切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 325 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2018.05.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

肝素化羊脱细胞真皮基质对深Ⅱ度烧伤创面组织中血管内皮生长因子和层粘连蛋白的影响
郝春光1, 李俊亮2, 段霞光3, 符雪2, 王凌峰2,()   
  1. 1. 014010 包头,内蒙古医科大学第三附属医院麻醉科;014010 包头,内蒙古医科大学第三附属医院内蒙古烧伤研究所
    2. 014010 包头,内蒙古医科大学第三附属医院内蒙古烧伤研究所;014010 包头,内蒙古医科大学第三附属医院烧伤科
    3. 014010 包头,内蒙古医科大学第三附属医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-24 出版日期:2018-10-01
  • 通信作者: 王凌峰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81060154); 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2010Zd27)

Effect of heparinized sheep acellular dermal matrix on vascular endothelial growth factor and laminin in deep partial-thickness burn wound tissue

Chunguang Hao1, Junliang Li2, Xiaguang Duan3, Xue Fu2, Lingfeng Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou 014010, China; Inner Mongolia Institute of Burn Research, Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou 014010, China
    2. Inner Mongolia Institute of Burn Research, Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou 014010, China; Department of Burns, Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou 014010, China
    3. Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou 014010, China
  • Received:2018-07-24 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Lingfeng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Lingfeng, Email:
引用本文:

郝春光, 李俊亮, 段霞光, 符雪, 王凌峰. 肝素化羊脱细胞真皮基质对深Ⅱ度烧伤创面组织中血管内皮生长因子和层粘连蛋白的影响[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(05): 325-330.

Chunguang Hao, Junliang Li, Xiaguang Duan, Xue Fu, Lingfeng Wang. Effect of heparinized sheep acellular dermal matrix on vascular endothelial growth factor and laminin in deep partial-thickness burn wound tissue[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2018, 13(05): 325-330.

目的

研究肝素化羊脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)促进深Ⅱ度烧伤创面愈合的作用机制。

方法

制作大鼠深Ⅱ度烧伤模型,随机分为碘伏纱布组、猪ADM组、羊ADM组和肝素化羊ADM组,每组40只。在伤后不同时间段,观察各组创面愈合率,同时在各个时间段处死大鼠8只,取创面组织标本做RT-qPCR和蛋白质印迹法检测各组创面组织中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和层粘连蛋白(LN)的mRNA与蛋白表达情况。对数据行单因素方差分析和t检验。

结果

肝素化羊ADM组深Ⅱ度创面的愈合率优于碘伏纱布组。RT-qPCR检测发现,VEGF的mRNA在各组伤后3 d的创面组织中表达较对照组高,各组间的比较发现,伤后7 d,肝素化羊ADM组的VEGF的mRNA表达量明显高于碘伏纱布组(t=80.83,P<0.05),羊ADM组和猪ADM组在伤后7 d也较碘伏纱布组的表达量高(t=60.80、53.42,P值均小于0.05);蛋白质印迹法检测肝素化羊ADM组伤后3 d时VEGF蛋白表达量较多,随后便逐渐减少,伤后21 d时蛋白表达较少。伤后3 d,碘伏纱布组LN在创面的表达明显下降,在之后的治疗过程中,LN的表达逐渐恢复,伤后14 d的表达量明显高于伤后3 d(t=19.5,P<0.001),伤后21、28 d的表达量与伤后14 d相差不明显。蛋白质印迹法检测发现肝素化羊ADM组LN在伤后3 d便开始出现表达量逐渐增多,伤后21 d时出现蛋白表达较多。

结论

肝素化羊ADM能够保护创面及促进创面组织中VEGF和LN的表达,进而促进创面愈合。

Objective

To investigate the mechanism of heparin-selective sheep acellular dermal matrix in healing wound healing of deep partial-thickness burn.

Methods

Rat deep partial-thickness models were made and randomly divided into iodophor gauze group, pig acellular dermal matrix (ADM) group, sheep ADM group and heparinized sheep ADM group, each group of 40 rats. The wound healing rate in the group was also sacrificed at various time points. Eight rats were killed at different times. The wound tissue samples were taken for RT-qPCR and Western-blotting to detect vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and laminin(LN) in the wound tissues of each group. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance and t test.

Results

The wound healing rate of the heparinized sheep ADM group in the treatment was better than that of the iodophor gauze group. RT-qPCR analysis showed that the expression of VEGF in the wound tissue at 3 days post-operation after scald in each group was higher than in the control group. The comparison between the groups showed that the expression of VEGF in heparinized sheep ADM group was significantly higher than that in iodophor group (t=80.83, P<0.05). The sheep ADM group and the pig ADM group were also higher than the iodophor group at 7 days post-operation (t=60.80, 53.42; with P values below 0.05). Western-blotting was used to detect the VEGF wound in the heparinized sheep ADM group. At 3 days post-operation, the expression was more, and then gradually decreased. At 21 days post-operation, the protein expression was less. At 3 days post-operation, the expression of LN in the iodophor group decreased significantly. During the subsequent treatment, the expression of LN gradually recovered, and the expression level at 14 days post-operation was significantly higher than that at 3 days post-operation group (t=19.5, P<0.001). The expression levels of 21 days post-operation and 28 days post-operation were not significantly different from those of 14 days post-operation. The Western-blotting showed that the LN of the heparinized sheep ADM group began to increase gradually at 3 days post-operation after the wound surface, and the protein expression appeared more on the 21 days post-operation.

Conclusion

Heparinized sheep ADM can protect the wound surface and promote the expression of VEGF and LN in the wound tissue, which in turn promotes wound healing.

表1 VEGF、LN及β-肌动蛋白的引物序列
表2 各组深Ⅱ度烫伤大鼠伤后不同时相点创面愈合率比较(%, ±s)
图1 RT-qPCR检测深Ⅱ度烧伤大鼠各治疗组VEGF mRNA的表达。VEGF为血管内皮生长因子;ADM为脱细胞真皮基质
图2 RT-qPCR检测深Ⅱ度烧伤大鼠各治疗组LN mRNA的表达。LN为层粘连蛋白;ADM为脱细胞真皮基质
图3 蛋白质印迹法检测各组中VEGF和LN蛋白的表达。A、B、C、D、E分别为伤后3、7、14、21、28 d碘伏纱布组、猪ADM组、羊ADM组、肝素化羊ADM组蛋白表达
[1]
黎鳌,主编. 黎鳌烧伤学[M]. 上海: 上海科技出版社,2001: 38-48.
[2]
温丰平,谢卫国,蒋南红. 肝素对烧伤治疗作用的系统评价[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2011, 6(4): 533-542.
[3]
赵景春,于家傲. 创面覆盖的替代疗法[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2013, 8(6): 660-662.
[4]
林颜,杨荣华,阮树斌,等. 异种(猪)脱细胞真皮基质降低深Ⅱ度烧伤炎症反应的实验研究[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2017, 12(3): 187-190.
[5]
Wang L, Hao C, Zhou B, et al. Application of Heparinized Selective Acellular Sheepskin in Wound-healing Promotion of Deep Second-degree Burns[J]. Wounds, 2016.
[6]
王慧媛,王凌峰,巴特. 肝素促进创面愈合作用的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(2): 727-729.
[7]
郝春光,王凌峰,符雪,等. 选择性脱细胞羊皮生物敷料对深Ⅱ度烧伤大鼠创面的治疗作用[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2012, 7(5): 476-481.
[8]
杨化超,李茂,黄文. 人脐带间充质干细胞对小鼠皮肤创面愈合及VEGF表达的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2016, 38(5): 456-462.
[9]
吴起,王甲汉,李志清,等. 大鼠深Ⅱ°烫伤创面组织中血管内皮生长因子的表达变化[J].中国医学科学院学报,2014, 36(6): 650-653.
[10]
胡迎春,罗振华,袁新健,等. 铀矿尘致大鼠肺纤维化过程中Ⅰ和Ⅲ型胶原及层粘连蛋白表达的变化[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2011, 29(2): 103-107.
[11]
Rousselle P, Beck K. Laminin332 processing impacts cellular behavior[J]. Cell Adh Migr, 2013, 7(1): 122-134.
[12]
赵晓芳,孟程程,李招发. 层粘连蛋白与疾病相关性的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通讯,2010, 21(1): 116-120.
[13]
Fitsialos G, Bourget I, Augierl S, et al. HIF1 transcription factor regulates Laminin-332 expression and keratinocyte migration[J]. J Cell Sci, 2008, 121(Pt 18): 2992-3001.
[14]
丁韧,贾生贤,赵雁飞,等. 大鼠烫伤创面愈合过程中皮肤基底膜层黏连蛋白的变化[J].中华创伤杂志,2002, 18(7): 410-412.
[15]
Zhu Y, Cankova Z, Iwanaszko M, et al. Potent laminin-inspired antioxidant regenerative dressing accelerates wound healing in diabetes[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018, 115(26): 6816-6821.
[1] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[2] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[3] 王成, 张慧君, 覃凤均, 陈辉. 网状植皮与ReCell表皮细胞种植在深Ⅱ度烧伤治疗中的疗效对比[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 498-502.
[4] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[5] 蔡柔妹, 曾洁梅, 黄伟丽, 谢文敏, 刘燕丹, 吴漫君, 蔡楚燕. 利用QC小组干预降低经烧伤创面股静脉置管导管相关性感染发生率的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 399-404.
[6] 茹天峰, 戴浩楠, 袁林, 吴坤平, 谢卫国. 对肌肉超声在严重烧伤患者肌肉性能评估中应用的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 197-203.
[7] 杨姣, 王玲, 古兰, 安慎通, 胡大海, 韩军涛. 对艾司氯胺酮在烧伤后瘢痕手术患儿静脉穿刺中的应用效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 210-216.
[8] 王博, 白子锐, 李坚. 近红外二区新型血管内皮生长因子受体靶向探针在结直肠癌小鼠模型中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 173-177.
[9] 芦丹, 杨硕, 刘旭. VEGF、HMGB1、hs-CRP/Alb在AECOPD伴呼吸衰竭中的变化及预后分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 532-534.
[10] 李翠平, 陈晓燕, 钱师宇, 林惠珠, 曾彩辉, 阳莉, 卢建溪. 不同抗凝剂保存液对脐血培养的NK细胞增殖及杀伤效应的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 572-576.
[11] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[12] 蔡荇, 郑瑞强. 肝素结合蛋白在脓毒症中的应用及研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 487-490.
[13] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[14] 王燕, 郭蕊, 王淑杰. 老年烧伤气管切开患者死亡风险诊断模型构建及对策分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 249-253.
[15] 高雷, 李全, 巴雅力嘎, 陈强, 侯智慧, 曹胜军, 巴特. 重度烧伤患者血小板外泌体对凝血功能调节作用的初步研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 149-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要