Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01): 60-64. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.01.010

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of debridement combined with antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer with severe infection

Yunxue Zhong1, Li Li1, Dali Wang1, Mingyuan Tang1, Xiaofeng Peng1, Wei Chen1, Chun Hu1, Guangtao Huang1, Zairong Wei1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China
  • Received:2021-10-16 Online:2022-02-01 Published:2022-02-07
  • Contact: Zairong Wei

Abstract:

Objective

To discuss the application value of debridement combined with antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of severe infection of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).

Methods

Nineteen patients with severe infection of DFU (Wagner grade 3 or above, severe infection) hospitalized in the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from June 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Their wounds were expanded and filled with antibiotic bone cement. After infection control, direct sutures, skin grafting or flap transplantation were performed. White blood cell count, C-reactive protein, absolute value of neutrophil and procalcitonin were collected before and 7 days after debridement combined with antibiotic bone cement treatment, and the time, frequency of bone cement coverageand were recorded and the efficacy of treatment was evaluated. Data were compared with t test and variance analysis.

Results

The infection of 19 patients was controlled effectively. After 7 days of treatment, the white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, absolute value of neutrophil and procalcitonin were (6.39±1.55)×109/L, (25.47±14.65) mg/L, 5.55±1.64, which were significantly lower than before treatmen [(12.97±5.27)×109/L, (126.13±42.64) mg/L, (9.68±4.04)], the differences were statistically significant (t=2.995, 3.842, 4.743; P<0.05); the level of procalcitonin decrease compared with before treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The covering time of bone cement were 10-61 days, and the covering frequency of bone cement was 1.4 times per person. Among the 19 cases, 12 cases were cured by direct suture, skin graft or skin flap transplantation after antibiotic bone cement filling, 2 cases were changed dressing until cured after bone cement treatment, amputation in 2 cases and loss of follow-up in 3 cases. The patient was not hospitalized again during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Antibiotic bone cement is an effective method in the treatment of DFU with severe infection, which could provide wound bed preparation for the following wound repair.

Key words: Diabetic foot, Infection, Debridement, Bone cement

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-58517075 E-mail: zhssyxf@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd