切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -9. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.01.001

所属专题: 指南共识

指南与共识

中国糖尿病足截肢(趾)治疗专家共识(2022年版)
中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会, 中国生物材料学会烧创伤创面修复材料分会   
  1. 1. 518055 深圳,南方科技大学医院创面修复科 南方科技大学医学院创面修复与再生医学研究所
    2. 510630 广州,暨南大学附属第一医院整形外科,暨南大学整形外科新技术研究所,再生医学教育部重点实验室
    3. 100853 北京,解放军总医院医学创新研究部创伤修复与组织再生研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-02 出版日期:2023-02-01
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81871563,82102345); 广东省重点领域研发计划项目(2022B1111080007); 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515110161); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(21619350); 广州市科技计划资助项目[市校(院)联合资助(高水平大学)基础研究项目](202201020002,202201020004,202201020468); 广东省医学科研基金项目(A2021165); 暨南大学附属第一医院临床前沿技术项目(JNU1AF-CFTP-2022-a01231,JNU1AF-CFTP-2022-a01208)

Expert consensus on the treatment of diabetic foot amputation (toe) in China (2022 version)

Burns and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Burns and Trauma Wound Repair Materials Branch of Chinese Biomaterials Society   

  1. 1. Shenzhen 518055, Department of Wound Repair, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Institute of Wound Repair and Regeneration Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology School of Medicine
    2. Guangzhou 510630, Department of Plastic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Institute of New Technology of Plastic Surgery of Jinan University, Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine of Ministry of Education
    3. Beijing 100853, Research Center for Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration, Medical Innovation Research Department, the PLA General Hospital
  • Received:2022-12-02 Published:2023-02-01
引用本文:

中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会, 中国生物材料学会烧创伤创面修复材料分会. 中国糖尿病足截肢(趾)治疗专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 1-9.

Burns and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Burns and Trauma Wound Repair Materials Branch of Chinese Biomaterials Society. Expert consensus on the treatment of diabetic foot amputation (toe) in China (2022 version)[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2023, 18(01): 1-9.

糖尿病足是糖尿病最常见、最严重的并发症。统计数据表明,糖尿病患者一生中发生足部溃疡的风险高达25%,其中有14%~24%的足部溃疡患者需行截肢(趾)治疗。目前,尽管对于严重肢(趾)体坏疽创面或感染等,截肢(趾)可以控制感染、促进愈合、挽救患者生命,但其同时也将严重影响患者的自主步态、生活方式、生存质量甚至预后,特别是大截肢患者,5年生存率仅约30%。因此,正确选择是否截肢(趾)、确定截肢(趾)平面、力争截肢(趾)后创面尽早愈合,对于糖尿病足的治疗有着非常重要的临床意义。近年来,国内外已有关于糖尿病足治疗的专家共识或指南、截肢(趾)治疗的基本原则等指导性意见,但如何确定糖尿病足患者是否需要截肢(趾),需要大截肢还是小截肢(趾),以及具体截肢(趾)平面的确定等仍存在诸多争议。鉴于截肢(趾)无论对于患者还是医师都需慎重考虑才能做出决定,为尽可能规范截肢(趾)治疗这一糖尿病足治疗的重要手段,专家组主要从糖尿病足截肢(趾)治疗相关问题进行讨论形成共识,为从事糖尿病足治疗的创面修复科医师提供参考。本共识达成的每项建议均通过至少95%相关领域专家的总结与认同,并参考分级评估、发展与评价(GRADE)系统对现有的证据质量和推荐强度进行分级。对于未能达成共识的相关问题,将通过密切关注国内外关于糖尿病足研究进展和专家的经验,后期组织相关领域专家更新共识内容。

Diabetic foot is one of the most common and serious complications of diabetes. Statistics show that diabetics have a 25% percent lifetime risk of developing foot ulcers, with 14% to 24% of patients requiring amputation(toe) treatment. At present, although amputation (toe) therapy can control wound infection, promote wound healing, and save patients′ lives for severe limb (toe) gangrene wounds and necrotic limb (toe) infection, and it can also affect patients′ voluntary gait, lifestyle, quality of life, and even prognosis; especially for wide range amputees, the 5-year survival rate is only about 30%. Therefore, the correct choice of amputation or not, the correct determination of the amputation plane, and strive for the primary wound healing after amputation have very important clinical significance for the treatment of diabetic foot. In recent years, there have been the experts consensus or guidelines on the treatment of diabetic foot, as well as guiding opinions on the basic principles of amputation (toe) treatment at home and abroad, however, it is still controversial on how to determine whether diabetic foot patients need amputation (toe), large or small amputation (toe) is required, as well as the amputation (toe) plane. Given that amputation (toe) is a decision that requires careful consideration for both the patient and the surgeon, in order to standardize amputation (toe) management, which is an important method for the treatment of diabetic foot, the expert group mainly discussed and reached a consensus on issues related to amputation (toe) treatment of diabetic foot, to provide a reference for wound specialist engaged in the treatment of the diabetic foot. Each consensus reached in this consensus is summarized and recognized by at least 95% of experts in relevant fields, and the existing evidence quality and recommendation strength are graded with reference to the Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. For issues that fail to reach consensus, we will pay close attention to the advances in diabetic foot ulcer therapy, and organize experts in related fields to further update the consensus in the future.

[1]
Singh R, Kishore L, Kaur N. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: current perspective and future directions[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2014, 80: 21-35.
[2]
Faruque LI, Wiebe N, Ehteshami-Afshar A, et al. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. CMAJ, 2017, 189(9): E341-E364.
[3]
中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志2021, 13(4): 315-409.
[4]
Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH, et al. International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Food[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2000, 16 Suppl 1: S84-92.
[5]
Marston WA. Risk factors associated with healing chronic diabetic foot ulcers: the importance of hyperglycemia[J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2006, 52(3): 26-28, 30, 32 passim.
[6]
Yekta Z, Pourali R, Nezhadrahim R, et al. Clinical and behavioral factors associated with management outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetic foot ulcer[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2011, 4: 371-375.
[7]
Miyajima S, Shirai A, Yamamoto S, et al. Risk factors for major limb amputations in diabetic foot gangrene patients[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2006, 71(3): 272-279.
[8]
Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2005, 5(1): 25.
[9]
医政医管局. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于加强体表慢性难愈合创面(溃疡)诊疗管理工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2019-12-2)[2022-12-1].

URL    
[10]
Eggert JV, Worth ER, Van Gils CC. Cost and mortality data of a regional limb salvage and hyperbaric medicine profram for Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Undersea Hyperb Med, 2016, 43(1): 1-8.
[11]
Wagner FW Jr. The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment[J]. Foot Ankle, 1981, 2(2): 64-122.
[12]
Monteiro-Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro J, et al. Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2012, 28(7): 574-600.
[13]
管珩,刘志民,李光伟,等. 50岁以上糖尿病人群周围动脉闭塞性疾病相关因素分析[J]. 中华医学杂志2007, 87(1): 23-27.
[14]
Hinchliffe RJ, Brownrigg JR, Apelqvist J, et al. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis, prognosis and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers in diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2016, 32 Suppl 1: 37-44.
[15]
Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2017, 135(12): e726-e779.
[16]
Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(24): 2890-2909.
[17]
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2012, 54(12): e132-173.
[18]
Lavery LA, Ryan EC, Ahn J, et al. The infected diabetic foot: re-evaluating the Infectious Diseases Society of America Diabetic Foot Infection Classification[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2020, 70(8): 1573-1579.
[19]
Lee WS, Kim J. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: where we are and where we are going[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2017, 32(3): 404-421.
[20]
Sumpio BE. Contemporary evaluation and management of the diabetic foot[J]. Scientifica (Cairo), 2012, 2012: 435487.
[21]
Raspovic KM, Ahn J, La Fontaine J, et al. End-stage renaldisease negatively affects physical quality of life in patients with diabetic foot complications[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2017, 16(2): 135-142.
[22]
Brownrigg JR, Hinchliffe RJ, Apelqvist J, et al. Performance of prognostic markers in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among patients with foot ulcers in diabetes: a systematic review[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2016, 32 Suppl 1: 128-135.
[23]
Acín F, Varela C, López de Maturana I, et al. Results of infrapopliteal endovascular procedures performed in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia and tissue loss from the perspective of an angiosome-oriented revascularization strategy[J]. Int J Vasc Med, 2014, 2014: 270539.
[24]
Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes[J]. JAMA, 2005, 293(2): 217-228.
[25]
Driver VR, Madsen J, Goodman RA. Reducing amputation rates in patients with diabetes at a military medical center: the limb preservation service model[J]. Diabetes Care, 2005, 28(2): 248-253.
[26]
Carls GS, Gibson TB, Driver VR, et al. The economic value of specialized lower-extremity medical care by podiatric physicians in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers[J]. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 2011, 101(2): 93-115.
[27]
Krishnan S, Nash F, Baker N, et al. Reduction in diabetic amputations over 11 years in a defined U. K. population: benefits of multidisciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit[J]. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31(1): 99-101.
[28]
Anichini R, Zecchini F, Cerretini I, et al. Improvement of diabetic foot care after the Implementation of the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot (ICDF): results of a 5-year prospective study[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2007, 75(2): 153-158.
[29]
Nather A, Siok Bee C, Keng Lin W, et al. Value of team approach combined with clinical pathway for diabetic foot problems: a clinical evaluation[J]. Diabet Foot Ankle, 2010, 1.
[30]
Wang C, Mai L, Yang C, et al. Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team in patient with diabetes foot ulcer[J]. BMC Endocr Disord, 2016, 16(1): 38.
[31]
Christman AL, Selvin E, Margolis DJ, et al. Hemoglobin A1c predicts healing rate in diabetic wounds[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 2011, 131(10): 2121-2127.
[32]
Markuson M, Hanson D, Anderson J, et al. The relationship between hemoglobin A(1c) values and healing time for lower extremity ulcers in individuals with diabetes[J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2009, 22(8): 365-372.
[33]
Hasan R, Firwana B, Elraiyah T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of glycemic control for the prevention of diabetic foot syndrome[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63(2 Suppl): 22S-28S.e1-2.
[34]
Chen Z, Liao W, Hu S, et al. Application of percutaneous oxygen partial pressure in determining amputation plane of diabetic foot[J]. Minerva Med, 2022.
[35]
Widatalla AH, Mahadi SE, Shawer MA, et al. Diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis: efficacy of combined surgical and medical treatment[J]. Diabet Foot Ankle, 2012, 3.
[36]
Wieman TJ, Mercke YK, Cerrito PB, et al. Resection of the metatarsal head for diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Am J Surg, 1998, 176(5): 436-441.
[37]
Janis JE, Kwon RK, Attinger CE. The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2011, 127 Suppl 1: 205S-212S.
[38]
Noble-Bell G, Forbes A. A systematic review of the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of diabetes foot ulcers[J]. Int Wound J, 2008, 5(2): 233-242.
[39]
Gregor S, Maegele M, Sauerland S, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy: a vacuum of evidence?[J]. Arch Surg, 2008, 143(2): 189-196.
[40]
Jiang Y, Ran X, Jia L, et al. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetic foot problems and predictive factors for amputation in China[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2015, 14(1): 19-27.
[41]
Hocking G, Mitchell CH. Optimizing the safety and practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: the role of echogenic technology[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2012, 25(5): 603-609.
[42]
Lai HY, Foo LL, Lim SM, et al. The hemodynamic and pain impact of peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in diabetic patients undergoing diabetic foot surgery[J]. Clin Auton Res, 2020, 30(1): 53-60.
[43]
Choi YS, Shin HJ, Park JY, et al. Ultrasound-guided femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks for below knee surgery in patients with severe cardiac disease[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2015, 68(5): 513-515.
[44]
Kim NY, Lee KY, Bai SJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil-based general anesthesia and popliteal nerve block on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in diabetic patients undergoing distal foot amputation: a retrospective observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(29): e4302.
[45]
Lipsky BA, Senneville éAbbas ZG, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2020, 36 Suppl 1: e3280.
[46]
Johnson SW, Drew RH, May DB. How long to treat with antibiotics following amputation in patients with diabetic foot infections? Are the 2012 IDSA DFI guidelines reasonable?[J]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2013, 38(2): 85-88.
[47]
Falanga V. Classifications for wound bed preparation and stimulation of chronic wounds[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2000, 8(5): 347-352.
[48]
Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2003, 11 Suppl 1: S1-28.
[49]
徐媛,刘宏伟. 创面修复"TIME"原则及其意义[J]. 中国组织工程研究2012, 16(11): 2059-2062.
[50]
Steed DL, Attinger C, Colaizzi T, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2006, 14(6): 680-692.
[51]
Elgzyri T, Larsson J, Nyberg P, et al. Early revascularization after admittance to a diabetic foot center affects the healing probability of ischemic foot ulcer in patients with diabetes[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2014, 48(4): 440-446.
[52]
Armstrong DG, Kanda VA, Lavery LA, et al. Mind the gap: disparity between research funding and costs of care for diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Diabetes Care, 2013, 36(7): 1815-1817.
[53]
Elgzyri T, Larsson J, Törne J, et al. Outcome of ischemic foot ulcer in diabetic patients who had no invasive vascular intervention[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2013, 46(1): 110-117.
[1] 张健, 刘小龙, 查天建, 姚俊杰, 王傑. 富含血小板血浆联合异种脱细胞真皮基质修复糖尿病足缺血性创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 503-506.
[2] 周子慧, 李恭驰, 李炳辉, 王知, 刘慧真, 王卉, 邹利军. 细胞自噬在创面愈合中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 542-546.
[3] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[4] 赵雅玫, 谢斌, 陈艳, 吴健. 抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流对糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 427-433.
[5] 陈继秋, 朱世辉. 皮肤牵张装置的临床应用现状[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 451-453.
[6] 鲍亚慧, 曹志斌, 王健楠, 别瑶, 孙晓东, 惠宗光. 应用羧甲基纤维素钠银敷料联合封闭负压吸引治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 326-330.
[7] 雷霞, 李炳辉, 王晓蓉, 张丽娟, 刘慧真, 王卉, 李恭驰. 对糖尿病足溃疡诱因与发生部位的临床观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 104-108.
[8] 余静雅, 戴燕, 石玉兰, 向利娟, 吴淑君. 对门诊糖尿病足患者治疗费用的分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 128-133.
[9] 魏忠玲, 陈赟, 叶美霞, 杨珺雯, 袁竺方. 不同种类敷料治疗糖尿病足疗效比较的网状荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 157-165.
[10] 李咏生, 孙建国, 李梦侠, 重庆肺癌精准治疗协作组(CPLOG). 第三代EGFR-TKI耐药后诊疗策略专家共识[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 145-155.
[11] 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识编写组. 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 630-638.
[12] 杨旭希, 郑吉洋, 陈秀梅, 陈淑玲, 杨峻青, 苏芝琪, 左咏臻, 广东省医师协会心力衰竭专业医师分会, 广东省护士协会介入护士分会. 慢性心力衰竭患者容量管理护理专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 201-207.
[13] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会护理协作组. 消化内镜中心的环境与布局专家共识建议(2023年,北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 240-247.
[14] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国结直肠息肉冷切专家共识(2023年,杭州)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 73-82.
[15] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会, 中国肥胖代谢外科研究协作组. 肥胖代谢外科个案管理术前临床路径中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 73-82.
阅读次数
全文


摘要