素B的个体化治疗一例[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 85-89.
阅读次数
全文


摘要